References
- Akaike, H. (1973). Maximum likelihood identification of Gaussian autoregressive moving average models. Biometrika, 60(2), 255–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/60.2.255
- Álvaro. (1999). La composición. In V. Demonte & I. Bosque (Eds.), Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española (pp. 4757–4842). Espasa Calpe.
- Arcara, G., Marelli, M., Buodo, G., & Mondini, S. (2013). Compound headedness in the mental lexicon: An event-related potential study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 164–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.847076
- Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
- Baayen, R. H., & Milin, P. (2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807
- Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models Usinglme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), (1–48), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01.
- Berti, S., Roeber, U., & Schröger, E. (2004). Bottom-up influences on working memory: Behavioral and electrophysiological distraction varies with distractor strength. Experimental Psychology, 51(4), 249–257. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169.51.4.249
- Chiarelli, V., El Yagoubi, R., Mondini, S., Danieli, M., Perrone, G., & Semenza, C. (2007). The electrophysiological correlates of noun–noun compounds. Brain and Language, 103(1-2), 20–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.010
- Crepaldi, D., Rastle, K., Davis, C. J., & Lupker, S. J. (2013). Seeing stems everywhere: Position-independent identification of stem morphemes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(2), 510–525. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029713
- Davis, C. P., Libben, G., & Segalowitz, S. J. (2019). Compounding matters: Event-related potential evidence for early semantic access to compound words. Cognition, 184, 44–52. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.12.006
- Debener, S., Kranczioch, C., Herrmann, C. S., & Engel, A. K. (2002). Auditory novelty oddball allows reliable distinction of top–down and bottom–up processes of attention. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 46(1), 77–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(02)00072-7
- Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
- Duchon, A., Perea, M., Sebastián-Gallés, N., Martí, A., & Carreiras, M. (2013). Espal: One-stop shopping for Spanish word properties. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1246–1258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0326-1
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Laka, I., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2009). Is Milkman a superhero like Batman? Constituent morphological priming in compound words. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 21(4), 615–640. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09541440802079835
- Duñabeitia, J. A., Perea, M., & Carreiras, M. (2007). The role of the frequency of constituents in compound words: Evidence from Basque and Spanish. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1171–1176. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193108
- El Yagoubi, R., Chiarelli, V., Mondini, S., Perrone, G., Danieli, M., & Semenza, C. (2008). Neural correlates of Italian nominal compounds and potential impact of headedness effect: An ERP study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 559–581. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290801900941
- Fábregas, A. (2013). La Morfología: el análisis de la palabra compleja. Síntesis.
- Fiorentino, R., Naito-Billen, Y., Bost, J., & Fund-Reznicek, E. (2013). Electrophysiological evidence for the morpheme-based combinatoric processing of English compounds. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(1-2), 123–146. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2013.855633
- Frisson, S., Niswander-Klement, E., & Pollatsek, A. (2008). The role of semantic transparency in the processing of English compound words. British Journal of Psychology, 99(1), 87–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/000712607X181304
- Gaeta, H., Friedman, D., & Hunt, G. (2003). Stimulus characteristics and task category dissociate the anterior and posterior aspects of the novelty P3. Psychophysiology, 40(2), 198–208. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1469-8986.00022
- Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2009). Constituent integration during the processing of compound words: Does it involve the use of relational structures? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1), 20–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.07.003
- Greenhouse, S. W., & Geisser, S. (1959). On methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika, 24(2), 95–112. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289823
- Grossberg, S. (2000). The complementary brain: Unifying brain dynamics and modularity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(6), 233–246. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01464-9
- Güemes, M., Gattei, C., & Wainselboim, A. (2019). Processing verb–noun compound words in Spanish: Evidence from event-related potentials. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 36(5-6), 265–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1618254
- Güemes, M. M., Gattei, C., Tabullo, Á, & Wainselboim, A. (2017). El papel de la estructura argumental en el procesamiento de los compuestos verbo-nombre del español: Evidencias experimentales. Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología Y Ciencias Afines, 33(2), 337–353. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.16888/interd.2016.33.2.9.
- Günther, F., & Marelli, M. (2018). The language-invariant aspect of compounding: Predicting compound meanings across languages. Proceedings of the Fifth Italian Conference on Computational Linguistics CliC-It, 230–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4000/books.aaccademia.3411.
- Hall, M.-H., Jensen, J. E., Du, F., Smoller, J. W., O’Connor, L., Spencer, K. M., & Öngür, D. (2015). Frontal P3 event-related potential is related to brain glutamine/glutamate ratio measured in vivo. NeuroImage, 111, 186–191. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.02.014
- Hammond, E. J., Meador, K. J., Aung-Din, R., & Wilder, B. J. (1987). Cholinergic modulation of human P3 event-related potentials. Neurology, 37(2), 346–346. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.37.2.346
- Hauk, O., Patterson, K., Woollams, A., Watling, L., Pulvermüller, F., & Rogers, T. T. (2006). [Q:] when would you prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP correlates of orthographic typicality and lexicality in written word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(5), 818–832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.5.818
- Hegerl, U., Juckel, G., & Möller, H.-J. (1996). ERP and neurotransmitters. European Journal of Neurology, 3(4), 289–294. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.1996.tb00219.x
- Hyönä, J., & Bertram, R. (2012). Flexible letter-position coding is unlikely to hold for morphologically rich languages. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35(5), 290–291. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000192
- Inhoff, A. W., Radach, R., & Heller, D. (2000). Complex compounds in German: Interword spaces facilitate segmentation but hinder assignment of meaning. Journal of Memory and Language, 42(1), 23–50. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2666
- Isel, F., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2003). Prosody-assisted head-driven access to spoken German compounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(2), 277–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.2.277
- Ji, H., Gagné, C. L., & Spalding, T. L. (2011). Benefits and costs of lexical decomposition and semantic integration during the processing of transparent and opaque English compounds. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 406–430. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.07.003
- Johnson Jr., R. (1988). The amplitude of the P300 component of the event-related potential: Review and synthesis. In P. Ackles, J. R. Jennings, & M. G. H. Coles (Eds.), Advances in psychophysiology: A research annual (pp. 69–137). JAI Press.
- Juhasz, B. J. (2007). The influence of semantic transparency on eye movements during English compound word recognition. In R. von Gompel, W. Murray, & M. Fischer (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 373–389). Elsevier.
- Juhasz, B. J., Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (2005). The role of interword spaces in the processing of English compound words. Language and Cognitive Processes, 20(1-2), 291–316. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960444000133
- Keppel, G. (1991). A modified Bonferroni test. In S. Finnemore, E. Riker, & C. Nausser (Eds.), Design and analysis: A researcher’s handbook (pp. 169–170). Prentice Hall.
- Koester, D., Gunter, T., Wagner, C., & Friederici, S., & D, A. (2004). Morphosyntax, prosody, and linking elements: The auditory processing of German nominal compounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1647–1668. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929042568541
- Koester, D., Gunter, T., & Wagner, S. (2007). The morphosyntactic decomposition and semantic composition of German compound words investigated by ERPs. Brain and Language, 102(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2006.09.003
- Koester, D., Holle, H., & Gunter, T. C. (2009). Electrophysiological evidence for incremental lexical-semantic integration in auditory compound comprehension. Neuropsychologia, 47(8-9), 1854–1864. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.027
- Kotchoubey, B. (2006). Event-related potentials, cognition, and behavior: A biological approach. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 30(1), 42–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.04.002
- Lawrence, M. A. (2013). ez: Easy analysis and visualization of factorial experiments. http://Cran.rproject.org/Web/Packages/Ez.; R project
- Leminen, A., Smolka, E., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Pliatsikas, C. (2019). Morphological processing in the brain: The good (inflection), the bad (derivation) and the ugly (compounding). Cortex, 116, 4–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.08.016
- Libben, G. (1998). Semantic transparency in the processing of compounds: Consequences for representation, processing, and impairment. Brain and Language, 61(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1876
- Libben, G., Gibson, M., Yoon, Y. B., & Sandra, D. (2003). Compound fracture: The role of semantic transparency and morphological headedness. Brain and Language, 84(1), 50–64. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00520-5
- MacGregor, L. J., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Multiple routes for compound word processing in the brain: Evidence from EEG. Brain and Language, 126(2), 217–229. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.04.002
- Marelli, M., & Luzzatti, C. (2012). Frequency effects in the processing of Italian nominal compounds: Modulation of headedness and semantic transparency. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 644–664. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.01.003
- Mognon, A., Jovicich, J., Bruzzone, L., & Buiatti, M. (2011). ADJUST: An automatic EEG artifact detector based on the joint use of spatial and temporal features. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01061.x
- Nieuwenhuis, S., Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). Decision making, the P3, and the locus coeruleus–norepinephrine system. Psychological Bulletin, 131(4), 510–532. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.4.510
- Peirce, J. W. (2007). Psychopy—Psychophysics software in python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1-2), 8–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
- Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-plus (pp. 3–56). New York: Springer.
- Polich, J., & Comerchero, M. (2003). P3a from visual stimuli: Typicality, task, and topography. Brain Topography, 15(3), 141–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022637732495
- R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.Rproject.org
- Sandra, D. (1990). On the representation and processing of compound words: Automatic access to constituent morphemes does not occur. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 42(3), 529–567. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14640749008401236
- Scalise, S., & Guevara, E. (2006). Exocentric compounding in a typological framework. Lingue E Linguaggio, V(2), 185–206.
- Taft, M. (1979). Recognition of affixed words and the word frequency effect. Memory & Cognition, 7(4), 263–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197599
- Varela Ortega, S. (1990). Composición nominal y estructura temática. Revista Española de Lingüística, 20(1), 55–82.
- Villoing, F. (2009). Les mots composés VN. In B. Fradin, F. Kerleroux, & M. Plénat (Eds.), Aperçus de morphologie du français (pp. 175–197). Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.
- Yoon, J. (2009). Constructional meanings of verb–noun compounds in spanish: Limpiabotas vs. Tientaparedes. Language Sciences, 31(4), 507–530. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2007.09.005
- Zwitserlood, P. (1994). The role of semantic transparency in the processing and representation of Dutch compounds. Language and Cognitive Processes, 9(3), 341–368. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969408402123