Electrophysiological patterns of visual word recognition in deaf and hearing readers: an ERP mega-study

References

• Andrews, S., & Hersch, J. (2010). Lexical precision in skilled readers: Individual differences in masked neighbor priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(2), 299–318. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018366
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Cortese, M. J., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., Neely, J. H., Nelson, D. L., Simpson, G. B., & Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39(3), 445–459. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2014). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Preprint, arXiv:1406.5823.
   Google Scholar
• Bavelier, D., Tomann, A., Hutton, C., Mitchell, T., Corina, D., Liu, G., & Neville, H. (2000). Visual attention to the periphery is enhanced in congenitally deaf individuals. Journal of Neuroscience, 20(17), RC93. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-17-j0001.2000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., Baum, S. R., & Mayberry, R. I. (2012). Reading difficulties in adult deaf readers of French: Phonological codes, not guilty!. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16(3), 263–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.568555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., Mayberry, R. I., & Rayner, K. (2013). Orthographic and phonological preview benefits: Parafoveal processing in skilled and less-skilled deaf readers. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(11), 2237–2252. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.780085
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélanger, N. N., & Rayner, K. (2015). What eye movements reveal about deaf readers. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414567527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottari, D., Caclin, A., Giard, M. H., & Pavani, F. (2011). Changes in early cortical visual processing predict enhanced reactivity in deaf individuals. PloS One, 6(9), e25607. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0025607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. M., & Brewer, L. C. (1996). Cognitive processes of deaf and hearing skilled and less skilled readers. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 1(4), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.deafed.a014301
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 977–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45(4), 751–774. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2785
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cates, D. M., Traxler, M. J., & Corina, D. P. (2021). Predictors of Reading comprehension in deaf and hearing bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(1), 81–123. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716421000412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Y., Davis, M. H., Pulvermüller, F., & Hauk, O. (2015). Early visual word processing is flexible: Evidence from spatiotemporal brain dynamics. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(9), 1738–1751. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00815
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M. D., Hauser, P. C., Miller, P., Kargin, T., Rathmann, C., Guldenoglu, B., Kubus, O., Spurgeon, E., & Israel, E. (2016). The importance of early sign language acquisition for deaf readers. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(2), 127–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2013.878123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello, B., Caffarra, S., Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2021). Reading without phonology: ERP evidence from skilled deaf readers of Spanish. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-84490-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cripps, J. H., McBride, K. A., & Forster, K. I. (2005). Lexical processing with deaf and hearing: Phonology and orthographic masked priming. Journal of Second Language Acquisition and Teaching, 12, 31–44. https://journals.uair.arizona.edu/index.php/AZSLAT/article/view/21285/20864
   Google Scholar
• Dehaene, S., Cohen, L., Sigman, M., & Vinckier, F. (2005). The neural code for written words: A proposal. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(7), 335–341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open-source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufau, S., Grainger, J., Midgley, K. J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2015). A thousand words are worth a picture: Snapshots of printed-word processing in an event-related potential megastudy. Psychological Science, 26(12), 1887–1897. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615603934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). PPVT-4: Peabody picture vocabulary test. Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., & Lee, B. (2021). The neurocognitive basis of skilled Reading in prelingually and profoundly deaf adults. Language and Linguistics Compass, 15(2), e12407. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., Midgley, K. J., Kohen, C. B., Sehyr, Z. S., & Holcomb, P. J. (2017). The N170 ERP component differs in laterality, distribution, and association with continuous Reading measures for deaf and hearing readers. Neuropsychologia, 106, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmorey, K., Winsler, K., Midgley, K. J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2020). Neurophysiological correlates of frequency, concreteness, and iconicity in American sign language. Neurobiology of Language, 1(2), 249–267. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00012
   Google Scholar
• Fariña, N., Duñabeitia, J. A., & Carreiras, M. (2017). Phonological and orthographic coding in deaf skilled readers. Cognition, 168, 27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frost, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123(1), 71–99. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.123.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2009). Watching the word go by: On the time-course of component processes in visual word recognition. Language and Linguistics Compass, 3(1), 128–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-818X.2008.00121.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2017). Early use of phonological codes in deaf readers: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 106, 261–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez-Sigut, E., Vergara-Martínez, M., & Perea, M. (2022). The impact of visual cues during visual word recognition in deaf readers: An ERP study. Cognition, 218, 104938. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauk, O., Davis, M. H., Ford, M., Pulvermüller, F., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2006). The time course of visual word recognition as revealed by linear regression analysis of ERP data. Neuroimage, 30(4), 1383–1400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshorn, E. A., Dye, M. W. G., Hauser, P., Supalla, T. R., & Bavelier, D. (2015). The contribution of phonological knowledge, memory, and language background to reading comprehension in deaf populations. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01153
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Grainger, J., & O'rourke, T. (2002). An electrophysiological study of the effects of orthographic neighborhood size on printed word perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(6), 938–950. https://doi.org/10.1162/089892902760191153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiyonaga, K., Grainger, J., Midgley, K., & Holcomb, P. J. (2007). Masked cross-modal repetition priming: An event-related potential investigation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(3), 337–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960600652471
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kounios, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (1994). Concreteness effects in semantic processing: ERP evidence supporting dual-coding theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 804. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. (2017). Lmertest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederberg, A. R., Branum-Martin, L., Webb, M., Schick, B., Antia, S., Easterbrooks, S. R., & Connor, C. M. (2019). Modality and interrelations Among language, Reading, spoken phonological awareness, and fingerspelling. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 24(4), 408–423. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enz011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, D., Gao, K., Wu, X., Chen, X., Zhang, X., Li, L., & He, W. (2013). Deaf and hard of hearing adolescents’ processing of pictures and written words for taxonomic categories in a priming task of semantic categorization. American Annals of the Deaf, 158(4), 426–437. https://doi.org/10.1353/aad.2013.0040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markwardt, F. C. (1989). Peabody individual achievement test-revised: PIAT-R. American Guidance Service Circle Pines.
   Google Scholar
• Mayberry, R. I., del Giudice, A. A., & Lieberman, A. M. (2011). Reading achievement in relation to phonological coding and awareness in deaf readers: A meta-analysis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enq049
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQuarrie, L., & Parrila, R. (2009). Phonological representations in deaf children: Rethinking the “functional equivalence” hypothesis. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enn025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meade, G., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2019). Task modulates ERP effects of orthographic neighborhood for pseudowords but not words. Neuropsychologia, 129, 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morford, J. P., Occhino-Kehoe, C., Piñar, P., Wilkinson, E., & Kroll, J. F. (2017). The time course of cross-language activation in deaf ASL–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 20(2), 337–350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S136672891500067X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pelli, D. G., Burns, C. W., Farell, B., & Moore-Page, D. C. (2006). Feature detection and letter identification. Vision Research, 46(28), 4646–4674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2006.04.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K. (2019). The place of morphology in learning to read in English. Cortex, 116, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.02.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarchet, T., Marschark, M., Borgna, G., Convertino, C., & Dirmyer, R. (2014). Vocabulary knowledge of deaf and hearing postsecondary students. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 27(2), 161–176. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4280560/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sehyr, Z., & Emmorey, K. (2021). Assessing the contribution of lexical quality and sign language variables to reading comprehension in deaf adult ASL signers. Paper presented at the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading, July, Virtual meeting.
   Google Scholar
• Strijkers, K., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2015). Seeing the same words differently: The time course of automaticity and topdown intention in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(8), 1542–1551. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00797
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heuven, W. J., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). SUBTLEX-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varga, V., Tóth, D., & Csépe, V. (2021). Lexical competition without phonology: Masked orthographic neighbor priming with deaf readers. The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 27(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enab040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villwock, A., Wilkinson, E., Piñar, P., & Morford, J. P. (2021). Language development in deaf bilinguals: Deaf middle school students co-activate written English and American sign language during lexical processing. Cognition, 211, 104642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, W. C., & Holcomb, P. J. (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024–1037. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290051137558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winsler, K., Midgley, K. J., Grainger, J., & Holcomb, P. J. (2018). An electrophysiological megastudy of spoken word recognition. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(8), 1063–1082. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1455985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D., & Yap, M. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar