The brave new world of AI: implications for public sector agents, organisations, and governance

References

• Alon-Barkat, S., & Busuioc, M. (2023). Human–AI interactions in public sector decision making: “Automation bias” and “selective adherence” to algorithmic advice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 33(1), 153–169. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, M., & Zouridis, S. (2002). From street‐level to system‐level bureaucracies: How information and communication technology is transforming administrative discretion and constitutional control. Public Administration Review, 62(2), 174–184. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00168
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buffat, A. (2015). Street-level bureaucracy and e-government. Public Management Review, 17(1), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.771699
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. B., Chen, Y. C., Himmelreich, J., Hudson, V. M., Korinek, A., Young, M. M., & Zhang, B. (Eds.). (2024). The oxford handbook of AI governance. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. B., Huang, H., & Kim, K. C. (2022). Machine intelligence, bureaucracy, and human control. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(2), 187–196. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac006
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K. C. (2020). Creation of artificial bureaucrats. Proceedings of European Conference on the Impact of Artificial Intelligence and Robotics, Online, October 22-23, 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, J., Young, M. M., Wang, Y. F., Giest, S., & Grimmelikhuijsen, S. (2020). Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service. Information Polity, 25(4), 491–506. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-200223
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busch, P. A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2018). Digital discretion: A systematic literature review of ICT and street-level discretion. Information Polity, 23(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-170050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, M. E., Young, M. M., Bullock, J. B., & Greer, R. (2023, July). Administrative errors and race: Can technology mitigate inequitable administrative outcomes? Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, 33(3), 512–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muac036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Boer, N., & Raaphorst, N. (2023). Automation and discretion: Explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce. Public Management Review, 25(1), 42–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell’acqua, F., McFowland, E., Mollick, E. R., Lifshitz-Assaf, H., Kellogg, K., Rajendran, S., Krayer, L., Candelon, F., & Lakhani, K. R. (2023). Navigating the jagged technological frontier: Field experimental evidence of the effects of AI on knowledge worker productivity and quality. Harvard Business School Technology & Operations Mgt. Unit Working Paper, 24–013.
   Google Scholar
• Glaze, K., Ho, D. E., Ray, G. K., & Tsang, C. (2023). Artificial intelligence for adjudication: The social security administration and ai governance. In J. B. Bullock (Ed.), The oxford handbook of AI governance (pp. 779–796). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020). Scaling laws for neural language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08361.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., & Lee, J. (2024). Digitally vulnerable populations’ use of e-government services: Inclusivity and access. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/23276665.2024.2321569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, R. (2023). Digital administrative burdens: An agenda for analyzing the citizen experience of digital bureaucratic encounters. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 6(1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvac024
   Google Scholar
• Ranerup, A., & Henriksen, H. Z. (2022). Digital discretion: Unpacking human and technological agency in automated decision making in Sweden’s social services. Social Science Computer Review, 40(2), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439320980434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (2013). Administrative behavior. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Taeihagh, A. (2021). Governance of artificial intelligence. Policy and Society, 40(2), 137–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2021.1928377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, M. M., Himmelreich, J., Bullock, J. B., & Kim, K. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence and administrative evil. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 4(3), 244–258. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvab006
   Google Scholar
• Zuiderwijk, A., Chen, Y. C., & Salem, F. (2021). Implications of the use of artificial intelligence in public governance: A systematic literature review and a research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 38(3), 101577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2021.101577
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar