http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8673-2912
References
- Bunn, R. (2019). Intersectional needs and re-entry: Re-conceptualising “multiple and complex needs” post-release. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 19(3), 328–345. doi:10.1177/1748895817751828
- Didi, A., Dowse, L., & Smith, L. (2018). Intellectual disability and complex support needs: Human rights perspective for policy and practice. The International Journal of Human Rights, 22(8), 989–1006. doi:10.1080/13642987.2018.1485653
- Dowse, L. (2017). Disruptive, dangerous and disturbing: The “challenge” of behaviour in the construction of normalcy and vulnerability. Continuum, 31(3), 447–457. doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1275148
- Dowse, L. (2020). Reconciling cognitive disability and corrosive social disadvantage: Identity, transgression and debility. In C. Spivakovsky, L. Steele, & P. Weller (Eds.), The legacies of institutionalisation: Disability, law and policy in the “deinstitutionalised” community (Chap 8). Oxford: Hart Publishing.
- Ellem, K. (2019). Supporting people with cognitive disabilities in contact with the criminal justice system: The importance of relationship-based practice. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 6(2), 164–177. doi:10.1080/23297018.2019.1629332
- Ellem, K., Baidawi, S., Dowse, L., & Smith, L. (2019). Services to young people with complex support needs in rural and regional Australia: Beyond a metro-centric response. Children and Youth Services Review, 99(April), 97–106. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2019.01.033
- Erevelles, N. (2011). Disability and difference in global contexts: Enabling a transformative body politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Fisher, P. (2016). Co-production: What is it and where do we begin? Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 23(6–7), 345–346. doi:10.1111/jpm.12281
- Fritsch, K. (2015). Gradations of debility and capacity: Biocapitalism and the neoliberalization of disability relations. Canadian Journal of Disability Studies, 4(2), 12–48. doi:10.15353/cjds.v4i2.208
- National Disability Insurance Scheme. (2015). Principles to determine the responsibilities of the NDIS and other service systems. Retrieved from https://www.coag.gov.au/sites/default/files/communique/NDIS-Principles-to-Determine-Responsibilities-NDIS-and-Other-Service.pdf
- Nunkoosing, K., & Haydon-Laurelut, M. (2012). Intellectual disability trouble: Foucault and Goffman on “challenging behavior”. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and social theory: New developments and directions (pp. 195–211). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
- O’Connor, M. (2014). The National Disability Insurance Scheme and people with mild intellectual disability: Potential pitfalls for consideration. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 1(1), 17–23. doi:10.1080/23297018.2014.908815
- Office of the Public Advocate. (2018). The illusion of ‘choice and control’. Melbourne, VIC: Office of the Public Advocate. Retrieved from https://www.publicadvocate.vic.gov.au/our-services/publications-forms/519-the-illusion-of-choice-and-control?path=
- Ruch, G. (2009). Identifying “the critical” in a relationship-based model of reflection. European Journal of Social Work, 12(3), 349–362. doi:10.1080/13691450902930761
- Smith, L., & Dowse, L. (2018). Complexity and disability: Drawing from a complexity approach to think through disability at the intersections. In M. Kent, K. Ellis, R. Roberson. & R. Garland-Thomson (Eds.), Interdisciplinary approaches to disability: Looking towards the future (pp. 123–130). London: Routledge.
- Smith, L., & Dowse, L. (2019). Times during transition for young people with complex support needs: Entangled critical moments, static liminal periods and contingent meaning making times. Journal of Youth Studies, 22(10), 1327–1344. doi:10.1080/13676261.2019.1575346
- Starr-Sered, S., & Norton-Hawk, M. (2014). Can’t catch a break: Gender, jail, drugs, and the limits of personal responsibility. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
- Wilson, K., Ruch, G., Lymbery, M., & Cooper, A. (2011). Relationship-based practice: Some fundamental principles. In K. Wilson, G. Ruch, M. Lymbery, & A. Cooper (Eds.), Social work: An introduction to contemporary practice (pp. 7–8). London: Pearson.