WAIS-IV GAI and CPI discrepancies in multiple sclerosis and traumatic brain injury

References

• Carlozzi, N. E., Kirsch, N. L., Kisala, P. A., & Tulsky, D. S. (2015). An examination of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scales, Fourth Edition (WAIS-IV) in individuals with complicated mild, moderate, and severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 21–37. doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1005677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLuca, J., Chelune, G. J., Tulsky, D. S., Lengenfelder, J., & Chiaravalloti, N. D. (2004). Is speed of processing or working memory the primary information processing deficit in multiple sclerosis? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 550–562. doi:10.1080/13803390490496641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devena, S. E., & Watkins, M. W. (2012). Diagnostic utility of WISC-IV General Ability Index and Cognitive Proficiency Index difference scores among children with ADHD. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 28, 133–154. doi:10.1080/15377903.2012.669743
   Google Scholar
• Donders, J., & Strong, C. H. (2015). Clinical utility of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition after traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 22, 17–22. doi:10.1177/1073191114530776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drozdick, L. W., Holdnack, J. A., Salthouse, T., & Cullum, C. M. (2013). Assessing cognition in older adults with the WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS. In J. A. Holdnak, L. W. Drozdick, L. G. Weiss, & G. L. Iverson (Eds.), WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced clinical interpretation (pp. 407–483). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 2, 861–874. doi:10.1016/j.patrec.2005.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forn, C., Belenguer, A., Parcet-Ibars, M. A., & Avila, C. (2008). Information-processing speed in the primary deficit underlying the poor performance of multiple sclerosis patients in the paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 789–796. doi:10.1080/13803390701779560
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., DeLisle, M. M., & Parker, K. C. H. (2008). An investigation of the General Abilities Index in a group of diagnostically mixed patients. Journal of Psychoeducation, 26, 247–259. doi:10.1177/0734282907304032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holdnack, J. A., & Weiss, L. G. (2013). Demographic adjustments to the WAIS-IV/WMS-IV norms. In J. A. Holdnack, L. W. Drozdick, L. G. Weiss, & G. L. Iverson (Eds.), WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ASC: Advanced clinical interpretation (pp. 171–216). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Iverson, G. I., Lange, R. T., Viljoen, H., & Brink, J. (2006). WAIS-III General Ability Index in neuropsychiatry and forensic psychiatry inpatient samples. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 77–82. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.07.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtzke, J. F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33, 1444–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, H. S., O'Donnell, V. M., & Grossman, R. G. (1979). The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test: A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 167, 675–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lichtenberger, E. O., & Kaufman, A. S. (2013). Essentials of WAIS-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, W. I., Compston, A., Edan, G., Goodkin, D., Hartung, H. P., Lublin, F. D., et al. (2001). Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 50, 121–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michel, N. M., Goldberg, J. O., Heinrichs, R. W., Miles, A. A., Ammari, N., & McDermid Vaz, S. (2013). WAIS-IV profile of cognition in schizophrenia. Assessment, 20, 462–473. doi:10.1177/1073191113478153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prifitera, A., Weiss, L. G., & Saklofske, D. H. (1998). The WISC-III in context. In A. Prifitera & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), WISC-III clinical use and interpretation (pp. 1–39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, J. J., Gontkovsky, S. T., Kreiner, D. S., & Tree, H. A. (2012). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Fourth Edition performance in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 34, 571–579. doi:10.1080/13803395.2012.666229
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swets, J. A. (1988). Measuring the accuracy of diagnostic systems. Science, 240, 1285–1293. doi:10.1126/science.3287615
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulsky, D. S., Saklofske, D. H., Wilkins, C., & Weiss, L. G. (2001). Development of a General Ability Index for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition. Psychological Assessment, 13, 566–571. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.13.4.566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (1997). WAIS-III: Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008a). WAIS-IV Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008b). WAIS-IV technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. G., Chen, H., Harris, J. G., Holdnack, J. A., & Saklofske, D. H. (2010). WAIS-IV use in societal context. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, D. Coalson, & S. E. Raiford (Eds.), WAIS-IV: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 97–139). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Coalson, D. L., & Raiford, S. E. (2010). Theoretical, empirical, and clinical foundations of the WAIS-IV index scores. In L. G. Weiss, D. H. Saklofske, D. Coalson, & S. E. Raiford (Eds.), WAIS-IV: Clinical use and interpretation (pp. 61–94). Boston, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar