References
- Anscomb, S., & Wallis, J. (2015). Assessing the civil service: How good is the UK? Accessible at: http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/civil-service-how-good-are-we/.
- Bogdanor, V. (2001). Civil service reform: A critique. The Political Quarterly, 72, 291–299.
- Brown, K. (2004). HRM in the public sector. Public Management Review, 6, 303–309.
- Burke, R. J., Allisey, A. F., & Noblet, A. J. (2013). The importance of HRM in the public sector, future challenges and the relevance of the current collection. In R. J. Burke, A. J. Noblet, & C. L. Cooper, (Eds.), HRM in the public sector (pp. 1–15). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
- Cabinet Office of the UK. (2014). Policy paper: Civil service reform – Progress report. Accessible at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/civil-service-reform-plan-progress-report/civil-service-reform-progress-report.
- Chapman, R. A. (2004). Civil service commission 1855–1991: A bureau biography. London: Routledge.
- Cheung, A. B. L. (2003). Public service reform in Singapore: Reinventing government in a global age. In A. B. L. Cheung & I. Scott (Eds.), Governance and public sector reform in Asia: Paradigm shifts or business as usual? (pp. 138–162). London & New York: Routledge Curzon.
- Cheung, A. B. L. (2009). Governance in Hong Kong: In search of identity, legitimacy and trust. Accessible at: http://libdr1.ied.edu.hk/pubdata/img00/arch00/link/archive/1/instarh/3104_image.pdf.
- Cheung, A. B. L. (2012). One country, two experiences: Administrative reforms in China and Hong Kong. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78, 261–283.
- Chinn, D., Dimson, J., Goodman, A., & Gleeson, I. (2015). World-class government: Transforming the UK public sector in an era of austerity – Five lessons from around the world. Discussion Paper for the GovernUp Conference in February 2015. Accessible at: http://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey%20offices/united%20kingdom/pdfs/world-class_government_transforming_the_uk_public_sector.ashx.
- Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and changing public governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1, 1–11.
- Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P. (2007a). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67, 1059–1066.
- Christensen, T. & Lægreid, P., (Eds.). (2007b). Transcending new public management. Aldershot: Ashgate.
- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2010). Increased complexity in public sector organizations: The challenge of combining NPM and post-NPM. In P. Lægreid & K. Verhoest, (Eds.), Governance of public sector organizations. Proliferation, autonomy and performance (pp. 255–275), London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Civil Service Bureau. (2013). Legislative council panel on public service: An overview of training and development for civil servants. Accessible at: http://www.csb.gov.hk/english/admin/training/files/TD_paper_18.2.2013.pdf.
- Civil Service Bureau. (2015). Hong Kong: The facts − Civil service. Accessible at: http://www.gov.hk/en/about/abouthk/factsheets/docs/civil_service.pdf.
- Cohen, N. (2016). Forgoing new public management and adopting post-new public management principles: The on-going civil service reform in Israel. Public Administration and Development, 36, 20–34.
- Corporate Watch. (2014). Capita: New ‘opportunities’. Accessible at: https://corporatewatch.org/company-profiles/capita-new-opportunities.
- CSC (Civil Service College of Singapore). (2009). Annual report 2008-2009. Accessible at: https://www.cscollege.gov.sg/About%20Us/Annual%20Report/AR_2008-2009.pdf.
- Eakin, H., Eriksen, S., Eikeland, P. O., & Øyen, C. (2011). Public sector reform and governance for adaptation: Implications of new public management for adaptive capacity in Mexico and Norway. Environmental Management, 47, 338–351.
- Efficiency Unit. (2007). Serving the community by using the private sector: A user guide to contract management. Accessible at: http://www.eu.gov.hk/en/reference/publications/cm2007.pdf.
- Efficiency Unit. (2008). Serving the community by using the private sector: A general guide to outsourcing. Accessible at: http://www.eu.gov.hk/en/reference/publications/guide_to_outsourcing_200803.pdf.
- Emam, D. A. (2014). Singapore shares experience in public sector reform. The Jordan Times. Accessible at: http://www.jordantimes.com/news/local/singapore-shares-experience-public-sector-reform
- Flynn, N. (2000). Managerialism and public services: Some international trends. In J. Clarke, S. Getwirtz, & E. McLaughlin, (Eds.), New managerialism, new welfare? (pp. 27–44). London, UK: Sage/Open University.
- Fukuyama, F. (1992). Asia’s soft authoritarian alternative. New perspectives quarterly, 9, 60–61.
- Galanaki, E., Bourantas, D., & Papalexandris, N. (2008). A decision model for outsourcing training functions: Distinguishing between generic and firm-job-specific training content. The International Journal of HRM, 19, 2332–2351.
- GCPSE (UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence). (2015). From old public administration to the new public service: Implications for public sector reform in developing countries. Accessible at: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/capacity-development/English/Singapore%20Centre/PS-Reform_Paper.pdf?download.
- Green, A. (2005). Managing human resources in a decentralized context. In World Bank (Ed.), East Asia decentralizes: Making local government work (pp. 129–154). Washington DC: World Bank.
- Gruening, G. (2001). Origin and theoretical basis of new public management. International Public Management Journal, 4, 1–25.
- Halligan, J. (2010). Post NPM responses to disaggregation through coordinating horizontally and integrating governance. In P. Lægreid & K. Verhoest, (Eds.), Governance of public sector organizations: Proliferation, autonomy and performance (pp. 235–254). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Haque, M. S. (1999). The changing nature of administrative reform: Cases in Malaysia and Singapore. In H. K. Wong & H. S. Chan, (Eds.), Handbook of comparative public administration in the Asia-pacific basin (pp. 47–68). New York: Marcel Dekker.
- Haque, M. S. (2004). New public management: Origins, dimensions, and critical implications. In K. K. Tummala, (Ed.), Public administration and public policy (pp. 209–228). Oxford: Eolss Publishers.
- HM Government. (2012). The Civil Service reform plan. Accessible at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/305148/Civil-Service-Reform-Plan-final.pdf.
- Hong Kong Correctional Services. (2013). Hong Kong correctional services annual review 2013: Human resources management. Accessible at: http://www.csd.gov.hk/annualreview/2013/text/htm_en/04_human.html.
- Hood, C. (1990). Beyond the public bureaucracy state? Public administration in the 1990s. Inaugural Lecture, London School of Economics, 16 January.
- Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons? Public Administration, 69, 3–19.
- Hope, K. R. (2001). The new public management: Context and practice in Africa. International Public Management Journal, 4, 119–134.
- Horton, S. & Van Wart, M. (2014). The United Kingdom. In M. Van Wart, A. Hondeghem, & E. Schwella, (Eds.), Leadership and culture: Comparative models of top civil servant training (pp. 41–55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Huque, A. S. & Vyas, L. (2008). Expectations and performance: Assessment of public service training in Hong Kong. The International Journal of HRM, 19, 188–204.
- Kingdom, J. (2003). Government and politics in Britain: An introduction. Oxford: Polity Press.
- Larbi, G. A. (2006). New public management as a template for reforms in low-income countries: Issues and lessons from Ghana. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behaviors, 9, 378–407.
- Lee, E. W. Y. & Haque, M. S. (2006). The new public management reform and governance in Asian NICs: A comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Governance, 19, 605–626.
- Lee, M. & Stead, V. (1998). Human resource development in the United Kingdom. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 9, 297–308.
- Legislative Council Panel on Public Service. (2015). An overview of training and development for civil servants. Accessible at: http://www.csb.gov.hk/english/admin/training/files/TDpaperA_16022015_e.pdf.
- Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A. (1999). The human resource architecture: Toward a theory of human capital allocation and development. Academy of Management Review, 24, 31–48.
- Lepak, D. P. & Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the human resource architecture: The relationships among human capital, employment, and human configurations. Journal of Management, 28, 517–533.
- Lucking, R. (2003). Lessons on best practice in the approach to effective civil service training: A comparative study of selected countries from Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union 1989 to 2003. New York: UNDP. Accessible at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNTC/UNPAN012894.pdf.
- McLeod, A. & Kurian, P. A. (2004). Contracting out local government service: A comparative study of two New Zealand regional councils. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 26, 115–133.
- National School of Government. (2011). National school of government annual report and resource accounts 2010 to 2011. Accessible at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/247452/0977.pdf.
- NLBS (National Library Board Singapore). (2015). Staff training institute (civil service college). Accessible at: http://eresources.nlb.gov.sg/infopedia/articles/SIP_2015-07-27_152543.html.
- Ong, G. (2014). Working paper (think piece): Strategic considerations for outsourcing service delivery in the public sector. Singapore: Civil Service College.
- Petticrew, M., & Roberts, H. (2006). Systematic reviews in the social sciences: A practical guide. Malden, MA; Oxford: Blackwell.
- Pilkington, C. (1999). The civil service in Britain today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
- Pollitt, C. (2003). Joined-up government: A survey. Political Studies Review, 1, 34–49.
- Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2000). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public management reform: A comparative analysis – New public management, governance, and the neo-Weberian state (3rd. ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Prachett, L. & Wingfield, M. (1996). Petty bureaucracy and wooly-minded liberalism? The changing ethos of local government officials. Public Administration, 74, 639–656.
- Priyantha, I. R. (2007). New public personnel management reforms at work in Sri Lanka: A waddling effort of transforming civil service? Paper presented at the NFU Conference on “Making Institutions Work for the Poor” Chr. Michelsen Institute, Bergen, Norway. Accessible at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/apcity/unpan039211.pdf.
- Randma-Liiv, T., Metsma, M., & Sarapuu, K. (2013). Between continuity and change: The analysis of the Estonian civil service training system. In M. Vintar, A. Rosenbaum, G. Jenei, & W. Drechsler, (Eds.), The past, present and the future of public administration in Central and Eastern Europe (pp. 195–218). Bratislava: NISPAcee Press.
- Rating and Valuation Department. (2010). Annual summary 2009–2010. Accessible at: http://www.rvd.gov.hk/doc/tc/AS_fullbook/AS_2009-10_fullbook.pdf.
- Reichard, C. (1998). Education and training for new public management. International Public Management Journal, 1, 177–194.
- Riccucci, N. M., & Naff, K. C. (2008). Personnel management in government: Politics and process (6th. ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Roy, D. (1994). Singapore, China, and the “soft authoritarian” challenge. Asian Survey, 34, 231–242.
- Sanchez, E. V. (2003). Training senior civil servants: Lessons from Poland and the UK ( Unpublished master’s thesis). Birmingham University, Birmingham, the United Kingdom.
- Saxena, N. C. (2011). Virtuous cycles: The Singapore public service and national development. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
- Singapore Cooperation Programme. (2016). Singapore cooperation programme training award/small island developing states technical cooperation programme. Accessible at: http://www.mvp.gov.ba/medjunarodna_saradnja/stipendije_i_studijski_boravci/doc/GIB%20(Leading%20and%20Managing%20Change%20in%20the%20Public%20Sector).pdf.
- Talbot, C. (1997). Paradoxes of management development: Trends and tensions. Career Development International, 2, 119–146.
- Taylor, J. A. (1992). Information networking in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 58, 375–389.
- Tessema, M. T., Soeters, J. L., & Ngoma, A. (2009). Decentralization of HR functions: Lessons from the Singapore civil service. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 29, 168–188.
- Thomson, S. B., Sharma, D., & Kong, E. (2014). Hybrid governance in India: A research review and agenda. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 36, 313–321.
- UK Government. (2014). Civil service: Training and development. Accessible at: https://www.gov.uk/guidance/training-and-development-opportunities-in-the-the-civil-service.
- World Bank. (1996). From plan to market: World development report 1996. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- World Bank. (1997). The state in a changing world: World development report 1997. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Vyas, L., & Luk, S. (2010). Decentralization and “consumerization” of the training function: The “reinvention” of the central training institute of Hong Kong. International Journal of Public Administration, 33, 710–727.