Eye tracking as a mean to detect feigned cognitive impairment in the Word Memory Test

References

• Abeles, D., & Yuval-Greenberg, S. (2017). Just look away: Gaze aversions as an overt attentional disengagement mechanism. Cognition, 168, 99–109. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2017.06.021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., & Green, P. (1999). Severe TBI sample perfonnance on CARB and the WMT: Supplement to the CARB '97 and word memory test manuals. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
   Google Scholar
• An, K. Y., Kaploun, K., Erdodi, L. A., & Abeare, C. A. (2017). Performance validity in undergraduate research participants: A comparison of failure rates across tests and cutoffs. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 193–206. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1217046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, D. M., & Ettenhofer, M. L. (2016). Assessment of performance validity using embedded saccadic and manual indices on a continuous performance test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31, 963–975. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw070
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashem, J. R., Rapport, L. J., Miller, J. B., Hanks, R. A., Axelrod, B. N., & Millis, S. R. (2014). Comparisons of five performance validity indices in bona fide and simulated traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 28, 851–875. doi:10.1080/13854046.2014.927927
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2006). Coverage of the test of memory malingering, victoria symptom validity test, and word memory test on the internet: Is test security threatened? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 21, 121–126. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.06.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beetar, J. T., & Williams, J. M. (1995). Malingering response styles on the memory assessment scales and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 10, 57–72. doi:10.1093/arclin/10.1.57
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benedek, M., Stoiser, R., Walcher, S., & Korner, C. (2017). Eye behavior associated with internally versus externally directed cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1092. doi:10.3389/Fpsyg.2017.01092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K., B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic psychology: An evidence-based approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bridgeman, B. (1992). Conscious vs unconscious processes: The case of vision. Theory & Psychology, 2, 73–88. doi:10.1177/0959354392021004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S., Ruff, R., Troster, A., Barth, J., Koffler, S., Pliskin, N., … Silver, C. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carone, D. A., & Bush, S. S. (Eds.). (2013). Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Castiel, M., Alderman, N., Jenkins, K., Knight, C., & Burgess, P. (2012). Use of the multiple errands test-simplified version in the assessment of suboptimal effort. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 734–751. doi:10.1080/09602011.2012.686884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, S., Epps, J., Ruiz, N., & Chen, F. (2011, February). Eye activity as a measure of human mental effort in HCI. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 16th international conference on Intelligent user interfaces.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Phelps, F. G. (2005). Gaze aversion: A response to cognitive or social difficulty? Memory & Cognition, 33, 727–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchowski, A. T. (2017). Eye tracking methodology: Theory and practice (3rd ed.). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dymowski, A. R., Owens, J. A., Ponsford, J. L., & Willmott, C. (2015). Speed of processing and strategic control of attention after traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 37, 1024–1035. doi:10.1080/13803395.2015.1074663
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, M. K., Guerra-Carrillo, B., Singley, A. T. M., & Bunge, S. A. (2017). Beyond eye gaze: What else can eyetracking reveal about cognition and cognitive development? Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 25, 69–91. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einhäuser, W. (Ed.). (2017). The pupil as marker of cognitive processes. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Botzer, A. (2017). Cyclopean vs. Dominant Eye in Gaze-Interface-Tracking. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 10(1), 1–14. doi:10.16910/Jemr.10.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, M., Bixler, R., & D’Mello, S. K. (2018). An automated behavioral measure of mind wandering during computerized reading. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 134–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goebel, R. A. (1983). Detection of faking on the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 731–742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2003). Green’s word memory test for windows: User’s manual. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2005). Green's word memory test for windows: User's manual (revised June 2005). Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Green's Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & Allen, L. M. (1999). Performance of neurological patients on the word memory test (WMT) and computerised assessment of response bias (CARB): Supplement to the word memory test and CARB '97 manuals. Durham, NC: CogniSyst.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, K. W., Curtis, K. L., & Bianchini, K. J. (2013). Symptom validity testing: A summary of recent research. In S. Koffler, J. Morgan, I. S. Baron, & M. F. Greiffenstein (Eds.), Neuropsychology science and practice I (pp. 61–94). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, J. M., & Gur, R. C. (2012). Detection of malingering using forced-choice techniques (ch. 4). In C. R. Reynolds & A. M. J. Horton (Eds.), Detection of Malingering during Head Injury Litigation (2nd ed., pp. 151–167). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hannula, D. E., Althoff, R. R., Warren, D. E., Riggs, L., Cohen, N. J., & Ryan, J. D. (2010). Worth a glance: Using eye movements to investigate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 4, 166. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00166
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., & Millis, S. R. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129. doi:10.1080/13854040903155063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmqvist, K., Nyström, M., Andersson, R., Dewhurst, R., Jarodzka, H., & Van de, W. J. (2011). Eye tracking: A comprehensive guide to methods and measures. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoover, S., Zottoli, T. M., & Grose-Fifer, J. (2014). ERP correlates of malingered executive dysfunction. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 91, 139–146. doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosmer, D. W., Lemeshow, S., & Sturdivant, R. X. (2013). Applied logisitic regression (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Kanser, R. J., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., Billings, N. M., Hanks, R. A., Axelrod, B. N., & Miller, J. B. (2017). Strategies of successful and unsuccessful simulators coached to feign traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 644–653. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1278040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., Kim, J., & Lee, J. H. (2016). Guilt, lying, and attentional avoidance of concealed information. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 44, 1467–1475. doi:10.2224/sbp.2016.44.9.1467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2012). Performance validity and symptom validity in neuropsychological assessment. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 18, 625–631.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, L., Basso, M. R., Estevis, E., Miller, A., Whiteside, D. M., Combs, D., & Arentsen, T. J. (2017). Detecting coached neuropsychological dysfunction: A simulation experiment regarding mild traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31, 1412–1431. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1318954
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, G. D. (1997). Automaticity and reading: Perspectives from the instance theory of automatization. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 13, 123–146. doi:10.1080/1057356970130203
   Google Scholar
• Lu, P. H., Boone, K. B., Jimenez, N., & Razani, J. (2004). Failure to inhibit the reading response on the Stroop Test: A pathognomonic indicator of suspect effort. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 26, 180–189. doi:10.1076/jcen.26.2.180.28082
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupu, T., Elbaum, T., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2017). Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the word memory test. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–11. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1341410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists' validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29, 741–776. doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014). Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67, 267–277. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, E. H., Verschuere, B., Gamer, M., Merckelbach, H., & Ben-Shakhar, G. (2016). Deception detection with behavioral, autonomic, and neural measures: Conceptual and methodological considerations that warrant modesty. Psychophysiology, 53, 593–604. doi:10.1111/psyp.12609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayama, M., Takahashi, K., & Shimizu, Y. (2002). The act of task difficulty and eye-movement frequency for the'Oculo-motor indices'. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2002 symposium on Eye tracking research & applications.
   Google Scholar
• O’brien, R. M. (2007). A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity, 41, 673–690. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orquin, J. L., & Mueller Loose, S. (2013). Attention and choice: A review on eye movements in decision making. Acta Psychologica, 144, 190–206. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2013.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, J., & Zhou, L. (2013, August). Eye gazing behaviors in online deception. Paper presented at the Nineteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, M., S., & Beck, M., R. (2011). Eye movements and memory (ch. 32). In S. P. Liversedge, I. D. Gilchrist, & S. Everling (Eds.), The oxford handbook of eye movements (pp. 579–592). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Proudfoot, J. G., Jenkins, J. L., Burgoon, J. K., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2016). More than meets the eye: how oculometric behaviors evolve over the course of automated deception detection interactions. Journal of Management Information Systems, 33, 332–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, K. (2009). Eye movements and attention in reading, scene perception, and visual search. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1457–1506. doi:10.1080/17470210902816461
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichle, E. D., Reineberg, A. E., & Schooler, J. W. (2010). Eye movements during mindless reading. Psychological Science, 21, 1300–1310. doi:10.1177/0956797610378686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roediger, H. L., & Mcdermott, K. B. (2000). Distortions of memory (ch. 10). In E. Tulving & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Oxford handbook of memory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R., & Gillard, N. D. (2011). Research methods for the assessment of malingering (ch. 10). In B. Rosenfeld & S. D. Penrod (Eds.), Research methods in forensic psychology (pp. 174). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, J. A., Miskey, H. M., Brearly, T. W., Martindale, S. L., & Shura, R. D. (2017). Word memory test performance across cognitive domains, psychiatric presentations, and mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 32, 306–315. doi:10.1093/arclin/acw107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruff, R. M., Klopfer, J., & Blank, J. (2016). Homogenous base rates for malingering in neuropsychological examination of litigants. Psychological Injury and Law, 9, 143–153. doi:10.1007/s12207-016-9259-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russeler, J., Brett, A., Klaue, U., Sailer, M., & Munte, T. F. (2008). The effect of coaching on the simulated malingering of memory impairment. BMC Neurology, 8, 37. doi:10.1186/1471-2377-8-37
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., & Odland, A. P. (2016). Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30, 515–535. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1177118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, T. L., Baker, C. A., & Gaunt, J. T. (2013). Combining blink, pupil, and response time measures in a concealed knowledge test. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 614. doi:10.3389/Fpsyg.2012.00614
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silk-Eglit, G. M., Stenclik, J. H., Miele, A. S., Lynch, J. K., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2015). Performance validity classification accuracy of single-, pairwise-, and triple-failure models using the Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological battery for adults. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 22, 271–281. doi:10.1080/23279095.2014.921167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick, D. J., & Sherman, E. M. S. (2013). Differential diagnosis of malingering (ch. 4). In D. A. Carone & S. S. Bush (Eds.), Mild traumatic brain injury: Symptom validity assessment and malingering (pp. 57–72). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13, 545–561. doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SR_Research (2010). Eyelink 1000 user’s manual, version 1.5.2. Mississauga, Ontario: SR Research Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Suchotzki, K., Verschuere, B., Van Bockstaele, B., Ben-Shakhar, G., & Crombez, G. (2017). Lying takes time: A meta-analysis on reaction time measures of deception. Psychological Bulletin, 143, 428–453. doi:10.1037/bul0000087
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhr, J. A., & Gunstad, J. (2007). Coaching and malingering: a review. In G. J. Larrabee (Ed.), Assessment of malingered neuropsychological deficits (pp. 287–311). New York, NY: Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How'd they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16, 495–505. doi:10.1076/clin.16.4.495.13909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Gog, T., Kester, L., Nievelstein, F., Giesbers, B., & Paas, F. (2009). Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 325–331. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Orden, K. F., Jung, T. P., & Makeig, S. (2000). Combined eye activity measures accurately estimate changes in sustained visual task performance. Biological Psychology, 52, 221–240. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(99)00043-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor, T. L., & Abeles, N. (2004). Coaching clients to take psychological and neuropsychological tests: A clash of ethical obligations. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 35, 373–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilar-Lopez, R., Perez-Garcia, M., Sanchez-Barrera, M. B., Rodriguez-Fernandez, A., & Gomez-Rio, M. (2011). Symptom validity testing and its underlying psychophysiological response pattern: A preliminary study. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26, 133–143. doi:10.1093/arclin/acq099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walczyk, J. J., Griffith, D. A., Yates, R., Visconte, S. R., Simoneaux, B., & Harris, L. L. (2012). Lie detection by inducing cognitive load: Eye movements and other cues to the false answers of "Witnesses" to crimes. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 39, 887–909. doi:10.1177/0093854812437014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whelan, C. W., Wagstaff, G. F., & Wheatcroft, J. M. (2014). High-stakes lies: Verbal and nonverbal cues to deception in public appeals for help with missing or murdered relatives. Psychiatry Psychology and Law, 21, 523–537. doi:10.1080/13218719.2013.839931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, G. (2015). Malingering in forensic disability-related assessments: Prevalence 15 ± 15%. Psychological Injury and Law, 8, 188–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar