A discriminative account of the learning, representation and processing of inflection systems

References

• Alegre, M. A., & Gordon, P. (1996). Red rats exposes recursion in children’s word formation. Cognition, 60(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(95)00703-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apfelbaum, K. S., & McMurray, B. (2017). Learning during processing: Word learning doesn't wait for word recognition to finish. Cognitive Science, 41(S4), 706. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12401
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Asplund, C. L., Todd, J. J., Snyder, A. P., & Marois, R. (2010). A central role for the lateral prefrontal cortex in goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention. Nature Neuroscience, 13(4), 507. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2509
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., Đurđević, D. F., Hendrix, P., & Marelli, M. (2011). An amorphous model for morphological processing in visual comprehension based on naive discriminative learning. Psychological Review, 118(3), 438. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berko, J. (1958). The child's learning of English morphology. Word, 14(2-3), 150–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/00437956.1958.11659661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. P. (2016). Word and paradigm morphology. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blevins, J. P., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M. (2017). The zipfian paradigm cell filling problem. In F. Kiefer, J. P. Blevins, & H. Bartos (Eds.), Perspectives on morphological organization (pp. 139–158). Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, M. H., Kessen, W., & Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.2.1.115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box, G. E. (1979). Robustness in the strategy of scientific model building. In R. L. Launer, & G. N. Wilkinson (Eds.), Robustness in statistics (pp. 201–236). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-438150-6.50018-2
   Google Scholar
• Bröker, F., & Ramscar, M. (2020). Representing absence of evidence: Why algorithms and representations matter in models of language and cognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R. (1973). Development of the first language in the human species. American Psychologist, 28(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, R., & Hanlon, C. (1970). Derivational complexity and order of acquisition in child speech. In J. R. Hayes (Ed.), Cognition and the development of language (pp. 11–53). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1985). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin, and use. Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Corkery, M., Matusevych, Y., & Goldwater, S. (2019, July 28-August 2). Are we there yet? Encoder-decoder neural networks as cognitive models of English past tense inflection. Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational linguistics, pp. 3868–3877.
   Google Scholar
• Daw, N. D., Courville, A. C., & Dayan, P. (2008). Semi-rational models: The case of trial order. In N. Chater, & M. Oaksford (Eds.), The probabilistic mind (pp. 473–492). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dayan, P., & Berridge, K. C. (2014). Model-based and model-free Pavlovian reward learning: Revaluation, revision, and revelation. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 473-492. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0277-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, P. L., & Paclisanu, M. I. (1967). Simple strategies in binary prediction by children and adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(2), 278. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024137
   Google Scholar
• Diamond, A. (2002). Normal development of prefrontal cortex from birth to young adulthood: Cognitive functions, anatomy, and biochemistry. In D. Stuss, & R. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function (pp. 466–503). Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, N. C. (2006). Language acquisition as rational contingency learning. Applied Linguistics, 27(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/ami038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, A. S., Lee, T., Kraus, A., & Kam, C. L. H. (2014). When it hurts (and helps) to try: The role of effort in language learning. PloS One, 9(7), e101806. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0101806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freudenthal, D., Ramscar, M., Leonard, L. B., & Pine, J. M. (2021). Simulating the acquisition of verb inflection in typically developing children and children with developmental language disorder in English and Spanish. Cognitive Science, 45(3), e12945. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Mueller, J. L., Sehm, B., & Ragert, P. (2013). Language learning without control: The role of the PFC. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(5), 814–821. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futrell, R., Wilcox, E., Morita, T., Qian, P., Ballesteros, M., & Levy, R. (2019). Neural language models as psycholinguistic subjects: Representations of syntactic state. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03260.
   Google Scholar
• Gleitman, L. R. (1965). Coordinating conjunctions in English. Language, 41(2), 260–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/411878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. (1985). Level-ordering in lexical development. Cognition, 21(2), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(85)90046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorman, K., McCarthy, A. D., Cotterell, R., Vylomova, E., Silfverberg, M., & Markowska, M. (2019, November 3–4). Weird inflects but OK: Making sense of morphological generation errors. Proceedings of the 23rd Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL), pp. 140–151.
   Google Scholar
• Graves, M., & Koziol, S. M., Jr. (1971). Noun plural development in primary grade children. Child Development, 42(4), 1165–1173. https://doi.org/10.2307/1127801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Nakisa, R. C. (2000). German inflection: Single route or dual route? Cognitive Psychology, 41(4), 313–360. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, Z., & Kapatsinski, V. (2021). A theory of repetition and retrieval in language production. Psychological Review, 128(6), 1112. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000305
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, C. L. (1992, July 29-August 1). Understanding English past tense formation: The shared meaning hypothesis. Fourteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Haskell, T. R., MacDonald, M. C., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2003). Language learning and innateness: Some implications of compounds research. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(03)00007-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendrix, P., Ramscar, M., & Baayen, H. (2019). NDRA: A single route model of response times in the reading aloud task based on discriminative learning. PloS One, 14(7), e0218802. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218802
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, D. B., Hendriks, P., Ramscar, M., & van Rij, J. (2021). An exploration of error-driven learning in simple two-layer networks from a discriminative learning perspective. Behavior Research Methods.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, D. B., van Rij, J., Hendriks, P., & Ramscar, M. (2020). Order matters! influences of linear order on linguistic category learning. Cognitive Science, 44(11), e12910. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2005). Regularizing unpredictable variation: The roles of adult and child learners in language formation and change. Language Learning And Development, 1(2), 151–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/15475441.2005.9684215
   Google Scholar
• Hudson Kam, C. L., & Newport, E. L. (2009). Getting it right by getting it wrong: When learners change languages. Cognitive Psychology, 59(1), 30–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2009.01.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, P. R., & Dabholkar, A. S. (1997). Regional differences in synaptogenesis in human cerebral cortex. Journal of Comparative Neurology, 387(2), 167–178. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19971020)387:2<167::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-Z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanisse, M. F., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1999). Impairments in verb morphology after brain injury: A connectionist model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96(13), 7592. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.13.7592
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, J. S., & Newport, E. L. (1989). Critical period effects in second language learning: The influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language. Cognitive Psychology, 21(1), 60–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(89)90003-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., & Coppola, M. (1994). Sensitivity of children's inflection to morphological structure. Journal of Child Language, 21(1), 173–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900008710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. J., Pinker, S., Prince, A., & Prasada, S. (1991). Why no mere mortal has ever flown out to center field. Cognitive Science, 15(2), 173–218. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1502_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiparsky, P. (1982). Lexical phonology and morphology. In I. S. Yang (Ed.), Linguistics in the morning calm (pp. 3–91). Hansin.
   Google Scholar
• Kirov, C., & Cotterell, R. (2018). Recurrent neural networks in linguistic theory: Revisiting Pinker and Prince (1988) and the past tense debate. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 6, 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00247
   Google Scholar
• Lake, B., & Baroni, M. (2018, July 10-15). Generalization without systematicity: On the compositional skills of sequence-to-sequence Recurrent networks. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 2873–2882, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm, Sweden, PMLR.
   Google Scholar
• Legate, J. A., & Yang, C. (2007). Morphosyntactic learning and the development of tense. Language Acquisition, 14(3), 315–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/10489220701471081
   Google Scholar
• Lignos, C., & Yang, C. (2018). Morphology and language acquisition. In A. Hippisley, & G. Stump (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of morphology (pp. 765–791). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Linzen, T., Dupoux, E., & Goldberg, Y. (2016). Assessing the ability of LSTMs to learn syntax-sensitive dependencies. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 4, 521–535. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00115
   Google Scholar
• Love, B. C., Medin, D. L., & Gureckis, T. M. (2004). SUSTAIN: A network model of category learning. Psychological Review, 111(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, S., & Ramscar, M. (2001, August 1-4). Testing the distributional hypothesis: The influence of context on judgements of semantic similarity. Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh.
   Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B., & Leinbach, J. (1991). Implementations are not conceptualizations: Revising the verb learning model. Cognition, 40(1-2), 121–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(91)90048-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malkova, L., Heuer, E., & Saunders, R. C. (2006). Longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging study of rhesus monkey brain development. European Journal of Neuroscience, 24(11), 3204. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2006.05175.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, G. F., Pinker, S., Ullman, M., Hollander, M., Rosen, J. T., & Xu, F. (1992). Overregularization in language acquisition. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 57(4), 1–165. https://doi.org/10.2307/1166115
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marslen-Wilson, W. D., & Tyler, L. K. (2007). Morphology, language and the brain: The decompositional substrate for language comprehension. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzi, C., Ferro, M., & Pirrelli, V. (2019). A processing-oriented investigation of inflectional complexity. Frontiers in Communication, 4, 48.
   Google Scholar
• Milin, P., Feldman, L. B., Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., & Baayen, R. H. (2017). Discrimination in lexical decision. PloS one, 12(2), e0171935. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, G. A.. (1967). The psycholinguists: On the new scientists of language. In G. A. Miller (Ed.), The psychology of communication (pp. 70–92). Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, R. R., Barnet, R. C., & Grahame, N. J. (1995). Assessment of the Rescorla–Wagner model. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 363–386. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.117.3.363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nee, D. E., & Jonides, J. (2011). Dissociable contributions of prefrontal cortex and the hippocampus to short-term memory: Evidence for a 3-state model of memory. Neuroimage, 54(2), 1540–1548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2002). On discriminative vs. generative classifiers: A comparison of logistic regression and naive Bayes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 14, 841–848.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. S. (2020). Of mice and men: Speech sound acquisition as discriminative learning from prediction error, not just statistical tracking. Cognition, 197, 104081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.104081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nixon, J. S., & Tomaschek, F. (2021). Prediction and error in early infant speech learning: A speech acquisition model. Cognition, 212, 104697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Friston, K., Critchley, H., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). Temporal difference models and reward-related learning in the human brain. Neuron, 38(2), 329–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadimitriou, I., Chi, E. A., Futrell, R., & Mahowald, K. (2021). Deep subjecthood: Higher-order grammatical features in multilingual BERT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11043.
   Google Scholar
• Perconti, P., & Plebe, A. (2020). Deep learning and cognitive science. Cognition, 203, 104365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petanjek, Z., Judaš, M., Šimić, G., Rašin, M. R., Uylings, H. B., Rakic, P., & Kostović, I. (2011). Extraordinary neoteny of synaptic spines in the human prefrontal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(32), 13281. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1105108108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1991). Rules of language. Science, 253(5019), 530–535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1994). The language instinct. Morrow.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1997). Words and rules in the human brain. Nature, 387(6633), 547–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/42347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (1999). Words and rules: The ingredients of language. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S. (2001). Four decades of rules and associations, or whatever happened to the past tense debate. In Emmanuel Dupoux (Ed.), Language, the brain, and cognitive development: Papers in honor of Jacques Mehler (pp. 157–179). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pinker, S., & Prince, A. (1988). On language and connectionism: Analysis of a parallel distributed processing model of language acquisition. Cognition, 28(1-2), 73–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(88)90032-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plunkett, K., & Marchman, V. (1993). From rote learning to system building: Acquiring verb morphology in children and connectionist nets. Cognition, 48(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(93)90057-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasada, S., & Pinker, S. (1993). Generalizations of regular and irregular morphological patterns. Language and Cognitive Processes, 8(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969308406948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakic, P., Bourgeois, J. P., Eckenhoff, M. F., Zecevic, N., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1986). Concurrent overproduction of synapses in diverse regions of the primate cerebral cortex. Science, 232(4747), 232–235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3952506
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M. (2002). The role of meaning in inflection: Why the past tense does not require a rule. Cognitive Psychology, 45(1), 45–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0285(02)00001-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M. (2021). How children learn to communicate discriminatively. Journal of Child Language, 48(5), 984–1022. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000921000544
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2009, 29 July-1 August). Error and expectation in language learning: An inquiry into the many curious incidences of “mouses” in adult speech. Proceedings of the 31st Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Dye, M. (2011). Learning language from the input: Why innate constraints can’t explain noun compounding. Cognitive Psychology, 62(1), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., Blevins, J., & Baayen, H. (2018). Morphological development. In A. Bar On, & D. Ravit (Eds.), Handbook of communication disorders (pp. 181–202). Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., Gustafson, J. W., & Klein, J. (2013c). Dual routes to cognitive flexibility: Learning and response-conflict resolution in the dimensional change card sort task. Child Development, 84(4), 1308–1323. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & Hübner, M. (2013). When the fly flied and when the fly flew: How semantics affect the processing of inflected verbs. Language and Cognitive Processes, 28(4), 468–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.649041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., & McCauley, S. M. (2013b). Error and expectation in language learning: The curious absence of “mouses” in adult speech. Language, 89(4), 760–793. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2013.0068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Dye, M., Popick, H. M., & O'Donnell-McCarthy, F. (2011). The enigma of number: Why children find the meanings of even small number words hard to learn and how we can help them do better. PloS One, 6(7), e22501. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0022501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Gitcho, N. (2007). Developmental change and the nature of learning in childhood. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 11(7), 274–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Hendrix, P., Shaoul, C., Milin, P., & Baayen, H. (2014). The myth of cognitive decline: Non-linear dynamics of lifelong learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 6(1), 5–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Port, R. F. (2015). Categorization (without categories). In E. Dabrowska, & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 75–99). De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Port, R. F. (2016). How spoken languages work in the absence of an inventory of discrete units. Language Sciences, 53, 58–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2015.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., & Yarlett, D. (2007). Linguistic self-correction in the absence of feedback: A new approach to the logical problem of language acquisition. Cognitive Science, 31(6), 927. https://doi.org/10.1080/03640210701703576
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramscar, M., Yarlett, D., Dye, M., Denny, K., & Thorpe, K. (2010). The effects of feature-label-order and their implications for symbolic learning. Cognitive Science, 34(6), 909–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01092.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black, & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64–99). Appleton-Century-Crofts.
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs. Implicit rules or parallel distributed processing? In R. McClelland (Ed.)the PDP Research Group (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 2, pp. 195–248). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandhofer, C. M., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Learning color words involves learning a system of mappings. Developmental Psychology, 35(3), 668. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.35.3.668
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, W. (2006). Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 87–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidenberg, M. S., & Plaut, D. C. (2014). Quasiregularity and its discontents: The legacy of the past tense debate. Cognitive Science, 38(6), 1190–1228. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.12147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selkirk, E. O. (1982). The syntax of words. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shimamura, A. P. (2000). The role of the prefrontal cortex in dynamic filtering. Psychobiology, 28(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03331979
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, D. (1979). Topics in English morphology. Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, S., & Allan, L. G. (1996). The widespread influence of the Rescorla-Wagner model. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3(3), 314–321. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, G. O. (1986). An analysis of the delta rule and the learning of statistical associations. In J.A. Feldman, P Hayes, & D.E. Rumelhart (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 444–459). Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1981). Toward a modern theory of adaptive networks: Expectation and prediction. Psychological Review, 88(2), 135. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.2.135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson-Schill, S. L., Ramscar, M., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2009). Cognition without control: When a little frontal lobe goes a long way. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(5), 259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaschek, F., Plag, I., Ernestus, M., & Baayen, R. H. (2021). Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics, 57(1), 123–161. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226719000203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujimoto, S. (2008). The prefrontal cortex: Functional neural development during early childhood. The Neuroscientist, 14(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858408316002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vujović, M., Ramscar, M., & Wonnacott, E. (2021). Language learning as uncertainty reduction: The role of prediction error in linguistic generalization and item-learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 119, 104231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2021.104231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, A., Kaplan, A., & Jackson, S. (2013). High functional load inhibits phonological contrast loss: A corpus study. Cognition, 128(2), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widrow, B., & Hoff, M. E. (1960). Adaptive switching circuits. Tech. Rep. Stanford Univ Ca Stanford Electronics Labs.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, E. (1981). On the notions “lexically related” and “head of a word”. Linguistic Inquiry, 12(2), 245–274. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4178218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yeung, N., Botvinick, M. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural basis of error detection: Conflict monitoring and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 111(4), 931. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.4.931
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar