An eye on semantics: a study on the influence of concreteness and predictability on early fixation durations

References

• Baayen, R. H. (2004). Statistics in psycholinguistics: A critique of some current gold standards. Mental Lexicon Working Papers.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, H. A., Otten, L. J., Kousta, S.-T., & Vigliocco, G. (2013). Concreteness in word processing: ERP and behavioral effects in a lexical decision task. Brain and Language, 125(1), 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013). Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(3), 255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W., & Wiemer-Hastings, K. (2005). Situating abstract concepts. In D. Pecher & R. A. Zwaan (Eds.), Grounding cognition (1st ed., pp. 129–163). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511499968.007
   Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905–917. https://doi.org/10.1162/0898929054021102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottini, R., Morucci, P., D’Urso, A., Collignon, O., & Crepaldi, D. (2022). The concreteness advantage in lexical decision does not depend on perceptual simulations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 151(3), 731–738. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001090
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalmaijer, E. S., Mathôt, S., & Van der Stigchel, S. (2014). PyGaze: An open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments. Behavior Research Methods, 46(4), 913–921. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-013-0422-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dambacher, M., Kliegl, R., Hofmann, M., & Jacobs, A. M. (2006). Frequency and predictability effects on event-related potentials during Reading. Brain Research, 1084(1), 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Degno, F., & Liversedge, S. P. (2020). Eye movements and fixation-related potentials in Reading: A review. Vision, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/vision4010011
   Google Scholar
• Degno, F., Loberg, O., & Liversedge, S. P. (2021). Co-Registration of Eye movements and fixation—related potentials in natural Reading: Practical issues of experimental design and data analysis. Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 18032. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.18032
   Google Scholar
• de Leeuw, J. R. (2015). jsPsych: A JavaScript library for creating behavioral experiments in a Web browser. Behavior Research Methods, 47(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0458-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhond, R. P., Witzel, T., Dale, A. M., & Halgren, E. (2007). Spatiotemporal cortical dynamics underlying abstract and concrete word Reading. Human Brain Mapping, 28(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., & Ehinger, B. V. (2021). Regression-based analysis of combined EEG and eye-tracking data: Theory and applications. Journal of Vision, 21(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.21.1.3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimigen, O., Sommer, W., Hohlfeld, A., Jacobs, A. M., & Kliegl, R. (2011). Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural Reading: Analyses and review. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(4), 552–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, S. A., Morris, R. K., & Rayner, K. (1988). Lexical ambiguity and fixation times in Reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(4), 429–446. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90066-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farahibozorg, S.-R., Henson, R. N., Woollams, A. M., & Hauk, O. (2022). Distinct roles for the anterior temporal lobe and angular gyrus in the spatiotemporal cortical semantic network. Cerebral Cortex, 32(20), 4549–4564. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhab501
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frisson, S., Harvey, D. R., & Staub, A. (2017). No prediction error cost in Reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 95, 200–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2017.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hand, C. J., Miellet, S., O’Donnell, P. J., & Sereno, S. C. (2010). The frequency-predictability interaction in Reading: It depends where you’re coming from. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5), 1294–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnp.12065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2015). Differing contributions of inferior prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex to concrete and abstract conceptual knowledge. Cortex, 63, 250–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., Jones, R. W., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2013). Be concrete to be comprehended: Consistent imageability effects in semantic dementia for nouns, verbs, synonyms and associates. Cortex, 49(5), 1206–1218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, P. J., Kounios, J., Anderson, J. E., & West, W. C. (1999). Dual-Coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 721–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.3.721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huth, A. G., de Heer, W. A., Griffiths, T. L., Theunissen, F. E., & Gallant, J. L. (2016). Natural speech reveals the semantic maps that tile human cerebral cortex. Nature, 532(7600), 453–458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature17637
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. L. (2021). The neural correlates of semantic control revisited. NeuroImage, 224, 117444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117444
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J. (2018). Experience with compound words influences their processing: An eye movement investigation with English compound words. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2016.1253756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Pollatsek, A. (2011). Lexical influences on eye movements in Reading. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199539789.013.0048
   Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J., & Rayner, K. (2003). Investigating the effects of a Set of intercorrelated variables on eye fixation durations in Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(6), 1312–1318. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.6.1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keuleers, E., Lacey, P., Rastle, K., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). The British Lexicon Project: Lexical decision data for 28,730 monosyllabic and disyllabic English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0118-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kliegl, R., Nuthmann, A., & Engbert, R. (2006). Tracking the mind during Reading: The influence of past, present, and future words on fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(1), 12–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.12
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kousta, S.-T., Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Andrews, M., & Del Campo, E. (2011). The representation of abstract words: Why emotion matters. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(1), 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperberg, G. R., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). What do we mean by prediction in language comprehension? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(1), 32–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1102299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuperman, V., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Brysbaert, M. (2012). Age-of-acquisition ratings for 30,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 44(4), 978–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0210-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, K., Kühn, S., & Filevich, E. (2015). "Just another tool for online studies” (JATOS): An easy solution for setup and management of Web servers supporting online studies. PLoS One, 10(6), e0130834. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0130834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy-Drori, S., & Henik, A. (2006). Concreteness and context availability in lexical decision tasks. The American Journal of Psychology, 119(1), 45–65. https://doi.org/10.2307/20445318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, S. G., & Christianson, K. (2018). The Provo Corpus: A large eye-tracking corpus with predictability norms. Behavior Research Methods, 50(2), 826–833. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0908-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynott, D., Connell, L., Brysbaert, M., Brand, J., & Carney, J. (2020). The Lancaster Sensorimotor Norms: Multidimensional measures of perceptual and action strength for 40,000 English words. Behavior Research Methods, 52(3), 1271–1291. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01316-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., & Lüdecke, D. (2020). The easystats collection of R packages. GitHub. https://github.com/easystats/easystats
   Google Scholar
• Medler, D A, & Binder, J R. (2005). MCWord: An on-line orthographic database of the English language.
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space. arXiv:1301.3781 [Cs]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1301.3781
   Google Scholar
• Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G., & Dean, J. (2013). Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. arXiv:1310.4546 [Cs, Stat]. http://arxiv.org/abs/1310.4546
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwland, M. S., Barr, D. J., Bartolozzi, F., Busch-Moreno, S., Darley, E., Donaldson, D. I., Ferguson, H. J., Fu, X., Heyselaar, E., Huettig, F., Matthew Husband, E., Ito, A., Kazanina, N., Kogan, V., Kohút, Z., Kulakova, E., Mézière, D., Politzer-Ahles, S., Rousselet, G., … Von Grebmer Zu Wolfsthurn, S. (2020). Dissociable effects of prediction and integration during language comprehension: Evidence from a large-scale study using brain potentials. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1791), 20180522. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2018.0522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D., McQueen, J. M., & Cutler, A. (2000). Merging information in speech recognition: Feedback is never necessary. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(3), 299–325. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00003241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2016). The hub-and-spoke hypothesis of semantic memory. In Neurobiology of Language (pp. 765–775). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407794-2.00061-4
   Google Scholar
• Patterson, K., Nestor, P. J., & Rogers, T. T. (2007). Where do you know what you know? The representation of semantic knowledge in the human brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(12), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peirce, J., Gray, J. R., Simpson, S., MacAskill, M., Höchenberger, R., Sogo, H., Kastman, E., & Lindeløv, J. K. (2019). PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behavior Research Methods, 51(1), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-01193-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pexman, P. M., Hargreaves, I. S., Edwards, J. D., Henry, L. C., & Goodyear, B. G. (2007). Neural correlates of concreteness in semantic categorization. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(8), 1407–1419. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2007.19.8.1407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock, L. (2018). Statistical and methodological problems with concreteness and other semantic variables: A list memory experiment case study. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 1198–1216. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-0938-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahimi, S., Farahibozorg, S.-R., Jackson, R., & Hauk, O. (2022). Task modulation of spatiotemporal dynamics in semantic brain networks: An EEG/MEG study. NeuroImage, 246, 118768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ralph, M. A. L., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(1), 42–55. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn.2016.150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). The 35th Sir Frederick Bartlett Lecture: Eye movements and attention in Reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(8), 1457–1506. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Ashby, J., Pollatsek, A., & Reichle, E. D. (2004). The effects of frequency and predictability on Eye fixations in Reading: Implications for the E-Z reader model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(4), 720. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.4.720
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K., Warren, T., Juhasz, B. J., & Liversedge, S. P. (2004). The effect of plausibility on Eye movements in Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(6), 1290–1301. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.6.1290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Řehůřek, R., & Sojka, P. (2010). Software framework for topic modelling with large corpora. Proceedings of the LREC 2010 Workshop on New Challenges for NLP Frameworks, 45–50.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, L. G. (1976). Concreteness as a variable in word recognition. The American Journal of Psychology, 89(4), 707–718. https://doi.org/10.2307/1421468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., Harnishfeger, K. K., & Stowe, R. W. (1988). Context availability and lexical decisions for abstract and concrete words. Journal of Memory and Language, 27(5), 499–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential Context Effects in the Comprehension of Abstract and Concrete Verbal Materials. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/748013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheikh, N. A., & Titone, D. A. (2013). Sensorimotor and linguistic information attenuate emotional word processing benefits: An eye-movement study. Emotion, 13(6), 1107–1121. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032417
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2011). The effect of lexical predictability on distributions of eye fixation durations. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 18(2), 371–376. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-010-0046-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A. (2015). The effect of lexical predictability on Eye movements in Reading: Critical review and theoretical interpretation. Language and Linguistics Compass, 9(8), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staub, A., & Goddard, K. (2019). The role of preview validity in predictability and frequency effects on eye movements in Reading. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, W. L. (1953). “Cloze procedure”: A New tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 30(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769905303000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hell, J. G., & de Groot, A. (1998). Disentangling context availability and concreteness in lexical decision and word translation. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 51(1), 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755752
   Google Scholar
• van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A New and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(6), 1176–1190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2013.850521
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1990). Interactions between sentence context and word frequencyinevent-related brainpotentials. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 380–393. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197127
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Petten, C., & Kutas, M. (1991). Influences of semantic and syntactic context on open- and closed-class words. Memory & Cognition, 19(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, B., Dreyer, F., Fonteneau, E., van Casteren, M., & Hauk, O. (2021). Investigating brain mechanisms underlying natural reading by co-registering eye tracking with combined EEG and MEG [Preprint]. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.09.451139
   Google Scholar