The effects of task novelty for age cohort and cognition level on memory for everyday virtual meal preparation tasks

References

• Abbott, V., Black, J. B., & Smith, E. E. (1985). The representation of scripts in memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(2), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90023-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett, M. D., Childers, L. G., & Parsons, T. D. (2021). A virtual kitchen protocol to measure everyday memory functioning for meal preparation. Brain Sciences, 11(5), 571. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11050571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barto, A., Mirolli, M., & Baldassarre, G. (2013). Novelty or surprise? Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 907. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlyne, D. E. (1960). Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/11164-000
   Google Scholar
• Bitan, T., & Karni, A. (2004). Procedural and declarative knowledge of word recognition and letter decoding in reading an artificial script. Brain Research. Cognitive Brain Research, 19(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.01.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brandt, K. R., Cooper, L. M., & Dewhurst, S. A. (2005). Expertise and recollective experience: recognition memory for familiar and unfamiliar academic subjects. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(9), 1113–1125. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, P. W., Alderman, N., Forbes, C., Costello, A., Coates, L. M. A., Dawson, D. R., Anderson, N., Gilbert, S. J., Dumontheil, I., & Channon, S. (2006). The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 12(2), 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617706060310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, A. D. (2005). Memory for grocery prices in younger and older adults: The role of schematic support. Psychology and Aging, 20(4), 718–721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castel, A. D., Farb, N. A. S., & Craik, F. I. M. (2007). Memory for general and specific value information in younger and older adults: Measuring the limits of strategic control. Memory & Cognition, 35(4), 689–700. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chalmers, K. A., & Humphreys, M. S. (1998). Role of generalized and episode specific memories in the word frequency effect in recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24(3), 610–632. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.24.3.610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:NERV.0000009483.91468.fb
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleary, A., Morris, A., & Langley, M. (2007). Recognition memory for novel stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(2), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.33.2.379
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahan, L., Rampon, C., & Florian, C. (2020). Age-related memory decline, dysfunction of the hippocampus and therapeutic opportunities. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology & Biological Psychiatry, 102, 109943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2020.109943
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, D., Malmstrom, T., Burden, M. J., & Luo, Z. (2000). Younger and older adults’ recall of typical and atypical actions from script-based text: Evidence for interruption and bizarre – imagery effects. Experimental Aging Research, 26(4), 409–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/036107300750015787
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987–2000). California Verbal Learning Test–Second Edition (CVLT –II) [Database record]. PsycTESTS.
   Google Scholar
• Drozdick, L. W., Holdnack, J. A., Salthouse, T., & Munro, C. (2013). Assessing cognition in older adults with the WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS. WAIS-IV, WMS-IV, and ACS: Advanced Clinical Interpretation, 407–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-386934-0.00009-2
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus, H. (1885). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. Dover.
   Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., & Bredenkamp, J. (1998). Recognition of script-typical versus script-atypical information: Effects of cognitive elaboration. Memory & Cognition, 26(5), 922–938. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03201173
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenker, D. B., Frey, J. U., Schuetze, H., Heipertz, D., Heinze, H. J., & Duzel, E. (2008). Novel scenes improve recollection and recall of words. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(7), 1250–1265. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.20086
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, M. D., & Wilhelm, K. L. (1996). Conceptual foundations of ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment. Ecological Validity of Neuropsychological Testing, 91–112.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, E., Sullivan, M. P., Camic, P. M., Yong, K. X., Stott, J., & Crutch, S. J. (2024). Exploring experiential differences in everyday activities – A focused ethnographic study in the homes of people living with memory-led Alzheimer’s disease and posterior cortical atrophy. Journal of Aging Studies, 69, 101226–104065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2024.101226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J. Y., Gallanter, E., Müller-Oehring, E. M., & Schulte, T. (2019). Phases of procedural learning and memory: Characterisation with perceptual-motor sequence tasks. Journal of Cognitive Psychology (Hove, England), 31(5–6), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2019.1642897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, O., Pang, Y., & Kim, J. H. (2019). The effectiveness of virtual reality for people with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 19(1), 219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2180
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koppel, J., & Berntsen, D. (2014). The cultural life script as cognitive schema: How the life script shapes memory for fictional life stories. Memory (Hove, England), 22(8), 949–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2013.859269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kormi-Nouri, R., Nilsson, L. G., & Ohta, N. (2005). The novelty effect: Support for the novelty-encoding hypothesis. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.2005.00443
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M. T., Jang, Y., & Chang, W. Y. (2019). How do impairments in cognitive functions affect activities of daily living functions in older adults? PloS One, 14(6), e0218112. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, L. L., & Anderson, P. A. (1983). Memory for scripts in young and older adults. Memory & Cognition, 11(5), 435–444. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196980
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcotte, T. D., Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., & Grant, I. (Eds.). (2022). Neuropsychology of everyday functioning. Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Neguț, A., Matu, S. A., Sava, F. A., & David, D. (2016b). Virtual reality measures in neuropsychological assessment: A meta-analytic review. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 30(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2016.1144793
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neguț, A., Matu, S.-A., Sava, F. A., & David, D. (2015). Convergent validity of virtual reality neurocognitive assessment: A meta-analytic approach. Erdélyi Pszichológical Szemle, 16(1), 31–54.
   Google Scholar
• Neguţ, A., Matu, S.-A., Sava, F. A., & David, D. (2016a). Task difficulty of virtual reality-based assessment tools compared to classical paper-and-pencil or computerized measures: A meta-analytic approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 414–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.08.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberauer, K., Farrell, S., Jarrold, C., & Niklaus, M. (2022). Evidence against novelty-gated encoding in serial recall. Journal of Cognition, 5(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.5334/joc.207
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Overman, A. A., Wiseman, K. D., Allison, M., & Stephens, J. D. W. (2013). Age differences and schema effects in memory for crime information. Experimental Aging Research, 39(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/0361073X.2013.761914
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsey, C. M., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2013). Applications of technology in neuropsychological assessment. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 27(8), 1328–1361. https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2013.834971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. D., Courtney, C. G., Arizmendi, B., & Dawson, M. (2011). Virtual reality stroop task for neurocognitive assessment. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 163, 433–439. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21335835
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons, T. D., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2017). Virtual reality for research in social neuroscience. Brain Sciences, 7(4), 42. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci7040042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. D., Gaggioli, A., & Riva, G. (2020). Extended reality for the clinical, affective, and social neurosciences. Brain Sciences, 10(12), 922. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10120922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perneczky, R., Pohl, C., Sorg, C., Hartmann, J., Komossa, K., Alexopoulos, P., Wagenpfeil, S., & Kurz, A. (2006). Complex activities of daily living in mild cognitive impairment: Conceptual and diagnostic issues. Age and Ageing, 35(3), 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afj054
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin, X. A., Koutstaal, W., & Engel, S. A. (2014). The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: Naturally familiar brand logos are found faster. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 76(4), 914–930. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-014-0623-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramzaoui, H., Faure, S., & Spotorno, S. (2021). Top-down and bottom-up guidance in normal aging during scene search. Psychology and Aging, 36(4), 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1037/pag0000485
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichardt, R., Polner, B., & Simor, P. (2020). Novelty manipulations, memory performance, and predictive coding: The role of unexpectedness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 14, 152. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2020.00152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2019). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salthouse, T. A. (2010). Does the meaning of neurocognitive change with age? Neuropsychology, 24(2), 273–278. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, D. J., Gobel, E. W., & Reber, P. J. (2010). Performing the unexplainable: Implicit task performance reveals individually reliable sequence learning without explicit knowledge. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17(6), 790–796. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.17.6.790
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. (2016). Job Simulator [Computer Software] USA; Owlchemy Labs.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, Z., Zhang, L., Xiao, X., Li, R., & Liang, R. (2020). Icon familiarity affects the performance of complex cognitive tasks. i-Perception, 11(2), 2041669520910167. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669520910167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shohamy, D., & Adcock, R. A. (2010). Dopamine and adaptive memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(10), 464–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2010.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sikkes, S., & Rotrou, J. (2014). A qualitative review of instrumental activities of daily living in dementia: What’s cooking? Neurodegenerative Disease Management, 4(5), 393–400. https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt.14.24
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, S. A. (2019). Virtual reality in episodic memory research: A review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1213–1237. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-019-01605-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spooner, D. M., & Pachana, N. A. (2006). Ecological validity in neuropsychological assessment: A case for greater consideration in research with neurologically intact populations. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology: The Official Journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists, 21(4), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2006.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squire, L. R. (2004). Memory systems of the brain: A brief history and current perspective. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 82(3), 171–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlm.2004.06.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabert, M. H., Albert, S. M., Borukhova-Milov, L., Camacho, Y., Pelton, G., Liu, X., Stern, Y., & Devanand, D. P. (2002). Functional deficits in patients with mild cognitive impairment: Prediction of AD. Neurology, 58(5), 758–764. https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.58.5.758
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker-Drob, E. M. (2011). Neurocognitive functions and everyday functions change together in old age. Neuropsychology, 25(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., & Kroll, N. (1995). Novelty assessment in the brain and long-term memory encoding. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 2(3), 387–390. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210977
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tulving, E., Markowitsch, H. J., Craik, F. I. M., Habib, R., & Houle, S. (1996). Novelty and familiarity activations in PET studies of memory encoding and retrieval. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 6(1), 71–79. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/6.1.71
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakil, E., Mosak, C., & Ashkenazi, M. (2003). The effect of aging on script memory for typical and atypical actions. Applied Neuropsychology, 10(4), 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324826an1004_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waris, O., Fellman, D., Jylkkä, J., & Laine, M. (2021). Stimulus novelty, task demands, and strategy use in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2006), 74(5), 872–888. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820980301
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2001). Wechsler test of adult reading: WTAR. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Wechsler, D. (2008). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth edition technical and interpretive manual. Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Whatley, M. C., & Castel, A. D. (2021). The role of metacognition and schematic support in younger and older adults’ episodic memory. Memory & Cognition, 50(3), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-021-01169-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xie, W., & Zhang, W. (2018). Familiarity speeds up visual short-term memory consolidation: Electrophysiological evidence from contralateral delay activities. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 30(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn_a_01188
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zárate-Rochín, A. M. (2024). Contemporary neurocognitive models of memory: A descriptive comparative analysis. Neuropsychologia, 196, 108846. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2024.108846
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar