Parents and Provider Perspectives on the Return of Genomic Findings for Cleft Families in Africa

References

• Abul-Husn, N. S., K. Manickam, L. K. Jones, E. A. Wright, D. N. Hartzel, C. Gonzaga-Jauregui, C. O’Dushlaine, J. B. Leader, H. Lester Kirchner, D. M. Lindbuchler, et al. 2016. Genetic identification of familial hypercholesterolemia within a single U.S. health care system. Science 354 (6319):aaf7000. doi:10.1126/science.aaf7000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ACMG. 2015. ACMG policy statement: Updated recommendations regarding analysis and reporting of secondary findings in clinical genome-scale sequencing. Genetics in Medicine 17 (1):68–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Al Mahdi, H. B., S. Edris, A. Bahieldin, J. Y. Al-Aama, R. Elango, B. A. Jamalalail, and H. J. Sabbagh. 2020. Identification of causative variants contributing to nonsyndromic orofacial clefts using whole-exome sequencing in a Saudi family. Genetic Testing and Molecular Biomarkers 24 (11):723–31. doi:10.1089/gtmb.2019.0233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alfayyad, I., M. Al-Tannir, A. Abu-Shaheen, and S. Alghamdi. 2021. To disclose, or not to disclose? Perspectives of clinical genomics professionals toward returning incidental findings from genomic research. BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):101. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00670-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelbaum, P. S., C. R. Waldman, A. Fyer, R. Klitzman, E. Parens, J. Martinez, W. N. Price, 2nd, and W. K. Chung. 2014. Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research. Genetics in Medicine 16 (5):367–73. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arora, N. S., J. K. Davis, C. Kirby, A. L. McGuire, R. C. Green, J. S. Blumenthal-Barby, P. A. Ubel, and MedSeq Project. 2016. Communication challenges for nongeneticist physicians relaying clinical genomic results. Personalized Medicine 14 (5):423–31. doi:10.2217/pme-2017-0008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awotoye, W., P. A. Mossey, J. B. Hetmanski, L. J. J. Gowans, M. A. Eshete, W. L. Adeyemo, A. Alade, E. Zeng, O. Adamson, T. Naicker, et al. 2022. Whole-genome sequencing reveals de-novo mutations associated with nonsyndromic cleft lip/palate. Scientific Reports 12 (1):11743. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-15885-1.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burke, W., A. H. M. Antommaria, R. Bennett, J. Botkin, E. W. Clayton, G. E. Henderson, I. A. Holm, G. P. Jarvik, M. J. Khoury, B. M. Knoppers, et al. 2013. Recommendations for returning genomic incidental findings? We need to talk!. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 15 (11):854–9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, W. 2021. Utility and diversity: Challenges for genomic medicine. Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics 22 (1):1–24. doi:10.1146/annurev-genom-120220-082640.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Butali, A., W. L. Adeyemo, P. A. Mossey, H. O. Olasoji, I. I. Onah, A. Adebola, A. Akintububo, O. James, O. O. Adeosun, M. O. Ogunlewe, A. L. Ladeinde, B. O. Mofikoya, M. O. Adeyemi, O. A. Ekhaguere, C. Emeka, and T. A. Awoyale. 2014. Prevalence of orofacial clefts in Nigeria. The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal 51 (3):320–5. doi:10.1597/12-135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calzone, K. A., M. Kirk, E. Tonkin, L. Badzek, C. Benjamin, and A. Middleton. 2018. Increasing nursing capacity in genomics: Overview of existing global genomics resources. Nurse Education Today 69:53–9. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. C., T. Makuwaza, D. P. Manca, N. Sopcak, J. A. Permaul, M. A. O’Brien, R. Heisey, E. A. Eisenhauer, J. Easley, M. K. Krzyzanowska, et al. 2016. Primary care providers’ experiences with and perceptions of personalized genomic medicine. Canadian Family Physician 62 (10):e626–35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, A. F., A. R. Duncan, G. Hallford, D. M. Kelley, and L. W. Dean. 2021. Barriers and strategies to integrate medical genetics and primary care in underserved populations: A scoping review. Journal of Community Genetics 12 (3):291–309. doi:10.1007/s12687-021-00508-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenhusz, G. M., K. Devriendt, and K. Dierickx. 2013. Disclosing incidental findings in genetics contexts: A review of the empirical ethical research. European Journal of Medical Genetics 56 (10):529–40. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2013.08.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cléophat, J. E., M. Dorval, Z. El Haffaf, J. Chiquette, S. Collins, B. Malo, V. Fradet, Y. Joly, and H. Nabi. 2021. Whether, when, how, and how much? General public’s and cancer patients’ views about the disclosure of genomic secondary findings. BMC Medical Genomics 14 (1):167. doi:10.1186/s12920-021-01016-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clift, K. E., C. M. E. Halverson, A. S. Fiksdal, A. Kumbamu, R. R. Sharp, and J. B. McCormick. 2015. Patients’ views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing. Applied & Translational Genomics 4:38–43. doi:10.1016/j.atg.2015.02.005.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cunha, A. 2017. Genomic technologies—From tools to therapies. Genome Medicine 9 (1):71. doi:10.1186/s13073-017-0462-9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Daack-Hirsch, S., M. Driessnack, A. Hanish, V. A. Johnson, L. L. Shah, C. M. Simon, and J. K. Williams. 2013. ‘Information is information’: A public perspective on incidental findings in clinical and research genome-based testing. Clinical Genetics 84 (1):11–8. doi:10.1111/cge.12167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Abrew, A., V. H. W. Dissanayake, and B. R. Korf. 2014. Challenges in global genomics education. Applied & Translational Genomics 3 (4):128–9.
