Legitimacy and ambiguity: institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities

References

• Act Concerning Support and Service for Persons with Certain Functional Impairments (LSS) (1993). FS 1993: 387. Retrieved from: https://www.ornskoldsvik.se/download/18.44a4cd7915743e6a7e926737/1475832232342/Om%20LSS%20på%20Engelska.pdf. [Swedish]
   Google Scholar
• Bigby, C., & Frawley, P. (2010). Social work and intellectual disability: Working for change. London: Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska-Joerges, B. (1988). Ideological control in non-ideological organizations. New York, NY: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. C. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds). The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. doi:10.2307/2095101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gustavsson, A. (2004). The role of theory in disability research – springboard or strait-jacket. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 6(1), 55–70. doi:10.1080/15017410409512639
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, R., Hvinden, B., Beadle-Brown, J., Biggeri, M., Tøssebro, M., & Waldschmidt, A. (2018). Understanding the lived experiences of persons with disabilities in nine countries. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hasenfeld, Y. (1983). Human service organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Hausstätter, R. S. (2014). In support of unfinished inclusion. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 58(4): 424–434. doi:10.1080/00313831.2013.773553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, G. M. (1998). The approach of institutional economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 166–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotulainen, R., & Takala, M. (2014). Parents views on the success of integration of students with special education needs. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 18(2), 140–154. doi:10.1080/13603116.2012.759630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland, J. (2015). Logics and ambivalence: Professional dilemmas during implementation of an inclusive education practice. Education Inquiry, 6(1), 26157–26171. doi:10.3402/edui.v6.26157
   Google Scholar
• Ineland, J. (2005). Logics and discourses in disability arts in Sweden: A neo-institutional perspective. Disability & Society, 20(7), 749–762. doi:10.1080/09687590500335766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland, J. (2007). Mellan konst och terapi. Om teater för personer med utvecklingsstörning. [Between art and therapy: Theatre and people with intellectual disabilities]. Institutionen för socialt arbete, Umeå universitet. Akademisk avhandling, Rapport nr 56 [Doctoral dissertation, Umeå University, Department of Social Work].
   Google Scholar
• Ineland, J. (2016). Hybrid structures and cultural diversity in welfare services for people with intellectual disabilities. The case of inclusive education and disability arts in Sweden. ALTER. European Journal of Disability Research, 10(4), 289. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2016.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland, J., & Hjelte, J. (2018). Knowing, being or doing? A comparative study on human service professionals' perceptions of quality in day-to-day encounters with clients and students with intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities: Joid, 22(3), 246–261. doi:10.1177/1744629517694705
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland, J., & Sauer, L. (2014). Cultural practices for people with intellectual disabilities – an educational challenge. [Kulturella verksamheter för personer med utvecklingsstörning – en pedagogisk utmaning.] Pedagogisk forskning i Sverige [Educational research in Sweden], 19(1), 32–53.
   Google Scholar
• Ineland, J., Sauer, L., & Molin, M. (2017). Sources of job satisfaction in intellectual disability services: A comparative analysis of experiences among human service professionals in schools, social services, and public health care in Sweden. Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disabilities, 43, 421–430. doi:10.3109/13668250.2017.1310817
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ineland, J., & Silfver, E. (2018). Bedömning och betygssättning av elever med utvecklingsstörning – attityder och erfarenheter från pedagogers perspektivs. [Assessing and grading students with intellectual disabilities: Attitudes and experiences from teachers’ perspective]. Pedagogisk Forskning i Sverige, 1(2), 107–126.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 55–77. doi:10.1086/226550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., & Scott, R. (1994). Institutional environments and organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Misangyi, V. F. (2016). Institutional complexity and the meaning of loose coupling: Connecting institutional sayings and (not) doings. Strategic Organization, 14(4), 407–440. doi:10.1177/1476127016635481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilholm, C. (2006). Special education, inclusion and democracy. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 21(4), 431–445. doi:10.1080/08856250600957905
   Google Scholar
• Novotna, G. (2014). Competing institutional logics in the development and implementation of integrated treatment for concurrent disorders in Ontario: A case study. Journal of Social Work, 14 (3), 260–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476. doi:10.5465/amr.35.3.zok455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palthe, J. (2014). Regulative, normative, and cognitive elements of organizations: Implications for managing change. Management and Organizational Studies, 1(2), 59–66. doi:10.5430/mos.v1n2p59
   Google Scholar
• Reay, T., & Hinings, C. R. (2009). Managing the rivalry of competing institutional logics. Organization Studies, 30(6), 629–652. doi:10.1177/0170840609104803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandvin, J., & Söder, M. (1996). Welfare state reconstruction. In Tøssebro, J., Gustavsson, A. & Dyrendahl, G. (eds.), Intellectual disabilities in the Nordic welfare states: Policies and everyday life. Oslo: Norwegian Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1994). Institutions and organizations: Toward a theoretical synthesis. In R. Scott & M. Meyer (Eds.) Institutional environments and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sépulchre, M. (2018). Tensions and unity in the struggle for citizenship: Swedish disability rights activists claim “Full Participation! Now!”. Disability & Society, 33(4), 539–5561. doi:10.1080/09687599.2018.1440194
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakespeare, T. (2006). Disability rights and wrongs. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Söder, M. (2013). Swedish social disability research: A short version of a long story. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 15(sup1), 90–107. doi:10.1080/15017419.2013.781961
   Google Scholar
• Solvang, P. K. (2018). Between art therapy and disability aesthetics: A sociological approach for understanding the intersection between art practice and disability discourse. Disability & Society, 33(2), 238–253. doi:10.1080/09687599.2017.1392929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Education Act. (2010:800). Svensk författningssamling SFS Skollag (2010: 800) [Swedish Code of Statutes Education Act (2010: 800)], Utbildningsdepartementet [Department of Education].
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 99–129). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tøssebro, J. (2016). Scandinavian disability policy: From deinstitutionalization to non-discrimination and beyond. ALTER. European Journal of Disability Research, 10(2), 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.alter.2016.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2006). United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. New York: UN. Retrieved from: www.un.org/disabilities/convention/conventionfull.shtml
   Google Scholar