506
Views
15
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

When 10 is enough: Errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMMe10) and administration time predict freestanding performance validity tests (PVTs) and underperformance on memory measures

References

  • American Board of Clinical Neuropsychology. (2007). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) practice guidelines for neuropsychological assessment and consultation. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 209–231.
  • Bailey, K. C., Soble, J. R., & O’Rourke, J. J. F. (2017). Clinical utility of the Rey 15-Item Test, recognition trial, and error scores for detecting noncredible neuropsychological performance in a mixed clinical sample of veterans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(1), 119–131, 1–13. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1333151
  • Bain, K. M., & Soble, J. R. (2017). Validation of the advanced clinical solutions word choice test (WCT) in a mixed clinical sample: Establishing classification accuracy, sensitivity/specificity, and cutoff scores. Assessment, Advance online publication, doi:10.1177/1073191117725172
  • Bauer, L., O'Bryant, S. E., Lynch, J. K., McCaffrey, R. J., & Fisher, J. M. (2007). Examining the test of memory malingering trial 1 and word memory test immediate recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort. Assessment, 14(3), 215–222. doi:10.1177/1073191106297617
  • Benedict, R. H. B. (1997). Brief visuospatial memory test-revised. Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
  • Bush, S. S., Ruff, R. M., Troster, A. I., Barth, J. T., Koffler, S. P., Pliskin, N. H., … Silver, C. H. (2005). Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessity NAN policy & planning committee. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 419–426. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2005.02.002
  • Denning, J. H. (2012). The efficiency and accuracy of the test of memory malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 27(4), 417–432. doi:10.1093/arclin/acs044
  • Denning, J. H. (2014a). (Corrigendum). The efficiency and accuracy of the test of memory malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the test of memory malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(7), 729–730. doi:10.1093/arclin/acu051
  • Denning, J. H. (2014b). Combining the test of memory malingering trial 1 with behavioral responses improves the detection of effort test failure. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 21(4), 269–277. doi:10.1080/23279095.2013.811076
  • Denning, J. H., & Shura, R. D. (2017). Cost of malingering mild traumatic brain injury related cognitive deficits during compensation and pension evaluations in the veterans benefits administration. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/23279095.2017.1350684
  • Fazio, R. L., Denning, J. H., & Denney, R. L. (2017). TOMM trial 1 as a performance validity indicator in a criminal forensic sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(1), 251–267. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1213316
  • Gabel, N. M., Waldron-Perrine, B., Spencer, R. J., Pangilinan, P. H., Hale, A. C., & Bieliauskas, L. A. (2018). Suspiciously slow: Timed digit span as an embedded performance validity measure in a sample of veterans with mTBI. Brain Injury, 33(3), 377–382. doi:10.1080/02699052.2018.1553311
  • Gavett, B. E., O'Bryant, S. E., Fisher, J. M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2005). Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) trial 1. Applied Neuropsychology, 12(1), 1–4. doi:10.1207/s15324826an1201_1
  • Grabyan, J. M., Collins, R. L., Alverson, W., A., & Chen, D., K. (2018). Performance on the test of memory malingering is predicted by the number of errors on its first 10 items on an inpatient epilepsy monitoring unit. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 468–478. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1368715
  • Green, P. (2004). Green’s Medical Symptom Validity Test (MSVT) for Windows: User’s manual. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada: Green’s Publishing.
  • Guilmette, T. J., Hast, K. J., Whelihan, W. M., Sparadeo, F. R., & Buongiorno, G. (1996). Order effects in the administration of a forced-choice procedure for detection of malingering in disability claimants’ evaluations. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 83(3), 1007–1016. doi:10.2466/pms.1996.83.3.1007
  • Heilbronner, R. L., Sweet, J. J., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., & Millis, S. (2009). American academy of clinical neuropsychology consensus conference statement on the neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23, 1093–1129.
  • Horner, M. D., Bedwell, J. S., & Duong, A. (2006). Abbreviated form of the test of memory malingering. International Journal of Neuroscience, 116(10), 1181–1186. doi:10.1080/00207450500514029
  • Kanser, R. J., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., & Hanks, R. A. (2018). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury: Combining response time with performance validity test accuracy. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(1), 90–107. doi:10.1080/13854046.2018.1440006
  • Kulas, J. F., Axelrod, B. N., & Rinaldi, A. R. (2014). Cross-validation of supplemental test of memory malingering scores as performance validity measures. Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 236–244. doi:10.1007/s12207-014-9200-4
  • Lippa, S. M. (2018). Performance validity testing in neuropsychology: A clinical guide, critical review, and update on a rapidly evolving literature. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 32(3), 391–421. doi:10.1080/13854046.2017.1406146
  • Loughan, A. R., Perna, R., & Le, J. (2016). Test of memory malingering with children: The utility of Trial 1 and tomme10 as screeners of test validity. Child Neuropsychology, 22(6), 707–717. doi:10.1080/09297049.2015.1020774
  • Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of north American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. doi:10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
  • Morgan, J. E., & Sweet, J. J. (Eds.). (2009). Neuropsychology of malingering casebook. New York, NY: Psychology Press.
  • Mossman, D., Wygant, D. B., Gervais, R. O., & Hart, K. J. (2017). Trial 1 versus trial 2 of the test of memory malingering: Evaluating accuracy without a “gold standard.” Psychological Assessment, 30(1), 74–85. doi:10.1037/pas0000449
  • O’Bryant, S. E., Engel, L. R., Kleiner, J. S., Vasterling, J. J., & Black, F. W. (2007). Test of memory malingering (TOMM) trial 1 as a screening measure for insufficient effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21, 511–521. doi:10.1080/13854040600611368
  • O’Bryant, S. E., Gavett, B. E., McCaffrey, R. J., O’Jile, J. R., Huerkamp, J. K., Smitherman, T. A., & Humphreys, J. D. (2008). Clinical utility of trial 1 of the test of memory malingering (tomm). Applied Neuropsychology, 15, 113–116. doi:10.1080/09084280802083921
  • Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practices with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(2), 213–223. doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004
  • Slick, D. J., Sherman, E. M. S., & Iverson, G. L. (1999). Diagnostic criteria for malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Proposed standards for clinical practice and research. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 13(4), 545–561. doi:10.1076/1385-4046(199911)13:04;1-Y;FT545
  • Sollman, M. J., & Berry, D. T. R. (2011). Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: A meta-analytic update and extension. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 26(8), 774–789. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr066
  • The Psychological Corporation. (2001). Wechsler test of adult reading. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
  • Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of memory malingering. North Tonawanda, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
  • Young, J. C., Roper, B. L., & Arentsen, T. J. (2016). Validity testing and neuropsychology practice in the VA healthcare system: Results from recent practitioner survey. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 497–514. doi:10.1080/13854046.2016.1159730
  • Zuccato, B. G., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2018). Early bird fails the pvt? The effects of timing artifacts on performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1491–1498. doi:10.1037/pas0000596

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.