Responsible research and innovation: building knowledge arenas for glocal sustainability research

References

• Ayres, R. 2008. “Sustainability Economics: Where Do We Stand?” Ecological Economics 67: 281–310. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.12.009
   Google Scholar
• Barnosky, A. D., E. A. Hadly, J. Bascompte, E. L. Berlow, J. H. Brown, M. Fortelius, W. M. Getz, et al. 2012. “Approaching a State Shift in Earth's Biosphere.” Nature 486: 52–58. doi: 10.1038/nature11018
   Google Scholar
• Brandt, P., A. Ernst, F. Gralla, C. Luederitz, D. J. Lang, J. Newig, F. Reinert, D. J. Abson, and von Wehrden, H. 2013. “A Review of Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science.” Ecological Economics 92: 1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Bruyninckx, H. 2014. “Greening the Entire Economy; Not Just a Handful of New Sectors.” EEA Newsletter (2014/1), March 17.
   Google Scholar
• Brynjolfsson, E., and Andrew McAfee. 2011. “Why Workers Are Losing the War Against Machines.” The Atlantic, October 26.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, V. 1945. Science: The Endless Frontier. Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, W. C., and N. M. Dickson. 2003. “Sustainability Science: The Emerging Research Program.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 100 (14): 8059–8061. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231333100
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, R. S., and M. Neurath. 1983. Otto Neurath. Philosophical Papers 1913–1946. Dordrecht: Reidel.
   Google Scholar
• Cornell, S., F. Berkhout, W. Tuinstra, J. D. Tábara, J. Jäger, I. Chabay, B. de Wit, et al. 2013. “Opening Up Knowledge Systems for Better Responses to Global Environmental Change.” Environmental Science & Policy 28: 60–70. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.11.008
   Google Scholar
• Courtenay Botterill, L., and A. Hindmoor. 2012. “Turtles All the Way Down: Bounded Rationality in an Evidence-Based Age.” Policy Studies 33 (5): 367–379. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2011.626315
   Google Scholar
• Deblonde, M. 2001. Economics as a Political Muse. Philosophical Reflections on the Relevance of Economics for Ecological Policy. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. 2013. Sustainability Science for Strong Sustainability. Université catholique de louvain and Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique, FSR-FNRS.
   Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. 2014. Sustainability Science for Strong Sustainability. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Diedrich, A., P. Upham, L. Levidow, and S. van den Hove. 2011. “Framing Environmental Sustainability Challenges for Research and Innovation in European Policy Agendas.” Environemental Science & Policy 14 (8): 935–939. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.07.012
   Google Scholar
• Dietz, S., and E. Neumayer. 2007. “Weak and Strong Sustainability in the SEEA: Concepts and Measurement.” Ecological Economics 61 (4): 617–626. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.09.007
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2010. Accelerating Technological Change: Racing into the Unknown. European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• EEA. 2013. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation. European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S., and J. R. Ravetz. 1991. “A New Scientific Methodology for Global Environmental Issues.” In Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, edited by R. Costanza, 137–152. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griggs, D., Mark Stafford-Smit, Owen Gaffney, J. Rockström, M. C. Öhman, P. Shyamsundar, W. Steffen, G. Glaser, N. Kanie, and I. Noble. 2013. “Policy: Sustainable Development Goals for People and Planet.” Nature 495 (7441): 305–307. doi: 10.1038/495305a
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, A., and C. Groves. 2013. “What Is “Responsible” about Responsible Innovation? Understanding the Ethical Issues.” In Responsible Innovation. Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 119–142. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Harremoës, P., D. Gee, M. Macgarvin, A. Stirling, J. Keys, B. Wynne, and S. Guedes Vaz. 2002. The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century. Late Lessons from Early Warningsct. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, C., and E. Ostrom. 2001. “Artifacts, Facilities, and Content: Information as a Common-Pool Resource.” Paper presented at Conference on the Public Domain, Duke Law School, Durham, North Carolina, November 9–11.
   Google Scholar
• Horlings, E., T. Gurney, J. Deuten, and L. van Drooge. 2013. Patentaanvragen door Kennisinstellingen. Rathenau Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, T., M. Bergmann, and F. Keil. 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization.” Ecological Economics 79: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017
   Google Scholar
• Jonas, H. 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility. In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kläy, A., A. B. Zimmermann, and F. Schneider. 2014. “Rethinking Science for Sustainable Development: Reflexive Interaction for a Paradigm Transformation.” Futures.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latouche, S. 2008. Farewell to Growth. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. 2010. “The Knowledge-Based Economy and the Triple Helix Model.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 44: 367–417. doi: 10.1002/aris.2010.1440440116
   Google Scholar
• Lietaer, B., C. Arnsperger, S. J. Goerner, and S. Brunnhuber. 2012. Money and Sustainability. The Missing Link. Devon, UK: Triarchy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maskus, K. E., and J. H. Reichman. 2004. “The Globalization of Private Knowledge Goods and the Privatization of Global Public Goods.” Journal of International Economic Law 7 (2): 279–320. doi: 10.1093/jiel/7.2.279
   Google Scholar
• McMurtry, J. 2010. Reclaiming Rationality and Scientific Method. The Life-Coherence Principle as Global System Imperative. Accessed January 14, 2014. http://www.globalresearch.ca/reclaiming-rationality-and-scientific-method/21302
   Google Scholar
• Mitcham, C., and R. Von Schomberg. 2000. “The Ethic of Scientists and Engineers: From Occupational Role Responsibility to Public Co-responsibility.” In Research in Philosophy and Technology, edited by P. Kroes and A. Meijers, 167–189. Amsterdam: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Motesharrei, S., Rivas, J., and Kalnay, E. 2014. “Human and Nature Dynamics (HANDY): Modeling Inequality and Use of Resources in the Collapse or Sustainability of Societies.” Ecological Economics 101: 90–102.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. Draft OECD recommendation on assessing the sustainability of bio-based products. Paris: OECD Directorate for Science, Technology and Industry, Science and Technology Policy Division, Biotechnology Unit. Accessed January 14, 2014. http://www.oecd.org/science/biotech/publicconsultation-draftoecdrecommendationonassessingthesustainabilityofbio-basedproducts.htm
   Google Scholar
• Peeters, J. 2012. “The Place of Social Work in Sustainable Development: Towards Ecosocial Practice.” International Journal of Social Welfare 21: 287–298. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2397.2011.00856.x
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Carmona, A. 2013. “Growth: A Discussion of the Margins of Economic and Ecological Thought.” In Transgovernance, edited by L. Meuleman, 83–161. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rees, W. E. 2006. “Globalization, Trade and Migration: Undermining Sustainability.” Ecological Economics 59: 220–225. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.12.021
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, K., R. Strand, R. Felland, and S. Funtowicz. 2013. “What Can History Teach Us about the Prospects of a European Research Area?” edited by A. Saltelli, Reference Report by the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. http://www.uib.no/sites/w3.uib.no/files/attachments/histera_final_report_25_2_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Shiva, V. 2011. “Equity: The Shortest Way to Global Sustainability.” In European Research on Sustainable Development. Volume 1: Transformative Science Approaches for Sustainability, edited by C. C. Jaeger, D. Tàbara, and J. Jaeger, 23–27. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simms, A. 2008. “The Poverty Myth.” New Scientist 200 (2678): 49. doi: 10.1016/S0262-4079(08)62641-X
   Google Scholar
• Skott, P., and F. Guy. 2007. “A Model of Power-Biased Technological Change.” Economics Letters 95 (1): 124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.econlet.2006.09.023
   Google Scholar
• Snick, A., and E. Cortier. 2012. Wijze Wetenschappen. Een antwoord op de grote maatschappelijke uitdagingen. Instituut Samenleving & Technologie, Vlaams Parlement.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. 2004. “Globalisation or ‘Glocalisation’? Networks, Territories and Rescaling.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 17 (1): 25–48. doi: 10.1080/0955757042000203632
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroeck, P. 2012. Working with Wicked Problems. Brussels: King Baudouin Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
   Google Scholar