How the brain processes emotional meaning of indirect reply: evidence from EEG

References

• Akimoto, Y., Takahashi, H., Gunji, A., Kaneko, Y., Asano, M., Matsuo, J., Ota, M., Kunugi, H., Hanakawa, T., Mazuka, R., & Kamio, Y. (2017). Alpha band event-related desynchronization underlying social situational context processing during irony comprehension: A magnetoencephalography source localization study. Brain and Language, 175, 42–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.09.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albrecht, J. E., & O'Brien, E. J. (1993). Updating a mental model: Maintaining both local and global coherence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(5), 1061–1070. http://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baptista, N. I., Manfredi, M., & Boggio, P. S. (2017). Medial prefrontal cortex stimulation modulates irony processing as indexed by the N400. Social Neuroscience, 13(4), 495–510. http://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2017.1356744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bašnáková, J., Weber, K., Petersson, K. M., van Berkum, J., & Hagoort, P. (2014). Beyond the language given: The neural correlates of inferring speaker meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 24(10), 2572–2578. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bht112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Magyari, L., & Hagoort, P. (2009). Syntactic unification operations are reflected in oscillatory dynamics during on-line sentence comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(7), 1333–1347. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaansen, M., Mazaheri, A., & Jensen, O. (2012). Beyond ERP’s: Oscillatory neuronal dynamics. In S. J. Luck, & E. S. Kappenman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of event-related potential components (pp. 31–50). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, M., Sommer, W., & Schacht, A. (2010). Reading emotional words within sentences: The impact of arousal and valence on event-related potentials. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(3), 299–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, G. A., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Recognizing verbal irony in spontaneous speech. Metaphor and Symbol, 17(2), 99–119. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327868MS1702_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caffarra, S., Wolpert, M., Scarinci, D., & Mancini, S. (2020). Who are you talking to? The role of addressee identity in utterance comprehension. Psychophysiology, 57(4), e13527. https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caillies, S., Gobin, P., Obert, A., Terrien, S., Coutté, A., Iakimova, G., Besche-Richard, C. (2019). Asymmetry of affect in verbal irony understanding: What about the n400 and p600 components? Journal of Neurolinguistics, 51, 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y., & Yang, Y. (2018). Concurrent emotional response and semantic unification: An event-related potential study. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience, 19, 154–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Lovett, C. (2010). Comprehension of nonconventional indirect requests: An event-related brain potential study. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 22(1), 107–124.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Van Petten, C. (2002). Conceptual integration and metaphor: An event-related potential study. Memory & Cognition, 30(6), 958–968. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D. J., & Indefrey, P. (2007). An inverse relation between event-related and time–frequency violation responses in sentence processing. Brain Research, 1158, 81–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.04.082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., Wu, Y., Jan, C., Yu, H., Jiang, X., & Zhou, X. (2017). Effects of contextual relevance on pragmatic inference during conversation: An fMRI study. Brain and Language, 171, 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2017.04.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1986). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 115(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.115.1.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (2012). Interpreting figurative meaning. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1968). Utterer’s meaning, sentence meaning and word meaning. In Philosophy, language, and artificial intelligence (pp. 49–66). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004368811_003
   Google Scholar
• Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the ways of words. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajra, S. G., Liu, C. C., Song, X., Fickling, S. D., Cheung, T. P., & D’Arcy, R. C. (2018). Multimodal characterisation of the semantic N400 response within a rapid evaluation brain vital sign framework. Journal of Translational Medicine, 16(151), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12967-018-1527-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hellbernd, N., & Sammler, D. (2016). Prosody conveys speakers’ intentions: Accoustic cues for speech act perception. Journal of Memory and Language, 88, 70–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinojosa, J. A., Albert, J., Fernández-Folgueiras, U., Santaniello, G., López-Bachiller, C., Sebastián, M., Sánchez-Carmona, A. J., & Pozo, M. A. (2014). Effects of negative content on the processing of gender information: An event-related potential study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(4), 1286–1299. http://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-014-0291-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1998). Interpreting indirect replies. Cognitive Psychology, 37(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtgraves, T. (1999). Comprehending indirect replies: When and how are their conveyed meanings activated? Journal of Memory and Language, 41(4), 519–540. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1999.2657
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jensen, O., & Mazaheri, A. (2010). Shaping functional architecture by oscillatory alpha activity: Gating by inhibition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4. http://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2010.00186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanske, P., & Kotz, S. A. (2007). Concreteness in emotional words: ERP evidence from a hemifield study. Brain Research, 1148, 138–148. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2007.02.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappenman, E. S., & Keil, A. (2017). How to get statistically significant effects in any ERP experiment (and why you shouldn't). Psychophysiology, 54(1), 146–157. http://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. N. (2005). Discourse and sociocultural factors in understanding nonliteral language figurative language comprehension: Social and cultural influences (pp. 183–207). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kielar, A., Meltser, J. A., Moreno, S., Alain, C., & Bialystok, E. (2014). Oscillatory responses to semantic and syntactic violations. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 26(12), 2840–2862. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_00670
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W. (1997). EEG-alpha rhythms and memory processes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 26(1-3), 319–340. http://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8760(97)00773-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klimesch, W., Freunberger, R., & Sauseng, P. (2010). Oscillatory mechanisms of process binding in memory. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(7), 1002–1014. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2009.10.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2000). Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 463–470. http://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01560-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutas, M., & Hillyard, S. A. (1980). Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biological Psychology, 11(2), 99–116. http://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0511(80)90046-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J.-M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, 1–9. http://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M. (2008). It's fascinating research: The cognition of verbal irony. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 17(4), 286–290. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00591.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfurtscheller, G., & Lopes da Silva, F. H. (1999). Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: Basic principles. Clinical Neurophysiology: Official Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, 110(11), 1842–1857. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457(99)00141-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proverbio, A. M., Santoni, S., & Adorni, R.. (2020). ERP markers of valence coding in emotional speech processing. iScience, 23(3), 100933. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.100933
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, A. M., Mutschler, D. E., & Erb, M. (2012). Where in the brain is nonliteral language? A coordinate-based meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. NeuroImage, 63(1), 600–610. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regel, S., Coulson, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2010). The communicative style of a speaker can affect language comprehension? ERP evidence from the comprehension of irony. Brain Research, 1311, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2009.10.077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regel, S., & Gunter, T. C. (2017). Don’t get me wrong: ERP evidence from cueing communicative intentions. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1465. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regel, S., Gunter, T. C., & Friederici, A. D. (2011). Isn’t it ironic? An electrophysiological exploration of figurative language processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2010.21411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regel, S., Meyer, L., & Gunter, T. C. (2014). Distinguishing neurocognitive processes reflected by P600 effects: Evidence from ERPs and neural oscillations. Plos One, 9(5), e96840. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0096840
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., & Kotz, S. A. (2006). Beyond the right hemisphere: Brain mechanisms mediating vocal emotional processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (Vol. 1). Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spotorno, N., Cheylus, A., Van Der Henst, J.-B., & Noveck, I. A. (2013). What’s behind a P600? Integration operations during irony processing. Plos One, 8(6), e66839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, A. J., Wood, J. S., Le-luan, E., Yao, B., & Haigh, M. (2018). ‘It’s hard to write a good article’: The online comprehension of excuses as indirect replies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(6), 1265–1269. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2017.1327546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vergis, N., Jiang, X., & Pell, M. D. (2020). Neural responses to interpersonal requests: Effects of imposition and vocally-expressed stance. Brain Research, 1740, 146855. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2020.146855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland, H., Bambini, V., & Schumacher, P. B. (2014). The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: Evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 583. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00583
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willems, R. M., Oostenveld, R., & Hagoort, P. (2008). Early decrease in alpha and gamma band power distinguish linguistic from visual information during spoken sentence comprehension. Brain Research, 1219, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.04.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Pan, X., Yang, X., & Yang, Y. (2023). Conventionality determines the time course of indirect replies comprehension: An ERP study. Brain and Language, 239, 105253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2023.105253
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, X., Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z., Yang, X., & Yang, Y. (2021). How working memory capacity modulates the time course of indirect replies comprehension: An event-related potential study. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(10), 1246–1257. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1924386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar