Big data and technology assessment: research topic or competitor?

References

• Abelson, Julia, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, John Eyles, Patricia Smith, Elisabeth Martin, and Francois-Pierre Gauvin. 2003. “Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes.” Social Science & Medicine 57 (2): 239–251.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, Barbara. 2005. “Futures in the Making: Contemporary Practices and Sociological Challenges.” Paper presented at the ASA conference. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/futures/conf_ba_asa230905.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Adams, Vincanne, Michelle Murphy, and Adele E Clarke. 2009. “Anticipation: Technoscience, Life, Affect, Temporality.” Subjectivity 28 (1): 246–265.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Chris. 2008. “The End of Theory: The Data Deluge Makes the Scientific Method Obsolete.” Wired. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.wired.com/2008/06/pb-theory/.
   Google Scholar
• Aradau, Claudia, and Tobias Blanke. 2016. “Politics of Prediction: Security and the Time/Space of Governmentality in the Age of Big Data.” European Journal of Social Theory 20 (3): 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Assefa, Getachew, and Björn M Frostell. 2007. “Social Sustainability and Social Acceptance in Technology Assessment: A Case Study of Energy Technologies.” Technology in Society 29 (1): 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Barben, Daniel, Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2008. “Anticipatory Governance and Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement, and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, 3rd ed., 979–1000. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barocas, Solon, and Andrew D. Selbst. 2016. “Big Data’s Disparate Impact.” California Law Review 104: 671–732.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Martin W. 2008. “Survey Research and the Public Understanding of Science.” In Handbook of Public Communication of Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench, 111–130. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Ira, and Daniel Sarewitz. 2006. “Too Little, Too Late?: Research Policies on the Societal Implications of Nanotechnology in the United States.” Science as Culture 15 (4): 309–325.
   Google Scholar
• Bimber, Bruce. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress. The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, danah. 2016. “Untangling Research and Practice: What Facebook’s “Emotional Contagion” Study Teaches Us.” Research Ethics 12 (1): 4–13.
   Google Scholar
• boyd, danah, and Kate Crawford. 2012. “Critical Questions for Big Data.” Information, Communication & Society 15 (5): 662–679.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, Kathrin, Alfred Moore, Svea Luise Herrmann, and Sabine Könninger. 2010. “Science Governance and the Politics of Proper Talk: Governmental Bioethics as a New Technology of Reflexive Government.” Economy and Society 39 (4): 510–533.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Nik, and Mike Michael. 2003. “A Sociology of Expectations: Retrospecting Prospects and Prospecting Retrospects.” Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 15 (1): 3–18.
   Google Scholar
• Burrell, Jenna. 2016. “How the Machine ‘Thinks’: Understanding Opacity in Machine Learning Algorithms.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, Erik, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Daniel Olsher, and Dipankar Das. 2014. “Big Social Data Analysis.” In Big Data Computing, edited by Rajendra Akerkar, 401–414. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2016. “Participation in the Making. Rethinking Public Engagement in Co-Productionist Terms.” In Remaking Participation. Science, Environment and Emergent Publics, edited by Jason Chilvers and Matthew Kearnes, 31–63. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Christin, Angèle, Alex Rosenblat, and danah boyd. 2015. “Courts and Predictive Algorithms.” Workshop Primer. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.datacivilrights.org/pubs/2015-1027/Courts_and_Predictive_Algorithms.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Citron, Danielle K., and Frank Pasquale. 2014. “The Scored Society: Due Process for Automated Predictions.” Washington Law Review 89 (1): 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, David. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Cotton, Matthew. 2014. Ethics and Technology Assessment: A Participatory Approach. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, Kate. 2013. “ The Hidden Biases in Big Data.” Harvard Business Review. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://hbr.org/2013/04/the-hidden-biases-in-big-data.
   Google Scholar
• Daston, Lorraine J., and Peter Galison. 2010. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, Thomas H. 2013. “ Analytics That Tell You What To Do.” The Wall Street Journal. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2013/04/03/analytics-that-tell-you-what-to-do/.
   Google Scholar
• Davenport, Thomas H. 2015. “ The Rise of Automated Analytics.” The Wall Street Journal. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2015/01/14/the-rise-of-automated-analytics/.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Michael. 2001. “Preface.” In Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Implementation and its Chances and Limits. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung Band 11, edited by Michael Decker, IX–X. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Michael. 2004. “The Role of Ethics in Interdisciplinary Technology Assessment.” Poiesis & Praxis 2: 139–156.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, Michael, and Armin Grunwald. 2001. “Rational Technology Assessment as Interdisciplinary Research.” In Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Implementation and its Chances and Limits. Wissenschaftsethik und Technikfolgenbeurteilung Band 11, edited by Michael Decker, 33–60. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ekbia, Hamid, Michael Mattioli, Inna Kouper, G. Arave, Ali Ghazinejad, Timothy Bowman, Venkata Ratandeep Suri, Andrew Tsou, Scott Weingart, and Cassidy R Sugimoto. 2015. “Big Data, Bigger Dilemmas: A Critical Review.” Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66 (8): 1523–1545.
   Google Scholar
• Eklöf, Jenny, and Astrid Mager. 2013. “Technoscientific Promotion and Biofuel Policy: How the Press and Search Engines Stage the Biofuel Controversy.” Media, Culture & Society 35 (4): 454–471.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, Elena. 2007. Die Fiktion der Wahrscheinlichen Realität. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• van Est, Rinie, and Frans Brom. 2012. “Technology Assessment as an Analytic and Democratic Practice.” In Encyclopedia of Applied Ethics, edited by Ruth Chadwick, Dan Callahan, and Peter Singer, 2nd ed., 306–320. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2014. “ The Use of Big Data in Public Health Policy and Research. Background information document.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ehealth/docs/ev_20141118_co07b_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015a. “ Data for Policy: When the Haystack is Made of Needles.” Call for Contributions. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/news/data-policy-when-haystack-made-needles-call-contributions.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015b. “ ICT-Enabled Public Sector Innovation in Horizon 2020.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/ict-enabled-public-sector-innovation-horizon-2020.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2015c. “ Special Eurobarometer 431 – Data Protection.” Report. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_431_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2016a. “ European Cloud Initiative to Give Europe a Global Lead in the Data-Driven Economy.” Press Release. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-1408_en.htm.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2016b. “ Big Data Analytics for Policy Making.” Report. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/sites/default/files/dg_digit_study_big_data_analytics_for_policy_making.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). 2016c. “ Data for Policy: An Increasingly Global Affair.” Conference Announcement. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/data-policy-increasingly-global-affair.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). n.d. a. “ Public Engagement in Responsible Research and Innovation.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/node/766.
   Google Scholar
• EC (European Commission). n.d. b. “ Responsible Research & Innovation.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament and Council. 2013. “ Regulation (EU) No 1291/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 establishing Horizon 2020 – the Framework Programme for Research and Innovation (2014–2020) and repealing Decision No 1982/2006/EC Text with EEA relevance.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013R1291&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Office of the President. 2014. “ Big Data: Seizing Opportunities, Preserving Values.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/big_data_privacy_report_may_1_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Executive Office of the President. 2016. “ Big Data: A Report on Algorithmic Systems, Opportunity, and Civil Rights.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/2016_0504_data_discrimination.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Simone Schumann, Claudia Schwarz, and Michael Strassnig. 2014. “Technology of Imagination: A Card-Based Public Engagement Method for Debating Emerging Technologies.” Qualitative Research 14 (2): 233–251.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, Edward M. 1909. “ The Machine Stops.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/The_Machine_Stops.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-Normal Age.” Futures 25 (7): 739–755.
   Google Scholar
• Gandomi, Amir, and Murtaza Haider. 2015. “Beyond the Hype: Big Data Concepts, Methods, and Analytics.” International Journal of Information Management 35 (2): 137–144.
   Google Scholar
• Gartner. 2015. “ Gartner Survey Shows More Than 75 Percent of Companies Are Investing or Planning to Invest in Big Data in the Next Two Years.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/3130817.
   Google Scholar
• Grubmüller, Verena, Katharina Götsch, and Bernhard Krieger. 2013. “Social Media Analytics for Future Oriented Policy Making.” European Journal of Futures Research 1 (20): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2009. “Technology Assessment: Concepts and Methods.” In Philosophy of Technology and Engineering Sciences, edited by Anthonie Meijers. Handbook of the Philosophy of Science. 9, 1103–1146. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2010. “Future.” In Encyclopedia of Nanoscience and Society. Volume 1, edited by David H. Guston, 265–267. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2012. Technikzukünfte als Medium von Zukunftsdebatten und Technikgestaltung. Karlsruhe: KIT Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Grunwald, Armin. 2014. “Technology Assessment for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation 1: Innovation Solutions for Global Issues, edited by Jeroen van den Hoven, Neelke Doorn, Tsjalling Swierstra, Bert-Jaap Koops, and Henny Romijin, 15–32. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2008. “Preface.” In The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society. Volume 1: Presenting Futures, edited by Erik Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and James M. Wetmore, V–VIII. New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2014. “Understanding ‘Anticipatory Governance’.” Social Studies of Science 44 (2): 218–242.
   Google Scholar
• Hardy, Quentin. 2013. “ Why Big Data is not Truth.” The New York Times. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/01/why-big-data-is-not-truth/.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, Jennifer C. 2013. “ Impact of Technology Foresight.” Nesta Working Paper 13/16. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.nesta.org.uk/sites/default/files/1316_impact_of_technology_foresight_final_version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hartzog, Woodrow, Gregory Conti, John Nelson, and Lisa A. Shay. 2015. “Inefficiently Automated Law Enforcement.” Michigan State Law Review 5: 1763–1796.
   Google Scholar
• Hassani, Hossein, and Emmanuel S Silva. 2015. “Forecasting with Big Data: A Review.” Annals of Data Science 2 (1): 5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Hey, Tony, Stewart Tansley, and Kristin Tolle, eds. 2009. The Fourth Paradigm. Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Research.
   Google Scholar
• Hocke, Peter, and Ortwin Renn. 2009. “Concerned Public and the Paralysis of Decision-Making: Nuclear Waste Management Policy in Germany.” Journal of Risk Research 12 (7–8): 921–940.
   Google Scholar
• IDC (International Data Research). 2014. “ The Digital Universe of Opportunities: Rich Data and the Increasing Value of the Internet of Things.” Accessed April 12, 2017. www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/2014iview/executive-summary.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Involve. 2005. “ People & Participation. How to Put Citizens at the Heart of Decision-Making.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.involve.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/People-and-Participation.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, Holman W. 2010. “ Google and the Search for the Future.” The Wall Street Journal. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704901104575423294099527212.
   Google Scholar
• Joss, Simon, and Sergio Bellucci. 2002. Participatory Technology Assessment: European Perspectives. Gateshead: Athenaeum Press /Centre for the Study of Democracy.
   Google Scholar
• Jurgenson, Nathan. 2014. “ View from Nowhere.” The New Inquiry. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://thenewinquiry.com/essays/view-from-nowhere/.
   Google Scholar
• Kerr, Ian, and Jessica Earle. 2013. “Prediction, Preemption, Presumption. How Big Data Threatens Big Picture Privacy.” Stanford Law Review Online 66: 65–72.
   Google Scholar
• Kitchin, Rob. 2014. “Big Data, New Epistemologies and Paradigm Shifts.” Big Data & Society 1 (1): 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Lars, Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen, and Marie Louise Jørgensen. 2015. Policy-Oriented Technology Assessment Across Europe. Expanding Capacities. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lafont, Christina. 2015. “Deliberation, Participation, and Democratic Legitimacy: Should Deliberative Mini-Publics Shape Public Policy?” Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (1): 40–63.
   Google Scholar
• Laney, Doug. 2001. “ 3D Data Management: Controlling Data Volume, Velocity, and Variety.” META Group. Application Delivery Strategies. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/files/2012/01/ad949-3D-Data-Management-Controlling-Data-Volume-Velocity-and-Variety.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Laney, Doug. 2012. “ Deja VVVu: Others Claiming Gartner’s Construct for Big Data.” Gartner Blog Network. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://blogs.gartner.com/doug-laney/deja-vvvue-others-claiming-gartners-volume-velocity-variety-construct-for-big-data/.
   Google Scholar
• Lansdall-Welfare, Thomas, Saatviga Sudhahar, Giuseppe A. Veltri, and Nello Christianini. 2014. “ On the Coverage of Science in the Media: A Big Data Study on the Impact of the Fukushima Disaster.” Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Big Data, 60–66.
   Google Scholar
• Law, John. 2009. “Seeing Like a Survey.” Cultural Sociology 3 (2): 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Leonelli, Sabrina. 2014. “What Difference Does Quantity Make? On the Epistemology of Big Data in Biology.” Big Data & Society 1 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Liebert, Wolfgang, and Jan C. Schmidt. 2010. “Collingridge’s Dilemma and Technoscience. An Attempt to Provide a Clarification from the Perspective of the Philosophy of Science.” Poiesis & Praxis 7: 55–71.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, Steve. 2012. “ The Age of Big Data.” The New York Times. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday-review/big-datas-impact-in-the-world.html?_r=0.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, David. 2014. “Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, Consequences, Critique.” Big Data and Society 1 (2): 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, Sarah Davies, and Matthew Kearnes. 2010. “Narrative and Public Engagement: Some Findings from the DEEPEN Project.” In Understanding Public Debate on Nanotechnologies. Options for Framing Public Policy, edited by René von Schomberg and Sarah Davies, 13–29. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Marres, Noortje, and Richard Rogers. 2000. “Depluralising the Web and Repluralising Public Debate: The Case of the GM Food Debate on the Web.” In Preferred Placement: Knowledge Politics on the Web, edited by Richard Rogers, 113–135. Maastricht: Jan van Eyck Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor, and Kenneth Cukier. 2013. Big Data. A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work, And Think. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, Morgan. 2010. “The Rise of the Knowledge Broker.” Science Communication 32 (1): 118–127.
   Google Scholar
• Michalek, Tomáš, Lenka Hebáková, Leonhard Hennen, Constanze Scherz, Linda Nierling, and Julia Hahn. 2014. “ Technology Assessment and Policy Areas of Great Transitions.” Proceedings from the PACITA 2013 Conference in Prague. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Conference-Book.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Moretti, Franco. 2013. Distant Reading. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2013a. “ The Real Privacy Problem.” MIT Technology Review. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.technologyreview.com/s/520426/the-real-privacy-problem/.
   Google Scholar
• Morozov, Evgeny. 2013b. To Save Everything, Click Here. The Folly of Technological Solutionism. New York: Public Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Mustafaraj, Eni, Samantha Finn, Carolyn Whitlock, and Panagiotis T Metaxas. 2011. “ Vocal Minority Versus Silent Majority: Discovering the Opinions of the Long Tail.” Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk, and Trust, and IEEE International Conference on Social Computing, 103–110.
   Google Scholar
• Nentwich, Michael. 2016. “ Parliamentary Technology Assessment Institutions and Practices. A Systematic Comparison of 15 Members of the EPTA Network.” ITA manu:scripts 16-02. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://epub.oeaw.ac.at/ita/ita-manuscript/ita_16_02.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, William H. 2010. “Undergraduate General Education.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by Robert Frodeman, Julie Thompson Klein, Carl Mitchman, and Britt J. Holbrook, 360–371. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Nathan. 2015. “Data Justice: Taking on Big Data as an Economic Justice Issue.” Data Justice Report. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.datajustice.org/sites/default/files/Data%20Justice-%20Taking%20on%20Big%20Data%20as%20an%20Economic%20Justice%20Issue.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyen, Khanh-Ly, Shin Byung-Joo, and Seong Joon Yoo. 2016. “Hot Topic Detection and Technology Trend Tracking for Patents Utilizing Term Frequency and Proportional Document Frequency and Semantic Information.” Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp), 223–230.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbon. 2001. Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neil, Cathy. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction. How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2015. Data-Driven Innovation: Big Data for Growth and Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• PACITA. 2013. “ Technology Assessment and Policy Areas of Great Transitions. 1st PACITA Project Conference.” Book of Abstracts. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Book-of-abstracts-Prague.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• PACITA. 2015. “ The Next Horizon of Technology Assessment. 2nd European TA Conference.” Book of Abstracts. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://berlinconference.pacitaproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Book-of-Abstracts-UPDATED3.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pan, Lei, Sacha Boucherie, and Shereen Hanafi. 2015. “Interdisciplinary Research: How Do 9 Nations Compare?” Elsevier Connect. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.elsevier.com/connect/interdisciplinary-research-how-do-9-nations-compare.
   Google Scholar
• Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology. 2001. “Open Channels: Public Dialogue in Science and Technology.” Report No. 153. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.parliament.uk/documents/post/pr153.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, Alex. 2012. “Society’s Nervous System: Building Effective Government, Energy, and Public Health Systems.” IEEE Computer 45 (1): 31–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pentland, Alex. 2014. Social Physics. How Good Ideas Spread – The Lessons from a New Science. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2014. “Public Perceptions of Privacy and Security in the Post-Snowden Era.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/11/PI_PublicPerceptionsofPrivacy_111214.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. 2015. “Americans’ Attitudes about Privacy, Security and Surveillance.” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/05/Privacy-and-Security-Attitudes-5.19.15_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Theodore M. 1995. Trust in Numbers: The Pursuit of Objectivity in Science and Public Life. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Porter, Alan L. 2010. “Technology Foresight: Types and Methods.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 6 (1): 36–45.
   Google Scholar
• President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology. 2014. “Big Data and Privacy: A Technological Perspective.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/PCAST/pcast_big_data_and_privacy_-_may_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Press, Gil. 2014. “12 Big Data Definitions: What’s Yours?” Forbes. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2014/09/03/12-big-data-definitions-whats-yours/#3bec4cba13ae.
   Google Scholar
• Presser, Lizzie, Maia Hruskova, Helen Rowbottom, and Jesse Kancir. 2015. “Care.data and Access to UK Health Records: Patient Privacy and Public Trust.” Technology Science. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://techscience.org/a/2015081103/.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, Gernot, and Judith Simon. 2016. “Datatrust: Or, the Political Quest for Numerical Evidence and the Epistemologies of Big Data.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, Gernot, and Judith Simon. 2017. “Big Data: A New Empiricism and its Epistemic and Socio-Political Consequences.” In Berechenbarkeit der Welt? Philosophie und Wissenschaft im Zeitalter von Big Data, edited by Wolfgang Pietsch, Jörg Wernecke, and Maximilian Ott, 85–105. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Rieder, Bernhard, and Guillaume Sire. 2014. “Conflicts of Interest and Incentives to Bias: A Microeconomic Critique of Google’s Tangled Position on the Web.” New Media & Society 16 (2): 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 1986. “Controversies as Informal Technology Assessment.” Science Communication 8 (2): 349–371.
   Google Scholar
• Rip, Arie. 2012. “Futures of Technology Assessment.” In Der Systemblick auf Innovation. Technikfolgenabschätzung in der Technikgestaltung, edited by Michael Decker, Armin Grunwald, and Martin Knapp, 29–39. Berlin: edition sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, Horst W. J., and Melvin M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4: 155–169.
   Google Scholar
• Rommetveit, Kjetil, Kristrun Gunnarsdóttir, Kim Sune Jepsen, Thora Margareta Bertilsson, Fanny Verrax, and Roger Strand. 2013. “The Technolife Project: An Experimental Approach to New Ethical Frameworks for Emerging Science and Technology.” International Journal of Sustainable Development 16 (1/2): 23–45.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Nikolas. 1999. Power of Freedom. Reframing Political Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rubinstein, Ira. 2013. “Big Data: The End of Privacy or a New Beginning?” International Data Privacy Law 3 (2): 74–87.
   Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2015. “Office of Technology Assessment: History, Implementation, and Participatory Critique.” Technology in Society 42: 9–20.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Jan C. 2008. “Towards a Philosophy of Interdisciplinarity. An Attempt to Provide a Classification and Clarification.” Poiesis & Praxis 5 (1): 53–69.
   Google Scholar
• Selin, Cynthia. 2011. “Negotiating Plausibility: Intervening in the Future of Nanotechnology.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17: 723–737.
   Google Scholar
• Silver, Nate. 2012. The Signal and the Noise. Why So Many Prediction Fail – But Some Don’t. New York: Penguin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Judith. 2015. “Distributed Epistemic Responsibility in a Hyperconnected Era.” In The Onlife Manifesto: Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era, edited by Luciano Floridi, 145–159. Charm: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, Judith. 2017. “Value-Sensitive Design and Responsible Innovation.” In Methods for the Ethics of Technology, edited by Sven O. Hansson, 219–236. London: Rowman and Littlefield International.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Vivek Kumar, Sumit Kumar Banshal, Khushboo Singhal, and Ashraf Uddin. 2015. “Scientometric Mapping of Research on ‘Big Data’.” Scientometrics 105 (2): 727–741.
   Google Scholar
• Statista. 2016. “Forecast of Big Data Market Size, Based on Revenue, from 2011 to 2026 (in Billion U.S. Dollars).” Accessed April 12, 2017. http://www.statista.com/statistics/254266/global-big-data-market-forecast/.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2014. “Disciplinary Dilemma: Working Across Research Silos Is Harder than It Looks.” The Guardian. Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/science/political-science/2014/jun/11/science-policy-research-silos-interdisciplinarity.
   Google Scholar
• Teknologirådet. 2015. “Predictive Policing: Can Data Analysis Help the Police to Be in the Right Place at the Right Time?” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://teknologiradet.no/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2013/08/Predicitve-policing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson Klein, Julie. 2001. “The Discourse of Transdisciplinarity: An Expanding Global Field.” In Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society, edited by Julie Thompson Klein, Walter Grossenbacher-Mansuy, Rudolf Häberli, Bill Alain, Roland W. Scholz, and Myrtha Welti, 35–44. Basel: Spring Basel AG.
   Google Scholar
• Turow, Joseph, Michael Hennessy, and Nora Draper. 2015. “The Tradeoff Fallacy. How Marketers Are Misrepresenting American Consumers and Opening Them Up to Exploitation. A Report from the Annenberg School for Communication.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/TradeoffFallacy_1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Upturn. 2014. “Civil Rights, Big Data, and Our Algorithmic Future. A September 2014 Report on Social Justice and Technology.” Accessed April 12, 2017. https://bigdata.fairness.io/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-04-20-Civil-Rights-Big-Data-and-Our-Algorithmic-Future-v1.2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Vance, Ashlee. 2010. “ EMC Takes a Big-Data Swipe at Oracle, H.P. and I.B.M.” The New York Times. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/10/13/emc-takes-a-big-data-swipe-at-oracle-h-p-and-i-b-m/.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, Jan-Peter, Bernhard Truffer, and Kornelia Konrad. 2006. “Sustainability Foresight: Reflexive Governance in the Transformation of Utility Systems.” In Reflexive Governance for Sustainable Development, edited by Jan-Peter Voß, Dierk Bauknecht, and René Kemp, 162–188. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Weltevrede, Esther, and Erik Borra. 2016. “Platform Affordances and Data Practices: The Value of Dispute on Wikipedia.” Big Data & Society 3 (1): 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, Anna, Jouni Paavola, Oliver Fritsch, and Ortwin Renn. 2011. “Rationales for Public Participation in Environmental Policy and Governance: Practitioners’ Perspectives.” Environment and Planning A 43 (11): 2688–2704.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, James, Robert Doubleday, and James Hynard. 2015. “Future Directions for Scientific Advice in Europe.” In Future Directions for Scientific Advice, edited by James Wilsdon and Robert Doubleday. Cambridge: Centre for Science and Policy. Accessed April 12, 2017. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/54004/4/future-directions-for-scientific-advice-in-europe-v10.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wood, Fred B. 1982. “The Status of Technology Assessment. A View from the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 22: 211–222.
   Google Scholar
• Youtie, Jan, Alan L. Porter, and Ying Huan. 2017. “Early Social Science Research about Big Data.” Science and Public Policy 44 (1): 65–74.
   Google Scholar