Using the concept of encounter to further the social inclusion of people with intellectual disabilities: what has been learned?

References

• Anderson, S., & Bigby, C. (2017). Self-advocacy as a means to positive identities for people with intellectual disability: “We just help them, be them really”. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 30(1), 109–120. doi:10.1111/jar.12223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Anderson, S., & Cameron, N. (2018a) Identifying conceptualisations and theories of change embedded in interventions to facilitate community participation for people with intellectual disability. A scoping review. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 31, 165–180.
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Anderson, S., & Cameron, N. (2018b). Full report: Designing effective support for community participation for people with intellectual disabilities. Report for Disability Research and Data Working Group. Melbourne: La Trobe University, Living with Disability Research Centre. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1959.9/563690
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., Clement, T., Mansell, J., & Beadle-Brown, J. (2009). “It's pretty hard with our ones, they can't talk, the more able bodied can participate”: Staff attitudes about the applicability of disability policies to people with severe and profound intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(4), 363–376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01154.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Wiesel, I. (2011). Encounter as a dimension of social inclusion for people with intellectual disability: Beyond and between community presence and participation. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(4), 259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Wiesel, I. (2015). Mediating community participation: Practice of support workers in initiating, facilitating or disrupting encounters between people with and without intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities: Jarid, 28(4), 307–318. doi:10.1111/jar.12140
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Wiesel, I. (n.d.). Supporting Inclusion Online Training Resource. Retrieved from SupportingInclusion.weebly.com
   Google Scholar
• Bould, E., Bigby, C., Bennett, P., & Howell, T. (2018). “More people talk to you when you have a dog”: Dogs as catalysts for community participation of people with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 62, 833–841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bredewold, F., Tonkens, E., & Trappenburg, M. (2016). Urban encounters limited: The importance of built-in boundaries in contacts between people with intellectual or psychiatric disabilities and their neighbours. Urban Studies, 53(16), 3371–3387. doi:10.1177/0042098015616895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2009). Breaking out of a distinct social space: Reflections on supporting community participation for people with severe and profound intellectual disability. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 22(3), 264–275. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3148.2008.00458.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clement, T., & Bigby, C. (2010). Group homes for people with intellectual disabilities: Encouraging inclusion and participation. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford-Simplican, S. (2018). Theorizing community participation: Successful concept or empty buzzword? Advance online publication. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. doi:10.1080/23297018.2018.1503938
   Google Scholar
• Clifford-Simplican, S., & Leader, G. (2015). Counting inclusion with Chantal Mouffe: A radical democratic approach to intellectual disability research. Disability and Society, 30(5), 717–730. doi:10.1080/09687599.2015.1021763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clifford-Simplican, S., Leader, G., Kosciulek, J., & Leahy, M. (2015). Defining social inclusion of people with intellectual and developmental disabilities: An ecological model of social networks and community participation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 38, 18–29. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2014.10.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2009). Shut out: The experience of people with disabilities and their families in Australia. National Disability Strategy Consultation Report prepared by the National People with Disabilities and Carer Council. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Commonwealth of Australia. (2011). National Disability Strategy. Canberra: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, D., & Bigby, C. (2015). “She's been involved in everything as far as I can see”: Supporting the active participation of people with intellectual disability in community groups. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 40(1), 12–25. doi:10.3109/13668250.2014.977235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fincher, R., Iveson, K. (2008). Planning and diversity in the city: Redistribution, recognition and encounter. Hampshire, UK: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gilroy, P. (2006). Multiculture in times of war: An inaugural lecture given at the London School of Economics. Critical Quarterly, 48(4), 27–45. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8705.2006.00731.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B. (2004). Deprogramming planning: Collaboration and inclusion in new urban development. Urban Policy and Research, 22(3), 315–322. doi:10.1080/0811114042000269326
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, B., & Kearns, R. (2001). Remoralising landscapes of care. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 19(1), 61–80. doi:10.1068/d38j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1961). Encounters: Two studies in the sociology of interaction. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin University Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York: Basic Books
   Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2004). Social geographies of learning disability: Narratives of exclusion and inclusion. Area, 36(3), 298–306. doi:10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00227.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, E. (2005). The entangled geographies of social exclusion/inclusion for people with learning disabilities. Health and Place, 11(2), 107–115. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2004.10.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J. (1962). The death and life of great American cities. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Milner, P., & Kelly, B. (2009). Community participation and inclusion: People with disabilities defining their place. Disability & Society, 24(1), 47–62. doi:10.1080/09687590802535410
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. (2013). No. 20. An Act to establish the National Disability Insurance Scheme, and for related purposes. Canberra: Australian Government.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, J. (1987). A framework for accomplishment. Decatur, GA: Responsive Systems Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Permezel, M. (2001). The practice of citizenship: Place, identity and the politics of participation in neighbourhood houses (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Pettigrew, T. F., & Tropp, L. R. (2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751–783. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, J., Emerson, E., Elliott, J., Hatton, C., McIntosh, B., Swift, P., … Joyce, T. (2007). The impact of person centred planning for people with intellectual disabilities in England: A summary of findings. Lancaster: Lancaster University.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability, rights and wrongs. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tajbakhsh, K. (2001). The promise of the city: Space, identity and politics in contemporary social thought. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, P. (1995). Community based is not community: The social geography of disability. In S. Taylor, R. Bodgan & Z. Lutfiyya (Eds.), The variety of community experience: Qualitative studies of family and community life. Baltimore: Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2014). Being recognised and becoming known: Encounters between people with and without intellectual disability in the public realm. Environment and Planning A, 46(7), 1754–1769. doi:10.1068/a46251
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., & Bigby, C. (2016). Mainstream, inclusionary, and convivial places: Locating encounters between people with and without intellectual disabilities. Geographical Review, 106(2), 201–214. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2015.12153.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel, I., Bigby, C., & Carling-Jenkins, R. (2013). “Do you think I'm stupid?”: Urban encounters between people with and without intellectual disability. Urban Studies, 50(12), 2391–2406. doi:10.1177/0042098012474521
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise, A. (2011). Moving food: Gustatory commensality and disjuncture in everyday multiculturalism. New Formations, 74(74), 82–107. doi:10.3898/NewF.74.05.2011
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar