Exploring attitudes to societal relevance: the effects of reflection on research practices among Swedish environmental scientistsFootnote^*

* The research was conducted at Linnaeus University, Sweden.

References

• Barnes, T., I. Pashby, and A. Gibbons. 2002. “Effective University – Industry Interaction.” European Management Journal 20: 272–285. doi: 10.1016/S0263-2373(02)00044-0
   Google Scholar
• Barns, I., and S. Wilson. 1996. “Scientists and the Broader Community.” International Journal of Environment and Pollution 6: 142–148.
   Google Scholar
• Benner, M., and U. Sandström. 2000. “Institutionalizing the Triple helix: Research Funding and Norms in the Academic System.” Research Policy 29: 291–301. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00067-0
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P., H. de Boer, and B. Jongbloed. 2015. “Between Good Intentions and Urgent Stakeholder Pressures: Institutionalizing the Universities’ Third Mission in the Swedish Context.” European Journal of Higher Education 5: 280–296. doi: 10.1080/21568235.2015.1044549
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L. 2013. “What Is Societal Impact of Research and How Can It be Assessed? A Literature Survey.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64: 217–233. doi: 10.1002/asi.22803
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2006. “What’s Special About Basic Research?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (2): 199–220. doi: 10.1177/0162243905283642
   Google Scholar
• de Campos, A. S., S. Hartley, C. de Koning, J. Lezaun, and L. Velho. 2017. “Responsible Innovation and Political Accountability: Genetically Modified Mosquitoes in Brazil.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1: 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, S. P., J. Smit, and L. van Drooge. 2015. “Scientists’ Response to Societal Impact Policies: A Policy Paradox.” Science and Public Policy 43: 102–114. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scv023
   Google Scholar
• de Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280
   Google Scholar
• Dilling, L., and M. C. Lemos. 2011. “Creating Usable Science: Opportunities and Constraints for Climate Knowledge Use and Their Implications for Science Policy.” Global Environmental Change 21 (2): 680–689. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, C. 2017. “For Ethical ‘Impactology’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi:10.1080/23299460.2017.1300756.
   Google Scholar
• Ernø-Kjølhede, E., and F. Hansson. 2011. “Measuring Research Performance During a Changing Relationship Between Science and Society.” Research Evaluation 20: 130–142. doi: 10.3152/095820211X12941371876544
   Google Scholar
• Esposito Vinzi, V., W. W. Chin, J. Henseler, and H. Wang. 2010. Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 2000. “The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations.” Research Policy 29: 109–123. doi: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Assessing Europe’s University-based Research: Expert Group on Assessment of University-based Research. Brussels: European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Fan, W., and Z. Yan. 2010. “Factors Affecting Response Rates of the Web Survey: A Systematic Review.” Computers in Human Behavior 26: 132–139. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2009.10.015
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E., M. O’Rourke, R. Evans, E. B. Kennedy, M. E. Gorman, and T. P. Seager. 2015. “Mapping the Integrative Field: Taking Stock of Socio-technical Collaborations.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2: 39–61. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.1001671
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, A., and D. Vogl. 2013. “Two Decades of Measuring Environmental Attitudes: A Comparative Analysis of 33 Countries.” Global Environmental Change 23: 1001–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.03.009
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. R. Ravetz. 1993. “Science for the Post-normal age.” Futures 25: 739–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. 1983. “Boundary-work and the Demarcation of Science from Non-science: Strains and Interests in Professional Ideologies of Scientists.” American Sociological Review 48: 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2007. Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., and H. van Lente. 2008. “Re-thinking New Knowledge Production: A Literature Review and a Research Agenda.” Research Policy 37: 740–760. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.01.008
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., H. van Lente, and R. Smits. 2009. “In Search of Relevance: The Changing Contract Between Science and Society.” Science and Public Policy 36: 387–401. doi: 10.3152/030234209X442034
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, M., T. Hellström, N. Adler, and F. Norrgren. 2000. “From Sponsorship to Partnership in Academy-Industry Relations.” R&D Management 30: 255–262.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., and E. Perez Vico. 2010. “Towards a Systemic Framework for Capturing and Explaining the Effects of Academic R&D.” Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 22: 765–787. doi: 10.1080/09537325.2010.511140
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, S., E. P. Vico, and H. Hellsmark. 2014. “The Many Ways of Academic Researchers: How Is Science Made Useful?” Science and Public Policy 41: 641–657. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct088
   Google Scholar
• Lam, A. 2010. “From ‘Ivory Tower Traditionalists’ to ‘Entrepreneurial Scientists’? Academic Scientists in Fuzzy University-Industry Boundaries.” Social Studies of Science 40 (2): 307–340. doi: 10.1177/0306312709349963
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Y. S. 2000. “The Sustainability of University-Industry Research Collaboration: An Empirical Assessment.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 25: 111–133. doi: 10.1023/A:1007895322042
   Google Scholar
• Lohmöller, J.-B. 2013. Latent variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Lubchenco, J. 1998. “Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science.” Science 279: 491–497. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5350.491
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, E., and C. Kelty. 2010. “Responsibility and Nanotechnology.” Social Studies of Science 40 (3): 405–432. doi: 10.1177/0306312709351762
   Google Scholar
• McNie, E. C. 2007. “Reconciling the Supply of Scientific Information with User Demands: An Analysis of the Problem and Review of the Literature.” Environmental Science & Policy 10: 17–38. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.10.004
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. 2001. “Hybrid Management: Boundary Organizations, Science Policy, and Environmental Governance in the Climate Regime.” Science, Technology & Human Values 26: 478–500. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600405
   Google Scholar
• Mobjörk, M., and B.-O. Linnér. 2006. “Sustainable Funding? How Funding Agencies Frame Science for Sustainable Development.” Environmental Science & Policy 9: 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2005.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the Art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1: 87–98. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882064
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2003. “Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 30: 151–156. doi: 10.3152/147154303781780461
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. T. Gibbons. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society 31: 27–50. doi: 10.1002/9781118551424.ch2
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., V. Tartari, M. McKelvey, E. Autio, A. Brostrom, P. D’Este, R. Fini, et al. 2013. “Academic Engagement and Commercialisation: A Review of the Literature on University-Industry Relations.” Research Policy 42: 423–442. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2012.09.007
   Google Scholar
• Perkmann, M., and K. Walsh. 2008. “Engaging the Scholar: Three Types of Academic Consulting and Their Impact on Universities and Industry.” Research Policy 37: 1884–1891. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2008.07.009
   Google Scholar
• Perz, S. G., S. Brilhante, F. Brown, A. C. Michaelsen, E. Mendoza, V. Passos, R. Pinedo, J. F. Reyes, D. Rojas, and G. Selaya. 2010. “Crossing Boundaries for Environmental Science and Management: Combining Interdisciplinary, Interorganizational and International Collaboration.” Environmental Conservation 37: 419–431. doi: 10.1017/S0376892910000810
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, R., and R. Byerly. 1998. “Beyond Basic and Applied.” Physics Today 51 (2): 42–46. doi: 10.1063/1.882141
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, M. R. 2009. “Realizing Societal Benefit from Academic Research: Analysis of the National Science Foundation’s Broader Impacts Criterion.” Social Epistemology 23 (3–4): 199–219. doi: 10.1080/02691720903364035
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. 2004. “How Science Makes Environmental Controversies Worse.” Environmental Science & Policy 7: 385–403. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Slaughter, S., and L. L. Leslie. 1997. Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies and the Entrepreneurial University. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Small, H., A. Kushmerick, and D. Benson. 2007. “Scientists’ Perceptions of the Social and Political Implications of Their Research.” Scientometrics 74: 207–221. doi: 10.1007/s11192-008-0213-1
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E., and S. G. Levin. 1992. Striking the Mother Lode in Science: The Importance of Age, Place, and Time. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stephan, P. E., and S. G. Levin. 2001. “Career Stage, Benchmarking and Collective Research.” International Journal of Technology Management 22: 676–687. doi: 10.1504/IJTM.2001.002985
   Google Scholar
• Susilo, Y. O., K. Williams, M. Lindsay, and C. Dair. 2012. “The Influence of Individuals’ Environmental Attitudes and Urban Design Features on Their Travel Patterns in Sustainable Neighborhoods in the UK.” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 17: 190–200. doi: 10.1016/j.trd.2011.11.007
   Google Scholar
• Swan, J., M. Bresnen, M. Robertson, S. Newell, and S. Dopson. 2010. “When Policy Meets Practice: Colliding Logics and the Challenges of ‘Mode 2’ Initiatives in the Translation of Academic Knowledge.” Organization Studies 31: 1311–1340. doi: 10.1177/0170840610374402
   Google Scholar
• Taebi, B., A. Correlje, E. Cuppen, M. Dignum, and U. Pesch. 2014. “Responsible Innovation as an Endorsement of Public Values: The Need for Interdisciplinary Research.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1: 118–124. doi: 10.1080/23299460.2014.882072
   Google Scholar
• van Eck, N., and L. Waltman. 2009. “Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping.” Scientometrics 84: 523–538. doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
   Google Scholar
• Wahlbin, C., and C. Wigren. 2007. Samverkan i det akademiska vardagslivet. Stockholm: NUTEK. Accessed September 29, 2016. http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:3464/FULLTEXT01.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Watermeyer, R. 2014. “Issues in the Articulation of ‘Impact’: The Responses of UK Academics to ‘Impact’ as a New Measure of Research Assessment.” Studies in Higher Education 39: 359–377. doi: 10.1080/03075079.2012.709490
   Google Scholar
• Waterton, C. 2005. “Scientists’ Conceptions of the Boundaries Between Their Own Research and Policy.” Science and Public Policy 32: 435–444. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779218
   Google Scholar
• Wigren-Kristoferson, C., J. Gabrielsson, and F. Kitagawa. 2011. “Mind the Gap and Bridge the Gap: Research Excellence and Diffusion of Academic Knowledge in Sweden.” Science and Public Policy 38: 481–492. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12960315267859
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., and R. Willis. 2004. See-through Science: Why Public Engagement Needs to Move Upstream. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wold, H. 1975. “Path Models with Latent Variables: The Non-linear Iterative Partial Least Squares (NIPALS) Approach.” In Quantitative Sociology: International Perspectives on Mathematical and Statistical Model Building, edited by H. M. Blalock, A. Aganbegian, F. M. Borodkin, R. Boudon, and V. Capecch, 307–357. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar