Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research—One Size Will Not Fit All

References

• All of Us Research Program. 2018. All of us research program - operational protocol. Maryland: National Institute of Health. Accessed October 1, 2018. https://allofus.nih.gov/sites/default/files/aou_operational_protocol_v1.7_mar_2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ansley, F., and J. Gaventa. 1997. Researching for democracy & democratizing research. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 29 (1):46–53. doi: 10.1080/00091389709603114.
   Google Scholar
• Aungst, J., A. Haas, A. Ommaya, and L. W. Green. 2003. Exploring challenges, progress, and new models for engaging the public in the clinical research enterprise: clinical research roundtable workshop summary. Washington: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belle, A., R. Thiagarajan, S. M. Soroushmehr, F. Navidi, D. A. Beard, and K. Najarian. 2015. Big data analytics in healthcare. BioMed Research International 2015: 370194. doi: 10.1155/2015/370194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, L. M., and W. Burke. 2010. Offering individual genetic research results: Context matters. Science Translational Medicine 2 (38):38cm20–5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beskow, L. M., W. Burke, S. M. Fullerton, and R. R. Sharp. 2012. Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: Opportunities and challenges. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 14 (4):490–496. doi: 10.1038/gim.2011.62.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W., B. J. Evans, and G. P. Jarvik. 2014. Return of results: Ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 166 (1):105–111. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.31393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, P. G., N. Diaz, G. Lucas, and M. S. Rosenthal. 2010. Dissemination of results in community-based participatory research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 39 (4):372–378. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.05.021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. 2018. “National Institutes of Health: All of Us Research Program.” Accessed May 1, 2018. https://allofus.nih.gov/about/about-all-us-research-program.
   Google Scholar
• Fabsitz, R. R., A. McGuire, R. R. Sharp, M. Puggal, L. M. Beskow, L. G. Biesecker, E. Bookman, W. Burke, E. G. Burchard, and G. Church. 2010. Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: Updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics 3 (6):574–80. doi: 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.110.958827.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haga, S. B., and L. M. Beskow. 2008. Ethical, legal, and social implications of biobanks for genetics research. Advances in Genetics 60:505–44. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2660(07)00418-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, B. L. 1992. From margins to center? The development and purpose of participatory research. The American Sociologist 23 (4):15–28. doi: 10.1007/BF02691928.
   Google Scholar
• Israel, B. A., A. J. Schulz, E. A. Parker, and A. B. Becker. 1998. Review of community-based research: Assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annual Review of Public Health 19 (1):173–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.publhealth.19.1.173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvik, G. P., L. M. Amendola, J. S. Berg, K. Brothers, E. W. Clayton, W. Chung, B. J. Evans, J. P. Evans, S. M. Fullerton, C. J. Gallego, et al. 2014. Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. American Journal of Human Genetics 94 (6):818–826. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaufman, D. J., R. Baker, L. C. Milner, S. Devaney, and K. L. Hudson. 2016. A survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment. PLoS One 11 (8):e0160461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160461.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodyakov, D., E. Bromley, S. K. Evans, and K. Sieck. 2018. “Best practices for participant and stakeholder engagement in the All of Us Research Program.” RAND. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RR2578.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lyles, C. R., M. R. Lunn, J. Obedin-Maliver, and K. Bibbins-Domingo. 2018. The new era of precision population health: Insights for the all of us research program and beyond. Journal of Translational Medicine 16 (1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1585-5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Manogaran, G., C. Thota, D. Lopez, V. Vijayakumar, K. M. Abbas, and R. Sundarsekar. 2017. Big data knowledge system in healthcare. In Internet of Things and Big Data Technologies for Next Generation Healthcare. 133–157. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• McEwen, J. E., J. T. Boyer, and K. Y. Sun. 2013. Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data. Trends in Genetics 29 (6):375–382. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2013.02.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., T. Caulfield, and M. K. Cho. 2008. Research ethics and the challenge of whole-genome sequencing. Nature Reviews Genetics 9 (2):152. doi: 10.1038/nrg2302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, A. L., J. O. Robinson, R. B. Ramoni, D. S. Morley, S. Joffe, and S. E. Plon. 2013. Returning genetic research results: Study type matters. Personalized Medicine 10 (1):27–34. doi: 10.2217/pme.12.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minkler, M. 2004. Ethical challenges for the “outside” researcher in community-based participatory research”. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication of the Society for Public Health Education 31 (6):684–697. doi: 10.1177/1090198104269566.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nanibaa’, A. G., N. A. Sathe, A. H. M. Antommaria, I. A. Holm, S. C. Sanderson, M. E. Smith, M. L. McPheeters, and E. W. Clayton. 2016. A systematic literature review of individuals’ perspectives on broad consent and data sharing in the United States. Genetics in Medicine 18 (7):663–671. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Returning Individual Research Results to Participants: Guidance for a New Research Paradigm. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prucka, S. K., L. J. Arnold, J. E. Brandt, S. Gilardi, L. C. Harty, F. Hong, J. Malia, and D. J. Pulford. 2015. An update to returning genetic research results to individuals: Perspectives of the industry pharmacogenomics working group. Bioethics 29 (2):82–90. doi: 10.1111/bioe.12073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, J., J. Lewis, C. McNaughton Nicholls, and R. Ormston. 2013. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatello, M., and P. S. Appelbaum. 2017. The precision medicine nation. Hastings Center Report 47 (4):19–29. doi: 10.1002/hast.736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M. 1995. Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health 18 (2):179–183. doi: 10.1002/nur.4770180211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, B., J. Sim, T. Kingstone, S. Baker, J. Waterfield, B. Bartlam, H. Burroughs, and C. Jinks. 2018. Saturation in qualitative research: Exploring its conceptualization and operationalization. Quality & Quantity 52 (4):1893–1907. doi: 10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M. 2013. Return of individual research results and incidental findings: Facing the challenges of translational science. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 14:557–577. doi: 10.1146/annurev-genom-091212-153506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, C. A., A. F. Hernandez, and R. M. Califf. 2018. Return of research results to study participants: Uncharted and untested. JAMA 320 (5):435–436. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.7898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar