The classification accuracy of Warrington’s recognition memory test (words) as a performance validity Test in a neurorehabilitation setting

References

• Abeare, C. A., An, K., Tyson, B., Holcomb, M., Cutler, L., May, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). The Emotion Word Fluency Test as an embedded validity indicator, alone and in multivariate verbal fluency validity composite. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 11(4), 713–724. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2021.1939027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abeare, C., Sabelli, A., Taylor, B., Holcomb, M., Dumitrescu, C., Kirsch, N., & Erdodi, L. (2019). The importance of demographically adjusted cutoffs: Age and education bias in raw score cutoffs within the Trail Making Test. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09353-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Brantuo, M., Cutler, L., Kennedy, A., & Erdodi, L. (2023). Limited English proficiency inhibits auditory verbal learning in cognitively healthy young adults – Exploring culturally responsive diagnostic and educational safeguards. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 12(2), 97–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2022.2034628
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Crisan, I., Abeare, C. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Cross-cultural performance validity testing: Managing false positives in examinees with limited English proficiency. Developmental Neuropsychology, 47(6), 273–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2022.2105847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ali, S., Elliott, L., Biss, R., Abumeeiz, M., Brantuo, M., Kuzmenka, P., Odenigbo, P., & Erdodi, L. (2022). The BNT-15 provides an accurate measure of English proficiency in cognitively intact bilinguals – A study in cross-cultural assessment. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(3), 351–363. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1760277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armistead-Jehle, P., & Buican, B. (2013). Comparison of select Advanced Clinical Solutions embedded effort measures to the Word Memory Test in the detection of suboptimal effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 28(3), 297–301. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf, L., Constantinou, M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2004). The effect of depression and anxiety on the TOMM in community-dwelling older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19(1), 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/19.1.125
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashendorf, L., Clark, E. L., & Sugarman, M. A. (2017). Performance validity and processing speed in a VA polytrauma sample. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 31(5), 857–866. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2017.1285961
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babikian, T., Boone, K. B., Lu, P., & Arnold, G. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of various Digit Span scores in the detection of suspect effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 20(1), 145–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040590947362
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, L., O’Bryant, S. E., Lynch, J. K., McCaffrey, R. J., & Fisher, J. M. (2007). Examining the test of memory malingering trial 1 and word memory test immediate recognition as screening tools for insufficient effort. Assessment, 14(3), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191106297617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2009). The need for continuous and comprehensive sampling of effort/response bias during neuropsychological examination.The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(4), 729–741.https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040802427803
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B. (2013). Clinical practice of forensic neuropsychology. Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bortnik, K. E., & Dean, A. C. (2021). Performance validity testing in patients with dementia. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment. A neuropsychological perspective (pp. 481–503). Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Boucher, C., May, N., Shahein, A., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Examining the effect of repeat administration, alternate versions and performance validity on letter fluency tests in a mixed clinical sample. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(2), 105–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000299
   Google Scholar
• Brantuo, M., An, K., Biss, R., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Neurocognitive profiles associated with limited English proficiency in cognitively intact adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 37(7), 1579–1600. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busse, M., & Whiteside, D. (2012). Detecting suboptimal cognitive effort: Classification accuracy of the Conners’ continuous performance test-II, brief test of attention, and trail making test. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(4), 675–687.https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2012.679623
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chafetz, M. D. (2022). Deception is different: Negative validity test findings do not provide “evidence” for “good effort. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(6), 1244–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1840633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisan, I., Matei, A., Avram, D.-L., Bunghez, C., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Full of surprises: Performance validity testing in examinees with limited English proficiency. Psychological Injury and Law, 16(2), 177–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09474-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crişan, I., Sava, F. A., Maricuţoiu, L. P., Ciumăgeanu, M. D., Axinia, O., Gîrniceanu, L., & Ciotlăuş, L. (2021). Evaluation of various detection strategies in the assessment of noncredible memory performance: Results of two experimental studies. Assessment, 29(8), 1973–1984. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911211040105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., Abeare, C., Messa, I., Holcomb, M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the Forced Choice Recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(6), 1425–1439. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1884555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, L., Greenacre, M., Abeare, C. A., Sirianni, C. D., Roth, R., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Multivariate models provide an effective psychometric solution to the variability in classification accuracy of D-KEFS Stroop performance validity cutoffs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 37(3), 617–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2022.2073914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Ponds, R. W. H. M., & Merten, T. (2013). Symptom validity and neuropsychological assessment: A survey of practices and beliefs on neuropsychologists in six European countries. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 28(8), 771–783. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/act073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A. C., Victor, T. L., Boone, K. B., Philpott, L. M., & Hess, R. A. (2009). Dementia and effort test performance. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 23(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040701819050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DenBoer, J. W., & Hall, S. (2007). Neuropsychological test performance of successful brain injury simulators. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 21(6), 943–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854040601020783
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H. (2012). The efficiency and accuracy of the test of memory malingering trial 1, errors on the first 10 items of the Test of Memory Malingering, and five embedded measures in predicting invalid test performance. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 27(4), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acs044
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H. (2023a). The TOMM1 discrepancy index (TDI): A new performance validity test (PVT) that differentiates between invalid cognitive testing and those diagnosed with dementia. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 30(1), 83–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2021.1910951
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H. (2023b). When failing one performance validity test matters. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–12. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2285503
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denning, J. H., & Horner, M. D. (2024). The impact of race and other demographic factors on the false positive rates of five embedded performance validity tests (PVTs) in a veteran sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 46(1), 25-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2024.2314737
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donders, J., & Hayden, A. (2022). Utility of the D–KEFS color word interference test as an embedded measure of performance validity after traumatic brain injury. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 36(7), 1964–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2020.1861659
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, A., Pyne, S., Tyson, B., Roth, R., Shahein, A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Critical item analysis enhances the classification of the Logical Memory Recognition Trial as a performance validity indicator. Developmental Neuropsychology, 46(5), 327–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2021.1956499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., & Lichtenstein, J. D. (2021). Information processing speed tests as performance validity tests. In K. B. Boone (Ed.), Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment: A neuropsychological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 218–247, 710 Pages). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Hurtubise, J. H., Brantuo, M., Cutler, L., Kennedy, A., & Hirst, R. (2021). Old vs new: The classic and D-KEFS Trails as embedded performance validity indicators and measures of psychomotor speed/executive function. Archives of Assessment Psychology, 11(1), 137–161.
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Abeare, C. A., Zuccato, B. G., Rai, J. K., Seke, K. R., Sagar, S., & Roth, R. M. (2018). Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 25(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1298600
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Aggregating validity indicators: The salience of domain specificity and the indeterminate range in multivariate models of performance validity assessment. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1384925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Taylor, B., Sabelli, A., Malleck, M., Kirsch, N. L., & Abeare, C. A. (2019). Demographically adjusted validity cutoffs in the Finger Tapping Test are superior to raw score cutoffs. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09352-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Tyson, B. T., Shahein, A., Lichtenstein, J. D., Abeare, C. A., Pelletier, C. L., Zuccato, B. G., Kucharski, B., & Roth, R. M. (2017). The power of timing: Adding a time-to-completion cutoff to the Word Choice Test and Recognition Memory Test improves classification accuracy. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 39(4), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2016.1230181
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Five shades of gray: Conceptual and methodological issues around multivariate models of performance validity. NeuroRehabilitation, 49(2), 179–213. https://doi.org/10.3233/NRE-218020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2023a). Multivariate models of performance validity: The Erdodi Index captures the dual nature of non-credible responding (continuous and categorical). Assessment, 30(5), 1467–1485. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221101910
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2023b). Cutoff elasticity in multivariate models of performance validity assessment as a function of the number of components and aggregation method. Psychological Injury and Law, 16(4), 328–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-023-09490-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A. (2023c). From "below chance" to "a single error is one too many": Evaluating various thresholds for invalid performance on two forced choice recognition tests. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 41(5), 445–462.https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2609
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Abeare, C. A., Medoff, B., Seke, K. R., Sagar, S., & Kirsch, N. L. (2018). A single error is one too many: The Forced Choice Recognition trial on the CVLT-II as a measure of performance validity in adults with TBI. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 33(7), 845–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/acn/acx110
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Green, P., Sirianni, C., & Abeare, C. A. (2019). The myth of high false positive rates on the Word Memory Test in mild TBI. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-09356-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Kirsch, N. L., Lajiness-O’Neill, R., Vingilis, E., & Medoff, B. (2014). Comparing the Recognition Memory Test and the Word Choice Test in a mixed clinical sample: Are they equivalent? Psychological Injury and Law, 7(3), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-014-9197-8
   Google Scholar
• Erdodi, L. A., Nussbaum, S., Sagar, S., Abeare, C. A., & Schwartz, E. S. (2017). Limited English proficiency increases failure rates on performance validity tests with high verbal mediation. Psychological Injury and Law, 10(1), 96–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-017-9282-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaudet, C. E., Castelluccio, B., Gold, D., McLaughlin, N. C. R., & Correia, S. (2022). Limitations of performance validity tests in dementia evaluations: The role of base rates. Psychological Assessment, 34(11), 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Giromini, L., Young, G., & Sellbom, M. (2022). Assessing negative response bias using self-report measures: New articles, new issues. Psychological Injury and Law, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09444-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graver, C., & Green, P. (2022). Misleading conclusions about word memory test results in multiple sclerosis (MS) by Loring and Goldstein (2019). Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 29(3), 315–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1748035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P. (2003). Green’s Word Memory Test. Green’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Green, P., & Flaro, L. (2003). Word Memory Test performance in children. Child Neuropsychology: a Journal on Normal and Abnormal Development in Childhood and Adolescence, 9(3), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1076/chin.9.3.189.16460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Flaro, L., & Courtney, J. (2009). Examining false positives on the Word Memory Test in adults with mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury, 23(9), 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699050903133962
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., Montijo, J., & Brockhaus, R. (2011). High specificity of the Word Memory Test and Medical Symptom Validity Test in groups with severe verbal memory impairment. Applied Neuropsychology, 18(2), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/09084282.2010.523389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiffenstein, M. F., Baker, W. J., & Gola, T. (1994). Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. Psychological Assessment, 6(3), 218–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.6.3.218
   Google Scholar
• Heaton, R. K., Miller, S. W., Taylor, M. J., & Grant, I. (2004). Revised comprehensive norms for an expanded Halstead-Reitan battery: Demographically adjusted neuropsychological norms for African American and Caucasian adults. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Heinly, M. T., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K., Love, J. M., & Brennan, A. (2005). WAIS Digit-Span-based indicators of malingered neurocognitive dysfunction: Classification accuracy in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 12(4), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191105281099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hermann, B. P., Connell, B., Barr, W. B., & Wyler, A. R. (1995). The utility of the Warrington Recognition Memory Test for temporal lobe epilepsy: Pre- and postoperative results. Journal of Epilepsy, 8(2), 139–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/0896-6974(95)00022-6
   Google Scholar
• Holcomb, M. J., Roth, R. M., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2022). Critical item (CR) analysis expands the classification accuracy of performance validity tests based on the forced choice paradigm – Replicating previously introduced CR cutoffs within the Word Choice Test. Neuropsychology, 36(7), 683–694. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000834
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holcomb, M., Pyne, S., Cutler, L., Oikle, D. A., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Take their word for it: The Inventory of Problems provides valuable information on both symptom and performance validity. Journal of Personality Assessment, 105(4), 520–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2022.2114358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iverson, G. L., & Franzen, M. D. (1994). The Recognition Memory Test, digit span, and knox cube test as markers of malingered memory impairment. Assessment, 1(4), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/107319119400100401
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M. S., Boone, K. B., Victor, T., Marion, S. D., Amano, S., Cottingham, M. E., Ziegler, E. A., & Zeller, M. A. (2010). The Warrington Recognition Memory Test for words as a measure of response bias: Total score and response time cutoffs developed on “real world” credible and noncredible subjects. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 25(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, R. T., Iverson, G. L., Brickell, T. A., Staver, T., Pancholi, S., Bhagwat, A., & French, L. M. (2013). Clinical utility of the Conners’ Continuous Performance Test-II to detect poor effort in U.S. military personnel following traumatic brain injury. Psychological Assessment, 25(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030915
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langeluddecke, P. M., & Lucas, S. K. (2003). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Third Edition findings in relation to severity of brain injury in litigants. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(2), 273–284. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.2.273.16499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larochette, A. C., & Harrison, A. G. (2012). Word Memory Test performance in Canadian adolescents with learning disabilities: A preliminary study. Applied Neuropsychology. Child, 1(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622965.2012.665777
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2003). Detection of malingering using atypical performance patterns on standard neuropsychological tests. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 17(3), 410–425.https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.410.18089
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J. (2014). False-positive rates associated with the use of multiple performance and symptom validity tests. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 29(4), 364–373. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., & Meyers, J. E. (2019). Use of multiple performance and symptom validity measures: Determining the optimal per test cutoff for determination of invalidity, analysis of skew, and inter-test correlations in valid and invalid performance groups. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 33(8), 1354–1372. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1614227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. D., Howieson, D. B., Bigler, E. D., & Tranel, D. (2012). Neuropsychological assessment (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, J. D., Greenacre, M. K., Cutler, L., Abeare, K., Baker, S. D., Kent, K. J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Geographic variation and instrumentation artifacts: in search of confounds in performance validity assessment in adults with mild TBI. Psychological Injury and Law, 12(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-019-0935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, P. K., Schroeder, R. W., & Odland, A. P. (2015). Neuropsychologists’ validity testing beliefs and practices: A survey of North American Professionals. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 29(6), 741–776. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2015.1087597
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias, C. W., Greve, K. W., Bianchini, K. J., Houston, R. J., & Crouch, J. A. (2002). Detecting malingered neurocognitive dysfunction using the reliable digit span in traumatic brain injury. Assessment, 9(3), 301–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191102009003009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merten, T., Dandachi-FitzGerald, B., Hall, V., Schmandd, B. A., Santamaríae, P., & González-Ordi, H. (2013). Symptom validity assessment in European countries: Development and state of the art. Clínica y Salud, 24(3), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1130-5274(13)70014-8
   Google Scholar
• Messa, I., Holcomb, M., Lichtenstein, J., Tyson, B., Roth, R., & Erdodi, L. (2022). They are not destined to fail: A systematic examination of scores on embedded performance validity indicators in patients with intellectual disability. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 54(5), 664–680. https://doi.org/10.1080/00450618.2020.1865457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millis, S. R. (1992). The Recognition Memory Test in the detection of malingered and exaggerated memory deficits. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 6(4), 406–414. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854049208401867
   Google Scholar
• Ord, A. S., Shura, R. D., Sansone, A. R., Martindale, S. L., Taber, K. H., & Rowland, J. A. (2021). Performance validity and symptom validity tests: Are they measuring different constructs? Neuropsychology, 35(3), 241–251. https://doi.org/10.1037/neu0000722
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson. (2009). Advanced clinical solutions for the WAIS-IV and WMS-IV – Technical Manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, M. R., Locke, D. E., Smigielski, J. S., & McCrea, M. (2011). Estimating the diagnostic value of the trail making test for suboptimal effort in acquired brain injury rehabilitation patients. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 25(1), 108–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2010.532912
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, J. K., An, K. Y., Charles, J., Ali, S., & Erdodi, L. A. (2019). Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Rey Complex Figure Test. Psychology & Neuroscience, 12(4), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000175
   Google Scholar
• Rai, J., Gervais, R., & Erdodi, L. (2023). A large-scale investigation of the classification accuracy of various performance validity tests in a medical-legal setting. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(3), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000320
   Google Scholar
• Resch, Z. J., Pham, A. T., Abramson, D. A., White, D. J., DeDios-Stern, S., Ovsiew, G. P., Castillo, L. R., & Soble, J. R. (2022). Examining independent and combined accuracy of embedded performance validity tests in the California Verbal Learning Test-II and Brief Visuospatial Memory-Revised for detecting invalid performance. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 29(2), 252–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2020.1742718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richman, J., Green, P., Gervais, R., Flaro, L., Merten, T., Brockhaus, R., & Ranks, D. (2006). Objective tests of symptom exaggeration in independent medical examinations. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 48(3), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.jom.0000183482.41957.c3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, A., Miller, L. R., Herring, T. T., & Calamia, M. (2023). Utility of the D-KEFS color–word interference test as an embedded validity indicator in psychoeducational evaluations. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(2), 138–146. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000301
   Google Scholar
• Rowland, J. A., Miskey, H. M., Brearly, T. W., Martindale, S. L., & Shura, R. D. (2017). Word memory test performance across cognitive domains, psychiatric presentations, and mild traumatic brain injury. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 32(3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabelli, A. G., Messa, I., Giromini, L., Lichtenstein, J. D., May, N., & Erdodi, L. A. (2021). Symptom versus performance validity in patients with mild TBI: Independent sources of non-credible responding. Psychological Injury and Law, 14(1), 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-021-09400-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, O. A., Kazakov, D., Reamer, M. K., Park, S. E., & Osmon, D. C. (2014). Effort in college undergraduate is sufficient on the Word Memory Test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 29(7), 609–613. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acu039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharland, M. J., & Gfeller, J. D. (2007). A survey of neuropsychologists’ beliefs and practice with respect to the assessment of effort. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 22(2), 213–223.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.12.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherman, E. M. S., Slick, D. J., & Iverson, G. L. (2020). Multidimensional malingering criteria for neuropsychological assessment: A 20-year update of the malingered neuropsychological dysfunction criteria. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 35(6), 735–764. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acaa019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Martindale, S. L., Taber, K. H., Higgins, A. M., & Rowland, J. A. (2020). Digit Span embedded validity indicators in neurologically-intact veterans. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 34(5), 1025–1037. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2019.1635209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shura, R. D., Miskey, H. M., Rowland, J. A., Yoash-Gantz, R. E., & Denning, J. H. (2016). Embedded performance validity measures with postdeployment veterans: Cross-validation and efficiency with multiple measures. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 23(2), 94–104.https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2015.1014556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweet, J. J., Heilbronner, R. L., Morgan, J. E., Larrabee, G. J., Rohling, M. L., Boone, K. B., Kirkwood, M. W., Schroeder, R. W., & Suhr, J. A., Conference Participants. (2021). American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 35(6), 1053–1106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2021.1896036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tarachow, S. (1947). The syndrome of inhibition. The Psychiatric Quarterly, 21(2), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01641756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tse, P. K. Y., Finley, J.-C., Frick, L., Guilfoyle, J., Brooks, J., Khalid, E., Charara, R., Resch, Z. J., Ulrich, D. M., Ovsiew, G. P., & Soble, J. R. (2023). Cross-validating the embedded performance validity indicators in the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test in mixed neuropsychiatric and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder clinical samples. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(2), 125–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000302
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, B. T., & Shahein, A. (2023). Combining accuracy scores with time cutoffs improves the specificity of the Word Choice Test. Psychology & Neuroscience, 16(3), 244–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000315
   Google Scholar
• Tyson, B. T., Pyne, S. R., Crisan, I., Calamia, M., Holcomb, M., Giromini, L., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Logical Memory, Visual Reproduction and Verbal Paired Associates are effective embedded validity indicators in patients with traumatic brain injury. Advance online publication. Applied Neuropsychology. Adult, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2023.2179400
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyson, B. T., Shahein, A., Abeare, C. A., Baker, S. D., Kent, K., Roth, R. M., & Erdodi, L. A. (2023). Replicating a meta-analysis: The search for the optimal Word Choice Test cutoff continues. Assessment, 30(8), 2476–2490. https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911221147043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uiterwijk, D., Wong, D., Stargatt, R., & Crowe, S. F. (2021). Performance and symptom validity testing in neuropsychological assessments in Australia: A survey of practises and beliefs. Australian Psychologist, 56(5), 355–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050067.2021.1948797
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Votruba, K. L., Rykulski, N., Dumitrescu, C., & Abeare, C. A. (2020). Handedness and performance validity test performance. Psychology & Neuroscience, 13(2), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/pne0000188
   Google Scholar
• Warrington, E. K. (1984). Recognition Memory Test manual. NFERNelson.
   Google Scholar
• Whitney, K. A., Davis, J. J., Shepard, P. H., Bertram, D. M., & Adams, K. M. (2009). Digit Span age scaled score in middle-aged military veterans: Is it more closely associated with TOMM failure than reliable digit span? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 24(3), 263–272. https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, J. C., Sawyer, R. J., Roper, B. L., & Baughman, B. C. (2012). Expansion and re-examination of Digit Span effort indices on the WAIS-IV. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 26(1), 147–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2011.647083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuccato, B. G., Tyson, B. T., & Erdodi, L. A. (2018). Early bird fails the PVT? The effects of timing artifacts on performance validity tests. Psychological Assessment, 30(11), 1491–1498.https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000596
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar