Public administration in authoritarian regimes: propositions for comparative research

References

• Agranoff, R. (2006). Inside collaborative networks: Ten lessons for public managers. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00666.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allison, G. T., & Halperin, M. H. (1972). Bureaucratic politics: A paradigm and some policy implications. World Politics, 24(S1), 40–79. https://doi.org/10.2307/2010559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anselmi, M. (2017). Post-populism in Latin America: On Venezuela after Chávez. Chinese Political Science Review, 2(3), 410–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41111-017-0066-y
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Art, D. (2012). What do we know about authoritarianism after ten years? Comparative Politics, 44(3), 351–373. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041512800078977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athey, S. (2017). Beyond prediction: Using big data for policy problems. Science, 355(6324), 483–485. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal4321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baiocchi, G. (2005). Militants and citizens: The politics of participatory democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balla, S. J. (2014). Health system reform and political participation on the Chinese internet. China Information, 28(2), 214–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X14525915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Breunig, C., Green‐Pedersen, C., Jones, B. D., Mortensen, P. B., Nuytemans, M., & Walgrave, S. (2009). Punctuated equilibrium in comparative perspective.American Journal of Political Science, 53(3), 603–620.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., & Jones, B. D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American Politics. Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, F. R., Jones, B. D., & Mortensen, P. B. (2018). Punctuated equilibrium theory: Explaining stability and change in public policymaking. Theories of the. 55–101.
   Google Scholar
• Bingham, L. B., Nabatchi, T., & O’Leary, R. (2005). The new governance: Practices and processes for stakeholder and citizen participation in the work of government. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 547–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00482.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (1997). After disaster: Agenda setting, public policy, and focusing events. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (1998). Focusing events, mobilization, and agenda setting. Journal of Public Policy, 18(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X98000038
   Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., Escribà-Folch, A., & Pilster, U. (2019). Pitfalls of professionalism? Military academies and coup risk. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 63(5), 1111–1139. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002718789744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchell, J. (2002). The evolution of green politics: Development and change within European green parties. Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Burns, J. P., Wei, L., & Peters, B. G. (2013). Changing governance structures and the evolution of public service bargains in Hong Kong. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 79(1), 131–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. (2001). The forging of bureaucratic autonomy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D. P., & Krause, G. A. (2012). Reputation and public administration. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 26–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. N., Lam, W. F., & Chen, S. (2021). Elite bargains and policy priorities in authoritarian regimes: Agenda setting in China under Xi Jinping and Hu Jintao. Governance, 34(3), 837–854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. N., & Zhao, S. (2016). Punctuated equilibrium and the information disadvantage of authoritarianism: Evidence from the People’s Republic of China. Policy Studies Journal, 44(2), 134–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, T., & Hong, J. Y. (2021). Rivals within: Political factions, loyalty, and elite competition under authoritarianism. Political Science Research and Methods, 9(3), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2019.61
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Jia, K. (2023). How local governments prioritize multiple conflicting goals: Beyond the sole‐goal perspective. Public Administration, 101(2), 522–538. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12807
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Jia, K. (2023). How local governments prioritize multiple conflicting goals: Beyond the sole‐goal perspective. Public administration, 101(2), 522–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, J., Pan, J., & Yiqing, X. (2016). Sources of authoritarian responsiveness: A field experiment in China. American Journal of Political Science, 60(2), 383–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, J. I. M., & Schuitema, G. (2012). How to make the unpopular popular? Policy characteristics, social norms and the acceptability of environmental policies. Environmental Science & Policy, 19, 100–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2012.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Mesquita, B. B., Smith, A., Siverson, R. M., & Morrow, J. D. (2005). The logic of political survival. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ding, C., & Lin, F. (2021). Information authoritarianism vs. information anarchy. China Review, 21(1), 91–106.
   Google Scholar
• Duong, H. (2023). Political parties and policy transfer in authoritarianism. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 37–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2045206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egorov, G., & Sonin, K. (2011). Dictators and their viziers: Endogenizing the loyalty–competence trade-off. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 903–930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eiró, F., & Lotta, G. (2023). On the frontline of global inequalities: A decolonial approach to the study of street-level bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(1), 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, D., & O’Halloran, S. (1995). A theory of strategic oversight: Congress, lobbyists, and the bureaucracy. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 11(2), 227–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, H., Li, M., & Wu, Z. (2022). Tournament-style political competition and local protectionism: Theory and evidence from China (NBER working paper No. 30780). National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, D. (2017). Disguised collective action in China. Comparative Political Studies, 50(4), 499–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414015626437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2009). Empowered participation. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Olin Wright, E. (2001). Deepening democracy: Innovations in empowered participatory governance. Politics & Society, 29(1), 5–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gailmard, S. (2009). Multiple principals and oversight of bureaucratic policy-making. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 21(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951629808100762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grömping, M., & Teets, J. C. (2023). Lobbying the autocrat: The Dynamics of Policy Advocacy in Nondemocracies (pp. 368). University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gruin, J. (2019). Financializing authoritarian capitalism: Chinese fintech and the institutional foundations of algorithmic governance. Finance and Society, 5(2), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.2218/finsoc.v5i2.4135
   Google Scholar
• Guliyev, F. (2011). Personal rule, neopatrimonialism, and regime typologies: Integrating Dahlian and Weberian approaches to regime studies. Democratization, 18(3), 575–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunitsky, S. (2015). Corrupting the cyber-commons: Social media as a tool of autocratic stability.Perspectives on Politics, 13(1), 42–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, T. H., & Knott, J. H. (1996). Who controls the bureaucracy?: Presidential power, congressional dominance, legal constraints, and bureaucratic autonomy in a model of multi-institutional policy-making. The Journal of Law, Economics, & Organization, 12(1), 119–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, C. (2005). The idea of joined-up government: A historical perspective. In V. Bogdanor (Ed.), Joined-up government (chapter 2) (pp. 19–42). Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C. & Lodge, M.(2006). Politics of Public Service Bargains. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (1995). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, H. (2015). Propaganda as signaling. Comparative Politics, 47(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515816103220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jamal, A. A. (2009). Barriers to democracy. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., & Sabatier, P. A. (1993). The study of public policy processes. Jones and Barlett Publishers, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., St.Clair, G. K., & Woods, B. (1991). Explaining change in policy subsystems: Analysis of coalition stability and defection over time. American Journal of Political Science, 35(4), 851–880. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ji, H. (2022). NDRC strengthens the regulatory regime for Chinese foreign debt. Hong Kong Lawyer. https://www.hk-lawyer.org/content/ndrc-strengthens-regulatory-regime-chinese-foreign-debt
   Google Scholar
• Jones, B. D., & Baumgartner, F. R. (2005). The politics of attention. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kerwin, C. M., & Furlong, S. R. (2018). How government agencies write law and make policy. CQ Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, D. R. (2008). Political control and bureaucratic autonomy revisited: A multi-institutional analysis of OSHA enforcement. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1984). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2013). How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. American Political Science Review, 107(2), 326–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055413000014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, C., & Janenova, S. (2023). Does bureaucratic performance vary across authoritarian regimes? Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 16–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2026794
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, T. S. K., Kuan, H. W., Lau, S. H. L., & Friedman, S. L. (2021). LGBT Movements in Taiwan, Hong Kong, and China. In P. Donald, Haider-Markel & C. Rimmerman (Eds.), Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kuran, T. (1997). Private truths, public lies: The social consequences of preference falsification. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, P. E. (1999). Green politics in Japan. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F. (2005). Coordinating the government bureaucracy in Hong Kong: An institutional analysis. Governance, 18(4), 633–654. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2005.00295.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F., & Chan, K. N. (2015). How authoritarianism intensifies punctuated equilibrium: The dynamics of policy attention in Hong Kong. Governance, 28(4), 549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lampton, D. M. (Ed.). (1987). Policy implementation in post-mao China. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, P. F. (2008). Decentralized authoritarianism in China: The communist party’s control of local elites in the post-mao era. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Landry, P. F., Lü, X., & Duan, H. (2018). Does performance matter? Evaluating political selection along the Chinese administrative ladder. Comparative Political Studies, 51(8), 1074–1105. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017730078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, E. W. Y. (1999). Governing post-colonial Hong Kong: Institutional incongruity, governance crisis, and authoritarianism. Asian Survey, 39(6), 940–959. https://doi.org/10.2307/3021147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lei, Y. W. (2018). The contentious public sphere: Law, media, and authoritarian rule in China. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leong, C. (2015). Persistently biased: The devil shift in water privatization in Jakarta. Review of Policy Research, 32(5), 600–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C. (2012). The end of the CCP’s resilient authoritarianism? A tripartite assessment of shifting power in China. The China Quarterly, 211, 595–623. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741012000902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberthal, K. G., & Oksenberg, M. (1988). Policy making in China: Leaders, structures, and processes. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, A. (1999). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. Yale university press.
   Google Scholar
• Li, J., Krishnamurthy, S., Roders, A. P., & van Wesemael, P. (2020). Informing or consulting? Exploring community participation within urban heritage management in China. Habitat International, 105, 102268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., Lo, C. W. H., & Tang, S. Y. (2017). Nonprofit policy advocacy under authoritarianism. Public Administration Review, 77(1), 103–117. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., & Zhao, H. (2021). Privacy lost: Appropriating surveillance technology in China’s fight against COVID-19. Business Horizons, 64(6), 743–756. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2021.07.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., & Weible, C. M. (2021). China’s policy processes and the advocacy coalition framework. Policy Studies Journal, 49(3), 703–730. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & Zhou, L. (2005). Political turnover and economic performance: The incentive role of personnel control in China. Journal of Public Economics, 89(9–10), 1743–1762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2004.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lo, C. W. H., & Leung, S. W. (2000). Environmental agency and public opinion in Guangzhou: The limits of a popular approach to environmental governance.The China Quarterly, 163, 677–704.
   Google Scholar
• Lorentzen, P. L. (2013). Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly. Journal of Political Science, 8(2), 127–158.
   Google Scholar
• Lührmann, A., Tannenberg, M., & Lindberg, S. I. (2018). Regimes of the world (RoW): Opening new avenues for the comparative study of political regimes. Politics & Governance, 6(1), 60. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i1.1214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico (Vol. 296). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manion, M. (2015). Information for autocrats. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, D. C. (2019). Art of political control in China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mattingly, D. C. (2020). The art of political control in China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., Arnell, R. J., & Hathaway, P. L. (2007). The intersection of narrative policy analysis and policy change theory.Policy Studies Journal, 35(1), 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCubbins, M. D., & Schwartz, T. (1984). Congressional oversight overlooked: Police patrols versus fire alarms. American. Journal of Political Science, 165–179.
   Google Scholar
• Mertha, A. (2009). “Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0”: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China Quarterly, 200, 995–1012. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741009990592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (1995). The politics of structural choice: Toward a theory of public bureaucracy. In O. Williamson (Ed.), Organization theory: From Chester Barnard to the present and beyond (pp. 117–153). Oxford: Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Muno, W., & Briceño, H. (2023). Autocratization and public administration: the revolutionary-populist regime in Venezuela in comparative perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 73–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2148262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nie, M. (2003). Drivers of natural resource-based political conflict.Policy sciences, 36(3–4), 307–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (1999). Campaign nostalgia in the Chinese countryside. Asian Survey, 39(3), 375–393. https://doi.org/10.1525/as.1999.39.3.01p0002g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., Folke, C., & Berkes, F. (2004). Adaptive comanagement for building resilience in social-ecological systems. Environmental Management, 34(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-003-0101-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan, J., & Chen, K. (2018). Concealing corruption: How Chinese officials distort upward reporting of online grievances. American Political Science Review, 112(3), 602–620. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055418000205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkin, S. (2018). LGBT rights-focused legal advocacy in China: The promise, and limits, of litigation. Fordham International Law Journal, 41(5), 1243–1262.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2023). Public administration in authoritarian regimes. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 7–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2023.2169820
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfaff, S. (2001). The limits of coercive surveillance: Social and penal control in the German democratic republic. Punishment & Society, 3(3), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474501003003003
   Google Scholar
• Potoski, M., & Woods, N. D. (2001). Designing state clean air agencies: Administrative procedures and bureaucratic autonomy.Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 11(2), 203–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pralle, S. B. (2006). Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rauch, J. N., & Chi, Y. F. (2010). The plight of green GDP in China. Consilience, 3, 102–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26167790
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, A. H., & Hynan, K. A. (2014). Corporate communication, sustainability, and social media: It’s not easy (really) being green. Business Horizons, 57(6), 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2014.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripoll, G., & Rode, M. (2023). Is there passion for public service in authoritarian bureaucracies? Exploring public service motivation across regime types. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2035238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. (2018). Distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenthal, U., & Kouzmin, A. (1997). Crises and crisis management: Toward comprehensive government decision making. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 7(2), 277–304. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024349
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (Eds.). (2014). Theories of the policy process. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sagarik, D., Chansukree, P., Cho, W., & Berman, E. (2018). E-government 4.0 in Thailand: The role of central agencies. Information Polity, 23(3), 343–353. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-180006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2000). The new governance and the tools of public action. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 28, 1611. https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/ulj/vol28/iss5/4
   Google Scholar
• Salamon, L. M. (2002). The tools of government: A guide to the new governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert, G., & Alpermann, B. (2019). Studying the Chinese policy process in the era of ‘top-level design’: The contribution of ‘political steering’ theory. Journal of Chinese Political Science, 24(2), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-018-09594-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, E. A., Jones, M. D., & McBeth, M. K. (2011). Policy narratives and policy processes. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 535–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00420.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih, V. C. (2022). Coalitions of the weak. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sloan, R. H., & Warner, R. (2016). The self, the stasi, the NSA: Privacy, knowledge, and complicity in the surveillance state. SSRN Electronic Journal, 17, 347. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2577308
   Google Scholar
• Smyth, R., Bianco, W., & Chan, K. N. (2019). Legislative rules in electoral authoritarian regimes: The case of Hong Kong’s legislative council. The Journal of Politics, 81(3), 892–905. https://doi.org/10.1086/703068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohn, I. (2015). China’s monetary ambitions: RMB internationalization in comparative perspective. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 13(1), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2015.04.13.1.181
   Google Scholar
• Stern, R. E., & Hassid, J. (2012). Amplifying silence: Uncertainty and control parables in contemporary China. Comparative Political Studies, 45(10), 1230–1254. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414011434295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockmann, D., & Gallagher, M. E. (2011). Remote control: How the media sustain authoritarian rule in China.Comparative political studies, 44(4), 436–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, D. A. (1989). Causal stories and the formation of policy agendas. Political Science Quarterly, 104(2), 281–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/2151585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svolik, M. W. (2009). Power sharing and leadership dynamics in authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(2), 477–494. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truex, R. (2016). Making autocracy work: Representation and responsiveness in modern China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, L. L. (2007). Accountability without democracy: Solidary groups and public goods provision in rural China. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, G. (2002). Veto players: How political institutions work. Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Unlu, A., Kapucu, N., & Sahin, B. (2010). Disaster and crisis management in Turkey: A need for a unified crisis management system. Disaster Prevention & Management: An International Journal, 19(2), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1108/09653561011037977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vachon, S., Klassen, R. D., & Co‐Editors: Benn Lawson, P. D. C. (2006). Extending green practices across the supply chain: The impact of upstream and downstream integration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 26(7), 795–821. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570610672248
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Dool, A., & Li, J. (2023). What do we know about the punctuated equilibrium theory in China? A systematic review and research priorities. Policy Studies Journal, 51(2), 283–305. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Kamp, D. S. (2021). Blunt force regulation and bureaucratic control: Understanding China’s war on pollution.Governance, 34(1), 191–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wal, Z., van den Berg, C., & Haque, M. S. (2021). Comparative public administration in a globalized world: Moving beyond standard assumptions toward increased understanding. Public Administration Review, 81(2), 295–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampler, B. (2012). Participation, representation, and social justice: Using participatory governance to transform representative democracy. Polity, 44(4), 666–682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedeen, L. (2015). Ambiguities of domination. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. C. (2014). Powerful patriots: Nationalist protest in China’s foreign relations. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wilensky, H. L. (1963). Organizational Intelligence. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Wintrobe, R. (1998). The political economy of dictatorship. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D. (1988). Principals, bureaucrats, and responsiveness in clean air enforcements. American Political Science Review, 82(1), 213–234. https://doi.org/10.2307/1958066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, B. D., & Waterman, R. W. (1991). The dynamics of political control of the bureaucracy. American Political Science Review, 85(3), 801–828. https://doi.org/10.2307/1963851
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, X. (2021). To repress or to co‐opt? Authoritarian control in the age of digital surveillance. American Journal of Political Science, 65(2), 309–325. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yao, Y., & Zhang, M. (2015). Subnational leaders and economic growth: Evidence from Chinese cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 20(4), 405–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9116-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yerramsetti, S. (2023). Public sector digitalisation and stealth intrusions upon individual freedoms and democratic accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 45(1), 54–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2022.2110909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, J. Y., & Barr, M. (2013). Politics in China. Pluto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zhan, J. V., & Zhu, J. (2022). Policy coordination and selective corruption control in China. Policy Studies Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4278147
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar