Participant Reactions to a Literacy-Focused, Web-Based Informed Consent Approach for a Genomic Implementation Study

References

• All of Us Research Program Investigators, J. C. Denny, J. L. Rutter, D. B. Goldstein, A. Philippakis, J. W. Smoller, G. Jenkins, and E. Dishman. 2019. The "All of Us" research program. New England Journal of Medicine 381:668–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amendola, L. M., J. S. Berg, C. R. Horowitz, F. Angelo, J. T. Bensen, B. B. Biesecker, L. G. Biesecker, G. M. Cooper, K. East, K. Filipski, et al. 2018. The Clinical Sequencing Evidence-Generating Research Consortium: Integrating genomic sequencing in diverse and medically underserved populations. American Journal of Human Genetics 103 (3):319–27. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.08.007.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellcross, C., A. Hermstad, C. Tallo, and C. Stanislaw. 2019. Validation of version 3.0 of the Breast Cancer Genetics Referral Screening Tool (B-RST). Genetics in Medicine 21 (1):181–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadigan, R. J., R. Butterfield, C. Rini, M. Waltz, K. J. Kuczynski, K. Muessig, K. A. B. Goddard, and G. E. Henderson. 2017. Online education and e-consent for GeneScreen, a preventive genomic screening study. Public Health Genomics 20 (4):235–46. doi: 10.1159/000481359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J., S. J. Bull, O. Doumbo, M. Ibrahim, O. Mercereau-Puijalon, D. Kwiatkowski, and M. Parker. 2011. Ethical issues in human genomics research in developing countries. BMC Medical Ethics 12:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickert, N. W., N. Eyal, S. F. Goldkind, C. Grady, S. Joffe, B. Lo, F. G. Miller, R. D. Pentz, R. Silbergleit, K. P. Weinfurt, et al. 2017. Reframing consent for clinical research: A function-based approach. The American Journal of Bioethics 17 (12):3–11. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2017.1388448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flory, J., and E. Emanuel. 2004. Interventions to improve research participants’ understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. Journal of the American Medical Association 292 (13):1593–601.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaieski, J. B., L. Patrick-Miller, B. L. Egleston, K. N. Maxwell, S. Walser, L. DiGiovanni, J. Brower, D. Fetzer, A. Ganzak, D. McKenna, et al. 2019. Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 7 (9):e898 doi: 10.1002/mgg3.898.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., and A. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, G., A. Bunce, and L. Johnson. 2006. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 18 (1):59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. A., R. Taylor, B. L. Minor, V. Elliott, M. Fernandez, L. O'Neal, L. McLeod, G. Delacqua, F. Delacqua, J. Kirby, et al. 2019. The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 95:103208. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, P. A., R. Taylor, R. Thielke, J. Payne, N. Gonzalez, and J. G. Conde. 2009. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 42 (2):377–81. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haun, J., V. Noland-Dodd, J. Varnes, J. Graham-Pole, B. Rienzo, and P. Donaldson. 2009. Testing the BRIEF health literacy screening tool. Federal Practitioner 2009:24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, G. E. 2011. Is informed consent broken? The American Journal of the Medical Sciences 342 (4):267–72. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e31822a6c47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hindorff, L. A., V. E. Bonham, L. C. Brody, M. E. C. Ginoza, C. M. Hutter, T. A. Manolio, and E. D. Green. 2017. Prioritizing diversity in human genomics research. Nature Reviews Genetics 89:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Hughson, J. A., R. Woodward-Kron, A. Parker, J. Hajek, A. Bresin, U. Knoch, T. Phan, and D. Story. 2016. A review of approaches to improve participation of culturally and linguistically diverse populations in clinical trials. Trials 17 (1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1384-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joffe, S., and F. G. Miller. 2008. Bench to bedside: Mapping the moral terrain of clinical research. Hastings Center Reports 38 (2):30–42. doi: 10.1353/hcr.2008.0019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kastrinos, F., H. Uno, C. Ukaegbu, C. Alvero, A. McFarland, M. B. Yurgelun, M. H. Kulke, D. Schrag, J. A. Meyerhardt, C. S. Fuchs, et al. 2017. Development and validation of the PREMM5 model for comprehensive risk assessment of Lynch syndrome. Journal of Clinical Oncology 35 (19):2165–72. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.6120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, S. A., C. McMullen, N. M. Lindberg, D. Bui, K. Shipman, K. Anderson, G. Joseph, D. M. Duenas, K. M. Porter, T. L. Kauffman, et al. 2020. Integrating stakeholder feedback in translational genomics research: An ethnographic analysis of a study protocol’s evolution. Genetics in Medicine 22 (6):1094–101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largent, E. A., S. Joffe, and F. G. Miller. 2011 Jul-Aug. Can research and care be ethically integrated? The Hastings Center Report 41 (4):37–46. doi: 10.1002/j.1552-146x.2011.tb00123.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcotte, E. 2011. Responsive web design. New York: A Book Apart.
   Google Scholar
• Montalvo, W., and E. Larson. 2014. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 46 (6):423–31. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12097.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). 2019a. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial high-risk assessment: Breast and ovarian V3.
   Google Scholar
• National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). 2019b. Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Genetic/Familial high-risk assessment: Colorectal V1.
   Google Scholar
• Nishimura, A., J. Carey, P. J. Erwin, J. C. Tilburt, M. J. Murad, and J. B. McCormick. 2013. Improving understanding in the research informed consent process: A systematic review of 54 interventions tested in randomized control trials. BMC Medical Ethics 14:28. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-14-28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, M., and N. Parker. 2013. Unsatisfactory saturation': A critical exploration of the notion of saturated sample sizes in qualitative research. Qualitative Research 13 (2):190–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pang, P. C., S. Chang, K. Verspoor, and O. Clavisi. 2018. The use of web-based technologies in health research participation: Qualitative study of consumer and researcher experiences. Journal of Medical Internet Research 20 (10):e12094. doi: 10.2196/12094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayes, N., D. J. Bowen, T. Coffin, D. Nebgen, C. Peterson, M. F. Munsell, K. Gavin, R. Lechner, J. Crase, D. Polinsky, et al. 2019. MAGENTA (Making Genetic testing accessible): A prospective randomized controlled trial comparing online genetic education and telephone genetic counseling for hereditary cancer genetic testing. BMC Cancer 19 (1):648. doi: 10.1186/s12885-019-5868-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saldaña, J. 2016. The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlinson, A. N., D. Skinner, D. L. Perry, S. R. Scollon, M. I. Roche, and B. A. Bernhardt. 2016. "Not tied up neatly with a bow": Professionals' challenging cases in informed consent for genomic sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 25 (1):62–72. doi: 10.1007/s10897-015-9842-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., L. M. Amendola, J. S. Berg, W. K. Chung, E. W. Clayton, R. C. Green, J. Harris-Wai, G. E. Henderson, G. P. Jarvik, B. A. Koenig, et al. 2018. Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: Analysis from the CSER Consortium. Genetics in Medicine 20 (5):545–53. doi: 10.1038/gim.2017.137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, S. M., W. Burke, and B. A. Koenig. 2015. Mapping the ethics of translational genomics: Situating return of results and navigating the research-clinical divide. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 43 (3):486–501. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wroblewski, L. 2011. Mobile first. New York: A Book Apart.
   Google Scholar
• Yearby, R. A. 2016. Involuntary consent: Conditioning access to health care on participation in clinical trials. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 44 (3):445–61. doi: 10.1177/1073110516667941.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J.-H., P. S. Appelbaum, K. B. Brothers, S. Joffe, T. L. Kauffman, B. A. Koenig, A. E. Prince, S. Scollon, S. M. Wolf, B. A. Bernhardt, et al. 2019. Consent for clinical genome sequencing: Considerations from the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium. Personalized Medicine 16 (4):325–33. doi: 10.2217/pme-2018-0076.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuen, J., N. Cousens, K. Barlow-Stewart, R. O’Shea, and L. Andrews. 2020. Online BRCA1/2 screening in the Australian Jewish community: A qualitative study. Journal of Community Genetics 11 (3):291–302. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00450-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar