From breaking bread to breaking hearts: embodied simulation and action language comprehension

References

• Allbritton, G., McKoon, G., & Gerrig, R. (1995). Metaphor-based schemas and text comprehension: Making connections through conceptual metaphors. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21(3), 612–625. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.612
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aziz-Zadeh, L., Wilson, S. M., Rizzolatti, G., & Iacoboni, M. (2006). Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions. Current Biology, 16(18), 1818–1823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.07.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(4), 577–660. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99002149
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergen, B. (2015). Embodiment, simulation and meaning. In N. Riemer (Ed.), The routledge handbook of semantics (pp. 142–157). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Blasko, D. G., & Connine, C. M. (1993). Effects of familiarity and aptness on metaphor processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19(2), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonini, L., Rotunno, C., Arcuri, E., & Gallese, V. (2022). Mirror neurons 30 years later: Implications and applications. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 26(9), 767–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2022.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: It's all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30(6), 1097–1112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Hauk, O., & Pulvermuller, F. (2009). Grasping ideas with the motor system: Semantic somatotopy in idiom comprehension. Cerebral Cortex, 19(8), 1905–1914. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhn217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boulenger, V., Roy, A. C., Paulignan, Y., Deprez, V., Jeannerod, M., & Nazir, T. A. (2006). Cross-talk between language processes and overt motor behavior in the first 200 msec of processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(10), 1607–1615. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2006.18.10.1607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowdle, B., & Gentner, D. (2005). The career of metaphor. Psychological Review, 112(1), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.193
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: a combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cacciari, C., Bolognini, N., Senna, I., Pellicciari, M. C., Miniussi, C., & Papagno, C. (2011). Literal, fictive and metaphorical motion sentences preserve the motion component of the verb: A TMS study. Brain and Language, 119(3), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2011.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacciari, C., & Pesciarelli, F. (2013). Motor activation in literal and non-literal sentences: does time matter? Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carapezza, M. (2019). The language game of lost meaning: Using literal meaning as a metalinguistic resource. Intercultural Pragmatics, 16(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2019-0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carapezza, M., & Cuccio, V. (2018) Abductive inferences in pragmatic processes. In A. Capone, M. Carapezza, & F. Lo Piparo (Eds.), Further advances in pragmatics and philosophy. Part 1: From theory to practice (pp. 221–242). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carapezza M., & Garello S. (in press). Literal or metaphorical? The role of literal meaning in metaphor comprehension. In A. Capone & P. Perconti (Eds.), Pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 1–18). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cardillo, E., Watson, C., Schmidt, G., Kranjec, A., & Chatterjee, A. (2012). From novel to familiar: Tuning the brain for metaphors. Neuroimage, 59(4), 3212–3221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.11.079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carston, R. (2018). Figurative language, mental imagery and pragmatics. Metaphor and Symbol, 33(3), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2018.1481257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, E., Widick, P., & Chatterjee, A. (2008). Functional-Anatomical organization of predicate metaphor processing. Brain and Language, 107(3), 194–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chersi, F., Thill, S., Ziemke, T., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). Sentence processing: Linking language to motor chains. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 4(4), 1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cuccio, V., Carapezza, M., & Gallese, V. (2013) Metafore che risuonano. Linguaggio e corpo tra filosofia e neuroscienze. E/C, 7(17), 75–80.
   Google Scholar
• Cuccio, V., & Caruana, F. (2019). Rethinking the abstract/concrete concepts dichotomy. Comment of “Words as social tools: language, sociality and inner grounding in abstract concepts” by A. Physics of Life Reviews, 29, 157–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plrev.2019.04.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccio, V., Ferri, F., Ambrosecchia, M., Carapezza, M., Lo Piparo, F., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2014). How the context matters. Literal and figurative meaning in the embodied language paradigm. PlosOne, 9(12), 1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuccio, V., & Gallese, V. (2018). A Peircean account of concepts: grounding abstraction in phylogeny through a comparative neuroscientific perspective. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752). https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desai, R., Binder, J., Conant, L., Mano, Q., & Seidenberg, M. (2011). The neural career of sensory-motor metaphors. Journal of Cognitive Science, 23(9), 2376–2386.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Desai, R., Conant, L., Binder, J., Park, H., & Seidenberg, M. (2013). A piece of the action: Modulation of sensory-motor regions by action idioms and metaphors. NeuroImage, 83, 862–869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ervas, F., Gola, E., & Rossi, M. G. (2017). How embodied cognition still matters to metaphor studies. In F. Ervas, E. Gola, & M. G. Rossi (Eds.), Metaphor in communication, science and education (pp. 1–25). De Gruyter Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, V. (2006). Lexical concepts, cognitive models and meaning-construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4), 491–534. https://doi.org/10.1515/COG.2006.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2003). The manifold nature of interpersonal relations: The quest for a common mechanism. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1234
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2005). Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z
   Google Scholar
• Gallese, V. (2008). Mirror neurons and the social nature of language: The neural exploitation hypothesis. Social Neuroscience, 3(3-4), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470910701563608
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Cuccio, V. (2018). The neural exploitation hypothesis and its implications for an embodied approach to language and cognition: Insights from the study of action verbs processing and motor disorders in Parkinson's disease. Cortex, 100, 215–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Lakoff, J. (2005). The brain’s concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3), 455–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallese, V., & Sinigaglia, C. (2011). What is so special about embodied simulation?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 512–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.09.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García, A. M., & Ibáñez, A. (2016). A touch with words: Dynamic synergies between manual actions and language. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 59–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.04.022
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. (1983). Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(3), 524–533. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.9.3.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (1994). The poetics of ming. Figurative thought, language and understanding. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W. (2006). Embodiment and cognitive science. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, R. W., & Colston, H. L. (1995). The cognitive psychological reality of image schemas and their transformations. Cognitive Linguistics, 6(4), 347–378. https://doi.org/10.1515/cogl.1995.6.4.347
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 558–565. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartung, F., Kenett, Y., Cardillo, E., Humphries, S., Klooster, N., & Chatterjee, A. (2020). Context matters: Novel metaphors in supportive and Non-supportive contexts. Neuroimage, 212, 116645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horvat, A. W., Bolognesi, M., Littlemore, J., & Barnden, J. (2022). Comprehension of different types of novel metaphors in monolinguals and multilinguals. Language and Cognition, 14(3), 1–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibáñez, A., Kühne, K., Miklashevsky, A., Monaco, E., Muraki, E., Ranzini, M., Speed, L. J., & Tuena, C. (2023). Ecological meanings: A consensus paper on individual differences and contextual influences in embodied language. Journal of Cognition, 6(1), 59, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.228
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Inhoff, A. W., Susan, D. L., & Carroll, P. J. (1984). Contextual effects on metaphor comprehension in Reading. Memory & Cognition, 12(6), 558–567. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamrozik, A., McQuire, M., Cardillo, E. R., & Chatterjee, A. (2016). Metaphor: Bridging embodiment to abstraction. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1080–1089. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0861-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6), 883–895. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210701623852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khatin-Zadeh, O. (2023). Embodied metaphor processing: A study of the priming impact of congruent and opposite gestural representations of metaphor schema on metaphor comprehension. Metaphor and Symbol, 38(1), 70–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926488.2022.2122830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mirabella, G., Iaconelli, S., Spadacenta, S., Federico, P., & Gallese, V. (2012). Processing of hand-related verbs specifically affects the planning and execution of arm reaching movements. PLoS One, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0035403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montalti, M., Calbi, M., Cuccio, V., Umiltà, M. A., & Gallese, V. (2023). Is motor inhibition involved in the processing of sentential negation? An assessment via the Stop-Signal Task. Psychological Research, 87(1), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01512-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morey, R. D., Kaschak, M. P., Díez-Álamo, A. M., Glenberg, A. M., Zwaan, R. A., Lakens, D., Ibáñez, A., García, A., Gianelli, C., Jones, J. L., Madden, J., Alifano, F., Bergen, B., Bloxsom, N. G., Bub, D. N., Cai, Z. G., Chartier, C. R., Chatterjee, Anjan, E., Conwell, … Ziv-Crispel, N. (2022). A pre-registered, multi-lab non-replication of the action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 29, 613–626.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortony, A., Schallert, D., Reynolds, R., & Antos, S. (1978). Interpreting metaphors and idioms: Some effects of context on comprehension. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17(4), 465–477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(78)90283-9
   Google Scholar
• Raposo, A., Moss, H., Stamatakis, E., & Tyler, L. (2009). Modulation of motor and premotor cortices by actions, action words and action sentences. Neuropsychologia, 47(2), 388–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reilly, M., Howerton, O., & Desai, R. H. (2019). Time-course of motor involvement in literal and metaphoric action sentence processing: a TMS study. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 371. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, G. (2004). Metaphors in conversational context: Toward a connectivity theory of metaphor interpretation. Metaphor and Symbol, 19(4), 265–287. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms1904_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero Lauro, L., Mattavelli, G., Papagno, C., & Tettamanti M. (2013). She runs, The road runs, My mind runs, Bad blood runs between US: Literal and figurative motion verbs: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 83, 361–371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.06.050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105(2), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saygin, A. P., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2480–2490. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steen, G. (2023). Thinking by metaphor, fast and slow: Deliberate metaphor theory offers a New model for metaphor and Its comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umiltà, M. A., Escola, L., Intskirveli, I., Grammont, F., Rochat, M., Caruana, F., Jezzini, A., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2008). When pliers become fingers in the monkey motor system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6), 2209–2213. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0705985105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallentin, M., Lund, T. E., Ostergaard, S., Ostergaard, L., & Roepstorf, A. (2005). Motion verb sentences activate left posterior middle temporal cortex despite static context. NeuroReport, 16(6), 649–652. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001756-200504250-00027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiland H., Bambini V., & Schumacher P. (2014). The role of literal meaning in figurative language comprehension: Evidence from masked priming ERP. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N., & Gibbs, R. (2007). Real and imagined body movement primes metaphor comprehension. Cognitive Science, 31(4), 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1080/15326900701399962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter, A., Dudschig, C., Miller, J., Ulrich, R., & Kaup, B. (2022). The action-sentence compatibility effect (ACE): meta-analysis of a benchmark finding for embodiment. Acta Psychologica, 230, 103712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103712
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar