The importance of sublexical structure in the orthographic representation of monosyllabic words

References

• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowey, J. A. (1990). Orthographic onsets and rimes as functional units of reading. Memory & Cognition, 18(4), 419–427. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108(1), 204–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J. (2010). The spatial coding model of visual word identification. Psychological Review, 117(3), 713–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019738
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2004). What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 923–941. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.923
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C.J., & Bowers, J.S. (2006). Contrasting five different theories of letter position coding: Evidence from orthographic similarity effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. J., & Bowers, J. S. (2017). A backwards glance at words: Using reversed-interior masked primes to test models of visual word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(3), 535–557. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.32.3.535
   Google Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A Windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 116–124. http://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195503
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forster, K. I., & Taft, M. (1994). Bodies, antibodies, and neighborhood-density effects in masked form priming.. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 844–863. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.844
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & van Heuven, W. J. B. (2003). Modeling letter position coding in printed word perception. In P. Bonin (Ed.), Mental lexicon: “Some words to talk about words” (pp. 1–23). Nova Science.
   Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Whitney, C. (2004). Does the huamn mnid raed wrods as a wlohe? Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 8(2), 58–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2003.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grainger, J., & Ziegler, J. C. (2011). A dual-route approach to orthographic processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 54. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P., & Christensen, R. (2014). LmerTest: Tests for random and fixed effects for linear mixed effect models. R package, version 2.0-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, C. H., & Taft, M. (2009). Are onsets and codas important in processing letter position? A comparison of TL effects in English and Korean. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 530–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouki, Y., & Grainger, J. (2014). Effects of stimulus duration and inter-letter spacing on letter-in-string identification. Acta Psychologica, 148, 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.12.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, K. E., & Morton, J. (1985). From orthography to phonology: An attempt at an old interpretation. In K. E. Patterson, J. C. Marshall, & M. Coltheart (Eds.), Surface Dyslexia (pp. 335–359). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Scaltritti, M., & Balota, D. A. (2013). Are all letters really processed equally and in parallel? Further evidence of a robust first letter advantage. Acta Psychologica, 144(2), 397–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.07.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoonbaert, S., & Grainger, J. (2004). Letter position coding in printed word perception: Effects of repeated and transposed letters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 19(3), 333–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960344000198
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & Krebs-Lazendic, L. (2013). The role of orthographic syllable structure in assigning letters to their position in visual word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 68(2), 85–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., & van Graan, F. (1998). Lack of phonological mediation in a semantic categorization task. Journal of Memory and Language, 38(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taft, M., Xu, J., & Li, S. (2017). Letter coding in visual word recognition: The impact of embedded words. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 14–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2016.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taraban, R., & McClelland, J. L. (1987). Conspiracy effects in word pronunciation. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(6), 608–631. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(87)90105-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., & Chafetz, J. (1987). Are there onset- and rime-like units in printed words. In M. Coltheart (Ed.), Attention and performance, XII (pp. 281-298). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Treiman, R., Mullennix, J., Bijeljac-Babic, R., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). The special role of rimes in the description, use, and acquisition of English orthography. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124(2), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.124.2.107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2001). How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8(2), 221–243. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C. (2008). Comparison of the SERIOL and SOLAR theories of letter-position encoding. Brain and Language, 107(2), 170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitney, C., & Cornelissen, P. (2008). SERIOL reading. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(1), 143–164. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701579771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar