Preferred and Actual Interbirth Intervals in Women With Multiple-Partner Fertility

References

• Andersson, L. (2021). Lifetime parenthood in the context of single- and multiple-partner fertility. Advances in Life Course Research, 47, 100355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.alcr.2020.100355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherlin, A. J. (2021). Rising nonmarital first childbearing among college-educated women: Evidence from three national studies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(37), e2109016118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2109016118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermudez, A., Castaño, F., & Norton, M. H. (2012). Effects of birth spacing on maternal, perinatal, infant, and child health: A systematic review of causal mechanisms. Studies in Family Planning, 43(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4465.2012.00308.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde-Agudelo, A., Rosas-Bermúdez, A., & Kafury-Goeta, A. C. (2007). Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 196(4), 297–308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cotter, D., Hermsen, J., & England, P. (2008). Moms and jobs: Trends in mothers’ employment and which mothers stay home. In S. Coontz, M. Parson, & G. Raley (Eds.), American families: A multicultural reader, 2nd ed., 379–386. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guzzo, K. B. (2014). New partners, more kids: Multiple-partner fertility in the United States. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 654(1), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716214525571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guzzo, K. B., & Hayford, S. (2011). Fertility following an unintended first birth. Demography, 48(4), 1493–1516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0059-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henz, U. (2002). Childbirth in East and West German stepfamilies. Demographic Research, 7, 307–342. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2002.7.6
   Google Scholar
• Hutcheon, J. A., Nelson, H. D., Stidd, R., Moskosky, S., & Ahrens, K. A. (2019). Short interpregnancy intervals and adverse maternal outcomes in high‐resource settings: An updated systematic review. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology, 33(1), O48–O59. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppe.12518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iacovou, M., & Tavares, L. P. (2011). Yearning, learning, and conceding: Reasons men and women change their childbearing intentions. Population and Development Review, 37(1), 89–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1728-4457.2011.00391.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreyenfeld, M., Geisler, E., Castro Martín, T., Hannemann, T., Heintz-Martin, V., Jalovaara, M., Kulu, H., Meggiolaro, S., Mortelmans, D., Pasteels, I., Seiz, M., & Solaz, A. (2017). Social policies, separation, and second birth spacing in Western Europe. Demographic Research, 37, 1245–1274. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2017.37.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logan, C., Manlove, J., Ikramullah, E., & Cottingham, S. (2006). Men who father children with more than one women: A contemporary portrait of multiple-partner fertility. Child Trends Research Brief, 10(2), 2006–2010.
   Google Scholar
• Manlove, J., Ryan, S., Wildsmith, E., & Franzetta, K. (2010). The relationship context of nonmarital childbearing in the U.S. Demographic Research, 23, 615–654. https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2010.23.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellon, J., & Prosser, C. (2017). Twitter and Facebook are not representative of the general population: Political attitudes and demographics of British social media users. Research & Politics, 4(3), 205316801772000–2053168017720008. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168017720008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte, L. M. (2019). Multiple-partner fertility in the United States: A demographic portrait. Demography, 56(1), 103–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-018-0743-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal, I., & Waldfogel, J. (2016). The family gap in pay: New evidence for 1967 to 2013. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(4), 104. https://doi.org/10.7758/rsf.2016.2.4.04
   Google Scholar
• Pronzato, C. D. (2009). Return to work after childbirth: Does parental leave matter in Europe? Review of Economics of the Household, 7(4), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-009-9059-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, C. R., Doren, C., & Li, A. (2002). Trends in years spent as mothers of young children: The role of completed fertility, birth spacing, and multiple partner fertility. In R. Schoen (Ed.), Analyzing contemporary fertility (pp. 237–256). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Finland. (2021, May 28). Fall in the number of families has halted. https://www.stat.fi/til/perh/2020/perh_2020_2021-05-28_tie_001_en.html
   Google Scholar
• The World Bank. (2023, April). Gini index. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, E., Dahlberg, J., & Svallfors, S. (2021). Childbearing across partnerships in Europe and the United States. Stockholm University Figshare. https://su.figshare.com/articles/preprint/Childbearing_across_Partnerships_in_Europe_and_the_United_States/14179967
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, E., Lappegård, T., Carlson, M., Evans, A., & Gray, E. (2014). Childbearing across partnerships in Australia, the United States, Norway, and Sweden. Demography, 51(2), 485–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-013-0273-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, E., Winkler-Dworak, M., Spielauer, M., & Prskawetz, A. (2012). Union instability as an engine of fertility? A microsimulation model for France. Demography, 49(1), 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-011-0085-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2020). International Migration 2020 Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/452).
   Google Scholar