A test of letter configuration coding in visual word recognition

References

• Adelman, J., & Trifonova, V. (2022). Orthographic priming from unrelated primes: Heterogeneous feedforward inhibition predicted by associative learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 127, 104372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2022.104372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berent, I., & Marom, M. (2005). Skeletal structure for printed words: Evidence from the Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(2), 328–338. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.2.328
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouma, H. (1970). Interaction effects in parafoveal letter recognition. Nature, 226(5241), 177–178. https://doi.org/10.1038/226177a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavey, V. D. C., & Hartsuiker, R. (2016). Is there a domain-general cognitive structuring system? Evidence from structural priming across music, math, action descriptions, and language. Cognition, 146, 172–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2015.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Ziegler, J., & Langdon, R. (2001). DRC: Dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (1999). The self-organising lexical acquisition and recognition (SOLAR) model of visual word recognition [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of New South Wales.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, C. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C., & Bowers, J. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forster, K., Davis, C., Schoknecht, C., & Carter, R. (1987). Masked priming with graphemically related forms: Repetition or partial activation? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 39(2), 211–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748708401785
   Google Scholar
• Gomez, P., Ratcliff, R., & Perea, M. (2008). The overlap model: A model of letter position coding. Psychological Review, 115(3), 577. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012667
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J. (2008). Cracking the orthographic code: An introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701578013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Jacobs, A. M. (1996). Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: A multiple read-out model. Psychological Review, 103(3), 518–565. http://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.3.518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., Mathôt, S., & Vitu, F. (2014). Test of a model of multi-word reading: Effects of parafoveal flanking letters on foveal word recognition. Acta Psychologica, 146, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.11.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), The mental lexicon: Some words to talk about words (pp. 1–23). Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Heuven, V. W., Dijkstra, T., Grainger, J., & Schriefers, H. (2001). Shared neighbourhood effects in masked orthographic priming. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(1), 96–101. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L. (2015). Grouping by similarity is mediated by feature selection: Evidence from the failure of cue combination. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 22(5), 1364–1369. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0801-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, L., & Pashler, H. (2007). A Boolean map theory of visual attention. Psychological Review, 114(3), 599–631. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.3.599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Version 0.17).
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Bicknell, K., Slattery, T., & Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movement evidence that readers maintain and act on uncertainty about past linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(50), 21086–21090. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0907664106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loomis, J. (1977). Lateral masking in foveal and eccentric vision. Vision Research, 18(3), 335–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/0042-6989(78)90168-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariol, M., Jacques, C., Schelstraete, M. A., & Rossion, B. (2008). The speed of orthographic processing during lexical decision: Electrophysiological evidence for independent coding of letter identity and letter position in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(7), 1283–1299. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouki, Y., & Grainger, J. (2014). Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification. Acta Psychologica, 148, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). OpenSesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J., & Rumelhart, D. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88(5), 375–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.88.5.375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, S., & Shillcock, R. (2003). Eye movements reveal the on-line computation of lexical probabilities during reading. Psychological Science, 14(6), 648–652. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0956-7976.2003.psci_1480.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moor, D. M., & Brysbaert, M. (2000). Neighborhood-frequency effects when primes and targets are of different lengths. Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 63(2), 159–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perea, M., Marcet, A., & Acha, J. (2018). Does consonant-vowel skeletal structure play a role early in lexical processing? Evidence from masked priming. Applied Psycholinguistics, 39(1), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716417000431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peressotti, F., & Grainger, J. (1999). The role of letter identity and letter position in orthographic priming. Perception and Psychophysics, 61(4), 691–706. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romberg, A., & Saffran, J. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1(6), 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.78
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., Bertrand, D., & Grainger, J. (2018b). Parafoveal letter-position coding in reading. Memory & Cognition, 46(4), 589–599. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0786-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snell, J., van Leipsig, S., Grainger, J., & Meeter, M. (2018a). OB1-reader: A model of word recognition and eye movements in text reading. Psychological Review, 125(6), 969–984. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treisman, A., & Souther, J. (1986). Illusory words: The roles of attention and top-down constraints in conjoining letters to form words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 12(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.12.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifonova, I. V., & Adelman, J. S. (2019). A delay in processing for repeated letters: Evidence from megastudies. Cognition, 189, 227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2019.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifonova, I. V., & Adelman, J. S. (2022). Repeated letters increase the ambiguity of strings: Evidence from identifcation, priming and same-different tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 132, 101445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101445
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Luce, P. A. (1999). Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 40(3), 374–408. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagemans, J., Elder, J., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S., Peterson, M., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure–ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138(6), 1172–1217. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029334
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. doi:10.3758/BF03196158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar