Fiscal decentralisation and good governance: convergence or divergence? The experience of commune councils in Cambodia

References

• Allen, T., & Flynn, N. (2006). Decentralisation of government finances and public-private partnerships. London: University of London, Centre for Financial and Management Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, R. (1999). Implementation rules for fiscal decentralization. Athens: Georgia State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, R. (2000). Intergovernmental transfers in developing and transition countries: Principles and practice. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, R. (2010). Conditional vs. unconditional grants: The case of developing countries. In J. Kim, J. Lotz, & N. J. Mau, (Eds.), General grants versus earmarked grants: Theory and practice – The Copenhagen workshop 2009 (pp. 126–148). Seoul & Copenhagen: The Korea Institute of Public Finance and the Danish Ministry of Interior and Health.
   Google Scholar
• Bahl, R. W., & Linn, J. (1992). Urban public finance in developing countries. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, R., & Smart, M. (2002). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers: International lessons for developing countries. World Development, 30(6), 899–912.10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00016-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, P., & Turner, M. (2005). Decentralisation, democracy and development in a post-conflict society: Commune councils in Cambodia. Public Administration and Development, 25(1), 75–87.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blunt, P., & Turner, M. (2007). Decentralization, deconcentration, and poverty reduction in the Asia Pacific. In D. G. Shabbir (Ed.), Decentralizing governance: Concepts and practices (pp. 115–128). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, J., & Grote, U. (2000). Does decentralisation serve the poor? Centre for Development Research. Bonn: University of Bonn.
   Google Scholar
• CIDS (Cambodia Institute of Development Study). (2011). Multi-level citizen & councilor survey: An index to measure sub-national democratic accountability in Cambodia ( Technical report). Phnom Penh: EU SPACE.
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (2008). A history of Cambodia (4th ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheema, S., & Rondinelli, D. (2007). From government decentralization to decentralized governance. In D. G. Shabbir (Ed.), Decentralizing governance: Concepts and practices (pp. 1–19). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chhorng, R. (2016). Decentralization at commune/sangkat level in Cambodia. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
   Google Scholar
• COMFREL (Committee for Free and Fair Elections in Cambodia). (2011). Survey on local participation and democratic governance. Phnom Penh: COMFREL.
   Google Scholar
• COMFREL. (2013). Assessment of the second term of decentralization in Cambodia: Commune council performance and citizens’ participation, 2007–2012. Phnom Penh: COMFREL.
   Google Scholar
• Conyers, D. (1986). Decentralization and development: A framework for analysis. Community Development Journal, 21, 88–100.10.1093/cdj/21.2.88
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mello, L. (2011). Does fiscal decentralization strengthen social capital? Cross-country evidence and the experience of Brazil and Indonesia. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 29(2), 281–296.10.1068/c10102r
   Google Scholar
• De Mello, L., & Barenstein, M. (2001). Fiscal decentralization and governance: A cross-country analysis ( IMF Working Paper 01/71). New York: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton, K., Kaiser, K., & Smoke, P. (2010). The political economy of decentralization reforms. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• EIC (Economic Institute of Cambodia). (2010). Report of the second citizen satisfaction survey in target communes of the LAAR project. Phnom Penh: USAID.
   Google Scholar
• Eng, N. (2014). The politics of decentralisation in Cambodia: The district level ( PhD Thesis). Melbourne: Monash University.
   Google Scholar
• Eng, N. (2016). Decentralization in Cambodia: New wine in old bottles. Public Administration and Development, 36(4), 250–262.10.1002/pad.v36.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan, C. S., Lin, C., & Treisman, D. (2009). Political decentralization and corruption: Evidence from around the world. Journal of Public Economics, 93(1-2), 14–34.10.1016/j.jpubeco.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrazzi, G., & Rohdewohld, R. (2017). Emerging practices in intergovernmental functional assignment. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, R., & Gatti, R. (2002). Decentralization and corruption: Evidence from U.S. federal transfer programs. Public Choice, 113(1), 25–35.10.1023/A:1020311511787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grindle, M. S. (2007). Local governments that perform well: Four explanations. In D. G. Shabbir (Ed.), Decentralizing governance: Concepts and practices (pp. 56–74), Washington, DC. Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• GTZ (German Technical Cooperation Agency). (2009). Functional assignment in multi-level government: A technical paper – Conceptual foundation of functional assignment (Vol. 1). Phnom Penh: GTZ.
   Google Scholar
• Gurgur, T., & Shah, A. (2005). Localization and corruption: Panacea or pandora’s box? ( Policy Research Working Paper Series 3486). Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/prwp
   Google Scholar
• Heng, S., & Kim, S. (2011). Decentralised governance in a hybrid polity: Localisation of decentralization reform in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: CDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Huther, J., & Shah, A. (1998). Applying a simple measure of good governance to the debate of fiscal decentralization ( Policy Research Working Paper Series, No. 1894). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• IMF (International Monetary Fund). (2004). Rebuilding fiscal institutions in post-conflict countries. Washington, DC: IMF.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, H. (2002). Optimal degrees of transparency in monetary policymaking. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(3), 399–422.10.1111/sjoe.2002.104.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. (1990). Multilateralism: An agenda for research. International Journal: Canada's Journal of Global Policy Analysis, 45(4), 731–764.10.1177/002070209004500401
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S. (2012). Democracy in action: Decentralisation in post-conflict Cambodia ( PhD Dissertation). Gothenburg: Gothenburg University.
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J. (1999). The political economy of democratic decentralization. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/0-8213-4470-6
   Google Scholar
• Manor, J., & Crook, R. C. (1998). Democracy and decentralization in South Asia and West Africa: Participation, accountability and performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Vazquez, J. (2011). The Impact of fiscal decentralization issues in theory and challenges in practice. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• MOI (Ministry of Interior). (2016). General Department of Administration. Phnon Penh: Ministry of Interior.
   Google Scholar
• Mountfield, E., & Wong, C. (2005). Public expenditure on the frontline: Toward effective management by subnational government. In World Bank (Ed.), East Asia decentralises: Making local government works (pp. 85–105). Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Niazi, T. H. (2011). Deconcentration and decentralization reforms in Cambodia: Recommendations for an institutional framework. Manila: Asian Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• NCDD (National Committee for Sub-National Democratic Development). (2008). Prakas no. 68 on the new structure of the PRDC/ExCom. Phnom Penh: NCDD.
   Google Scholar
• NCDD. (2010). Outline of the first 3 years (2011–2013) implementation plan of NP-SNDD. Phnom Penh: NCDD.
   Google Scholar
• NCDD. (2012). Results of IP3 2011 local governance survey. Phnom Penh: NCDD.
   Google Scholar
• Ojendal, J., & Kim, S. (2013). Reconciliation in Cambodia? Decentralization as a post-conflict strategy. In J. Ojendal & A. Dellnas (Eds.), The imperative of good local governance: Challenges for the next decade of decentralisation (pp. 305–330). Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, K. (2011a). Fiscal decentralisation in Cambodia: A review of progress and challenges ( CDRI Working Paper Series 50). Phnom Penh: CDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Pak, K. (2011b). A dominant party in a weak state: How the ruling party in Cambodia has managed to stay dominant ( PhD dissertation). Canberra: Australia National University.
   Google Scholar
• RGC (Royal Government of Cambodia). (1998). Royal decree on provincial/municipal budget and durable assets regime. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (1999). Cambodia’s constitution (amended). Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2000). Law on auditing. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2001a). Law on management and administration of communes/sangkats. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2001b). Law on commune/sangkat elections. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2002). Budget law for 2002. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2005). Strategic framework for decentralisation and deconcentration reforms. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2008a). Law on administrative management of the capital of provinces, municipalities, districts and communes. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2008b). Law on public financial system. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2008c). Rectangular strategy for growth, employment, equity and efficiency. Phase II. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2009). Public investment programme: 3 year rolling 2010–2012. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2010a). Sub-decree on allowance for commune councillors and village chiefs. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2010b). Ten-year national programme for decentralisation and deconcentration reforms. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2010c). National programme for sub-national democratic development (NP-SNDD) 2010–2019. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2013). Rectangular strategy for growth, employment, equity and efficiency. Phase III. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2014). Budget law for 2014. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2015). Budget law for 2015. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2016). Budget law for 2016. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• RGC. (2017). Budget law for 2017. Phnom Penh: RGC.
   Google Scholar
• Rondinelli, D. (1981). Government decentralization in comparative perspective: Theory and practice in developing countries. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 47(2), 136–145.
   Google Scholar
• Rusten, C., Kim, S., Eng, N., & Pak, K. (2004). The challenges of decentralization design in Cambodia. Phnom Penh: CDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Seabright, P. (1996). Accountability and decentralization in government: An incomplete contracts model. European Economic Review, 40(1), 61–89.10.1016/0014-2921(95)00055-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2005). Fiscal decentralisation and performance ( World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3786). Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/prwp
   Google Scholar
• Shah, A. (2007). Local public financial management. Washington, DC: World Bank.10.1596/978-0-8213-6937-1
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. C. (1985). Decentralization: The territorial dimension of the state. London: George Allen and Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P. (2000). Fiscal decentralisation in East and Southern Africa: A selective review of experience and thoughts on moving forward. Washington, DC: International Monetart Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P. (2001). Fiscal decentralization in developing countries: A review of current concepts and practice. New York: United Nations Research Institute for Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P. (2005). Fiscal decentralization for good governance and effective service delivery: What do we know? In G. Bertucci & J. Balogun (Eds.), Decentralized governance for democracy and development (pp. 37–56). New York: United Nations Department for Economic and Social Development.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P. (2015). Quality support facilities in the field of decentralization, local governance and local development: Decentralisation in Cambodia. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Smoke, P., & Morrison, J. (2008). Decentralisation in Cambodia: Consolidating central power or building accountability from below? Georgia: Andrew Young School of Policy Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Spina, N. (2014). Decentralisation and political participation: An empirical analysis in Western and Eastern Europe. International Political Science Review, 35(4), 448–462.10.1177/0192512113496681
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• STF (Seila Task Force). (2008). Seila programme: Design, implementation and management (Vol. 1). Phnom Penh: STF.
   Google Scholar
• Sudhipongpracha, T., & Wongpredee, A. (2016). Fiscal decentralization in comparative perspective: Analysis of the intergovernmental grant systems in Indonesia and Thailand. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(3), 245–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanzi, V. (1995). Taxation in an integrating world. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanzi, V. (2001). Pitfalls on the road to fiscal decentralisation. Washington, DC: International Monetary Fund.
   Google Scholar
• Thon, V., Ou, S., Eng, N., & Ly, T. (2009). Leadership in three Cambodian communes. Phnom Penh: CDRI.
   Google Scholar
• Timofeev, A. (2002). Fiscal decentralisation and soft budget constraints ( Working paper series, no. 01/02). Prague: Economics Education and Research Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (2013). Why is it so difficult to reform some Asian bureaucracies? Building theory from Cambodian evidence. Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 275–285.10.1002/pad.v33.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2007). Fiscal decentralisation: An overview. Bratislava: UNDP Bratislava Regional Centre.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCAP (United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia Pacific). (2009). What is good governance? New York, NY: UNESCAP.
   Google Scholar
• Virak, M., & Xiaolin, X. (2016). Commune/sangkat fund and local development: The case of Cambodia. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 7(22), 141–147.
   Google Scholar
• White, A. (2006). Decentralization, governance and capacity building in Cambodia. Local Economy, 21(4), 423–428.10.1080/02690940601002833
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2001). Intergovernmental fiscal transfers. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2011). Voice, choice and decision: A study of local governance processes in Cambodia. Cambodia: Governance partnership facility – The commune series. Phnom Penh: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2017). World development report 2017: Governance and the law. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar