Supporting Intellectually Disabled Women’s Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights: A Qualitative Study With Support Workers in Aotearoa New Zealand

References

• Agaronnik, N., Pendo, E., Lagu, T., DeJong, C., Perez-Caraballo, A., & Iezzoni, L. I. (2020). Ensuring the reproductive rights of women with intellectual disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 45(4), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2020.1762383
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, N., & Gomez, M. T. (2017). Pleasure, sex, prohibition, intellectual disability, and dangerous ideas. Reproductive Health Matters, 25(50), 114–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/09688080.2017.1331690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, C., McCarthy, M., Milne Skillman, K., Elson, N., Forrester-Jones, R., & Hunt, S. (2020). “Always trying to walk a bit of a tightrope”: The role of social care staff in supporting adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities to develop and maintain loving relationships. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Is thematic analysis used well in health psychology? A critical review of published research, with recommendations for quality practice and reporting. Health Psychology Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2022.2161594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315715421
   Google Scholar
• Charitou, M., Quayle, E., & Sutherland, A. (2021). Supporting adults with intellectual disabilities with relationships and sex: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative research with staff. Sexuality and Disability, 39(1), 113–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-020-09646-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiweshe, M., Mavuso, J., & Macleod, C. I. (2017). Reproductive justice in context: South African and Zimbabwean women’s narratives of their abortion decision. Feminism & Psychology, 27(2), 203–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353517699234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrastina, J., & Večeřová, H. (2020). Supporting sexuality in adults with intellectual disability—A short review. Sexuality and Disability, 38(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-018-9546-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ćwirynkało, K., Byra, S., & Żyta, A. (2017). Sexuality of adults with intellectual disabilities as described by support staff workers. Hrvatska Revija Za Rehabilitacijska Istrazivanja, 53, 77–87.
   Google Scholar
• Daly, A., Heah, R., & Liddiard, K. (2019). Vulnerable subjects and autonomous actors: The right to sexuality education for disabled under-18s. Global Studies of Childhood, 9(3), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1177/2043610619860997
   Google Scholar
• de Wit, W., van Oorsouw, W. M. W. J., & Embregts, P. J. C. M. (2022). Sexuality, education and support for people with intellectual disabilities: A systematic review of the attitudes of support staff and relatives. Sexuality and Disability, 40(2), 315–346. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-021-09724-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deffew, A., Coughlan, B., Burke, T., & Rogers, E. (2022). Staff member’s views and attitudes to supporting people with an intellectual disability: A multi-method investigation of intimate relationships and sexuality. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(4), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12897
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillaway, H., Marzolf, B., Fritz, H., Tarraf, W., & Lysack, C. (2019). Experiences of reproductive and sexual health and health care among women with disabilities. In J. M. Ussher, J. C. Chrisler, & J. Perez (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of women’s sexual and reproductive health (pp. 569–580). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351035620-39
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. (1988). Sexuality, schooling, and adolescent females: The missing discourse of desire. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 29–54. https://doi.org/10.17763/haer.58.1.u0468k1v2n2n8242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, M. (2016). Already doing it: Intellectual disability and sexual agency. Minnesota Scholarship Online. https://doi.org/10.5749/minnesota/9780816682973.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gilmore, L., & Chambers, B. (2010). Intellectual disability and sexuality: Attitudes of disability support staff and leisure industry employees. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 35(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250903496344
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginn, H. G. (2022). Securing sexual justice for people with intellectual disability: A systematic review and critical appraisal of research recommendations. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(4), 921–934. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12867
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, C. (2015). Sterilization and intellectually disabled people in New Zealand: Rights, responsibility and wise counsel needed. Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online, 10(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2014.953185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollomotz, A. (2011). Learning difficulties and sexual vulnerability: A social approach account. Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ignagni, E., Fudge Schormans, A., Liddiard, K., & Runswick-Cole, K. (2016). ‘Some people are not allowed to love’: Intimate citizenship in the lives of people labelled with intellectual disabilities. Disability & Society, 31(1), 131–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2015.1136148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarman, M. (2015). Relations of abortion: Crip approaches to reproductive justice. Feminist Formations, 27(1), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1353/ff.2015.0008
   Google Scholar
• Kahonde, C. K. (2023). Perceptions and responses of staff to the sexuality of adults with intellectual disabilities at facilities in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities, 27(1), 138–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/17446295211048743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leclerc, M. J., & Morin, D. (2022). Factors affecting residential staff’s role in supporting the sexuality of adults with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(4), 1028–1036. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddiard, K. (2018). The intimate lives of disabled people. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Löfgren-Mårtenson, L. (2004). “May I?” About sexuality and love in the new generation with intellectual disabilities. Sexuality and Disability, 22(3), 197–207. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SEDI.0000039062.73691.cb
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConnell, D., & Phelan, S. (2022). The devolution of eugenic practices: Sexual and reproductive health and oppression of people with intellectual disability. Social Science & Medicine, 298, 114877. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114877
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meer, T., & Combrinck, H. (2015). Invisible intersections: Understanding the complex stigmatisation of women with intellectual disabilities in their vulnerability to gender-based violence. Agenda, 29(2), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2015.1039307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meier, S., Sundstrom, B., DeMaria, A. L., & Delay, C. (2019). Beyond a legacy of coercion: Long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) and social justice. Women’s Reproductive Health, 6(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/23293691.2018.1556424
   Google Scholar
• Mohamed, K., & Shefer, T. (2015). Gendering disability and disabling gender: Critical reflections on intersections of gender and disability. Agenda, 29(2), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2015.1055878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison, T. (2023). Using reproductive justice as a theoretical lens in qualitative research in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 20(1), 172–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2022.2121236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morison, T., & Mavuso, J. M. J. (2022). Introduction. In T. Morison & J. M. J. Mavuson (Eds.), Sexual and reproductive justice: From the margins to the centre (pp. 1–20). Lexington Press.
   Google Scholar
• Munévar, D. I. (2021). Dialogues between (feminist) studies of care and (critical) disability studies to rethink emerging activisms. In N. Araujo Guimarães & H. Hirata (Eds.), Care and care workers: Latin American societies (pp. 217–234). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51693-2_13
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, R. (2020). Attitudes of direct support staff regarding couple relationships of adults with intellectual disability: Implications for the provision of support. Journal of Social Service Research, 46(5), 713–725. https://doi.org/10.1080/01488376.2019.1648361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, R. (2022). Supporting people with intellectual and developmental disabilities in their adult aspiration for sexual relationships and parenthood. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 19(2), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-021-00574-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oates, M., Crichton, K., Cranor, L., Budwig, S., Weston, E. J. L., Bernagozzi, B. M., & Pagaduan, J. (2022). Audio, video, chat, email, or survey: How much does online interview mode matter? PLoS One, 17(2), e0263876. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263876
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oloidi, E. O., Northway, R., & Prince, J. (2022). ‘People with intellectual disabilities living in the communities is bad enough let alone…having sex’: Exploring societal influence on social care workers’ attitudes, beliefs and behaviours towards support for personal and sexual relationship needs. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 35(4), 1037–1048. https://doi.org/10.1111/jar.12839
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Shea, A., & Frawley, P. (2020). Gender, sexuality and relationships for young Australian women with intellectual disability. Disability & Society, 35(4), 654–675. https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2019.1647148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pariseau-Legault, P., Holmes, D., Ouellet, G., & Vallée-Ouimet, S. (2019). An ethical inquiry of support workers’ experiences related to sexuality in the context of intellectual disabilities in Quebec, Canada. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 47(2), 116–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petner-Arrey, J., & Copeland, S. R. (2015). “You have to care:” Perceptions of promoting autonomy in support settings for adults with intellectual disability. British Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/bld.12084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenswood, K., Douglas, J., & Ewertowska, T. (2021). The New Zealand Care Workforce Survey 2019 report. https://workresearch.aut.ac.nz/data/assets/pdf_file/0003/504093/Care-Workforce-Survey-2019-Report-edited.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. J. (2017). Conceptualising reproductive justice theory: A manifesto for activism. In L. Ross, E. Derkas, W. Peoples, L. Roberts, P. Bridgewater, & D. Roberts (Eds.), Radical reproductive justice: Foundation, theory, practice, critique. Feminist Press at CUNY (pp. 3171–4461).
   Google Scholar
• Ross, L. J., & Solinger, R. (2017). Reproductive justice: An introduction. California University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rushbrooke, E., Murray, C. D., & Townsend, S. (2014). What difficulties are experienced by caregivers in relation to the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities? A qualitative meta-synthesis. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(4), 871–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.01.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, L. J., Rosqvist, H. B., & Grigorovich, A. (2021). Regulating, fostering and preserving: The production of sexual normates through cognitive ableism and cognitive othering. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 23(10), 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2020.1787519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santinele Martino, A., & Perreault-Laird, J. (2019). “I don’t know if I can talk about that”: An exploratory study on the experiences of care workers regarding the sexuality of people with intellectual disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 39(3). https://doi.org/10.18061/dsq.v39i3.6383
   Google Scholar
• Shuttleworth, R., Bahner, J., & Mona, L. R. (2020). Contextualising disability and sexuality studies. In R. P. Shuttleworth & L. R. Mona (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of disability and sexuality (pp. 3–36). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Soniya, A. M. (2022). Notions of sexuality: An analysis of the interplays of gender and care among adults with intellectual disabilities in Kerala. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(7), 863–873. https://doi.org/10.1080/09589236.2022.2039102
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefánsdóttir, G. V. (2014). Sterilisation and women with intellectual disability in Iceland. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 39(2), 188–197. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2014.899327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanhalla, A. (2007). To ‘better the breed of men’: Women and eugenics in New Zealand, 1900–1935. Women’s History Review, 16(2), 163–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/09612020601048779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. J., & Frawley, P. (2016). Transition staff discuss sex education and support for young men and women with intellectual and developmental disability. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 41(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2016.1162771
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. J., Parmenter, T. R., Stancliffe, R. J., & Shuttleworth, R. P. (2011). Conditionally sexual: Men and teenage boys with moderate to profound intellectual disability. Sexuality and Disability, 29(3), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9203-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. J., Parmenter, T. R., Stancliffe, R. J., & Shuttleworth, R. P. (2013). From diminished men to conditionally masculine: Sexuality and Australian men and adolescent boys with intellectual disability. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 15(6), 738–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691058.2013.780262
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiseman, P., & Ferrie, J. (2020). Reproductive (in)justice and inequality in the lives of women with intellectual disabilities in Scotland. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 318–329. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.677
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Braunschweig, Y., Harris, L. H., Horner-Johnson, W., Ernst, S. D., & Stevens, B. (2019). Looking back while moving forward: A justice-based, intersectional approach to research on contraception and disability. Contraception, 99(5), 267–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.01.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young, R., Gore, N., & McCarthy, M. (2012). Staff attitudes towards sexuality in relation to gender of people with intellectual disability: A qualitative study. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability, 37(4), 343–347. https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2012.704983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar