Public administration and the rule of law in Asia: breadth without depth?

References

• Adsera, A., Boix, C., & Payne, M. (2003). Are you being served? Political accountabilty and quality of government. The Journal of Law, Economics and Organizations, 19, 445–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts, S. (2009). How constitutions constraint. Comparative Politics, 41, 127–143.
   Google Scholar
• Armytage, L. (2012). Reforming justice. A journey to fairness in Asia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergling, P., Wennerstroem, E. O., & Sannerholm, R. Z. (2010). Rule of law in public administration: Problems and ways ahead in post-conflict peace-building. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 2, 171–202.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E. (Ed.). (2011). Public administration in Southeast Asia: Thailand, Philippines, Malaysia, Hong Kong and Macao, London & New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berman, E., Moon, J., Choi, H. (Eds.) (2010). Public Administration in East Asia: Mainland China, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan, London & New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bertelli, A. M. (2005). Law and public administration. In E. Ferllie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 133–155). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M. (2005). Public accountability. In E. Ferllie, L. E. Lynn, & C. Pollitt (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of public management (pp. 182–209). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., Schillemans, T., & ’T Hart, P. (2008). Does public accountability work? An assessment tool. Public Administration, 86, 225–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butt, S., & Lindsey, T. (2012). The constitution of Indonesia. A contextual analysis. Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, A. H. Y. (2009). Conclusion: Reflections on administrative law and judicialized governance in East and Southeast Asia. In T. Ginsburg & A. H. Y. Chen (Ed.), Administrative law and governance in Asia: Comparative perspectives (pp. 359–380). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cheung, A. B. (2005). The politics of administrative reforms in Asia: Paradigms and legacies, paths and diversities. Governance, 18, 257–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demmke, C., & Moilanen, T. (2010). Civil services in the EU of 27: Reform outcomes and the future of the civil service. Bern: Peter Lang. Europäischer Verlag der Wissenschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Dressel, B. (Ed.) (2012). The judicialization of politics in Asia. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ferejohn, J. (2006). Self-enforcing democracy. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Gillespie, J. (2009). The juridification of administrative complaints and review in Vietnam. In T. Ginsburg & A. H. Y. Chen (Eds.), Administrative law and governance in Asia: Comparative perspectives (pp. 205–229). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T. (2009). The judicialization of adminsitrative governance. Causes, consequences and limits. In T. Ginsburg & A. H. Y. Chen (Eds.), Administrative law and governance in Asia: Comparative perspectives (pp. 1–19). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., & Chen, A. H. Y. (Eds.) (2009). Administrative law and governance in Asia. Comparative perspectives. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, T., & Moustafa, T. (2008). Rule by law: The politics of courts in authoritarian regimes. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haque, S. (2004). Reforming public administration in Southeast Asia: Trends and impacts. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 4, 361–371.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, A., & Nicholson, P. (2010). New courts in Asia. Oxon and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Lodge, M. (2006). The politics of public service bargains. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (1999a). Introduction: A framework for the analysis of legal institutions in East Asia. In K. Jayasuriya (Ed.), Law, capitalism, and power in Asia (pp. 1–27). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (1999b). Law, capitalism and power in Asia: The rule of law and legal institutions. Law, capitalism and power in Asia. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jayasuriya, K. (2001). The exception becomes the norm: Law and regimes of exception in East Asia. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 2, 108–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lev, D. S. (2007). State and law reform in Indonesia. In T. Lindsey (Ed.), Law reform in developing and transitional states (pp. 236–267). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, J. (2009). The judicialization of governance: The case of Singapore. In T. Ginsburg & A. H. Y. Chen (Eds.), Administrative law and governance in Asia: Comparative perspectives (pp. 287–312). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Painter, M., & Peters, B. G. (2010). Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 19–30). London and New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Peerenboom, R. (2004). Varieties of rule of law: An introduction and provisional conclusion. In R. Peerenboom (Ed.), Asian discourses of rule of law (pp. 1–56). London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform. A comparative analysis – new public management, governance, and the neo-weberian state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, A. (2006). Self-enforcing democracy. In B. Weingast & D. Wittman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political economy (pp. 312–328). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodan, G., & Jayasuriya, K. (2009). Capitalist development, regime transitions and new forms of authoritarianism in Asia. The Pacific Review, 22, 23–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (1983). Public administrative theory and the separations of power. Public Administration Review, 43, 219–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (1987). Public administrators and the judiciary: The ‘new partnership’. Public Administration Review, 47, 75–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H. (2013). Reflections on ‘public administrative theory and the separations of power. The American Review of Public Administration, 43, 381–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., Kravchuck, R., & Clerkin, R. M. (2009). Public administration: Understanding management, politics, and law in the public sector (7th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbloom, D. H., O’Leary, R., & Chanin, J. M. (2010). Public administration and law (3rd ed.). New York: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, H. (2000). Democratisation or oligarchic restructuring? The politics of reform in Malaysia. Government & Opposition, 35, 520–546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. (2005). The self-enforcing constitution: With an application to uncertain democracy in America’s first century [Working paper]. Palo Alto, CA: Hoover Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Weingast, B. R. (1997). The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. American Political Science Review, 91, 245–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar