Responsibilization through visions

References

• Adam, B., and C. Groves. 2007. Future Matters: Action, Knowledge, Ethics. Boston: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Alvial Palavicino, C. 2016. Mindful Anticipation: a Practice Approach to the Study of Expectations in Emerging Technologies. Enschede: Twente University.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B. 2010. “Preemption, Precaution, Preparedness: Anticipatory Action and Future Geographies.” Progress in Human Geography 34 (6): 777–798. doi: 10.1177/0309132510362600
   Google Scholar
• Biebricher, T. 2011. “(Ir-)Responsibilization, Genetics and Neuroscience.” European Journal of Social Theory 14: 469–488. doi: 10.1177/1368431011417933
   Google Scholar
• BMU and BMWi. 2011. The Federal Government’s Energy Concept of 2010 and the Transformation of the Energy System of 2011. Munich: Federal Ministry of Economics and Technology and Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety.
   Google Scholar
• BMWi. 2014. Smart Energy Made in Germany. Erkenntnisse zum Aufbau und zur Nutzung intelligenter Energiesysteme im Rahmen der Energiewende. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie.
   Google Scholar
• Böhle, K., and K. Bopp. 2014. “What a Vision: The Artificial Companion; A Piece of Vision Assessment Including an Expert Survey.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 10 (1): 155–186.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D., and K. Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for big Data – Provocations for a Cultural, Technological, and Scholarly Phenomenon.” Information Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
   Google Scholar
• Brown, N., B. Rappert, and A. Webster, eds. 2000. Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-Science. Burlington: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Consumer Protection Association. 2013. “ Transcript of an Expert Interview with a Spokesperson of a German Consumer Protection Association”, conducted in 2013, quotations from the German language transcript translated to English by the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Covrig, C. F., M. Ardelean, J. Vasiljevska, A. Mengolini, G. Fulli, and E. Amoiralis. 2014. Smart Grid Projects Outlook 2014. EUR – Scientific and Technical Research Series. Luxembourg: Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, K., K. Miltner, and M. L. Gray. 2014. “Critiquing Big Data: Politics, Ethics, Epistemology.” International Journal of Communication 8: 1663–1672.
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, S., and J.-F. Schrape. 2017a. “The Logic of Digital Utopianism.” Nanoethics 11: 47–58. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0285-6
   Google Scholar
• Dickel, S., and J.-F. Schrape. 2017b. “The Renaissance of Techno-Utopianism as a Challenge for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1–6. Online first: doi: 10.1080/23299460.2017.1310523
   Google Scholar
• Dieckhoff, C. 2015. Modellierte Zukunft – Energieszenarien in der wissenschaftlichen Politikberatung. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Dierkes, M., U. Hoffman, and L. Marz. 1996. Visions of Technology. Social and Institutional Factors Shaping the Development of New Technologies. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Energy Supply Company. 2013. “ Transcript of an Expert Interview with the Head of an Innovation Group of one of the Big German Energy Supply Companies”, conducted in 2013, quotations from the German language transcript translated to English by the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Engels, F., and A. V. Münch. 2015. “The Micro Smart Grid as a Materialised Imaginary Within the German Energy Transition.” Energy Research & Social Science 9: 35–42. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2015.08.024
   Google Scholar
• Environmental Association. 2013. “ Transcript of an Expert Interview with a Leading Expert for Renewable Energies from a German Environmental Association”, conducted in 2013, quotations from the German language transcript translated to English by the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrari, A., and A. Lösch. 2017. “How Smart Grid Meets In Vitro Meat: on Visions as Socio-Epistemic Practices.” Nanoethics 11: 75–91. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0282-9
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. 2005. Fab: The Coming Revolution on Your Desktop – from Personal Computers to Personal Fabrication. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gershenfeld, N. 2012. “How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution.” Foreign Affairs (Council on Foreign Relations) 91: 43.
   Google Scholar
• Goulden, M., B. Bedwell, S. Rennick-Egglestone, T. Rodden, and A. Spence. 2014. “Smart Grids, Smart Users? The Role of the User in Demand Side Management.” Energy Research & Social Science 2: 21–29. doi: 10.1016/j.erss.2014.04.008
   Google Scholar
• Gransche, B. 2015. Vorausschauendes Denken. Philosophie und Zukunftsforschung jenseits von Statistik und Kalkül. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., and A. Grunwald, eds. 2000. Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2012. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2013. “Modes of Orientation Provided by Futures Studies: Making Sense of Diversity and Divergence.” European Journal of Futures Research 2: 30. doi: 10.1007/s40309-013-0030-5
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2014. “The Hermeneutic Side of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 274–291. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.968437
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. 2017. “Assigning Meaning to NEST by Technology Futures: Extended Responsibility of Technology Assessment in RRI.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2), [this issue].
   Google Scholar
• Industry Association. 2013. “ Transcript of an Expert Interview with an Expert for Smart Grids, Smart Markets and Regulation from One of the Big Industry Associations in Germany in the Energy Sector”, conducted in 2013, quotations from the German language transcript translated to English by the authors.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S., and S.-H. Kim. 2015. Dreamscapes of Modernity. Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, M., M. Kurath, S. Maasen, and C. Rehmann-Sutter, eds. 2010. Governing Future Technologies: Nanotechnology and the Rise of an Assessment Regime. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook 27. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. 1997. “Sociality with Objects.” Theory, Culture and Society 14 (4): 1–30. doi: 10.1177/026327697014004001
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2002. “Foucault, Governmentality, and Critique.” Rethinking Marxism 14: 49–64. doi: 10.1080/089356902101242288
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2006a. “Anticipating the Futures of Nanotechnology: Visionary Images as Means of Communication.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 18 (3/4): 393–409. doi: 10.1080/09537320600777168
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2006b. “Means of Communicating Innovations. A Case Study for the Analysis and Assessment of Nanotechnology’s Futuristic Visions.” Science, Technology & Innovation Studies 2: 103–125.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A. 2014. “Diskursrisiken der Kommunikation von Nichtwissen. Der Fall, Nanotechnologie.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 23 (2): 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Lösch, A., and C. Schneider. 2016. “Transforming Power/Knowledge Apparatuses: The Smart Grid in the German Energy Transition.” Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 29 (3): 262–284. doi:10.1080/13511610.2016.1154783.
   Google Scholar
• Mambrey, P., and A. Tepper. 2000. “Technology Assessment as a Metaphor Assessment. Visions Guiding the Development of Information and Communications.” In Vision Assessment: Shaping Technology in 21st Century Society. Towards a Repertoire for Technology Assessment, edited by J. Grin and A. Grunwald, 33–52. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Manjoo, F. 2014. “Larry Page on Google’s Many Arms”. New York Times, June 26, 2014, B1.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, E. 2013. To Save Everything, Click Here: the Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: PublicAffairs.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2010. “A Forensics of Wishing: Technology Assessment in the Age of Technoscience.” Poiesis & Praxis, 7 (1): 5–15. doi: 10.1007/s10202-010-0081-7
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
   Google Scholar
• Nyborg, S., and I. Røpke. 2013. “Constructing Users in the Smart Grid – Insights from the Danish eFlex Project.” Energy Efficiency 6 (4): 655–670. doi: 10.1007/s12053-013-9210-1
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, eds. 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Prodhan, G., and M. Nienaber. 2015. “Merkel Urges Germans to Put Aside Fear of Big Data”. Reuters. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-germany-technology-merkel-idUSKBN0OP2EM20150609.
   Google Scholar
• Ramchurn, S. D., P. Vytelingum, A. Rogers, and N. R. Jennings. 2012. “Putting the ‘Smarts’ into the Smart Grid: A Grand Challenge for Artificial Intelligence.” Communications of the ACM 55 (4): 86–97. doi: 10.1145/2133806.2133825
   Google Scholar
• Sand, M., and C. Schneider. 2017. “Visioneering Socio-Technical Innovations – a Missing Piece of the Puzzle.” Nanoethics 11: 19–29. doi: 10.1007/s11569-017-0293-6
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. 2017. “Transforming TechKnowledgies: The Case of Open Digital Fabrication.” PhD thesis, Technical University of Munich.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C. forthcoming. “The Becoming Public of Open Digital Fabrication.” In TechnoScienceSociety. Technological Reconfigurations of Science and Society, edited by S. Maasen, S. Dickel and C. Schneider. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, C., and A. Lösch. 2015. “What About Your Futures, Technology Assessment? An Essay on How to Take the Visions of TA Seriously, Motivated by the PACITA Conference.” Technikfolgenabschätzung – Theorie und Praxis 24 (2): 70–74.
   Google Scholar
• Schrape, J. 2016. “Big Data: Informatisierung der Gesellschaft 4.0.” Berliner Debatte Initial 27 (4): 12–21.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A., M. Fressoli, D. Abrol, E. Arond, and A. Ely. 2016. Grassroots Innovation Movements. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Söderberg, J. 2014. “Reproducing Wealth Without Money, One 3D Printer at a Time: The Cunning of Instrumental Reason.” Journal of Peer Production (4). http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-4-value-and-currency/.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. 2010. “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science Technology Human Values, 35 (5): 601–617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., and J. R. Griesemer. 1999. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translation,’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” In The Science Studies Reader., edited by M. Biagioli, 505–524. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tech, R. P. G., J.-P. Ferdinand, and M. Dopfer. 2016. “Open Source Hardware Startups and Their Communities.” In The Decentralized and Networked Future of Value Creation, edited by J.-P. Ferdinand, U. Petschow, and S. Dickel, 129–145. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Tkacz, N. 2015. Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Troxler, P. 2014. “Fab Labs Forked: A Grassroots Insurgency Inside the Next Industrial Revolution.” Journal of Peer Production (5). http://peerproduction.net/issues/issue-5-shared-machine-shops/.
   Google Scholar
• Troxler, P. 2015. Beyond Consenting Nerds: Lateral Design Patterns for New Manufacturing. Amsterdam: Hogeschool Rotterdam Uitgeverij.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, F. 2006. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• van den Hoven, J., N. Doorn, T. Swierstra, B.-J. Koops, and H. Romijn, eds. 2014. Responsible Innovation 1. Innovative Solutions for Global Issues. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren: Bildungspotenziale transdisziplinärer Methoden, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–62. Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Walter-Herrmann, J., and C. Büching, eds. 2013. FabLab: Of Machines, Makers and Inventors. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Wei, Y., P. Yildirim, C. van den Bulte, and C. Dellarocas. 2016. “Credit Scoring with Social Network Data.” Marketing Science 35 (2): 234–258. doi: 10.1287/mksc.2015.0949
   Google Scholar