152
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Commentary

Grounding requires multimodal and multilevel representations

Received 17 Jul 2023, Accepted 04 Aug 2023, Published online: 14 Aug 2023

References

  • Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems, and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives on dysphasia (pp. 207–244). Churchill Livingstone.
  • Auvray, M., & Spence, C. (2008). The multisensory perception of flavor. Consciousness and Cognition, 17(3), 1016–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.005
  • Barrós-Loscertales, A., González, J., Pulvermüller, F., Ventura-Campos, N., Bustamante, J., Costumero, V., Parcet, M., & Ávila, C. (2012). Reading salt activates gustatory brain regions: fMRI evidence for semantic grounding in a novel sensory modality. Cerebral Cortex, 22(11), 2554–2563. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhr324
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2016). On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1122–1142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1028-3
  • Binder, J. R., Desai, R., Conant, L. L., & Graves, W. W. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp055
  • Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Science, 15(11), 527–536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
  • Borghesani, V., & Piazza, M. (2017). The neurocognitive representation of symbols: The case of concrete words. Neuropsychologia, 105, 4–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.06.026
  • Clazavarini, F. (2023). Rethinking modality-specificity in the cognitive neuroscience of concrete word meaning: A position paper. Language, Cognition, & Neuroscience, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2173789
  • Conca, F., & Tettamanti, M. (2018). Conceptual semantics as grounded in personal experience. Phenomenology and Mind, 14, 98–116.
  • Dove, G. (2022). Abstract concepts and the embodied mind: Rethinking grounded cognition. Oxford University Press.
  • Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016). Concept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics. Cerebral Cortex, 26(5), 2018–2034. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhv020
  • Fernandino, L., Tong, J.-Q., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., & Binder, J. R. (2022). Decoding the information structure underlying the neural representation of concepts. PNAS, 199(6), 1–11.
  • Gallese, V., & Lakoff, G. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3–4), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
  • Garagnani, M., & Pulvermüller, F. (2016). Conceptual grounding of language in action and perception: A neurocomputational model of the emergence of category specificity and semantic hubs. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43(6), 721–737. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.13145
  • Ghazanfar, A. A., & Schroeder, C. E. (2006). Is neocortex essentially multisensory? Trends in Cognitive Science, 10(6), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.04.008
  • Goldberg, R. F., Perfetti, C. A., & Schneider, W. (2006). Distinct and common cortical activations for multimodal semantic categories. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 6(3), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.3758/CABN.6.3.214
  • Haimovici, S. (2018). The modal-amodal distinction in the debate on conceptual format. Philosophies, 3(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies3020007
  • Humphreys, G. F., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Simons, J. S. (2021). A unifying account of angular gyrus contributions to episodic and semantic cognition. Trends in Neurosciences, 44(6), 452–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2021.01.006
  • Kemmerer, D. (2022). Cognitive neuroscience of language, second edition. Routledge.
  • Kiefer, M., Kuhnke, P., & Hartwigsen, G. (2023). Distinguishing modality-specificity at the representational and input level: A commentary on Calzavarini (2023). Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2023.2209928
  • Kuhnke, P., Beaupain, M. C., Arola, J., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2023). Meta-analytic evidence for a novel hierarchical model of conceptual processing. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 144(104994), 1–17.
  • Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2020). Task-dependent recruitment of modality- specific and multimodal regions during conceptual processing. Cerebral Cortex, 30(7), 3938–3959. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhaa010
  • Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2021). Task-dependent functional and effective connectivity during conceptual processing. Cerebral Cortex, 31(7), 3475–3493. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab026
  • Kuhnke, P., Kiefer, M., & Hartwigsen, G. (2023). Conceptual representations in the default, control, and attention networks are task-dependent and cross-modal. biorXiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.04.15.536954.
  • Martin, A. (2016). GRAPES—grounding representations in action, perception, and emotion systems: How object properties and categories are represented in the human brain. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 979–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0842-3
  • Mesulam, M. (1998). From sensation to cognition. Brain, 121(6), 1013–1052. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/121.6.1013
  • Meteyard, L., Cuadrado, S. R., Bahrami, B., & Viglocco, G. (2012). Coming of age: A review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics. Cortex, 48(7), 788–804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2010.11.002
  • Michel, C. (2020). Overcoming the modal/amodal dichotomy of concepts. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 655–677. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09678-y
  • Piccinini, G. (2022). Situated neural representations: Solving the problems of content. Frontiers in Neurobotics, 16, Article 846979, 1–13.
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2001). Brain reflections of words and their meanings. Trends in Cognitive Sceinces, 5(12), 517–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01803-9
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology, 160, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.001
  • Reilly, J., Peele, J. E., Garcia, A., & Crutch, S. J. (2016). Linking somatic and symbolic representation in the semantic memory: The dynamic multilevel representation framework. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1002–1014. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0824-5
  • Speed, L., & Majid, A. (2020). Grounding language in the neglected senses of touch, taste, and smell. Cognitive Neuropsycholgy, 37(5–6), 363–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2019.1623188
  • Stein, B. E. (ed.). (2012). The new handbook of multisensory processing. MIT Press.
  • Tong, J., Binder, J. R., Humphries, C., Mazurchuk, S., Conant, L. L., & Fernandino, L. (2022). A distributed network for multimodal experiential representation of concepts. Journal of Neuroscience, 42(37), 7121–7130. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1243-21.2022

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.