References
- Altermark, N. (2018). Citizenship, inclusion and intellectual disability. Routledge.
- Beaupert, F. (2018a). Freedom of opinion and expression: From the perspective of psychosocial disability and madness. Laws, 7(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/laws7010003
- Beaupert, F. (2018b). Silencing prote(x)t: Disrupting the scripts of mental health law. UNSW Law Journal, 41(3), 746–782. www.unswlawjournal.unsw.edu.au/wpcontent/uploads/2018/09/Beaupert.pdf.
- Cadwallader, J., Spivakovsky, C., Steele, L., & Wadiwel, D. (2018). Institutional violence against people with disability: Recent legal and political developments. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 29(3), 259–272. https://doi.org/10.1080/10345329.2018.12036101
- Dowse, L. (2017). Disruptive, dangerous and disturbing: The “challenge” of behaviour in the construction of normalcy and vulnerability. Continuum, 31(3), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1275148
- Dowse, L. (2020). Reconciling cognitive disability and corrosive social disadvantage: Identity, transgression and debility. In Spivakovsky, C., Steele, L. & Weller, P. (Eds.), The legacies of institutionalisation: Disability, law and policy in the “deinstitutionalised” community (pp. 149–160). Hart Publishing. Advance online publication.
- Ineland, J. (2019). Legitimacy and ambiguity: Institutional logics and their outcome for people with intellectual disabilities. Research and Practice in Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 7(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/23297018.2019.1641833
- Spivakovsky, C. (2014a). From punishment to protection: Containing and controlling the lives of people with disabilities in human rights. Punishment & Society, 16(5), 560–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474514548805
- Spivakovsky, C. (2014b). Making dangerousness intelligible in intellectual disability. Griffith Law Review, 23(3), 389–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2014.979463
- Spivakovsky, C. (2017). Governing freedom through risk: Locating the group home in the archipelago of confinement and control. Punishment & Society, 19(3), 366–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474517703968
- Spivakovsky, C. (2018). The impossibilities of “bearing witness” to the violence of coercive interventions in the disability sector. In Spivakovsky, C., Seear, K., & Carter, A. (Eds.), Critical perspectives on coercive interventions: Law, medicine and society (pp. 97–113). Routledge.
- Spivakovsky, C., & Seear, K. (2017). Making the abject: Problem solving courts, addiction, mental illness and impairment. Continuum, 31(3), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1275152
- Steele, L. (2017a). Disabling forensic mental health detention: The carcerality of the disabled body. Punishment and Society, 19(3), 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/1462474516680204
- Steele, L. (2017b). Policing normalcy: Sexual violence against women offenders with disability. Continuum, 31(3), 422–435. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304312.2016.1275144
- Steele, L. (2018). Troubling law’s indefinite detention: Disability, the carceral body and institutional injustice. Social and Legal Studies, Online First, 1–24, 096466391876947. https://doi.org/10.1177/0964663918769478
- Steele, L. (2020). Disability, criminal justice and law: Reconsidering court diversion. Routledge. Advance online publication.