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, J., G. Landouré, and A. Wonkam. 2020. Stigma in African genomics research: Gendered blame, polygamy, ancestry and disease causal beliefs impact on the risk of harm. Social Science & Medicine 258:113091. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vries, J., S. N. Munung, A. Matimba, S. McCurdy, O. Ouwe Missi Oukem-Boyer, C. Staunton, A. Yakubu, P. Tindana, and H3Africa Consortium. 2017. Regulation of genomic and biobanking research in Africa: A content analysis of ethics guidelines, policies and procedures from 22 African countries. BMC Medical Ethics 18 (1):8. doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0165-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Delanne, J., S. Nambot, A. Chassagne, O. Putois, A. Pelissier, C. Peyron, E. Gautier, J. Thevenon, E. Cretin, A. L. Bruel, et al. 2019. Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature. European Journal of Medical Genetics 62 (6):103529. doi:10.1016/j.ejmg.2018.08.010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• East, K. M., M. E. Cochran, W. V. Kelley, V. Greve, C. R. Finnila, T. Coleman, M. Jennings, L. Alexander, E. J. Rahn, M. I. Danila, et al. 2022. Education and training of non-genetics providers on the return of genome sequencing results in a NICU setting. Journal of Personalized Medicine 12 (3):405. doi:10.3390/jpm12030405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernandez, C. V., E. Bouffet, D. Malkin, N. Jabado, C. O’Connell, D. Avard, B. M. Knoppers, M. Ferguson, K. M. Boycott, P. H. Sorensen, et al. 2014. Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children. Genetics in Medicine 16 (8):633–40. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ginsburg, G. 2014. Medical genomics: Gather and use genetic data in health care. Nature 508 (7497):451–3. doi:10.1038/508451a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gornick, M. C., A. M. Scherer, E. J. Sutton, K. A. Ryan, N. L. Exe, M. Li, W. R. Uhlmann, Y. H. Scott, J. Kim, R. G. Scott Roberts, et al. 2017. Effect of public deliberation on attitudes toward return of secondary results in genomic sequencing. Journal of Genetic Counseling 26 (1):122–32. doi:10.1007/s10897-016-9987-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gowans, L. J. J., N. Al Dhaheri, M. Li, T. Busch, S. Obiri-Yeboah, A. A. Oti, D. K. Sabbah, F. K. N. Arthur, W. O. Awotoye, A. A. Alade, et al. 2021. Co-occurrence of orofacial clefts and clubfoot phenotypes in a sub-Saharan African cohort: Whole-exome sequencing implicates multiple syndromes and genes. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine 9 (4):e1655. doi:10.1002/mgg3.1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, S. W., E. R. Park, J. Najita, Y. Martins, L. Traeger, E. Bair, J. Gagne, J. Garber, P. A. Jänne, N. Lindeman, et al. 2016. Oncologists’ and cancer patients’ views on whole-exome sequencing and incidental findings: Results from the CanSeq study. Genetics in Medicine 18 (10):1011–9. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, R. C., J. S. Berg, W. W. Grody, S. S. Kalia, B. R. Korf, C. L. Martin, A. L. McGuire, R. L. Nussbaum, J. M. O’Daniel, K. E. Ormond, et al. 2013. ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing. Genetics in Medicine 15 (7):565–74. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holtzman, N. A. 2013. ACMG recommendations on incidental findings are flawed scientifically and ethically. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 15 (9):750–1. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvik, G. P., L. M. Amendola, J. S. Berg, K. Brothers, E. W. Clayton, W. Chung, B. J. Evans, J. P. Evans, S. M. Fullerton, C. J. Gallego, et al. 2014. Return of genomic results to research participants: The floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between. American Journal of Human Genetics 94 (6):818–26. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jelsig, A. M., N. Qvist, K. Brusgaard, and L. B. Ousager. 2015. Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings. European Journal of Human Genetics 23 (10):1423–6. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, D., V. H. Dissanayake, B. R. Korf, M. Towery, and R. L. Haspel. 2022. An international genomics health workforce education priorities assessment. Personalized Medicine 19 (4):299–306. doi:10.2217/pme-2021-0094.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnson, K. B., E. Wright Clayton, J. Starren, and J. Peterson. 2020. The implementation chasm hindering genome-informed health care. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 48 (1):119–25. doi:10.1177/1073110520916999.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, A. E., R. L. Nussbaum, B. D. Solomon, H. L. Rehm, M. S. Williams, and L. G. Biesecker. 2020. Management of secondary genomic findings. American Journal of Human Genetics 107 (1):3–14. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2020.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerasidou, A. 2015. Sharing the knowledge: Sharing aggregate genomic findings with research participants in developing countries. Developing World Bioethics 15 (3):267–74. doi:10.1111/dewb.12071.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kini, U. 2023. Genetics and orofacial clefts: A clinical perspective. British Dental Journal 234 (12):947–52. doi:10.1038/s41415-023-5994-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleiderman, E., B. M. Knoppers, C. V. Fernandez, K. M. Boycott, G. Ouellette, D. Wong-Rieger, S. Adam, J. Richer, and D. Avard. 2014. Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: Views of parents of children affected by rare diseases. Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (10):691–6. doi:10.1136/medethics-2013-101648.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klitzman, R., P. S. Appelbaum, A. Fyer, J. Martinez, B. Buquez, J. Wynn, C. R. Waldman, J. Phelan, E. Parens, and W. K. Chung. 2013. Researchers’ views on return of incidental genomic research results: Qualitative and quantitative findings. Genetics in Medicine 15 (11):888–95. doi:10.1038/gim.2013.87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lázaro-Muñoz, G., M. S. Farrell, J. J. Crowley, D. M. Filmyer, R. A. Shaughnessy, R. C. Josiassen, and P. F. Sullivan. 2018. Improved ethical guidance for the return of results from psychiatric genomics research. Molecular Psychiatry 23 (1):15–23. doi: 10.1038/mp.2017.228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, A. A., D. Bick, D. Dimmock, P. Simpson, and R. Veith. 2013. Perspectives of clinical genetics professionals toward genome sequencing and incidental findings: A survey study. Clinical Genetics 84 (3):230–6. doi:10.1111/cge.12060.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke, A. A., and J. N. Harris-Wai. 2015. Stakeholder engagement in policy development: Challenges and opportunities for human genomics. Genetics in Medicine 17 (12):949–57. doi:10.1038/gim.2015.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loud, J. T., R. C. Bremer, P. L. Mai, J. A. Peters, N. Giri, D. R. Stewart, M. H. Greene, B. P. Alter, and S. A. Savage. 2016. Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings. Genetics in Medicine 18 (12):1218–25. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley, M. P., E. Blair, M. Parker, J. C. Taylor, H. Watkins, and E. Ormondroyd. 2018. Views of rare disease participants in a UK whole-genome sequencing study towards secondary findings: A qualitative study. European Journal of Human Genetics 26 (5):652–9. doi:10.1038/s41431-018-0106-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley, M. P., and B. Capps. 2017. Expect the unexpected: Screening for secondary findings in clinical genomics research. British Medical Bulletin 122 (1):109–22. doi:10.1093/bmb/ldx009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackley, M. P., B. Fletcher, M. Parker, H. Watkins, and E. Ormondroyd. 2017. Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: A systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. Genetics in Medicine 19 (3):283–93. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manickam, K., A. H. Buchanan, M. L. B. Schwartz, M. L. G. Hallquist, J. L. Williams, A. K. Rahm, H. Rocha, J. M. Savatt, A. E. Evans, L. M. Butry, et al. 2018. Exome sequencing-based screening for BRCA1/2 expected pathogenic variants among adult biobank participants. JAMA Network Open 1 (5):e182140. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.2140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manolio, T. A., F. Marc Abramowicz, W. Al-Mulla, R. Anderson, A. C. Balling, S. Berger, A. Bleyl, W. Chakravarti, R. L. Chantratita, V. H. W. Chisholm, et al. 2015. Global implementation of genomic medicine: We are not alone. American Journal of Human Genetics 104 (1):13–20. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aab0194.
   Google Scholar
• Matimba, A., S. Ali, K. Littler, E. Madden, P. Marshall, S. McCurdy, V. Nembaware, L. Rodriguez, J. Seeley, P. Tindana, et al. 2022. Guideline for feedback of individual genetic research findings for genomics research in Africa. BMJ Global Health 7 (1):e007184. doi:10.1136/bmjgh-2021-007184.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, A., K. I. Morley, E. Bragin, H. V. Firth, M. E. Hurles, C. F. Wright, M. Parker, and DDD Study. 2016. Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research. European Journal of Human Genetics 24 (1):21–9. doi:10.1038/ejhg.2015.58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikat-Stevens, N. A., I. A. Larson, and B. A. Tarini. 2015. Primary-care providers’ perceived barriers to integration of genetics services: A systematic review of the literature. Genetics in Medicine 17 (3):169–76. doi:10.1038/gim.2014.101.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., K. Lee, N. S. Abul-Husn, L. M. Amendola, K. Brothers, W. K. Chung, M. H. Gollob, A. S. Gordon, S. M. Harrison, R. E. Hershberger, et al. 2022. ACMG SF v3.1 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in Medicine 24 (7):1407–14. doi:10.1016/j.gim.2022.04.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., K. Lee, A. S. Gordon, L. M. Amendola, K. Adelman, S. J. Bale, W. K. Chung, M. H. Gollob, S. M. Harrison, G. E. Herman, et al. 2021. Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2021 update: A policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 23 (8):1391–8. doi:10.1038/s41436-021-01171-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlotshwa, B. C., S. Mwesigwa, G. Mboowa, L. Williams, G. Retshabile, A. Kekitiinwa, M. Wayengera, S. Kyobe, C. W. Brown, N. A. Hanchard, et al. 2017. The collaborative African genomics network training program: A trainee perspective on training the next generation of African scientists. Genetics in Medicine 19 (7):826–33. doi:10.1038/gim.2016.177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukhopadhyay, N., M. Bishop, M. Mortillo, P. Chopra, J. B. Hetmanski, M. A. Taub, L. M. Moreno, L. C. Valencia-Ramirez, C. Restrepo, G. L. Wehby, et al. 2020. Whole genome sequencing of orofacial cleft trios from the Gabriella Miller Kids First Pediatric Research Consortium identifies a new locus on chromosome 21. Human Genetics 139 (2):215–26. doi:10.1007/s00439-019-02099-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neben, C. L., A. D. Zimmer, W. Stedden, J. Van Den Akker, R. O'Connor, R. C. Chan, E. Chen, Z. Tan, A. Leon, J. Ji, et al. 2019. Multi-gene panel testing of 23,179 individuals for hereditary cancer risk identifies pathogenic variant carriers missed by current genetic testing guidelines. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics 21 (4):646–57. doi:10.1016/j.jmoldx.2019.03.001.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nidey, N., L. M. Moreno Uribe, M. M. Marazita, and G. L. Wehby. 2016. Psychosocial well-being of parents of children with oral clefts. Child: Care, Health and Development 42 (1):42–50. doi:10.1111/cch.12276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NIH. 2020. NOT-OD-21-020: Notice of special interest: Administrative supplement for research and capacity building efforts related to bioethical issues (Admin Supp Clinical Trial Optional). grants.nih.gov.
   Google Scholar
• Ochieng, J., B. Kwagala, J. Barugahare, E. Mwaka, D. Ekusai-Sebatta, J. Ali, and N. K. Sewankambo. 2021. Perspectives and ethical considerations for return of genetics and genomics research results: A qualitative study of genomics researchers in Uganda. BMC Medical Ethics 22 (1):154. doi:10.1186/s12910-021-00724-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puryear, L., N. Downs, A. Nevedal, E. T. Lewis, K. E. Ormond, M. Bregendahl, C. J. Suarez, S. P. David, I. Steven Charlap, S. M. Chu, et al. 2018. Patient and provider perspectives on the development of personalized medicine: A mixed-methods approach. Journal of Community Genetics 9 (3):283–91. doi:10.1007/s12687-017-0349-x.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ross, L. F., M. A. Rothstein, and E. W. Clayton. 2013. Mandatory extended searches in all genome sequencing: “incidental findings,” patient autonomy, and shared decision making. JAMA 310 (4):367–8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.41700.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupmann, W., S. A. Miner, H. K. Sullivan, J. R. Glover, J. E. Hall, S. H. Schurman, and B. E. Berkman. 2021. Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary genetic findings about themselves. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 23 (12):2281–8. doi: 10.1038/s41436-021-01271-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sirisena, N. D., and V. H. Dissanayake. 2019. Strategies for genomic medicine education in low-and middle-income countries. Frontiers in Genetics 10:944. doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spies, G., J. Mokaya, J. Steadman, N. Schuitmaker, M. Kidd, S. M. J. Hemmings, J. A. Carr, H. Kuivaniemi, S. Seedat, and SHARED ROOTS Group. 2021. Attitudes among South African university staff and students towards disclosing secondary genetic findings. Journal of Community Genetics 12 (1):171–84. doi:10.1007/s12687-020-00494-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, Z., L. Dolman, T. A. Manolio, B. Ozenberger, S. L. Hill, M. J. Caulfied, Y. Levy, D. Glazer, J. Wilson, T. Mark Lawler, et al. 2019. Integrating genomics into healthcare: A global responsibility. American Journal of Human Genetics 104 (1):13–20. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2018.11.014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, K. A., K. L. Zusevics, D. P. Bick, and R. Veith. 2014a. Views of nonmedical, health system professionals regarding the return of whole genome sequencing incidental findings. WMJ 113 (5):179–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Strong, K. A., K. L. Zusevics, D. Bick, and R. Veith. 2014b. Views of primary care providers regarding the return of genome sequencing incidental findings. Clinical Genetics 86 (5):461–8. doi:10.1111/cge.12390.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, C. S.-M., S. Dattani, M.-T. So, S. S. Cherny, P. K. H. Tam, P. C. Sham, and M.-M. Garcia-Barcelo. 2018. Actionable secondary findings from whole-genome sequencing of 954 East Asians. Human Genetics 137 (1):31–7. doi:10.1007/s00439-017-1852-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TanzilaRafique, and G. S. Hassan. 2020. Burden of Oro facial clefts, quality of life and costs—A review article. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science 25:40–6.
   Google Scholar
• Thorogood, A., G. Dalpé, and B. M. Knoppers. 2019. Return of individual genomic research results: Are laws and policies keeping step? European Journal of Human Genetics 27 (4):535–46. doi:10.1038/s41431-018-0311-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend, A., S. Adam, P. H. Birch, and J. M. Friedman. 2013. Paternalism and the ACMG recommendations on genomic incidental findings: Patients seen but not heard. Genetics in Medicine: Official Journal of the American College of Medical Genetics 15 (9):751–2. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, C. 2014. Anticipate and communicate: ethical management of incidental and secondary findings in the clinical, research, and direct-to-consumer contexts (December 2013 Report of the Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues). American Journal of Epidemiology 180 (6):562–4. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwu217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S., C. Jacobs, and J. Phillips. 2020. Mainstreaming genetics and genomics: A systematic review of the barriers and facilitators for nurses and physicians in secondary and tertiary care. Genetics in Medicine 22 (7):1149–55. doi:10.1038/s41436-020-0785-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, B., and M. P. Adam, eds. 1993. University of Washington, Seattle Copyright © 1993-2021, University of Washington, Seattle. GeneReviews is a registered trademark of the University of Washington, Seattle (WA).
   Google Scholar
• Wonkam, A., and J. de Vries. 2020. Returning incidental findings in African genomics research. Nature Genetics 52 (1):17–20. doi:10.1038/s41588-019-0542-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonkam, A., W. Muna, R. Ramesar, C. N. Rotimi, and M. J. Newport. 2010. Capacity-building in human genetics for developing countries: Initiatives and perspectives in sub-Saharan Africa. Public Health Genomics 13 (7-8):492–4. doi:10.1159/000294171.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wonkam, A., A. K. Njamnshi, and F. F. Angwafo. 2006. Knowledge and attitudes concerning medical genetics amongst physicians and medical students in Cameroon (sub-Saharan Africa). Genetics in Medicine 8 (6):331–8. doi:10.1097/01.gim.0000223542.97262.21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J.-H., T. M. Harrell, S. M. Jamal, H. K. Tabor, and M. J. Bamshad. 2014. Attitudes of genetics professionals toward the return of incidental results from exome and whole-genome sequencing. American Journal of Human Genetics 95 (1):77–84. doi:10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.06.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, A., B. Darren, B. Loiseau, L. Q. B. He, T. Chang, J. Hill, and H. Dimaras. 2021. Ethical, social, and cultural issues related to clinical genetic testing and counseling in low- and middle-income countries: A systematic review. Genetics in Medicine 23 (12):2270–80. doi:10.1038/s41436-018-0090-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar