Mapping ‘social responsibility’ in science

References

• Abraham, J. 2003. “The Science and Politics of Medicines Control.” Drug Safety 26 (3): 135–143. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200326030-00001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abraham, J., and C. Davis. 2005. “Risking Public Safety: Experts, the Medical Profession and ‘Acceptable’ Drug Injury.” Health, Risk and Society 7 (4): 379–395. doi: 10.1080/13698570500390473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abraham, J., and J. Sheppard. 1997. “Democracy, Technocracy, and the Secret State of Medicines Control: Expert and Nonexpert Perspectives.” Science, Technology & Human Values 22 (2): 139–167. doi: 10.1177/016224399702200201
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allyse, Megan. 2010. “Embryos, Ethics and Expertise: The Emerging Model of the Research Ethics Regulator.” Science and Public Policy 37 (8): 597–609. doi: 10.3152/030234210X12767691861092
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, D. 1999. “Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice.” Danish Medical Bulletin 46 (1): 60–61.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, P. A., and S. D. Boden. 2008. “Ethical Considerations of Authorship.” SAS Journal 2 (3): 155–158. doi: 10.1016/S1935-9810(08)70034-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson, M. S., and J. B. Shultz. 2003. “The Role of Scientific Associations in Promoting Research Integrity and Deterring Research Misconduct: Commentary on ‘Challenges in Studying the Effects of Scientific Societies on Research Integrity’ (Levine and Iutcovitch).” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 269–272. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0013-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ball, D. J. 2002. “Environmental Risk Assessment and the Intrusion of Bias.” Environment International 28 (6): 529–544. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00061-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barinaga, M. 2000. “Asilomar Revisited: Lessons for Today?” Science 287 (5458): 1584–1585. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5458.1584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, S. R., W. Faulkner, S. Parry, and S. Cunningham-Burley. 2010. “‘How Do We Know It's Not Been Done Yet?!’ Trust, Trust Building and Regulation in Stem Cell Research.” Science and Public Policy 37 (9): 703–718.
   Google Scholar
• Baylis, Françoise, and Jason Scott Robert. 2006. “Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Argument for National Research Review.” Accountability in Research 13 (3): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/03605300600848136
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckwith, J., and L. N. Geller. 1997. “Commentary on ‘the Social Responsibilities of Biological Scientists’ (S.J. Reiser and R.E. Bulger).” Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2): 145–148. doi: 10.1007/s11948-997-0005-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beckwith, J., and F. Huang. 2005. “Should We Make a Fuss? A Case for Social Responsibility in Science.” Nature Biotechnology 23 (12): 1479–1480. doi: 10.1038/nbt1205-1479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beesley, Lisa G. A. 2003. “Science Policy in Changing Times: Are Governments Poised to Take Full Advantage of an Institution in Transition?” Research Policy 32 (8): 1519–1531. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00023-4
   Google Scholar
• Beggins, David. 1978. “Social Responsibility in Science.” Social Alternatives 1 (3): 54–60.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, D. 1976. Knowledge and Social Imagery. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bosch, X. 2010. “Safeguarding Good Scientific Practice in Europe.” EMBO Reports 11 (4): 252–257. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.32
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K., A. Moore, S. L. Herrmann, and Sabine Könninger. 2010. “Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk: Governmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Government.” Economy and Society 39 (4): 510–533. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2010.510682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brice, J., and J. Bligh. 2005. “Author Misconduct: Not Just the Editors’ Responsibility.” Medical Education 39 (1): 83–89. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02027.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brouwer, W. 1994. “Taking Responsibility for the Implications of Science.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 14 (4): 192–202. doi: 10.1177/027046769401400402
   Google Scholar
• Bubela, T., G. Hagen, and E. Einsiedel. 2012. “Synthetic Biology Confronts Publics and Policy Makers: Challenges for Communication, Regulation and Commercialization.” Trends in Biotechnology 30 (3): 132–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2011.10.003
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bubela, T., M. C. Nisbet, R. Borchelt, F. Brunger, C. Critchley, E. Einsiedel, G. Geller, A, et al. 2009. “Science Communication Reconsidered.” Nature Biotechnology 27 (6): 514–518. doi: 10.1038/nbt0609-514
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bulger, R. E., and E. Heitman. 2007. “Expanding Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction Across the University.” Academic Medicine 82 (9): 876–878. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31812f7909
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caelleigh, A. S. 1991. “Editorial: Credit and Responsibility in Authorship.” Academic Medicine 66 (11): 676–677. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199111000-00007
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caelleigh, A. S. 2003. “Roles for Scientific Societies in Promoting Integrity in Publication Ethics.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 221–241. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0010-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cain, J. 1999. “Why Be My Colleague's Keeper? Moral Justifications for Peer Review.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4): 531–540. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0053-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Caveman, A. 2002. “Public Advocacy of Science.” Journal of Cell Science 115 (9): 1777–1778.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho, M. K., and D. A. Relman. 2010. “Synthetic ‘Life,’ Ethics, National Security, and Public Discourse.” Science 329 (5987): 38–39. doi: 10.1126/science.1193749
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Claxton, L. D. 2005a. “Scientific Authorship: Part 1. A Window into Scientific Fraud?” Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research 589 (1): 17–30. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claxton, L. D. 2005b. “Scientific Authorship: Part 2. History, Recurring Issues, Practices, and Guidelines.” Mutation Research – Reviews in Mutation Research 589 (1): 31–45. doi: 10.1016/j.mrrev.2004.07.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Robin, and Calvin C. Gotlieb. 1989. “Educating Tomorrow's Professionals.” Journal of Business Ethics 8 (2): 193–199. doi: 10.1007/BF00382584
   Google Scholar
• Cournand, A. 1977. “The Code of the Scientist and Its Relationship to Ethics.” Science 198 (4318): 699–705. doi: 10.1126/science.910153
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Danforth, W. H., and D. M. Schoenhoff. 1992. “Fostering Integrity in Scientific Research.” Academic Medicine 67 (6): 351–356. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199206000-00001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davidoff, F., and P. Batalden. 2005. “Toward Stronger Evidence on Quality Improvement. Draft Publication Guidelines: The Beginning of a Consensus Project.” Quality Safety in Health Care 14 (5): 319–325. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014787
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Davies, S., and M. Horst. 2012. “Responsible Innovation in the US, UK and Denmark: Governance Landscapes.” Working Paper. Presented at the responsible innovation conference, Den Haag.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, S. C. Glerup, and M. Horst. in press. “On Being Responsible. Multiplicity in Responsible Development.” In Responsibility in Nanotechnology Development, edited by S. Arnaldi, A. Ferrari, P. Magaudda, and F. Marin. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Melo-Martín, I. 2008. “Ethics, Embryos, and Eggs: The Need for More than Epistemic Values.” American Journal of Bioethics 8 (12): 38–40. doi: 10.1080/15265160802559211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. E. 2003. “The Moral Responsibility of Scientists (Tensions Between Autonomy and Responsibility).” American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (1): 59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drenth, P. J. D. 2006. “Responsible Conduct in Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1): 13–21. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0003-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, J. 1999. “Participatory Technology Assessment and the Democratic Model of the Public Understanding of Science.” Science and Public Policy 26 (5): 313–319. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782329
   Google Scholar
• Editorial. 2006. “Beautification and Fraud.” Nature Cell Biology 8 (2): 101–102. doi: 10.1038/ncb0206-101
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Edsall, J. T. 1975. “Scientific Freedom and Responsibility – Report of the AAAS Committee on Scientific Freedom and Responsibility.” Science 188 (4189): 687–693. doi: 10.1126/science.11643270
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elshtain, J. B. 2008. “Why Science Cannot Stand Alone.” Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 29 (3): 161–169. doi: 10.1007/s11017-008-9074-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ernst, R. R. 2003. “The Responsibility of Scientists, a European View.” Angewandte Chemie (International Edition) 42 (37): 4434–4439. doi: 10.1002/anie.200330065
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Etzkowitz, Henry, Andrew Webster, Christiane Gebhardt, and Branca R. C. Terra. 2000. “The Future of the University and the University of the Future: Evolution of Ivory Tower to Entrepreneurial Paradigm.” Research Policy 29 (2): 313–330. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00069-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, M. 1999. “Bioethics and the Newspapers.” The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (2): 164–180. doi: 10.1076/jmep.24.2.164.2529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, N. G. 2010. “Speak No Evil: Scientists, Responsibility, and the Public Understanding of Science.” NanoEthics 4 (3): 215–220. doi: 10.1007/s11569-010-0101-z
   Google Scholar
• Evered, D., and P. Lazar. 1995. “Misconduct in Medical Research.” Lancet 345 (8958): 1161–1162. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)90984-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fischer, F. 1999. “Technological Deliberation in a Democratic Society: The Case for Participatory Inquiry.” Science and Public Policy 26 (5): 294–302. doi: 10.3152/147154399781782293
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, C. B. 2003. “Developing a Code of Ethics for Academics. Commentary on ‘Ethics for All: Differences Across Scientific Society Codes’ (Bullock and Panicker).” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (2): 171–179. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0004-2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fisher, E. 2007. “The Convergence of Nanotechnology, Policy, and Ethics.” Advance in Computers 71 (2007): 273–296. doi: 10.1016/S0065-2458(06)71006-3
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., and R. L. Mahajan. 2006. “Contradictory Intent? US Federal Legislation on Integrating Societal Concerns into Nanotechnology Research and Development.” Science and Public Policy 33 (1): 5–16. doi: 10.3152/147154306781779181
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, Martin. 2008. “Reflections on the Sociology of Science and Social Responsibility in Science, in Relationship to Cold Fusion.” Accountability in Research 8 (1–2): 19–54.
   Google Scholar
• Flipse, S. M., M. C. A. van der Sanden, and P. Osseveijer. 2012. “Midstream Modulation in Biotechnology Industry: Redefining What Is ‘Part of the Job’ of Researchers in Industry.” Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (3): 1141–1164. doi: 10.1007/s11948-012-9411-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forge, J. 2000. “Moral Responsibility and the ‘Ignorant Scientist’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (3): 341–349. doi: 10.1007/s11948-000-0036-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1972/2004. Vidensarkæologien. Aarhus: Forlaget Philosophia.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 1976/1998. The Will to Power. The History of Sexuality Volue 1. London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003a. “Governmentality.” In The Essential Foucault. Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow and N. Rose, 229–245. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2003b. “The Subject and Power.” In The Essential Foucault. Selections from Essential Works of Foucault, 1954–1984, edited by P. Rabinow and N. Rose, 126–145. New York: The New Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frankel, M. S. 2000. “Scientific Societies as Sentinels of Responsible Research Conduct.” Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine 224 (4): 216–219. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1373.2000.22424.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H., and D. Sarewitz. 2002. “Real-Time Technology Assessment.” Technology in Society 24 (2002): 93–109. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(01)00047-1
   Google Scholar
• Heitman, E., and R. E. Bulger. 2005. “Assessing the Educational Literature in the Responsible Conduct of Research for Core Content.” Accountability in Research 12 (3): 207–224. doi: 10.1080/08989620500217420
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heitor, M. 2008. “A System Approach to Tertiary Education Institutions: Towards Knowledge Networks and Enhanced Societal Trust.” Science and Public Policy 35 (8): 607–617. doi: 10.3152/030234208X377371
   Google Scholar
• Hellström, T. 2003. “Systemic Innovation and Risk: Technology Assessment and the Challenge of Responsible Innovation.” Technology in Society 25 (3): 369–384. doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1
   Google Scholar
• Horton, R. 2010. “Science Will Never be the Same Again.” Lancet 376 (9736): 143–144. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61091-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hugman, R., E. Pittaway, and L. Bartolomei. 2011. “When ‘Do No Harm’ Is Not Enough: The Ethics of Research with Refugees and Other Vulnerable Groups.” British Journal of Social Work 41 (7): 1271–1287. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bcr013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illes, J., M. A. Moser, J. B. McCormick, E. Racine, S. Blakeslee, A. Caplan, E. C. Hayden, et al. 2010. “Neurotalk: Improving the Communication of Neuroscience Research.” Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11 (1): 61–69. doi: 10.1038/nrn2773
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’ Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320. doi: 10.1177/0306312706053350
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2011. “Constitutional Moments in Governing Science and Technology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 621–638. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9302-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirman, Joseph M. 1992. “Values, Technology, and Social Studies.” McGill Journal of Education 27 (1): 5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2004. “Responsible Biology.” Bioscience 54 (4): 331–336. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0331:RB]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic Cultures. How the Sciences Make Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koepsell, D. 2010. “On Genies and Bottles: Scientists’ Moral Responsibility and Dangerous Technology R&D.” Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1): 119–133. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9158-x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lancet Editors. 1996. “Dealing with Deception.” Lancet 347 (9005): 843. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)91337-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1979/1986. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liska, A. J. 2004. “The Morality of Problem Selection in Proteomics.” Proteomics 4 (7): 1929–1931. doi: 10.1002/pmic.200300714
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lynch, M. 1997. Scientific Practice and Ordinary Action. Ethnomethodology and Social Studies of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Catriona, Christopher McDowell, and Eileen Pittaway. 2007. “Beyond ‘Do No Harm’: The Challenge of Constructing Ethical Relationships in Refugee Research.” Journal of Refugee Studies 20 (2): 299–319. doi: 10.1093/jrs/fem008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., M. B. Kearnes, and B. Wynne. 2005. “Nanotechnology, Governance and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Science Communication 27 (2): 268–291. doi: 10.1177/1075547005281531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchant, G. E., and L. L. Pope. 2009. “The Problems with Forbidding Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3): 375–394. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9130-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. DeVries. 2005. “Scientists Behaving Badly.” Nature 435 (7043): 737–738. doi: 10.1038/435737a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCarthy, E., and C. Kelty. 2010. “Responsibility and Nanotechnology.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 405–432. doi: 10.1177/0306312709351762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeish, Caitríona, and Paul Nightingale. 2007. “Biosecurity, Bioterrorism and the Governance of Science: The Increasing Convergence of Science and Security Policy.” Research Policy 36 (10): 1635–1654. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science. Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miah, A. 2005. “Genetics, Cyberspace and Bioethics: Why Not a Public Engagement with Ethics?” Public Understanding of Science 14 (4): 409–421. doi: 10.1177/0963662505056616
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikulak, A. 2011. “Mismatches Between ‘Scientific’ and ‘Non-Scientific’ Ways of Knowing and Their Contributions to Public Understanding of Science.” Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 45 (2): 201–215. doi: 10.1007/s12124-011-9157-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N. R. 2011. “Checking for Plagiarism, Duplicate Publication, and Text Recycling.” Lancet 377 (9775): 1403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60565-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, P., and N. Rose. 1990. “Governing Economic Life.” Economy and Society 19 (1): 1–31. doi: 10.1080/03085149000000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nature Editors. 2009. A Responsibility Index. Vol. 457. Nature Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, B. 1999. “Molecular Geneticists and Moral Responsibility: ‘Maybe If We Were Working on the Atom Bomb I Would Have a Different Argument’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (4): 515–530. doi: 10.1007/s11948-999-0052-3
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2005. “High- and Low-Cost Realities for Science and Society.” Science 308 (5725): 1117–1118. doi: 10.1126/science.1113825
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nüsslin, Fridtjof, and William Hendee. 2008. “A Statement of the Rights of Scientists and Engineers.” Physica Medica 24 (3): 127–128. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2008.08.001
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Owen, R., D. Baxter, T. Maynard, and M. Depledge. 2009. “Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation.” Environmental Science & Technology 43 (18): 6902–6906. doi: 10.1021/es803332u
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peiffer, A. M., C. E. Hugenschmidt, and P. J. Laurienti. 2011. “Ethics in 15 Min Per Week.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (2): 289–297. doi: 10.1007/s11948-010-9197-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perlis, C., and N. Shannon. 2012. “Role of Professional Organizations in Setting and Enforcing Ethical Norms.” Clinics in Dermatology 30 (2): 156–159. doi: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2011.06.002
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Phelps, R., and E. Fisher. 2011. “Legislating the Laboratory’ Promotion and Precaution in a Nanomaterials Company.” Biomedical Nanotechnology 726 (2011): 339–358.
   Google Scholar
• Pimple, K. D. 2002. “Six Domains of Research Ethics: A Heuristic Framework for the Responsible Conduct of Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (2): 191–205. doi: 10.1007/s11948-002-0018-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittenger, D. J. 2003. “Intellectual Freedom and Editorial Responsibilities Within the Context of Controversial Research.” Ethics Behavior 13 (2): 105–125. doi: 10.1207/S15327019EB1302_01
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PLoS Medicine Editors. 2010. “Increased Responsibility and Transparency in an Era of Increased Visibility.” PLoS Medicine 7 (10): 1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Poff, D. 2009. “Reflections on Ethics in Journal Publications.” Journal of Academic Ethics 7 (1): 51–55. doi: 10.1007/s10805-009-9090-3
   Google Scholar
• Rappert, B. 2003. “Coding Ethical Behaviour. The Challenges of Biological Weapons.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (4): 453–470. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0044-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Redman, B. K., and A. L. Caplan. 2005. “Off with Their Heads: The Need to Criminalize Some Forms of Scientific Misconduct.” The Journal of Law, Medicine 33 (2): 345–348.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. 2012. The Making of the Atomic Bomb. 25th Anniversary ed. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Riis, P. 2001. “Scientific Dishonesty: European Reflections.” Journal of Clinical Pathology 54 (1): 4–6. doi: 10.1136/jcp.54.1.4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rip, A. 2009. “Futures of ELSA: Science Society Series on Convergence Research.” EMBO Reports 10 (7): 666–670. doi: 10.1038/embor.2009.149
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ritterbush, Philip C. 1977. “The Public Side of Science.” Change 9 (9): 26–33. doi: 10.1080/00091383.1977.10569232
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Roco, M. C. 2006. Progress in Governance of Converging Technologies Integrated from the Nanoscale. Vol. 1093. New York: New York Academy of Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Roco, M. C., B. Harthorn, D. Guston, and P. Shapira. 2011. “Innovative and Responsible Governance of Nanotechnology for Societal Development.” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (9): 3557–3590. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0454-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roland, M.-C. 2007. “Who Is Responsible?” EMBO Reports 8 (8): 706–711. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7401035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. “Political Power Beyond the State. Problematics of Government.” The British Journal of Sociology 43 (2): 173–205. doi: 10.2307/591464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotblat, J. 1999. “A Hippocratic Oath for Scientists.” Science 286 (5444): 1475. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5444.1475
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rothman, K. J., and C. Poole. 1985. “Science and Policy Making.” American Journal of Public Health 75 (4): 340–341. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.75.4.340
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sandler, Ronald. 2007. “Nanotechnology and Social Context.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 27 (6): 446–454. doi: 10.1177/0270467607308288
   Google Scholar
• Sassower, R. 1996. “Responsible Technoscience: The Haunting Reality of Auschwitz and Hiroshima.” Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3): 277–290. doi: 10.1007/BF02583914
   Google Scholar
• Schmaus, W. 1983. “Fraud and the Norms of Science.” Science, Technology, Human Values 8 (4): 12–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schrag, B., L. Love-Gregory, K. M. T. Muskavitch, and J. McCafferty. 2003. “Forbidden Knowledge: A Case Study with Commentaries Exploring Ethical Issues and Genetic Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (3): 409–416. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0037-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schuurbiers, D., P. Osseweijer, and J. Kinderlerer. 2009. “Implementing the Netherlands Code of Conduct for Scientific Practice – A Case Study.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2): 213–231. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9114-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuurbiers, D., S. Sleenhoff, J. F. Jacobs, and P. Osseweijer. 2009. “Multidisciplinary Engagement with Nanoethics Through Education – The Nanobio-RAISE Advanced Courses as a Case Study and Model.” NanoEthics 3 (3): 197–211. doi: 10.1007/s11569-009-0073-z
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott, P. 2003. “The Ethical Implications of the New Research Paradigm.” Science and Engineering Ethics 9 (1): 73–84. doi: 10.1007/s11948-003-0021-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seiler, S. N., B. J. Brummel, K. L. Anderson, K. J. Kim, S. Wee, C. K. Gunsalus, and M. C. Loui. 2011. “Outcomes Assessment of Role-Play Scenarios for Teaching Responsible Conduct of Research.” Accountability in Research 18 (4): 217–246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shamir, R. 2008. “The Age of Responsibilization. On Market-Embedded Morality.” Economy and Society 37 (1): 1–19. doi: 10.1080/03085140701760833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapin, S. 2008. The Scientific Life. A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation. Chicago: University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Slesser, A. A. P., and Y. A. Qureshi. 2009. “The Implications of Fraud in Medical and Scientific Research.” World Journal of Surgery 33 (11): 2355–2359. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0201-5
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, M. L. 1992. “On being an Authentic Scientist.” Ethics and Human Research 14 (2): 1–4. doi: 10.2307/3564534
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. 1998. “Beyond Conflict of Interest.” British Medical Journal 317 (7154): 291–292. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7154.291
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Steckler, Bernard M. 1973. “The World of Science and the World of People.” Journal of Chemical Education 50 (1): 46–49. doi: 10.1021/ed050p46
   Google Scholar
• Stieb, J. A. 2008. “A Critique of Positive Responsibility in Computing.” Science and Engineering Ethics 14 (2): 219–233. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9067-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strydom, Piet. 1999. “The Challenge of Responsibility for Sociology.” Current Sociology 47 (3): 65–82. doi: 10.1177/0011392199047003006
   Google Scholar
• Studer, Kenneth E., and Daryl E. Chubin. 1977. “Ethics and the Unintended Consequences of Social Research: A Perspective from the Sociology of Science.” Policy Sciences 8 (2): 111–124. doi: 10.1007/BF01712288
   Google Scholar
• Sutcliffe, H. 2011. “A Report on Responsible Research & Innovation.” Accessed January 17, 2013. http://www.matterforall.org/pdf/RRI-Report2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sweeney, A. E. 2006. “Social and Ethical Dimensions of Nanoscale Science and Engineering Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (3): 435–464. doi: 10.1007/s11948-006-0044-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, P. 2009. “Scientific Self-Regulation—So Good, How Can It Fail? Commentary on ‘The Problems with Forbidding Science’.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3): 395–406. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9123-8
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thorpe, Charles. 2004. “Violence and the Scientific Vocation.” Theory, Culture & Society 21 (3): 59–84. doi: 10.1177/0263276404043620
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood, M. C. 2009. “Joseph Rotblat and the Moral Responsibilities of the Scientist.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (2): 129–134. doi: 10.1007/s11948-009-9117-6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Van der Burg, S., and A. van Gorp. 2005. “Understanding Moral Responsibility in the Design of Trailers.” Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2): 235–256. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0044-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vessuri, H. 2002. “Ethical Challenges for the Social Sciences on the Threshold of the 21st Century.” Current Sociology 50 (1): 135–150. doi: 10.1177/0011392102050001010
   Google Scholar
• Vogt, Tom, Davis Baird, and Chris Robinson. 2007. “Opportunities in the ‘Post-Academic’ World.” Nature Nanotechnology 2 (6): 329–332. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2007.164
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Vollmer, W. M. 2007. “Responsibilities of Authorship.” Chest 132 (6): 2042–2045. doi: 10.1378/chest.07-2051
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Von Hippel, Frank. 1978. “Professional Freedom and Responsibility: The Role of the Professional Society.” Science, Technology & Human Values 3 (1): 37–42. doi: 10.1177/016224397800300107
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, R. 2011. Towards Responsible Research and Innovation in the Information and Communication Technologies and Security Technologies Fields. European Commission Services, Directorate General for Research and Innovation. Luxembourg: Publication Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Waelbers, K. 2009. “Technological Delegation: Responsibility for the Unintended.” Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (1): 51–68. doi: 10.1007/s11948-008-9098-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wager, E. 2011. “Coping with Scientific Misconduct.” British Medical Journal 343 (7831): 992–993.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, Bernard C. 1974. “The Social Responsibility of the Social Scientist.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Meeting, Chicago, April 15–19.
   Google Scholar
• Weed, D. L., and R. E. Mckeown. 2003. “Science and Social Responsibility in Public Health.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (14): 1804–1808. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner-Felmayer, G. 2010. “Rethinking the Meaning of Being a Scientist – The Role of Scientific Integrity Boards and Some Thoughts about Scientific Culture.” Medicine and Law 29 (3): 329–339.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Whitbeck, C. 1995. “Truth and Trustworthiness in Research.” Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4): 403–416. doi: 10.1007/BF02583258
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wing, S. 2003. “Objectivity and Ethics in Environmental Health Science.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111 (14): 1809–1818. doi: 10.1289/ehp.6200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpe, P. R. 2006. “Reasons Scientists Avoid Thinking about Ethics.” Cell 125 (6): 1023–1025. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolpert, L. 1989. “The Social Responsibility of Scientists: Moonshine and Morals.” British Medical Journal 298 (6678): 941–943. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6678.941
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wolpert, L. 2005. “The Medawar Lecture 1998 Is Science Dangerous?” Philosophical Transactions – Royal Society Biological Sciences 360 (1458): 1253–1258. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1659
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woollard, Robert F. 2006. “Caring for a Common Future: Medical Schools’ Social Accountability.” Medical Education 40 (4): 301–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02416.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. 1998. “Why Must Scientists Become More Ethically Sensitive than They Used to Be?” Science 282 (5395): 1813–1814. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5395.1813
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziman, J. 2001. “Getting Scientists to Think about What They Are Doing.” Science and Engineering Ethics 7 (2): 165–176. doi: 10.1007/s11948-001-0038-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar