A Comparison of the Menstrual Cup and the Intrauterine Device: Attitudes and Future Intentions

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists. (2018). Adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: Implants and intrauterine devices. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 131, e130–e139.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnack, J. L., & Chrisler, J. C. (2007). The experience of chronic illness in women: A comparison between women with endometriosis and women with chronic migraine headaches. Women & Health, 46(1), 115–133. doi:10.1300/J013v46n01_08
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beksinska, M., Smit, J., Greener, R., Todd, C., Lee, M., Maphumulo, V., & Hoffman, V. (2015). Acceptability and performance of the menstrual cup in South Africa: A randomized crossover trial comparing the menstrual cup to tampons or sanitary pads. Journal of Women's Health (2002)), 24(2), 151–158. doi:10.1089/jwh.2014.5021
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Branch, F., Woodruff, T. J., Mitro, S. D., & Zota, A. V. (2015). Vaginal douching and racial/ethnic disparities in phthalates exposures among reproductive-aged women: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001–2004. Environmental Health, 14(1), 1–8. 10.1186/s12940-015-0043-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chrisler, J. C., Gorman, J. A., Manion, J., Murgo, M., Barney, A., Adams-Clark, A., … McGrath, M. (2016). Queer periods: Attitudes toward and experiences with menstruation in the masculine of centre and transgender community. Culture, Health, & Sexuality, 18(11), 1238–1250. doi:10.1080/13691058.2016.1182645
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139–167.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, D. W., Gorn, G. J., & Weinberg, C. B. (1997). Condom-carrying behavior among college students. American Journal of Public Health, 87(6), 1059–1060. doi:10.2105/AJPH.87.6.1059
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Daugherty, J., Jones, J., & Mosher, W. (2015). Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013. National Health Statistics Reports, 86.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, A. Y. (1981). Women, race, & class (1st ed.). New York, NY: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18(2), 189–196. doi: 0278-6133/99. doi:10.1037//0278-6133.18.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVries, A. S., Lesher, L., Schlievert, P. M., Rogers, T., Villaume, L. G., Danila, R., & Lynfield, R. (2011). Staphylococcal toxic shock syndrome 2000–2006: Epidemiology, clinical features, and molecular characteristics. PLoS One, 6(8), e22997. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022997
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, K. L., Sokoloff, A., & Raine, T. R. (2010). Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women. Contraception, 82(2), 178–182. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.02.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997). Objectification theory: Toward understanding women’s lived experiences and mental health risks. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(2), 173–206. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredrickson, B. L., Roberts, T.-A., Noll, S. M., Quinn, D. M., & Twenge, J. M. (1998). That swimsuit becomes you: Sex difference in self-objectification, restrained eating, and math performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(1), 269–284. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, K. M., & Updegraff, J. A. (2012). Health message framing effects on attitudes, intentions, and behavior: A meta-analytic review. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 43(1), 101–116. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9308-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomez, A., Hartofelis, E., Finlayson, S., & Clark, J. (2015). Do knowledge and attitudes regarding intrauterine devices predict interest in their use? Women's Health Issues, 25(4), 359–365. doi:10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grose, R. G., & Grabe, S. (2014). Sociocultural attitudes surrounding menstruation and alternative menstrual products: The explanatory role of self-objectification. Health Care for Women International, 35(6), 677–694. doi:10.1080/07399332.2014.888721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins, J. A. (2014). Celebration meets caution: Long acting reversible contraception (LARC)’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception, 89(4), 237–241. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston-Robledo, I., & Chrisler, J. C. (2013). The menstrual mark: Menstruation as social stigma. Sex Roles, 68(1–2), 9–18. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0052-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston-Robledo, I., Ball, M., Lauta, K., & Zekoll, A. (2003). To bleed or not to bleed: Young women's attitudes toward menstrual suppression. Women & Health, 38(3), 59–75. doi:10.1300/J013v38n03_05
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston-Robledo, I., Sheffield, K., Voigt, J., & Wilcox-Constantine, J. (2007). Reproductive shame: Self-objectification and young women's attitudes toward their reproductive functioning. Women & Health, 46(1), 25–39. doi:10.1300/J013v46n01_03
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juma, J., Nyothach, E., Laserson, K. F., Oduor, C., Arita, L., Ouma, C., … Phillips-Howard, P. A. (2017). Examining the safety of menstrual cups among rural primary school girls in western Kenya: Observational studies nested in a randomized controlled feasibility study. BMJ Open, 7(4), e015429–9. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015429
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, S., Viney, R., Gu, Y., Hole, A., Fiebig, D., Street, D., … Bateson, D. (2013). The effect of adverse information and positive promotion on women’s preferences for prescribed contraceptive products. Social Science & Medicine, 83, 70–80. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamont, J. M., Wagner, K. M., & Incorvati, C. G. (2019). The relationship of self-objectification and body shame to attitudes toward and willingness to use reusable menstrual products. Women's Reproductive Health, 6(1), 1–16. doi:10.1080/2329369.2018.1556428
   Google Scholar
• Macapagal, K., Janssen, E., Matson, M., Finn, P. R., & Heiman, J. R. (2017). The impact of gain- and loss-framed messages on young adults’ sexual decision making: An experimental study. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(2), 385–394. doi:10.1007/s10508-015-0679-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madziyire, M. G., Magure, T. M., & Madziwa, C. F. (2018). Menstrual cups as a menstrual management method for low socioeconomic status women and girls in Zimbabwe: A pilot study. Women's Reproductive Health, 5(1), 59–65. doi:10.1080/23293691.2018.1429371
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S., Sundstrom, B., DeMaria, A. L., & Delay, C. (2019). Beyond a legacy of coercion: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and social justice. Women's Reproductive Health, 6(1), 17–33. doi:10.1080/23293691.2018.1556424
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, M. A., Bisch, S., Arntfield, S., & Hosseini-Moghaddam, S. M. (2015). A confirmed case of toxic shock syndrome associated with the use of a menstrual cup. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 26(4), 218–220. doi:10.1155/2015/560959
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NonWovens Industry. (2016). An assessment of the global feminine care market. Retrieved from: https://www.nonwovens-industry.com/issues/2016-11-01/view_features/an-assessment-of-the-global-feminine-care-market/13588
   Google Scholar
• North, B., & Oldham, M. (2011). Preclinical, clinical, and over-the-counter post marketing experience with a new vaginal cup: Menstrual collection. Journal of Women’s Health, 20(2), 303–311. doi:10.1089/jwh.2009.1929
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaklander, M. (2014, November, 24). Is the menstrual cup going mainstream? Time. Retrieved from http://time.com/3599463/menstrual-cup-tampons/
   Google Scholar
• Planned Parenthood. (2019). IUD. Retrieved from https://www.plannedparenthood.org/learn/birth-control/iud
   Google Scholar
• Potter, J., Rubin, S. E., & Sherman, P. (2014). Fear of intrauterine contraception among adolescents in New York City. Contraception, 89(5), 446–450. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T.-A. (2004). Female trouble: The menstrual self-evaluation scale and women’s self-objectification. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 28(1), 22–26. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2004.00119.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, T.-A., Goldenberg, J. L., Power, C., & Pyszczynski, T. (2002). Feminine protection”: The effects of menstruation on attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26(2), 131–139. doi: 0361-6843/02.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, A. (2014). Women spend hundreds of extra dollars per year. Here’s one easy way out. Groundswell. Retrieved from https://groundswell.org/women-spend-hundreds-of-extra-dollars-per-year-heres-one-easy-out/
   Google Scholar
• Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). An experimental test of the theory of planned behavior. Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(2), 257–270. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01013.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitaker, A. K., Johnson, L. M., Harwood, B., Chiappetta, L., Creinin, M. D., & Gold, M. A. (2008). Adolescent and young adult women’s knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device. Contraception, 78(3), 211–217. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2008.04.119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar