References
- Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255–278. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
- Bloom, P. A., & Fischler, I. (1980). Completion norms for 329 sentence contexts. Memory & Cognition, 8(6), 631–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213783
- Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2015). Effects of prediction and contextual support on lexical processing: Prediction takes precedence. Cognition, 136, 135–149. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.017
- Brothers, T., Swaab, T. Y., & Traxler, M. J. (2017). Goals and strategies influence lexical prediction during sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 203–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.002
- Brothers, T., Wlotko, E. W., Warnke, L., Kuperberg, G. R., & Watkins, K. E. (2020). Going the extra mile: Effects of discourse context on two late positivities during language comprehension. Neurobiology of Language, 1(1), 135–160. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00006 Running
- Brysbaert, M., & Stevens, M. (2018). Power analysis and effect size in mixed effects models: A tutorial. Journal of Cognition, 1(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.10
- Chow, W. Y., Lago, S., Barrios, S., Parker, D., Morini, G., & Lau, E. (2014). Additive effects of repetition and predictability during comprehension: Evidence from event-related potentials. PLoS One, 9(6), e99199. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099199
- Christensen, R. H. B. (2019). A tutorial on fitting cumulative link mixed models with clmm2 from the ordinal package. https://cran.rproject.org/web/packages/ordinal/vignettes/clmm2_tutorial.pdf
- Comesaña, M., Sánchez-Casas, R., Soares, A. P., Pinheiro, A. P., Rauber, A., Frade, S., & Fraga, I. (2012). The interplay of phonology and orthography in visual cognate word recognition: An ERP study. Neuroscience Letters, 529(1), 75–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2012.09.010
- Coulson, S., & Kutas, M. (2001). Getting it: Human event-related brain response to jokes in good and poor comprehenders. Neuroscience Letters, 316(2), 71–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3940(01)02387-4
- DeLong, K. A., Chan, W. H., & Kutas, M. (2019). Similar time courses for word form and meaning preactivation during sentence comprehension. Psychophysiology, 56(4), e13312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13312
- DeLong, K. A., & Kutas, M. (2020). Comprehending surprising sentences: Sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35, 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1708960
- DeLong, K. A., Quante, L., & Kutas, M. (2014a). Predictability, plausibility, and two late ERP positivities during written sentence comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 61, 150–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.06.016
- Delong, K. A., Troyer, M., & Kutas, M. (2014b). Pre-processing in sentence comprehension: Sensitivity to likely upcoming meaning and structure. Linguistics and Language Compass, 8(12), 631–645. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12093
- Delong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., Groppe, D. M., & Kutas, M. (2011). Overlapping dual ERP responses to low cloze probability sentence continuations. Psychophysiology, 48(9), 1203–1207. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01199.x
- DeLong, K. A., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2005). Probabilistic word pre-activation during language comprehension inferred from electrical brain activity. Nature Neuroscience, 8(8), 1117–1121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nn1504
- Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
- Duffy, S. A., Henderson, J. M., & Morris, R. K. (1989). Semantic facilitation of lexical access during sentence processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(5), 791–801. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198255
- Federmeier, K. D. (2007). Thinking ahead: The role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. Psychophysiology, 44(4), 491–505. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2007.00531.x
- Federmeier, K. D., & Kutas, M. (1999). A rose by any other name : Long-term memory structure and sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 469–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2660
- Federmeier, K. D., McLennan, D. B., Ochoa, E., & Kutas, M. (2002). The impact of semantic memory organization and sentence context information on spoken language processing by younger and older adults: An ERP study. Psychophysiology, 39(2), 133–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.3920133
- Federmeier, K. D., Wlotko, E. W., De Ochoa-Dewald, E., & Kutas, M. (2007). Multiple effects of sentential constraint on word processing. Brain Research, 1146, 75–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.06.101
- Ferreira, F., & Chantavarin, S. (2018). Integration and prediction in language processing: A synthesis of old and new. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(6), 443–448. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721418794491
- Fischler, I., & Bloom, P. A. (1979). Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90534-6
- Forster, K. I. (1981). Priming and the effects of sentence and lexical contexts on naming time: Evidence for autonomous lexical processing. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 465–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400804
- Frank, S. L., Otten, L. J., Galli, G., & Vigliocco, G. (2015). The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences. Brain and Language, 140, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2014.10.006
- Frisson, S., Harvey, D., Drieghe, D., & Staub, A. (2017). No prediction error cost in reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 200–214. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007
- Frisson, S., Rayner, K., & Pickering, M. J. (2005). Effects of contextual predictability and transitional probability on eye movements during reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(5), 862–877. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.5.862
- Goregliad Fjaellingsdal, T., Schwenke, D., Scherbaum, S., Kuhlen, A. K., Bögels, S., Meekes, J., & Bleichner, M. G. (2020). Expectancy effects in the EEG during joint and spontaneous word-by-word sentence production in German. Scientific Reports, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-62155-z
- Hagoort, P. (2005). On Broca, brain, and binding: A new framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(9), 416–423. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.004
- Hintz, F., Meyer, A. S., & Huettig, F. (2016). Encouraging prediction during production facilitates subsequent comprehension: Evidence from interleaved object naming in sentence context and sentence reading. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69(6), 1056–1063. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2015.1131309
- Huettig, F., & Mani, N. (2016). Is prediction necessary to understand language? Probably not. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1072223
- Ito, A., Corley, M., Pickering, M. J., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016a). Predicting form and meaning: Evidence from brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language, 86, 157–171. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.10.007
- Ito, A., Martin, A. E., & Nieuwland, M. S. (2016b). How robust are prediction effects in language comprehension? Failure to replicate article-elicited N400 effects. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(8), 954–965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1242761
- Kamide, Y., Altmann, G. T. M., & Haywood, S. L. (2003). The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 49(1), 133–156. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(03)00023-8
- Kliegl, R., Dambacher, M., Dimigen, O., Jacobs, A. M., & Sommer, W. (2012). Eye movements and brain electric potentials during reading. Psychological Research, 76(2), 145–158. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-011-0376-x
- Kuperberg, G. R., Brothers, T., & Wlotko, E. (2020). A tale of two positivities and the N400: Distinct neural signatures are evoked by confirmed and violated predictions at different levels of representation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01465
- Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
- Kutas, M. (1993). In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 533–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407587
- Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electropsysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(12), 463–470. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
- Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1984). Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association. Nature, 307(5947), 161–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/307161a0
- Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. (1980). Reading senseless sentences: Brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. Science, 207(4427), 203–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7350657
- Kwon, N., Sturt, P., & Liu, P. (2017). Predicting semantic features in Chinese : Evidence from ERPs. Cognition, 166, 433–446. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.010
- Laszlo, S., & Federmeier, K. D. (2009). A beautiful day in the neighborhood: An event-related potential study of lexical relationships and prediction in context. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(3), 326–338. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.06.004
- Lau, E. F., Phillips, C., & Poeppel, D. (2008). A cortical network for semantics: (De)constructing the N400. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 9(12), 920–933. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2532
- Lopez-Calderon, J., & Luck, S. J. (2014). ERPLAB: An open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials. Frontiers in Human Neurosciencer, 8(213), 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00213
- Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2016). Limits on lexical prediction during reading. Cognitive Psychology, 88, 22–60. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2016.06.002
- Mandel, A., Bourguignon, M., Parkkonen, L., & Hari, R. (2016). Sensorimotor activation related to speaker vs. Listener role during natural conversation. Neuroscience Letters, 614, 99–104. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2015.12.054
- Martin, C. D., Thierry, G., Kuipers, J. R., Boutonnet, B., Foucart, A., & Costa, A. (2013). Bilinguals reading in their second language do not predict upcoming words as native readers do. Journal of Memory and Language, 69(4), 574–588. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2013.08.001
- Matsuki, K., Chow, T., Hare, M., Elman, J. L., Scheepers, C., & McRae, K. (2011). Event-based plausibility immediately influences on-line Language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 37(4), 913–934. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022964
- Matuschek, H., Kliegl, R., Vasishth, S., Baayen, H., & Bates, D. (2017). Balancing type I error and power in linear mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 305–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.01.001
- McDonald, S. A., & Tamariz, M. (2002). Completion norms for 112 Spanish sentences. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34(1), 128–137. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195431
- Mognon, A., Jovicich, J., & Bruzzone, L. (2011). ADJUST : An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01061.x
- Ness, T., & Meltzer-Asscher, A. (2018). Lexical inhibition due to failed prediction: Behavioral evidence and ERP correlates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 44(8), 1269–1285. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000525
- Ng, S., Payne, B. R., Steen, A. A., Stine-Morrow, E. A. L., & Federmeier, K. D. (2017). Use of contextual information and prediction by struggling adult readers: Evidence from reading times and event-related potentials. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(5), 359–375. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1310213
- Nieuwland, M. S., Politzer-Ahles, S., Heyselaar, E., Segaert, K., Darley, E., Kazanina, N., Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S., Bartolozzi, F., Kogan, V., Ito, A., Mézière, D., Barr, D. J., Rousselet, G. A., Ferguson, H. J., Busch-Moreno, S., Fu, X., Tuomainen, J., Kulakova, E., Husband, E. M., … Huettig, F. (2018). Large-scale replication study reveals a limit on probabilistic prediction in language comprehension. ELife, 7, e33468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.33468
- Pérez, A., Dumas, G., Karadag, M., & Duñabeitia, J. A. (2019). Differential brain-to-brain entrainment while speaking and listening in native and foreign languages. Cortex, 111, 303–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.11.026
- Pinheiro, A. P., del Re, E., Nestor, P. G., McCarley, R. W., Gonçalves, O. F., & Niznikiewicz, M. (2013). Interactions between mood and the structure of semantic memory: Event-related potentials evidence. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(5), 579–594. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nss035
- Pinheiro, A. P., Soares, A. P., Comesaña, M., Niznikiewicz, M., & Gonçalves, O. F. (2010). Sentence-final word completion norms for European Portuguese children and adolescents. Behavior Research Methods, 42(4), 1022–1029. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.42.4.1022
- Raposo, A., & Marques, J. F. (2013). The contribution of fronto-parietal regions to sentence comprehension: Insights from the Moses illusion. NeuroImage, 83, 431–437. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.052
- Schuster, S., Hawelka, S., Hutzler, F., Kronbichler, M., & Richlan, F. (2016). Words in context: The effects of length, frequency, and predictability on brain responses during natural reading. Cerebral Cortex, 26(10), 3889–3904. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhw184
- Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1986). Completion norms for final words of sentences using a multiple production measure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 18(4), 363–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03204419
- Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1985). The influence of sentence constraint on the scope of facilitation for upcoming words. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(2), 232–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90026-9
- Simpson, G. B., Peterson, R. R., Casteel, M. A., & Burgess, C. (1989). Lexical and sentence context effects in word recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-7393.15.1.88
- Smith, N. J., & Levy, R. (2013). The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic. Cognition, 128(3), 302–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.02.013
- Soares, A. P., Iriarte, Á, De Almeida, J. J., Simões, A., Costa, A., Machado, J., França, P., Comesaña, M., Rauber, A., Rato, A., & Perea, M. (2018). Procura-PALavras (P-PAL): A web-based interface for a new European Portuguese lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, 50(4), 1461–1481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1058-z
- Staub, A., Grant, M., Astheimer, L., & Cohen, A. (2015). The influence of cloze probability and item constraint on cloze task response time. Journal of Memory and Language, 82, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.02.004
- Szewczyk, J. M., & Schriefers, H. (2013). Prediction in language comprehension beyond specific words : An ERP study on sentence comprehension in Polish. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(4), 297–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.12.002
- Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Bulletin, 30(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905303000401
- Thornhill, D. E., & Van Petten, C. (2012). Lexical versus conceptual anticipation during sentence processing: Frontal positivity and N400 ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(3), 382–392. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.12.007
- Van Berkum, J. J. A., Brown, C. M., Zwitserlood, P., Kooijman, V., & Hagoort, P. (2005). Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 31(3), 443–467. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.31.3.443
- Van Petten, C. (1993). A comparison of lexical and sentence-level context effects in event-related potentials. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(4), 485–531. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308407586
- Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequency in event-related brain potentials. Memory and Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197127
- Van Petten, C., & Luka, B. J. (2012). Prediction during language comprehension: Benefits, costs, and ERP components. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 83(2), 176–190. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2011.09.015
- Van Petten, C., Rubin, S., Parks, M., Plante, E., & Coulson, S. (2000). Time course of word identification and semantic integration in spoken language. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 108(5), 2643–2643. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4743849
- Wicha, N. Y. Y., Moreno, E. M., & Kutas, M. (2004). Anticipating words and their gender: An event-related brain potential study of semantic integration, gender expectancy, and gender agreement in Spanish sentence reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1272–1288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929041920487
- Willems, R. M., Frank, S. L., Nijhof, A. D., Hagoort, P., & Van Den Bosch, A. (2016). Prediction during natural language comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 26(6), 2506–2516. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv075
- Wlotko, E. W., & Federmeier, K. D. (2012). So that’s what you meant! event-related potentials reveal multiple aspects of context use during construction of message-level meaning. NeuroImage, 62(1), 356–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.04.054
- Zhu, Z., Hagoort, P., Zhang, J. X., Feng, G., Chen, H. C., Bastiaansen, M., & Wang, S. (2012). The anterior left inferior frontal gyrus contributes to semantic unification. NeuroImage, 60(4), 2230–2237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.036