Technical standards in nanotechnology as an instrument of subordinated governance: Mexico case study

References

• Anzaldo, Mónica, and Raúl Herrera-Basurto. 2015. “Actores, Visiones y Perspectivas de la Gobernanza de la Regulación de las Nanotecnologías en México.” In Nanotecnologías en América: Trabajo y Regulación, coordinated by Guillermo Foladori, Anwar Hasmy, Noela Invernizzi, and Edgar Záyago, 25–39. México: Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas/ReLans/Porrúa.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. 1998. La Sociedad del Riesgo. Hacia una Nueva Modernidad. Translated by Jorge Navarro, Daniel Jiménez and Ma. Rosa Borrás. Barcelona: Paidós Básica.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeson, Lynn L. 2014a. “Belgium Publishes Decree on the Nanomaterial Register.” Nano and Other Emerging Chemical Technologies Blog, October 28. http://nanotech.lawbc.com/2014/10/belgiumpublishesdecreeonthenanomaterialregister/.
   Google Scholar
• Bergeson, Lynn L. 2014b. “Denmark Order on Nano Products Register Enters Into Force.” Nano and Other Emerging Chemical Technologies Blog, June 18. http://nanotech.lawbc.com/2014/06/denmarkorderonnanoproductsregisterentersintoforce/.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Jonathan, and Jennifer Kuzma. 2013. “Hungry for Information: Public Attitudes toward Food Nanotechnology and Labeling.” Review of Policy Research 30 (5): 512–548. doi:10.1111/ropr.12035.
   Google Scholar
• Delgado-Ramos, Gian Carlo. 2014. “Nanotechnology in Mexico: Global Trends and National Implications for Policy and Regulatory Issues.” Technology in Society 37: 4–15. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.09.005
   Google Scholar
• ETC. (2003). The Big Down: Atomtech Technologies Converging at the Nano Scale. Action Group on Erosion, Technology and Concentration: Winnipeg, Canada. www.etcgroup.org.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Brian Wynne. 2007. “Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously.” Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate, Directorate-General for Research. Brussels: European Commission. http://bookshop.europa.eu/en/taking-european-knowledge-society-seriously-pbKINA22700/.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori, Guillermo. 2009. “La Gobernanza de las Nanotecnologías.” Sociológica 24 (71): 125–153.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori, Guillermo. 2012. “Riesgos a la Salud y al Medioambiente en las Políticas de Nanotecnología en América Latina.” Sociológica 27 (77): 143–180.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori, Guillermo, and Edgar Záyago. 2011. “The Role of Organized Workers in the Regulation of Nanotechnologies.” In Nanotechnology and the Challenges of Equity, Equality and Development Volume 2 of the series Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society, edited by Susan Cozzens, and Jameson Wetmore, 181–198. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9615-9.
   Google Scholar
• Foladori, Guillermo, and Edgar Záyago. 2014. “The Regulation of Nanotechnologies in Mexico.” Nanotechnology Law & Business 11 (2): 164–171.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, Paulo, and Tiago Santos Pereira. 2014. “The Governance of Nanotechnology in the Brazilian Context: Entangling approaches.” Technology in Society 37: 16–27. doi: 10.1016/j.techsoc.2013.07.003
   Google Scholar
• FAO/WHO (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations/World Health Organization). 2010. “ Expert Meeting on the Application of Nanotechnologies in the Food and Agriculture Sectors: Potential Food Safety Implications. Meeting Report. Rome: FAO/WHO.
   Google Scholar
• Forsberg, Ellen-Marie. 2012. “Standardisation in the Field of Nanotechnology: Some Issues of Legitimacy.” Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4): 719–739. doi:10.1007/s11948-011-9268-0.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David. 2013. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242. doi:10.1177/0306312713508669.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David, Erik Fisher, Armin Grunwald, Richard Owen, Tsjalling Swierstra, and Simone van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.885175.
   Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, Rob, Peter Healey, Maja Horst, and Alan Irwin. 2005. Science, Technology and Governance in Europe: Challenges of Public Engagement. Brussels: University of Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Hatto, Peter. 2013. Standards and Standarisation. A Practical Guide for Researchers. Directorate-General for Research. Luxembourg: European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/research/industrial_technologies/pdf/handbook-standardisation_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Joseph. 2004. New Technologies and Environment Innovation. Cheltenham: Edward-Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hufty, Marc. 2011. “Investigating Policy Processes: The Governance Analytical Framework (GAF).” In Research for Sustainable Development Foundations, Experiences, and Perspectives, edited by Urs Wiesmann and Hans Hurni with an international group of co-editors, 403–424. Bern, Switzerland: NCCR North-South.
   Google Scholar
• IMNC (Instituto Mexicano de Normalización y Certificación). 2010. IMNC/CTNN 13 Nanotecnologías. México: IMNC.
   Google Scholar
• Invernizzi, Noela. 2011. “Nanotechnologies between de Lab and the Shop Floor: What are the Effects on Labor?” Journal of Nanoparticle Research 13 (6): 2249–2268. doi: 10.1007/s11051-011-0333-z
   Google Scholar
• ISO (International Organization for Standardization). 2011. Business Plan ISO/TC 229 Nanotechnologies. ISO/TC 229 N 791. ISO. http://isotc.iso.org/livelink/livelink/fetch/2000/2122/687806/ISO_TC_229__Nanotechnologies_.pdf?nodeid=6507632&vernum=-2.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “Technologies of Humility: Citizen Participation in Governing Science.” Minerva 41: 223–244. doi: 10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Google Scholar
• Kumar, Challa, ed. 2006. Nanomaterials-Toxicity: Health and Environmental Issues. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. H., W. K. Kuk, M. Kwon, J. H. Lee, K. S. Lee, and I. J. Yu. 2013. “Evaluation of Information in Nanomaterial Safety Data Sheets and Development of International Standard for Guidance on Preparation of Nanomaterial Safety Data Sheets.” Nanotoxicology 3 (7): 338–345.
   Google Scholar
• Lucatero, Jesús. 2014. “Retos y Oportunidades para México para Armonizar la Regulación con el Resto de América del Norte.” Power point presentation, México, July 9.
   Google Scholar
• Meili, Christoph, and Markus Widmer. 2010. “Voluntary Measures in Nanotechnology Risk Governance: The Difficulty of Holding the Wolf by the Ears.” In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman, and Andrew D. Maynard, 446–461. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, John. 2010. “Nanotechnology Captured.” In International Handbook on Regulating Nanotechnologies, edited by Graeme A. Hodge, Diana M. Bowman, and Andrew D. Maynard, 83–106. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• NIOSH (National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health). 2011. Occupational Exposure to Titanium Dioxide. Cincinnati, OH: Department of Health and Human Services.
   Google Scholar
• NSTC (National Science and Technology Council). 2004. Nanotechnology Initiative. Strategic Plan. Washington, DC: NSTC.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2011. Nanosafety at the OECD: The First Five Years 2006–2010. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2012. “Safe Management of Nanowaste”. Draft Agenda of the Workshop of Safe Management of Nanowaste, Munich, Germany, May 2012. http://nanotech.lawbc.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/539/2012/03/00092177.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Official Journal of the European Union. 2009. Regulation (EC) No 1223/2009 on Cosmetic Products. Brussels: The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union. http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/consumers/product_labelling_and_packaging/co0013_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Prats, Joan. 2001. “Gobernabilidad democrática para el desarrollo humano: marco conceptual y analítico.” In Revista Instituciones y Desarrollo, 10, 103–148. http://www.red-redial.net/referencia-bibliografica-48332.html.
   Google Scholar
• RS&RAE (Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering). 2004. Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: Opportunities and uncertainties. London: Royal Society.
   Google Scholar
• Schierow, Linda-Jo. 2008. “ Engineered Nanoscale Materials and Derivative Products: Regulatory Challenges.” Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service Reports. Paper 50. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/crsdocs/50.
   Google Scholar
• SE (Secretaría de Economía). 2012. Lineamientos para regulaciones sobre nanotecnologías para impulsar la competitividad y proteger al medio ambiente, la salud y la seguridad de los consumidores [Guidelines for regulations on nanotechnology to boost competitiveness and protect the environment, health and safety of consumers]. Mexico, DF: Secretaría de Economía.
   Google Scholar
• SE (Secretaría de Economía). 2013. Reglas de Operación del Comité Técnico de Normalización Nacional en Nanotecnologías. Mexico, DF: Secretaría de Economía. http://www.economia.gob.mx/files/comunidad_negocios/competitividad/lineamientos_regulaciones_nanotecnologias_261112.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2006. Cómo hacer que funcione la globalización. Mexico, DF: Taurus.
   Google Scholar
• Van de Poel, Ibo, and Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist. 2012. “Risk and Responsibility.” In Handbook of Risk Theory. Epistemology, Decision Theory, Ethics, and Social Implications of Risk, edited by Sabine Roeser, Rafaela Hillerbrand, Per Sandin, and Martin Peterson, 878–907. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Oudheusden, Michiel. 2014. “Where are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86. doi:10.1080/23299460.2014.882097.
   Google Scholar