Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences

References

• Allen, N. L., E. W. Karlson, S. Malspeis, B. Lu, C. E. Seidman, and L. S. Lehmann. 2014. Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: Perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project. Mayo Clinic Proceedings 89 (6):738–46. doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2014.03.015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amendola, L. M., M. Horike-Pyne, S. B. Trinidad, S. M. Fullerton, B. J. Evans, W. Burke, and G. P. Jarvik. 2015. Patients' choice for return of exome sequencing results to relatives in the event of their death. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3):476–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronowitz, R. 2015. Risky medicine: Our quest to cure fear and uncertainty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arribas-Ayllon, M., K. Featherstone, and P. Atkinson. 2011. The practical ethics of genetic responsibility: Non-disclosure and the autonomy of affect. Social Theory & Health 9 (1):3–23. doi:10.1057/sth.2009.22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, P., K. Featherstone, and M. Gregory. 2013. Kinscapes, timescapes and genescapes: Families living with genetic risk. Sociology of Health & Illness 35 (8):1227–41. doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benner, P. E. 1994. Interpretive phenomenology: Embodiment, caring and ethics in health and illness. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bennette, C. S., S. B. Trinidad, S. M. Fullerton, D. Patrick, L. Amendola, W. Burke, F. M. Hisama, G. P. Jarvik, D. A. Regier, and D. L. Veenstra. 2013. Return of incidental findings in genomic medicine: Measuring what patients value–development of an instrument to measure preferences for information from next-generation testing. Genetics in Medicine 15 (11):873–81. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, J. S., M. J. Khoury, and J. P. Evans. 2011. Deploying whole genome sequencing in clinical practice and public health: Meeting the challenge one bin at a time. Genetics in Medicine 13 (6):499–504. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e318220aaba.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergner, A. L., J. Bollinger, K. S. Raraigh, C. Tichnell, B. Murray, C. L. Blout, A. B. Telegrafi, and C. A. James. 2014. Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: The emerging issue of incidental findings. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 164A (11):2745–52. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.36706.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beskow, L. M., and W. Burke. 2010. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Science Translational Medicine 2 (38):38cm20. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3000952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, L. M., E. E. Namey, R. J. Cadigan, T. Brazg, J. Crouch, G. E. Henderson, M. Michie, D. K. Nelson, H. K. Tabor, and B. S. Wilfond. 2011. Research participants' perspectives on genotype-driven research recruitment. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6 (4):3–20. doi:10.1525/jer.2011.6.4.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boenink, M., and S. van der Burg. 2010. Informed decision making about predictive DNA tests: Arguments for more public visibility of personal deliberations about the good life. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (2):127–38. doi:10.1007/s11019-009-9227-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollinger, J. M., J. Scott, R. Dvoskin, and D. Kaufman. 2012. Public preferences regarding the return of individual genetic research results: Findings from a qualitative focus group study. Genetics in Medicine 14 (4):451–7. doi:10.1038/gim.2011.66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredenoord, A. L., and J. J. M. van Delden. 2012. Disclosing individual genetic research results to deceased participants’ relatives by means of a qualified disclosure policy. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):10–12. doi:10.1080/15265161.2012.699145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W., P. Appelbaum, L. Dame, P. Marshall, N. Press, R. Pyeritz, R. Sharp, and E. Juengst. 2015. The translational potential of research on the ethical, legal, and social implications of genomics. Genetics in Medicine 17 (1):12–20. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaffee, K. G., A. L. Oberg, R. R. McWilliams, N. Majithia, B. A. Allen, J. Kidd, N. Singh, A. R. Hartman, R. J. Wenstrup, and G. M. Petersen. 2018. Prevalence of germ-line mutations in cancer genes among pancreatic cancer patients with a positive family history. Genetics in Medicine 20 (1):119–127. doi:10.1038/gim.2017.85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, B., F. M. Facio, H. Eidem, S. C. Hull, L. G. Biesecker, and B. E. Berkman. 2012. Genomic inheritances: Disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives. American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):1–8. doi:10.1080/15265161.2012.699138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, A., L. Mamo, R. J. Fosket, J. R. Fishman, and J. K. Shim. 2010. Biomedicalization: Technoscience, health, and illness in the U.S. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, E. W., and S. E. Kelly. 2013. Let us ask better questions. Genetics in Medicine 15 (11):871–872. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couzin-Frankel, J. 2014. Divulging DNA secrets of dead stirs debate. Science 343 (6169):356–357. doi:10.1126/science.343.6169.356.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, R. 1980. Healthism and the medicalization of everyday life. International Journal of Health Services: Planning, Administration, Evaluation 10 (3):365–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dheensa, S., A. Fenwick, and A. Lucassen. 2016. Is this knowledge mine and nobody else's? I don't feel that. Patient views about consent, confidentiality and information-sharing in genetic medicine. Journal of Medical Ethics 42(3):174–79. doi:10.1136/medethics-2015-102781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dheensa, S., A. Fenwick, S. Shkedi-Rafid, G. Crawford, and A. Lucassen. 2015. Health-care professionals' responsibility to patients' relatives in genetic medicine: A systematic review and synthesis of empirical research. Genetics in Medicine 18 (4):290–301. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumit, J. 2012. Drugs for life: How pharmaceutical companies define our health. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esserman, L. J., I. M. Thompson, Jr., and B. Reid. 2013. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: An opportunity for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association 310(8):797–98. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.108415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Facio, F. M., H. Eidem, T. Fisher, S. Brooks, A. Linn, K. A. Kaphingst, L. G. Biesecker, and B. B. Biesecker. 2013. Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study. European Journal of Human Genetics 21 (3):261–65. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. V., E. Bouffet, D. Malkin, N. Jabado, C. O’Connell, D. Avard, B. M. Knoppers, M. Ferguson, K. M. Boycott, P. H. Sorensen, et al. 2014. Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children. Genetics in Medicine 16 (8):633–40. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. 1973. The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. London, UK: Fontana.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbar, R., and J. Miola. 2015. One size fits all? On patient autonomy, medical decision-making, and the impact of culture. Medical Law Review 23 (3):375–99. doi:10.1093/medlaw/fwu032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graves, K. D., P. S. Sinicrope, J. B. McCormick, Y. Zhou, S. T. Vadaparampil, and N. M. Lindor. 2015. Public perceptions of disease severity but not actionability correlate with interest in receiving genomic results: Nonalignment with current trends in practice. Public Health Genomics 18 (3):173–83. doi:10.1159/000375479.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. C., J. S. Berg, W. W. Grody, S. S. Kalia, B. R. Korf, C. L. Martin, A. L. McGuire, R. L. Nussbaum, J. M. O’Daniel, K. E. Ormond., et al. 2013. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine 15 (7):565–74. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. 1990. The taming of chance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1086/ahr/97.1.157.
   Google Scholar
• Hallowell, N., K. Alsop, M. Gleeson, A. Crook, L. Plunkett, D. Bowtell, G. Mitchell, Group Australian Ovarian Cancer Study, and M. A. Young. 2013. The responses of research participants and their next of kin to receiving feedback of genetic test results following participation in the Australian ovarian cancer study. Genetics in Medicine 15 (6):458–65. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallowell, N., C. Foster, R. Eeles, A. Ardern-Jones, V. Murday, and M. Watson. 2003. Balancing autonomy and responsibility: The ethics of generating and disclosing genetic information. Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (2):74–79. discussion 80-83. doi:10.1136/jme.29.2.74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, A. 2009. They just don't get it!' when family disagrees with expert opinion. Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (8):497–501. doi:10.1136/jme.2008.028555.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husedzinovic, A., D. Ose, C. Schickhardt, S. Frohling, and E. C. Winkler. 2015. Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: Systematic review of the literature. European Journal of Human Genetics 23 (12):1607–14. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvik, G. P., L. M. Amendola, J. S. Berg, K. Brothers, E. W. Clayton, W. Chung, B. J. Evans, J. P. Evans, S. M. Fullerton, C. J. Gallego, et al. 2014. Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. American Journal of Human Genetics 94 (6):818–26. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, A. L., S. H. McKay, J. L. Humphris, M. Pinese, L. A. Chantrill, R. S. Mead, K. Tucker, L. Andrews, A. Goodwin, C. Leonard, H. A., et al. 2017. Lost in translation: Returning germline genetic results in genome-scale cancer research. Genome Medicine 9 (1):41. doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0430-4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johns, A. L., D. K. Miller, S. H. Simpson, A. J. Gill, K. S. Kassahn, J. L. Humphris, J. S. Samra, K. Tucker, L. Andrews, D. K. Chang, N., et al. 2014. Returning individual research results for genome sequences of pancreatic cancer. Genome Medicine 6 (5):42. doi:10.1186/gm558.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juengst, E. T., M. A. Flatt, and R. A. Settersten. Jr. 2012. Personalized genomic medicine and the rhetoric of empowerment. Hastings Center Report 42(5):34–40. doi:10.1002/hast.65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, S. R. 2015. Ordinary medicine: Extraordinary treatments, longer lives, and where to draw the line. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kleinman, A. 1997. Writing at the margin: Discourse between anthropology and medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knoppers, B. M., M. Deschênes, H. Z. Ma’n, and A. M. Tassé. 2013. Population studies: Return of research results and incidental findings policy statement. European Journal of Human Genetics 21 (3):245–247. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2012.152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koenig, B. A. 2001. Why not grant primacy to the family? American Journal of Bioethics 1 (3):33–34. doi:10.1162/152651601750417937.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Konrad, M. 2003. From secrets of life to the life of secrets: Tracing genetic knowledge as genealogical ethics in biomedical Britain. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 9 (2):339–58. doi:10.1111/1467-9655.00153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konrad, M. 2005. Narrating the new predictive genetics: Ethics, ethnography, and science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lock, M. 1998. Breast cancer: Reading the omens. Anthropology Today 14 (4):7–16. doi:10.2307/2783351.
   Google Scholar
• Lucassen, A., and A. Hall. 2012. Consent and confidentiality in clinical genetic practice: Guidance on genetic testing and sharing genetic information. Clinical Medicine 12 (1):5–6. doi:10.7861/clinmedicine.12-1-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupton, D. 1995. The imperative of health: Public health and the regulated body. London, UK: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Mackley, M. P., B. Fletcher, M. Parker, H. Watkins, and E. Ormondroyd. 2017. Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Genetics in Medicine 19 (3):283–93. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., T. Caulfield, and M. K. Cho. 2008. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (2):152–56. doi:10.1038/nrg2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, R. R., W. R. Bamlet, M. de Andrade, D. N. Rider, J. M. Cunningham, and G. M. Petersen. 2009. Nucleotide excision repair pathway polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer risk: evidence for role of MMS19L. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 18 (4):1295–302. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-08-1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McWilliams, R. R., G. M. Petersen, K. G. Rabe, L. M. Holtegaard, P. J. Lynch, M. D. Bishop, and W. E. Highsmith. Jr. 2010. Cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene mutations and risk for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Cancer 116 (1):203–9. doi:10.1002/cncr.24697.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenkamp, T. M., S. K. Gevers, J. A. Bovenberg, G. H. Koppelman, A. V Hylckama Vlieg, and E. M. Smets. 2010. Communication of biobanks' research results: What do (potential) participants want? American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 152A (10):2482–92. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.33617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, J., J. Scott, D. Kaufman, G. Geller, L. LeRoy, and K. Hudson. 2008. Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research. American Journal of Bioethics 8 (11):36–43. doi:10.1080/15265160802513093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelkin, D., and M. S. Lindee. 1995. The DNA mystique: the gene as a cultural icon. New York: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, A. M. 1997. Improving patient satisfaction now: How to earn patient and payer loyalty. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, L. S. 2012. Returning individual research results: What role should people's preferences play? Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 13 (2):449–84.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen, G. M., M. de Andrade, M. Goggins, R. H. Hruban, M. Bondy, J. F. Korczak, S. Gallinger, H. T. Lynch, S. Syngal, K. G. Rabe, D., et al. 2006. Pancreatic cancer genetic epidemiology consortium. Cancer, Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention 15 (4):704–10. doi:10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0734.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ploug, T., and S. Holm. 2017. Clinical genome sequencing and population preferences for information about 'incidental' findings: From medically actionable genes (MAGs) to patient actionable genes (PAGs). PLoS One 12 (7):e0179935. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0179935.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. 2013. Anticipate and communicate: Ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Press, N., J. R. Fishman, and B. A. Koenig. 2000. Collective fear, individualized risk: The social and cultural context of genetic testing for breast cancer. Nursing Ethics 7 (3):237–49. doi:10.1177/096973300000700306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radecki Breitkopf, C., G. M. Petersen, S. M. Wolf, K. G. Chaffee, M. E. Robinson, D. R. Gordon, N. M. Lindor, and B. A. Koenig. 2015. Preferences regarding return of genomic results to relatives of research participants, including after participant death: Empirical results from a cancer biobank. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3):464–75. doi:10.1111/jlme.12289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radecki Breitkopf, C., G. M. Petersen, S. M. Wolf, K. G. Chaffee, M. E. Robinson, D. R. Gordon, N. M. Lindor, and B. A. Koenig. 2018. Attitudes toward return of genetic research results to relatives, including after death: Comparison of cancer probands, blood relatives, and spouse/partners. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 13 (3):295–304. doi:10.1177/1556264618769165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shindo, K., J. Yu, M. Suenaga, S. Fesharakizadeh, C. Cho, A. Macgregor-Das, A. Siddiqui, P. D. Witmer, K. Tamura, T. J. Song, J. A., et al. 2017. Deleterious germline mutations in patients with apparently sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Journal of Clinical Oncology 35 (30):3382–390. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.72.3502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shkedi-Rafid, S., S. Dheensa, G. Crawford, A. Fenwick, and A. Lucassen. 2014. Defining and managing incidental findings in genetic and genomic practice. Journal of Medical Genetics 51 (11):715–23. doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2014-102435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., and J. M. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., and M. Buchbinder. 2013. Saving babies? The consequences of newborn genetic screening, fieldwork encounters and discoveries. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, M. 2016. The double helix: Applying an ethic of care to the duty to warn genetic relatives of genetic information. Bioethics 30 (3):181–87. doi:10.1111/bioe.12176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, D. C., and J. C. Fletcher. 1991. Privacy and disclosure in medical genetics examined in an ethics of care. Bioethics 5 (3):212–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., Branum, R. B. A. Koenig, G. M. Petersen, S. A. Berry, L. M. Beskow, M. B. Daly, C. V. Fernandez, R. C. Green, B. S. LeRoy, N. M., et al. 2015. Returning a research participant's genomic results to relatives: Analysis and recommendations. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3):440–63. doi:10.1111/jlme.12288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., Crock, B. N. B. Van Ness, F. Lawrenz, J. P. Kahn, L. M. Beskow, M. K. Cho, M. F. Christman, R. C. Green, R. Hall, J., et al. 2012. Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets. Genetics in Medicine 14 (4):361–84. doi:10.1038/gim.2012.23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., B. A. Koenig, and G. M. Petersen, eds. 2015. Symposium: Should we offer genomic research results to a participant's family, including after the participant's death? Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3):437–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., F. P. Lawrenz, C. A. Nelson, J. P. Kahn, M. K. Cho, E. Wright Clayton, J. G. Fletcher, M. K. Georgieff, D. Hammerschmidt, and K. Hudson. 2008. Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: Analysis and recommendations. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 36 (2):219–48. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00266.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zerhouni, E. A. 2007. Translational research: Moving discovery to practice. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics 81 (1):126–28. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen, D. B., K. G. Rabe, S. Gallinger, S. Syngal, A. G. Schwartz, M. G. Goggins, R. H. Hruban, M. L. Cote, R. R. McWilliams, N. J. Roberts, et al. 2015. BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, and CDKN2A mutations in familial pancreatic cancer: A PACGENE study. Genetics in Medicine 17 (7):569–77. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar