Views of clinical trial participants on the readability and their understanding of informed consent documents

References

• Armstrong, N., M. Dixon-Woods, A. Thomas, G. Rusk, and C. Tarrant. 2012. Do informed consent documents for cancer trials do what they should? A study of manifest and latent functions. Sociology of Health & Illness 34 (8):1230–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01469.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, O., B. H. Grønberg, K. Sand, S. Kaasa, and J. H. Loge. 2009. The length of consent documents in oncological trials is doubled in twenty years. Annals of Oncology 20:379–385. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdn623
   Google Scholar
• Bolam v Friern HMC. 1957. 1 WLR 582.
   Google Scholar
• Brandberg, Y., H. Johansson, and M. Bergen mar. 2016. Patients' knowledge and perceived understanding—Associations with consenting to participate in cancer clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications 2:6–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buccini, L. D., D. Iverson, P. Caputi, and C. Jones. 2010. An Australian based study on the readability of HIV/AIDS and type 2 diabetes clinical trial informed consent documents. Bioethical Inquiry 7:313–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9244-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carstens, P., and D. Pearmain. 2007. Foundational principles of South African medical law, 875–876. Durban, South Africa: LexisNexis.
   Google Scholar
• Christodoulou, G. N., C. W. Van Staden, D. Jousset, M. Schwartz, A. Mishara, and J. E. Mezzich. 2016. Ethics in person-centred psychiatry. In Person-centered psychiatry, ed. J. E. Mezzich, M. Botbol, G. Christodoulou, C. R. Cloninger, and I. Salloum, 35–46. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Denzen, E. M., M. E. Burton Santibáñez, H. Moore, et al. 2012. Easy-to-read informed consent forms for hematopoietic cell transplantation clinical trials. Biology of Blood and Marrow Transplantation 18 (2):183–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbmt.2011.07.022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donovan-Kicken, E., M. Mackert, T. D. Guinn, A. C. Tollison, B. Breckinridge, and S. J. Pont. 2012. Health literacy, self-efficacy, and patients' assessment of medical disclosure and consent documentation. Health Communication 27 (6):581–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-010-9244-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, P. R. 2002. Patients' perceptions of information provided in clinical trials. Journal of Medical Ethics 28:45–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foe, G., and E. L. Larson. 2016. Reading level and comprehension of research consent forms. An integrative review. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 11:21–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1556264615624078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochhauser, M. 1999. Informed consent and patient's rights documents: A right, a rite, or a rewrite? Ethics & Behaviour 9(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327019eb0901_1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffner, B., S. Bauer-Wu, S. Hitchcock-Bryan, M. Powell, A. Wolanski, and S. Joffe. 2012. “Entering a clinical trial: Is it right for you?” A randomized study of the clinical trials video and its impact on the informed consent process. Cancer 118 (7):1877–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.26438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaspers, K. (1913) 1997. Allgemeine Psychopathologie. General psychopathology, trans. J. Hoenig and M. W. Hamilton, 302–13. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, J. 2002. The silent world of doctor and patient. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knifed, E., N. Lipsman, W. Mason, and M. Bernstein. 2008. Patients' perception of the informed consent process for neurooncology clinical trials. Neuro-Oncology 10:348–54. https://doi.org/10.1215/15228517-2008-007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koelsch, M., H. Singer, A. Prestal, J. Burkert, U. Schuze, and J. M. Fegert. 2009. “…Because I am something special” or “I think I will be something like a guinea pig”: Information and assent of legal minors in clinical trials—Assessment of understanding, appreciation and reasoning. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 3:2. https://doi.org/10.1186/1753-2000-3-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koh, J., E. Goh, K. Yu, B. Cho, and J. H. Yang. 2012. Discrepancy between participants' understanding and desire to know in informed consent: Are they informed about what they really want to know? Journal Medical Ethics 38:102–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/jmw.2010.040972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kost, R. G., L. M. Lee, J. Yessis, B. S. Coller, and D. K. Henderson. 2011. Assessing research participants' perceptions of their clinical research experiences. Clinical Translation Science 4 (6):403–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00349.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manta, C. J., J. Ortiz, B. W. Moulton, and S. S. Sonnad. 2016. From the patient perspective, consent forms fall short of providing information to guide decision making. Journal of Patient Safety. Available at: http://journals.lww.com/journalpatientsafety/Abstract/publishahead/From_the_Patient_Perspective,_Consent_Forms_Fall.99588.aspx (accessed October 24, 2016).
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meneguin, S., and J. A. Ayres. 2014. Perception of informed consent form by participants in clinical trials. Investigación y Educación en Enfermería 32 (1):95–102.
   Google Scholar
• Mezzich, J. E. 2013. Geneva Declaration on Person-centred Health Research. International Journal of Person Centered Medicine 3:106–7.
   Google Scholar
• Molyneux, S., and S. Bull. 2013. Consent and community engagement in diverse research contexts: Reviewing and developing research and practice. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 8 (4):1–18. doi:10.1525/jer.2013.8.4.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board. 2015. 2 WLR 768.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo, W., and E. Larson. 2014. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46 (6):423–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paasche-Orlow, M. K., H. A. Taylor, and F. L. Brancati. 2003. Readability standards for informed-consent forms as compared with actual readability. New England Journal of Medicine 348:721–26. https://doi.org/:10.1056/NEJMsa021212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sateren, W. B., E. L. Trimble, J. Abrams, et al. 2002. How sociodemographics, presence of oncology specialists, and hospital cancer programs affect accrual to cancer treatment trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 20 (8):2109–17. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2002.08.056.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharp, S. M. 2004. Consent documents for oncology trials: does anybody read these things? American Journal of Clinical Oncology 27 (6):570–75. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.coc.0000135925.83221.b3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, A., W. M. Silkov, M. I. Quesenberry, H. Safran, H. Khushid, K. M. Mitchell, and A. J. Olszewski. 2017. Informed consent in oncology clinical trials. PLoS ONE 12 (2):e0172957. doi:10.1371/journa;.pone.0172957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, H. A. 1999. Barriers to informed consent. Seminars in Oncology Nursing 15 (2):89–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0749-2081(99)80066-7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Taylor, H. E., and D. E. Bramley. 2012. An analysis of the readability of patient information and consent forms used in research studies in anaesthesia in Australia and New Zealand. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 40 (6):995–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Staden, C. W. 2009. Acceptance and insight. Current Opinion in Psychiatry 22:554–58. https://doi.org/10.1097/yco.0b013e32833168b9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Staden, C. W. 2015. Informed consent to treatment: incapacity and complexity owing to mental disorder. In Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics, ed. J. Z. Sadler, C. W. van Staden, K. W. M. Fulford, ed.1129–42. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallcraft, J. L. 2015. Service user involvement in research: Ethics and values. In Oxford handbook of psychiatric ethics, ed. J. Z. Sadler, C. W. van Staden, and K. W. M. Fulford, 970–88. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar