Operational Characteristics of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) in the United States

References

• 21 CFR 56. 2008. Code of Federal Regulations Title 21, Food and drugs, Chapter I - Food and Drug Administration, Dept. Health and Human Services, Subchapter A, General Part 56 Institutional review boards. https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfcfr/CFRSearch.cfm?CFRPart=56
   Google Scholar
• AAHRPP. 2017. Metrics on human research protection program performance. Association for the Accreditation of Human Research Protection Programs. Updated May 2, 2018. http://www.aahrpp.org/apply/resources/metrics-on-hrpp-performance
   Google Scholar
• Abbott, D., R. Califf, B. W. Morrison, C. Pierre, J. Bolte, and S. Chakraborty. 2013. Cycle time metrics for multisite clinical trials in the united states. Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science 47 (2):152–60. doi: 10.1177/2168479012464371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, L., and C. Grady. 2011. A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 6 (1):3–20. doi: 10.1525/jer.2011.6.1.3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caligury, M., K. Allen, N. Buscher, L. Denney, C. Gates, K. Kantelo, A. Magit, R. Sak, G. Firestein, and J. Fontanesi. 2017. A multisite study of performance drivers among institutional review boards. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science 1: 192–197. doi: 10.1017/cts.2017.8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. 1966. The SCREE test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research 1 (2):245–76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. Department of Health and Human Services. Human subjects research protections: Enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Fed Registrar 76 (143):44512–31. https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2011/07/26/2011-18792/human-subjects-research-protections-enhancing-protections-for-research-subjects-and-reducing-burden
   Google Scholar
• Desai, P., P. Nasa, J. Soo, C. Jia, M. L. Berbaum, J. H. Fischer, and T. P. Johnson. 2017. Effects of regulatory support services on institutional review board turnaround times. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 12 (3):131–9. doi: 10.1177/1556264617704294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Genes. 2018. Statistics and Figures on prevalence of genetic and rare diseases. Accessed March 7. https://globalgenes.org Web site. https://globalgenes.org/rare-diseases-facts-statistics. Updated 2015. .
   Google Scholar
• Harris, P. A., R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, and J. G. Conde. 2009. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)—A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 42 (2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, D. A., and D. R. Denison. 1989. Stepwise regression in social and psychological research. Psychological Reports 64 (1):251–7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1989.64.1.251.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirshon, J. M., S. D. Krugman, M. D. Witting, J. P. Furuno, M. R. Limcangco, A. R. Perisse, E. K. Rasch. 2002. Variability in institutional review board assessment of minimal-risk research. Academic Emergency Medicine 9 (12):1417–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2002.tb01612.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, M. A., M. S. Barratt, S. D. Krugman, J. R. Serwint, and M. Dumont-Driscoll. 2014. Variability of the institutional review board process within a national research network. Clinical Pediatrics 53 (6):556–60. doi: 10.1177/0009922814527504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. 2014. An easy guide to factor analysis. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Klitzman, R. 2015. The ethics police?: the struggle to make human research safe. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mansbach, J., U. Acholonu, S. Clark, and C. A. Camargo. Jr. 2007. Variation in institutional review board responses to a standard, observational, pediatric research protocol. Academic Emergency Medicine 14 (4):377–80. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2006.11.031.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millum, J., and J. Menikoff. 2010. Streamlining ethical review. Annals of Internal Medicine 153 (10):655. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-10-201011160-00008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health. 2017. NIH research portfolio online reporting tools (RePORT): Awards by location & and organization. Accessed February 1. https://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm Web site. https://report.nih.gov/award/index.cfm. Updated 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Sass, D. A., and T. A. Schmitt. 2010. A comparative investigation of rotation criteria within exploratory factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research 45 (1):73–103. doi: 10.1080/00273170903504810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silberman, G., and K. L. Kahn. 2011. Burdens on research imposed by institutional review boards: The state of the evidence and its implications for regulatory reform. Milbank Quarterly 89 (4):599–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0009.2011.00644.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellecy, R., A. M. Eve, E. R. Connors, R. Shaker, and D. C. Clark. 2018. The Real-Time IRB: A collaborative Innovation to Decrease IRB Review Time. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics: JERHRE 13 (4):432–7. doi: 10.1177/1556264618780803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, A. R., J. E. Tyson, and P. L. Hibberd. 2010. Variation among institutional review boards in evaluating the design of a multicenter randomized trial. Journal of Perinatology 30 (3):163–9. doi: 10.1038/jp.2009.157.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, P. R., U. Feske, S. Gao, R. Stone, S. Zhang, R. Monte, R. M. Arnold, and D. E. Hall. 2016. Time required to review research protocols at 10 Veterans Affairs Institutional Review Boards. Journal of Surgical Research 204 (2):481–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Velicer, W. F. 1976. Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika 41 (3):321–7. doi: 10.1007/BF02293557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfe, E., and L. Dobria. 2008. Applications of the multifaceted rasch model. In Best practices in quantitative methods, ed. J. Osborne, 71–85. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar