Framing the diagnosis and treatment of absolute uterine factor infertility: Insights from in-depth interviews with uterus transplant trial participants

References

• Bayefsky, M. J., and B. E. Berkman. 2016. The ethics of allocating uterine transplants. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 25 (03):350–65. doi: 10.1017/S0963180115000687.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Birks, M., Y. Chapman, and K. Francis. 2008. Memoing in qualitative research: Probing data and processes. Journal of Research in Nursing 13 (1):68–75. doi: 10.1177/1744987107081254.
   Google Scholar
• Bortoletto, P., E. Hariton, L. V. Farland, R. H. Goldman, and A. R. Gargiulo. 2018. Uterine transplantation: A survey of perceptions and attitudes of American reproductive endocrinologists and gynecologic surgeons. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25 (6):974–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.02.013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström, M. 2015. Uterus transplantation. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation 20 (6):621–8. doi: 10.1097/MOT.0000000000000246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brännström, M., P. Dahm Kähler, R. Greite, J. Mölne, C. Díaz-García, and S. G. Tullius. 2018. Uterus transplantation: A rapidly expanding field. Transplantation 102 (4):569–77. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000002035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbin, J., and A. Strauss. 2008. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oakes, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, D. C., J. M. Millis, and M. Siegler. 2001. Transplantation of liver grafts from living donors into adults: Too much, too soon. New England Journal of Medicine 344 (21):1633–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200105243442112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deonandan, R. 2015. Recent trends in reproductive tourism and international surrogacy: Ethical considerations and challenges for policy. Risk Management and Healthcare Policy 8:111–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S63862
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ejzenberg, D., W. Andraus, L. R. Baratelli Carelli Mendes, L. Ducatti, A. Song, R. Tanigawa, V. Rocha-Santos, R. Macedo Arantes, J. M. Soares, Jr, P. C. Serafini., et al. 2018. Livebirth after uterus transplantation from a deceased donor in a recipient with uterine infertility. The Lancet 392 (10165):31766–5. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31766-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, R. M., and T. Falcone. 2015. Uterine transplant: New medical and ethical considerations. The Lancet 385 (9968):581–2. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61792-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, R. M., R. Flyckt, and T. Falcone. 2018. The call for a closer examination of the ethical issues associated with uterine transplantation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25 (6):933–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyckt, R., A. Davis, R. Farrell, S. Zimberg, A. Tzakis, and T. Falcone. 2018. Uterine transplantation: Surgical innovation in the treatment of uterine factor infertility. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 40 (1):86–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.06.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyckt, R. L., R. M. Farrell, U. C. Perni, A. G. Tzakis, and T. Falcone. 2016. Deceased donor uterine transplantation: Innovation and adaptation. Obstetrics and Gynecology 128 (4):837–42. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hariton, E., P. Bortoletto, R. H. Goldman, L. V. Farland, E. S. Ginsburg, and A. R. Gargiulo. 2018. A survey of public opinion in the United States regarding uterine transplantation. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 25 (6):980–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2018.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlin, M., A.-M. B. Bjørn, M. Rasmussen, B. Trolle, and M. B. Petersen. 2016. Prevalence and patient characteristics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser syndrome: A nationwide registry-based study. Human Reproduction 31 (10):2384–90. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horsburgh, C. C. 2017. A call for empirical research on uterine transplantation and reproductive autonomy. Hastings Center Report 47 (S3):S46–S9. doi: 10.1002/hast.795.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johannesson, L., P. Dahm-Kähler, S. Eklind, and M. Brännström. 2014. The future of human uterus transplantation. Women's Health 10 (4):455–67. doi: 10.2217/WHE.14.22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lefkowitz, A., M. Edwards, and J. Balayla. 2012. The montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Transplant International 25 (4):439–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01438.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lefkowitz, A., M. Edwards, and J. Balayla. 2013. Ethical considerations in the era of the uterine transplant: An update of the montreal criteria for the ethical feasibility of uterine transplantation. Fertility and Sterility 100 (4):924–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabel, H., R. M. Farrell, and A. Tzakis. 2018. On gender and reproductive decision-making in uterine transplantation. American Journal of Bioethics 18 (7):3–5. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2018.1489655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulligan, A. 2018. Identity rights and sensitive ethical questions: The European convention on human rights and the regulation of surrogacy arrangements. Medical Law Review 26 (3):449–75. doi: 10.1093/medlaw/fwx066.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohman, S. G., C. Grunewald, and U. Waldenström. 2003. Women’s worries during pregnancy: Testing the Cambridge worry scale on 200 swedish women. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 17 (2):148–52. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-6712.2003.00095.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• QSR International Pty Ltd. 2008. NVivo qualitative data analysis software. QSR International Pty Ltd. Version 8.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, E. G., R. Flyckt, A. Tzakis, and T. Falcone. 2018. Uterus transplantation: Organ procurement in a deceased donor model. Fertility and Sterility 110 (1):183. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.04.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, G. W., and H. R. Bernard. 2003. Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods 15 (1):85–109. doi: 10.1177/1525822X02239569.
   Google Scholar
• Rycus, J. S., M. Freundlich, R. C. Hughes, B. Keefer, and E. J. Oakes. 2006. Confronting barriers to adoption success. Family Court Review 44 (2):210–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwx066 doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1617.2006.00081.x.
   Google Scholar
• Saso, S., A. Clarke, T. Bracewell-Milnes, A. Saso, M. Al-Memar, M.-Y. Thum, J. Yazbek, G. D. Priore, P. Hardiman, S. Ghaem-Maghami., et al. 2016. Psychological issues associated with absolute uterine factor infertility and attitudes of patients toward uterine transplantation. Progress in Transplantation 26 (1):28–39. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1526924816634840. doi: 10.1177/1526924816634840.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, G., E. C. Koon, and L. Johannesson. 2017. Living donor uterus transplant and surrogacy: Ethical analysis according to the principle of equipoise. American Journal of Transplantation 17 (4):912–6. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14086.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tzakis, A. 2013. Nonhuman primates as models for transplantation of the uterus. Fertility and Sterility 100 (1):61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.03.041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi, D. 2017. Re-Evaluating the ethics of uterine transplantation. The Journal of Clinical Ethics 28 (3):212–6. PMID: 28930707
   PubMedGoogle Scholar