References
- Contera, S., J. B. de la Sema, and T. D. Tetley. 2020. “Biotechnology, Nanotechnology and Medicine.” Emerging Topics in Life Sciences 4: 551–554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1042/ETLS20200350.
- De Jong, M. D. T., S. Neulen, and S. R. Jansma. 2019. “Citizens’ Intentions to Participate in Governmental Co-creation Initiatives: Comparing Three Co-creation Configurations.” Government Information Quarterly 36 (3): 490–500. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.04.003.
- Delgado, A., K. L. Kjolberg, and F. Wickson. 2011. “Public Engagement Coming of Age: From Theory to Practice in STS Encounters with Nanotechnology.” Public Understanding of Science 20 (6): 826–845. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510363054.
- Engels, F., A. Wentland, and S. M. Pfofenhauer. 2019. “Testing Future Societies? Developing a Ramework for Test Beds and Living Labs as Instrument for Innovation Governance.” Research Policy 48: 103826–103837. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103826.
- European Commission. 2016. “Public Engagement in Responsible Research and Innovation.” https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/publicengagementresponsible-research-and-innovation.
- Foley, R. W., M. J. Bernstein, and A. Wiek. 2016. “Towards an Alignment of Activities, Aspirations, and Stakeholders for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 209–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380.
- Foley, R., A. Wiek, and B. Kay. 2017. “Nanotechnology Development as If People and Places Matter.” NanoEthics 11 (3): 243–257. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0300-y.
- Genus, A., and A. Stirling. 2018. “Collingridge and the Dilemma of Control: Towards Responsible and Accountable Innovation.” Research Policy 47 (1): 61–69. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.012.
- Gudowsky, N., and W. Peissl. 2016. “Human Centred Science and Technology – Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation as Tools for Active Needs-Based Innovation Governance.” European Journal of Futures Research 4 (8): 1–10.
- Gudowsky, N., and M. Sotoudeh. 2017. “Into Blue Skies – A Transdisciplinary Foresight and Co-creation Method for Adding Robustness to Visioneering.” Nanoethics 11: 93–106. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-017-0284-7.
- Ienca, M. 2019. “Democratizing Cognitive Technology: A Proactive Approach.” Ethics and Information Technology 21: 267–280. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9453-9.
- Ind, N., and N. Coates. 2013. “The Meanings of Co-creation.” European Business Review 25 (1): 86–95. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/09555341311287754.
- Jansma, S. R., A. M. Dijkstra, and M. D. T. de Jong. forthcoming. “How can I Contribute? Citizen Engagement in the Development of Nanotechnology for Health.” Nanoethics.
- Jantan, R., N. Kamaruddin, S. Z. Abidin, T. S. Said, and H. Ramli. 2020. “Value in Exchange: The Importance of User Interaction as the Center of Experiences. International Journal of Innovation.” Creativity, and Change 11: 75–83.
- Jarmai, K., and H. Vogel-Pöschl. 2020. “Meaningful Collaboration for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 138–143. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1633227.
- Jasanoff, S. 2014. “A Mirror for Science.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (1): 21–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662513505509.
- Malakhatka, E., L. Sopjani, and P. Lundqvist. 2021. “Co-creating Service Concepts for the Built Environment Based on the End-Users ‘Daily Activities Analysis: KTH Live-in-lab Explorative Case Study.” Sustainability 13: 1942–1963. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041942.
- Mauser, W., G. Klepper, M. Rice, B. S. Schmalzbauer, H. Hackmann, R. Leemans, and H. Moore. 2013. “Transdisciplinary Global Change Research: The Co-creation of Knowledge for Sustainability.” Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 5: 420–431. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.07.001.
- Metselaar, J. M., and T. Lammers. 2020. “Challenges in Nanomedicine Clinical Translation.” Drug Delivery and Translational Research 10: 721–725. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13346-020-007405.
- Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39: 751–760. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
- Polk, M. 2015. “Transdisciplinary co-Production: Designing and Testing a Transdisciplinary Research Framework for Societal Problem Solving.” Futures 65: 110–122. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2014.11.001.
- Prandelli, E., G. Verona, and D. Raccagni. 2006. “Diffusion of Web-Based Product Innovation.” California Management Review 48 (4): 109–135.
- Reed, M. S., S. Vella, E. Challies, J. de Vente, L. Frewer, D. Hohenwallner-Ries, T. Huber, et al. 2018. “A Theory of Participation: What Makes Stakeholder and Public Engagement in Environmental Management Work?” Restoration Ecology 26 (1): S7–S17. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12541.
- Rip, A. 2014. “The Past and Future of RRI.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10: 1–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1186/s40504-014-0017-4.
- Roberts, N. 2004. “Public Deliberation in an Age of Direct Citizen Participation.” The American Review of Public Administration 34: 315–353.
- Robinson, D. K. R., A. Simone, and M. Mazzonetto. 2020. “RRI Legacies: co-Creation for Responsible, Equitable, and Fair Innovation in Horizon Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation.
- Rowe, G., and L. J. Frewer. 2005. “A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 30 (2): 251–290.
- Russel, A. W. 2013. “Improving Legitimacy in Nanotechnology Policy Development Through Stakeholder Engagement: Forging new Pathways.” Review of Policy Research 30 (5): 566–587. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12037.
- Shelley-Egan, C., D. M. Bowman, and D. K. R. Robinson. 2018. “Devices of Responsibility: Over a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation Initiatives for Nanotechnologies.” Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (6): 1719–1746. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-0179978z.
- Silverman, R. M., H. L. Taylor, L. Yin, C. Miller, and P. Buggs. 2019. “Are We Still Going Through the Empty Ritual of Participation? Inner-City Residents and Other Grassroots Stakeholders’ Perceptions of Public Input and Neighborhood Revitalization.” Critical Sociology 46 (3): 413–428. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920519837322.
- Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
- Stirling, A. (2008). ““Opening Up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appriasal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265.
- Van de Grift, E., E. Cuppen, and S. Spruit. 2020. “Co-creation, Control or Compliance? How Dutch Community Engagement Professionals View Their Work.” Energy Research & Social Science 60: 101323–101337. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.101323.
- Vargo, S. L., and R. F. Lusch. 2004. “The Four Marketing Myths: Remnants of Goods-Based, Manufacturing Model.” Journal of Service Research 6 (4): 324–335. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503262946.
- Von Hippel, E. 2005. Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Von Schomberg, R. 2012. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen Abschätzen Lehren: Bildungspotenziale Transdisziplinärer, edited by M. Dusseldorp and R. Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
- Voorberg, W. H., V. J. J. M. Bekkers, and L. G. Tummers. 2015. “A Systematic Review of Co-creation and Co-production: Embarking on the Social Innovation Journey.” Public Management Review 17 (9): 1333–1357. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505.
- Wynne, B. 2006. “Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science: Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?” Community Genetics 9 (3): 211–2020.
- Yoo, D., A. Huldtgren, J. P. Woelfer, D. G. Hendry, and B. Friedman. 2013. “A Value Sensitive Action-Reflection Model: Evolving Co-design Space with Stakeholder and Designer Prompts.” In CHI 2013 Conference: Changing Perspectives, 419–428. Paris. https://vsdesign.org/publications/pdf/p419-yoo.pdf.