Governance strategies for responding to alarming studies on the safety of GM crops

References

• Bauer-Panskus, A., and C. Then. 2014. Comments Regarding the Grace Publication ‘Ninety-Day Oral Toxicity Studies on Two Genetically Modified Maize Mon810 Varieties in Wistar Han Rcc Rats (Eu 7th Framework Programme Project Grace)’. Website Testbiotech.
   Google Scholar
• Belgian Biosafety Advisory Council. 2012. Advice of the Belgian Biosafety Advisory Council on the Article by Séralini et al., 2012 on Toxicity of Gm Maize Nk603.
   Google Scholar
• Bohannon, J. October 4, 2013. “ Who's Afraid of Peer Review?” (Science Magazine Sect. Section: Start Page Col. Column).
   Google Scholar
• Bovenkerk, B. 2012. The Biotechnology Debate: Democracy in the Face of Intractable Disagreement. Düwell, M. editor. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Carman, J. A., H. R. Vlieger, L. J. Versteeg, V. E. Sneller, G. W. Robinson, C. A. Clinch-Jones, J. I. Haynes, and J. W. Edwards. 2013. “A Long-Term Toxicology Study on Pigs Fed a Combined Genetically Modified (Gm) Soy and Gm Maize Diet.” Journal of Organic Systems 8: 38–54.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo, M. 2012. “ Study Says Genetically Modified Corn Causes Tumors, but Other Scientists Skeptical About Research.” (CBS news Sect. Section: Start Page, Col. Column).
   Google Scholar
• COGEM. 2013. Where There Is Smoke, Is There Fire? Responding to the Results of Alarming Studies on the Safety of GMOS. Bilthoven. (CGM/131031–01).
   Google Scholar
• DeFrancesco, L. 2013. “How Safe Does Transgenic Food Need to Be?” Nature Biotechnology 31: 794–802. Epub 2013/09/12. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2686
   Google Scholar
• Dunwell, J. M. 2014. “Genetically Modified (Gm) Crops: European and Transatlantic Divisions.” Molecular Plant Pathology 15: 119–121. Epub 2014/01/08. doi: 10.1111/mpp.12087
   Google Scholar
• Durant, R. F., and J. S. Legge Jr. 2006. “Public Opinion, Risk Perceptions and Genetically Modified Food Regulatory Policy. Reassessing the Calculus of Dissent among European Citizens.” European Union Politics 6: 181–200. doi: 10.1177/1465116505051982
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2012a. “ EFSA to Issue Statement on Potential Glyphosate Toxicity as Used in Herbicides and Gm Maize Nk603.” EFSA news: EFSA.
   Google Scholar
• EFSA. 2012b. Final Review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) Publication on a 2-Year Rodent Feeding Study with Glyphosate Formulations and Gm Maize Nk603 as Published Online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA Journal: EFSA. p. 2986–2996.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2001. Directive 2001/18/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the Deliberate Release into the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms and Repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC. In: Directive 2001/18/EC.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2003. Regulation (Ec) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on Genetically Modified Food and Feed. In: Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. GMOs: Member States to Be Given Full Responsibility on Cultivation in Their Territories. Brussels: European Commission press release.
   Google Scholar
• Ewen, S. W. B., and A. Pusztai. 1999. “Effect of Diets Containing Genetically Modified Potatoes Expressing Galanthus Nivalis Lectin on Rat Small Intestine.” The Lancet 354: 1353–1354. Epub 1999/10/26. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)05860-7
   Google Scholar
• Fitzsimons, J. 2009. Genetic Modification Revisited. In: Speech to the NZ Institute of Agricultural and Horticultural Science Inc – forum, 1 July 2009: Website Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• FSANZ (2013). Response to a feeding study in pigs by Carman et al. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. July 2013. Available from http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/consumer/gmfood/Pages/Response-to-Dr-Carman%27s-study.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• GMOSeralini (2014a). Criigen Withdraws from French Government Project on Gmo Risks [Website]: GMOseralini.org. Available from http://www.gmoseralini.org/criigen-withdraws-from-french-government-project-on-gmo-risks/.
   Google Scholar
• GMOSeralini (2014b). Republication of the Séralini Study: Science Speaks for Itself [Website]: GMOSeralini.org. http://www.gmoseralini.org/republication-seralini-study-science-speaks/.
   Google Scholar
• GM-FreeCymru. 2012. Revealed: How EFSA Staff Orchestrated ‘Official’ Rebuttals of Seralini Research. In: GM-Free Cymru website.
   Google Scholar
• GMWatch (2012a). Pusztai Hitman Oversaw Efsa's Demolition of Séralini [Website]: GMWatch.org. Available from http://www.gmwatch.org/latest-listing/51-2012/14296-pusztai-hitman-oversaw-efsas-demolition-of-seralini.
   Google Scholar
• GMWatch (2012b). Shock as EFSA Says ‘No Problem’ with Gm Maize It Claimed Was Safe [Website]: GMWatch.org. http://gmwatch.org/index.php/news/archive/2012/14263-shock-as-efsa-says-qno-problemq-with-gm-maizeit-claimed-was-safe.
   Google Scholar
• Gorski, D. 2013. More Bad Science in the Service of Anti-Gmo Activism. In: Science-Based Medicine. p. Comment by user ‘Alia’ posted June 17, 2013 at 2011:2014 pm.
   Google Scholar
• Hansson, S. O. 2004. “ Philosophical Perspectives on Risk.” Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. W. 2013. Food and Chemical Toxicology Editor-in-Chief, A. Wallace Hayes, Publishes Response to Letters to the Editors. Cambridge, MA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hess, S., C. J. Lagerkvist, W. Redekop, and A. Pakseresht. 2013. “Consumers’ Evaluation of Biotechnology in Food Products: New Evidence from a Meta-Survey.” Proceedings of the Agricultural & Applied Economics Association's 2013 AAEA & CAES Joint Annual Meeting, August 4–6.
   Google Scholar
• Hilbeck, A., R. Binimelis, N. Defarge, R. Steinbrecher, A. Székács, F. Wickson, M. Antoniou, et al. 2015. “No Scientific Consensus on Gmo Safety.” Environmental Sciences Europe 27. http://www.enveurope.com/content/pdf/s12302-014-0034-1.pdf. doi: 10.1186/s12302-014-0034-1
   Google Scholar
• Hisschemöller, M. 1993. “ De Democratie Van Problemen: De Relatie Tussen De Inhoud Van Beleidsproblemen En Methoden Van Politieke Besluitvorming [The Democracy of Problems: Exploring the Relationship between Policy Content and Method of Political Decision Making]” PhD diss., Amsterdam: VU.
   Google Scholar
• Hisschemöller, M., and R. Hoppe. 1995. “Coping with Intractable Controversies: The Case for Problem Structuring in Policy Design and Analysis.” Knowledge and Policy 8: 40–60. doi: 10.1007/BF02832229
   Google Scholar
• Holbrook, J. B., and A. Briggle. 2014. “Knowledge Kills Action – Why Principles Should Play a Limited Role in Policy-Making.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1: 51–66. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882554
   Google Scholar
• Huber, D. 2011. Letter to Secretary Vilsack from Dr. Huber – Roundup May Be Causing Animal Miscarriages and Infertility. In Personal communication to Secretary Vilsack.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, C. G. 2006. “What You Can't Measure, You Can't Manage: The Need for Quantitative Indicators in Peer Review.” http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05032.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mampuys, R., and F. W. A. Brom. forthcoming. Ethics of Dissent: A Plea for Argumentative Restraint in the Scientific Debate About the Safety of Gm Crops.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C. 2001. “Public Views on Gmos: Deconstructing the Myths.” EMBO Reports 2: 545–548. Epub 2001/07/21. doi: 10.1093/embo-reports/kve142
   Google Scholar
• Masip, G., M. Sabalza, E. Pérez-Massot, R. Banakar, D. Cebrian, R. M. Twyman, T. Capell, R. Albajes, and P. Christou. 2013. “Paradoxical EU Agricultural Policies on Genetically Engineered Crops.” Trends in Plant Science 18: 312–324. Epub 2013/04/30. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.03.004
   Google Scholar
• Meester, G., P. Berkhout, and L. Dries. 2013. Eu Beleid Voor Landbouw, Voedsel En Groen: Van Politiek Naar Praktijk [Eu Policy for Agriculture, Food and Rural Areas: From Politics to Practice]. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Mouffe, C. 2000. The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Nature. 2006. Overview: Nature's Peer Review Trial. Nature. December 2006. http://www.nature.com/nature/peerreview/debate/nature05535.html.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolia, A., A. Manzo, F. Veronesi, and D. Rosellini. 2014. “An Overview of the Last 10 Years of Genetically Engineered Crop Safety Research.” Critical Reviews in Biotechnology 34: 77–88. Epub 2013/09/18. doi: 10.3109/07388551.2013.823595
   Google Scholar
• NVWA. 2012. Teleconference with EFSA and Member States on Séralini et al. Study (2012) (Personal Notes): The Netherlands Food and Consumer Product Safety Authority.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2004. “Science and Public Policy: What's Proof Got to Do with It?” Environmental Science & Policy 7: 369–383. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.002
   Google Scholar
• Quist, D., and I. N. Chapela. 2001. “Transgenic DNA Introgressed into Traditional Maize Landraces in Oaxaca, Mexico.” Nature 414: 541–543. doi: 10.1038/35107068
   Google Scholar
• RetractionWatch (2014). Retracted Seralini Gmo-Rat Study Republished [Website]. http://retractionwatch.com/2014/06/24/retracted-seralini-gmo-rat-study-republished/.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, C. 2013. “Don't Look, Don't Find: Health Hazards of Genetically Modified Food.” CAND Vital Link 20: 17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Roeser, S. 2002. “ Ethical Intuitions and Emotions: A Philosophical Study.” PhD diss., Amsterdam: Free University.
   Google Scholar
• Rosi-Marshall, E. J., J. L. Tank, T. V. Royer, M. R. Whiles, M. Evans-White, C. Chambers, N. A. Griffiths, J. Pokelsek, and M. L. Stephen. 2007. “Toxins in Transgenic Crop Byproducts May Affect Headwater Stream Ecosystems.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 16204–16208. Epub 2007/10/10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707177104
   Google Scholar
• Ruivenkamp, G., and J. Jongerden. 2010. Politiek in Convergerende Technologieën: Sociale Denkplaatsen Als Beleidsperspectief [Politics in Converging Technologies; Thinking Laboratories as Policy Option]. Bilthoven. (Research report; no. CGM/2010–04).
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2006. “Liberating Science from Politics.” American Scientist 94: 104. doi: 10.1511/2006.2.104
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D., and R. A. Pielke Jr. 2000. “ Breaking the Global Warming Gridlock.” (Atlantic Monthly Sect. Section: Start Page, Col. Column).
   Google Scholar
• Schiemann, J. 2014. Open Letter to Testbiotech in Response to Its Report and Press Release Dated 7-11-2014. GRACE Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Séralini, G. E., E. Claira, R. Mesnage, S. Gress, N. Nicolas Defarge, M. Malatesta, D. Hennequin, and J. S. De Vendômois. 2012. “Long Term Toxicity of a Roundup Herbicide and a Roundup-Tolerant Genetically Modified Maize.” Food and Chemical Toxicology 50: 4221–4231. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2012.08.005
   Google Scholar
• Slovic, P. 2000. The Perception of Risk. London, MI: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Sustein, C. R. 2005. Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
   Google Scholar
• Te Molder, H. F. M. 2011. Beyond Happy Science and Grim Technology: Science Communication in an Interactional Perspective.
   Google Scholar
• The Economist. October 19, 2013. “ Trouble at the Lab. Scientists Like to Think of Science as Self-Correcting. To an Alarming Degree, It Is Not.” (The Economist Sect. Section: Start Page Col. Column).
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, M., and E. Vos. 2010. “Wrestling with Uncertain Risks: EU Regulation of GMOs and the Uncertainty Paradox.” Journal of Risk Research 11: 281–300. doi: 10.1080/13669870801990806
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where Are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of responsible innovation 1: 67–86. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882097
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, J. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wardekker, J. A., J. P. Van der Sluijs, P. H. M. Janssen, P. Kloprogge, and A. C. Petersen. 2008. “Uncertainty Communication in Environmental Assessments: Views from the Dutch Science-Policy Interface.” Environmental Science & Policy 11: 627–641. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2008.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M. 2002. “Publics and Counterpublics (Abbreviated Version).” Quarterly Journal of Speech 88: 413–425. doi: 10.1080/00335630209384388
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. W. 1999. “Examination of Witnesses (Questions 240–259).” In Committee on Science and Technology Testimony of Professor Philip James and Dr. Andrew Chesson ed. Parliament Homepage.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 1989. “Sheepfarming after Chernobyl: A Case Study in Communicating Scientific Information.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 31: 10–39. doi: 10.1080/00139157.1989.9928930
   Google Scholar