Response time measures on the Word Memory Test do not add incremental validity to accuracy scores in predicting noncredible neurocognitive dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury litigants

References

• American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. (1993). Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 8, 86–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bolan, B., Foster, J. K., Schmand, B., & Bolan, S. (2002). A comparison of three tests to detect feigned amnesia: The effects of feedback and the measurement of response latency. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 24(2), 154–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2021). Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braw, Y. (2022). Response time measures as supplementary validity indicators in forced-choice recognition memory performance validity tests: A systematic review. Neuropsychology Review, 32(1), 71–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-021-09499-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerny, B. M., Rhoads, T., Leib, S. I., Jennette, K. J., Bassurto, K. S., Durkin, N. M., Ovsiew, G. P., Resch, Z. J., & Soble, J. R. (2021). Mean response latency indices on the Victoria Symptom Validity Test do not contribute meaningful predictive value over accuracy scores for detecting invalid performance. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28, 1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dunn, T. M., Shear, P. K., Howe, S., & Ris, M. D. (2003). Detecting neuropsychological malingering: Effects of coaching and information. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 18(2), 121–134.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbaum, T., Golan, L., Lupu, T., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2020). Establishing supplementary response time validity indicators in the Word Memory Test (WMT) and directions for future research. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 27(5), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2018.1555161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Rohling, M., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2001). Effort has a greater effect on test scores than severe brain injury in compensation claimants. Brain Injury, 15(12), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050110088254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Lees-Haley, P. R., & Allen, L. M. (2003). The Word Memory Test and the validity of neuropsychological test scores. Journal of Forensic Neuropsychology, 2(3-4), 97–124. https://doi.org/10.1300/J151v02n03_05
   Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2005). Green’s Word Memory Test for Windows: User’s manual. Green’s Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Heitz, R. P. (2014). The speed-accuracy tradeoff: History, physiology, methodology, and behavior. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmon, V. C. (1911). The relation of the time of a judgment to its accuracy. Psychological Review, 18, 186–201.
   Google Scholar
• Kanser, R. J., Rapport, L. J., Bashem, J. R., & Hanks, R. A. (2019). Detecting malingering in traumatic brain injury: Combining response time with performance validity test accuracy. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(1), 90–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2018.1440006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Cottingham, M. E., Ziegler, E. A., & Zeller, M. A. (2010). The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on “real world” credible and noncredible subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 25(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood, M. W. (2015). Validity testing in child and adolescent assessment: Evaluating exaggeration, feigning, and noncredible effort. The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupu, T., Elbaum, M., Wagner, M., & Braw, Y. (2018). Enhanced detection of feigned cognitive impairment using per item response time measurements in the Word Memory Test. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 25(6), 532–542.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., Olsen, D. H., Maloy, H., Boettcher, A., Ernst, N., & Okut, H. (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the Test of Memory Malingering in adults: Two decades of deception detection. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(1), 88–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1637027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Messick, S. (1995). Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 14(4), 5–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3992.1995.tb00881.x
   Google Scholar
• Patrick, S. D., Rapport, L. J., Kanser, R. J., Hanks, R. A., & Bashem, J. R. (2021). Detecting simulated versus bona fide traumatic brain injury using pupillometry. Neuropsychology, 35(5), 472–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicker, L. I. (2008). The ability of reaction time tests to detect simulation: An investigation of contextual effects and criterion scores. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23(4), 419–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2008.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohling, M. L., Allen, L. M., & Green, P. (2002). Who is exaggerating cognitive impairment and who is not? CNS Spectrums, 7(5), 387–395.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schroeder, R. W., Martin, P. K., & Odland, A. P. (2016). Expert beliefs and practices regarding neuropsychological validity testing. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(4), 515–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1177118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. M., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slick, D., Hopp, M. A., Strauss, E., & Thompson, G. B. (1997). Victoria Symptom Validity Test. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Sweet, J. J., Klipfel, K. M., Nelson, N. W., & Moberg, P. J. (2021). Professional practices, beliefs, and incomes of U.S. neuropsychologists: The AACN, NAN, SCN 2020 practice and “salary survey”. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(1), 7–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1849803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., & Suhr, J. A. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, J. E., Slick, D. J., Strauss, E., & Hultsch, D. F. (2002). How’d they do it? Malingering strategies on symptom validity tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 16(4), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.16.4.495.13909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T. N. (1996). Test of Memory Malingering. Multi-Health Systems, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1984). Recognition Memory Rest: Manual. NFER-Nelson.
   Google Scholar