What’s wrong with global challenges?

References

• Åm, H. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensaude Vincent B. 2014. “The Politics of Buzzwords at the Interface of Technoscience, Market and Society: The Case of ‘Public Engagement in Science’.” Public Understanding of Science 23 (3): 238–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackstock, Kirsty, Liz Dinnie, Rachel Dilley, Keith Marshall, Jill Dunglinson, Hamish Trench, Katie Harper, et al. 2015. “Participatory Research to Influence Participatory Governance: Managing Relationships with Planners.” Area 47 (3): 254–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V., B. Gremmen, and R. Wesselink. 2015. “Dealing with the Wicked Problem of Sustainability: The Role of Individual Virtuous Competence.” Business and Professional Ethics Journal 34 (3): 297–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blok, V., and P. Lemmens. 2015. “The Emerging Concept of Responsible Innovation. Three Reasons Why It Is Questionable and Calls for a Radical Transformation of the Concept of Innovation.” In In Responsible Innovation 2, edited by B. Koops, I. Oosterlaken, H. Romijn, T. Swierstra, and J. van den Hoven, 19–35. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Boerengroup. 2016. ‘Onderzoek van de WUR is gestuurd’ https://www.boerengroep.nl/rechtbank-concludeert-dat-wur-onderzoek-gestuurd-was/.
   Google Scholar
• BP. 2011. The Future of Mobility. Global Challenges, Pragmatic Solutions. Berlin Mobility Conference, 27 October 2011. https://www.bp.com/en/global/corporate/media/speeches/the-future-of-mobility–global-challenges–pragmatic-solutions.html.
   Google Scholar
• Brammer, S., L. Branicki, M. Linnenluecke, and T. Smith. 2019. “Grand Challenges in Management Research: Attributes, Achievements, and Advancement.” Australian Journal of Management 44 (4): 517–533.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, T., and V. Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K., and S. Könninger. 2018. “From Experiments to Ecosystems? Reviewing Public Participation, Scientific Governance and the Systemic Turn.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (6): 674–689.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, S., M. Leach, H. Lucas, and E. Millstone. 2009. Silver Bullets, Grand Challenges and the New Philanthropy. STEPS Working Paper 24, STEPS Centre, Brighton. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/19918012.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, V., J. Harris, and J. Russell. 2010. Tackling Wicked Problems Through the Transdisciplinary Imagination. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, J. 2013. “Systems Biology, Big Science and Grand Challenges.” BioSocieties 8 (4): 466–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, K., and B. W. Head. 2017. “The Enduring Challenge of ‘Wicked Problems’: Revisiting Rittel and Webber.” Policy Sciences 50 (4): 539–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeFries, R., and H. Nagendra. 2017. “Ecosystem Management as a Wicked Problem.” Science 356 (6335): 265–270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diercks, G., H. Larsen, and F. Steward. 2019. “Transformative Innovation Policy: Addressing Variety in an Emerging Policy Paradigm.” Research Policy 48 (4): 880–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, T., A.-M. Forsberg, D. Ludwig, P. Macnaghten, and S. Shelley-Egan. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorian, J., H. Franssen, and D. Simbeck. 2006. “Global Challenges in Energy.” Energy Policy 34 (15): 1984–1991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, M. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edgeman, R. 2015. “Wicked Global Challenges: Sustainability in the Enterprise Crosshairs.” Measuring Business Excellence 19 (1): 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, S. 2016. “Is It Possible to Give Scientific Solutions to Grand Challenges? On the Idea of Grand Challenges for Life Science Research” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 56 (April): 48–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.10.009.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Horizon Europe Strategic Plan (2021–2024). https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/funding/documents/ec_rtd_horizon-europe-strategic-plan-2021-24.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. 2017. “Responsible Innovation in a Post-Truth Moment.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 1–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink, T., and D. Kaldewey. 2018. “The New Production of Legitimacy: STI Policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor.” Research Policy 47 (1): 14–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. 2018. “RRI: How to ‘Mainstream’ the ‘Upstream’ Engagement.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): C06.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzman, P. Scott, and M. Trow. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Grinbaum, A., É Klein, and M. Vandermersch. 2018. RRI-Practice Report from National Case Study: France, D. 6.1. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5bd29ea2a&appId=PPGMS.
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D., E. Fisher, A. Grunwald, R. Owen, T. Swierstra, and S. van der Burg. 2014. “Responsible Innovation: Motivations for a New Journal.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Hagendijk, R., and A. Irwin. 2006. “Public Deliberation and Governance: Engaging with Science and Technology in Contemporary Europe.” Minerva 44 (2): 167–184.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., C. McLeod, M. Clifford, S. Jewitt, and C. Ray. 2019. “A Retrospective Analysis of Responsible Innovation for Low-technology Innovation in the Global South.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 143–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley, S., W. Pearce, and A. Taylor. 2017. “Against the Tide of Depoliticisation: The Politics of Research Governance.” Policy and Politics 45 (3): 361–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, B. 2008. “Wicked Problems in Public Policy.” Public Policy 3 (2): 101–118.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, D. 2016. “Grand Challenges in US Science Policy Attempt Policy Innovation.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11 (1–3): 22–42.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R., 2011. The Governance of Problems: Puzzling, Powering, Participation. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Initiative for Science in Europe. 2018. Statement on the European Commission’s Horizon Europe Proposal. https://initiative-se.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/18_06_27_ISE-statement_Horizon-Europe_FINAL.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, N., J. Gutknecht, K. A. Bybee-Finley, M. Hunter, T. J. Krupnik, C. M. Pittelkow, P. V. V. Prasad, and S. Snapp. 2021. “To Meet Grand Challenges, Agricultural Scientists Must Engage in the Politics of Constructive Collective Action.” Crop Science 61 (1): 24–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldewey, D. 2018. “The Grand Challenges Discourse: Transforming Identity Work in Science and Science Policy.” Minerva 56 (2): 161–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9332-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallerud, E., D. Sutherland Olsen, A. Klitkou, P. Upham, E. Amanatidou, M. Nieminen, M. Lima Toivanen, and J. Oksanen. 2013. Dimensions of Research and Innovation Policies to Address Grand and Global Challenges. (EU-SPRI Position Paper). Manchester: Manchester Institute of Innovation Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, W. 2020. “Managing Budgetary Uncertainty, Interpreting Policy. How Researchers Integrate “Grand Challenges” Funding Programs Into Their Research Agendas.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 320–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, S., and A. Rip. 2018. “Next-generation Innovation Policy and Grand Challenges.” Science and Public Policy 45 (4): 448–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, A., J. I. Höffken, and A. Pols. 2021. Dilemmas of Energy Transitions in the Global South: Balancing Urgency and Justice. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lach, D., S. Rayner, and H. Ingram. 2005. “Taming the Waters: Strategies to Domesticate the Wicked Problems of Water Resource Management.” International Journal of Water 3 (1): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Long, T., and V. Blok. 2017. “When the Going Gets Tough, the Tough get Going: Towards a New – More Critical – Engagement with Responsible Research and Innovation in an Age of Trump, Brexit, and Wider Populism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (1): 64–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., and B. Boogaard. 2021. “Making Transdisciplinarity Work: An Epistemology of Inclusive Development and Innovation.” In The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation, edited by D. Ludwig, B. Boogard, C. Leuwis, and P. Macnaghten, 19–33. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ludwig, D., and P. Macnaghten. 2020. “Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Innovation Governance: A Framework for Responsible and Just Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (1): 26–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2020. The Making of Responsible Innovation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P., E. Shah, and D. Ludwig. 2021. “Making Dialogue Work: Responsible Innovation and Gene Editing.” In The Politics of Knowledge in Inclusive Development and Innovation, edited by D. Ludwig, B. Boogard, C. Leuwis, and P. Macnaghten, 243–256. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Marris, C., and J. Calvert. 2020. “Science and Technology Studies in Policy: The UK Synthetic Biology Roadmap.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 45 (1): 34–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzonetto, M., and A. Simone. 2018. “Introduction to “Science, Society and Citizens: Suggestions (and Hopes) on How to Foster RRI in Horizon Europe”.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): C01.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejlgaard, Niels, Richard Woolley, Carter Bloch, Susanne Buehrer, Erich Griessler, Angela Jaeger, Ralf Lindner, et al. 2018. “A key Moment for European Science Policy.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): C05.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Economic Affairs and Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [MEA and MECS]. 2014. Global Challenges Dutch Solutions. The Hague: MEA and MECS. https://www.government.nl/documents/reports/2014/01/21/global-challenges-dutch-solutions.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education, Culture and Science [MECS]. 2014. 2025 Vision for Science, Choices for the Future. The Hague: MECS. https://www.government.nl/binaries/government/documents/reports/2014/12/08/2025-vision-for-science-choices-for-the-future/visie-wetenschap-eng-web.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Monsanto. 2018. Coming Soon: Better, More Sustainable and Integrated Innovations for the Farm. https://monsanto.com/innovations/research-development/articles/farm-innovations/.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2001. Grand Challenges in Environmental Sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neely, A., R. Edgeman, and J. Eskildsen. 2015. “Wicked Global Challenges: Sustainability in the Enterprise Crosshairs.” Measuring Business Excellence 19 (1): 13–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H., P. Scott, and M. Gibbons. 2003. “Introduction: ‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41 (3): 179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., R. von Schomberg, and P. Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. 2017. “What is so Wicked About Wicked Problems? A Conceptual Analysis and a Research Program.” Policy and Society 36 (3): 385–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., B. Truffer, and G. Hirsch-Hadorn. 2017. “Addressing Wicked Problems Through Transdisciplinary Research.” In The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity, edited by R. Frodeman, 319–331. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popa, E. O., V. Blok, and R. Wesselink. 2021. “A Processual Approach to Friction in Quadruple Helix Collaborations.” Science and Public Policy 47 (6): 876–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radder, H. 2010. The Commodification of Academic Research. Science and the Modern University. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rheingans, C., and C. Moe. 2006. “Global Challenges in Water, Sanitation and Health.” Journal of Water and Health 4 (S1): 41–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rittel, H., and M. Webber. 1973. “Dilemmas in a General Theory of Planning.” Policy Sciences 4 (2): 155–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, D., A. Simone, and M. Mazzonetto. 2020. “RRI Legacies: co-Creation for Responsible, Equitable and Fair Innovation in Horizon Europe.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1842633
   Google Scholar
• Rush, E. 2019. “Wicked Problems: The Challenge of Food Safety Versus Food Security – Working Towards the SDG Goals?” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition 73: 1091–1094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saretzki, T. 2018. “Participatory Governance of Science.” In Handbook on Participatory Governance, edited by H. Heinelt, 157–184. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schikowitz, A. 2020. “Creating Relevant Knowledge in Transdisciplinary Research Projects – Coping with Inherent Tensions.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 217–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schillo, R. S., and R. M. Robinson, 2017. “Inclusive Innovation in Developed Countries: The Who, What, Why, and How.” Technology Innovation Management Review 7 (7).
   Google Scholar
• Selin, C., K. C. Rawlings, K. de Ridder-Vignone, J. Sadowski, C. Altamirano Allende, G. Gano, S. R. Davies, et al. 2017. “Experiments in Engagement: Designing Public Engagement with Science and Technology for Capacity Building.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (6): 634–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schot, J., and W. E. Steinmueller. 2018. “Three Frames for Innovation Policy: R&D, Systems of Innovation and Transformative Change.” Research Policy 47 (9): 1554–1567.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemens. 2018. Complete Mobility. https://w1.siemens.ch/mobility/global/en/complete-mobility/pages/complete-mobility.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish Presidency. 2009. The Lund Declaration: Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of Our Time. Swedish EU Presidency, July 8. Lund: Sweden. http://www.vr.se/download/18.7dac901212646d84fd38000336/.
   Google Scholar
• Termeer, J., A. Dewulf, G. Breeman, and S. Stiller. 2015. “Governance Capabilities for Dealing Wisely with Wicked Problems.” Administration & Society 47 (6): 680–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouw. 2016. ‘Trouw mag schrijven dat rapport WUR ‘gestuurd’ was’ [Trouw is allowed to write that WUR report was ‘sent’]. https://www.trouw.nl/duurzaamheid-natuur/trouw-mag-schrijven-dat-rapport-wur-gestuurd-was~bfaf6108/.
   Google Scholar
• Ulnicane, I. 2016. “'Grand Challenges' Concept: a Return of the 'big Ideas' in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy?” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11 (1–3): 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078378.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Molen, F., D. Ludwig, L. Consoli, and H. Zwart. 2019. “Global Challenges, Dutch Solutions? The Shape of Responsibility in Dutch Science and Technology Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 340–345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Lente, H., T. Swierstra, and P.-B. Joly. 2017. “Responsible Innovation as a Critique of Technology Assessment.’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 4 (2): 254–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oudheusden, M. 2014. “Where Are the Politics in Responsible Innovation? European Governance, Technology Assessments, and Beyond.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 67–86.
   Google Scholar
• VNO-NCW. 2017. Global challenges, Dutch solutions. 2030 Agenda. https://www.vno-ncw.nl/sites/default/files/global_challenges_dutch_solutions_eng.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 51–74. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Wanzenböck, I., J. Wesseling, K. Frenken, P. Hekkert, and K. Weber. 2020. “A Framework for Mission-Oriented Innovation Policy: Alternative Pathways Through the Problem–Solution Space.” Science and Public Policy 47 (4): 474–489.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White House. 2009. A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs. https://apps.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a524201.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• White House. 2021. Remarks by President Biden on America’s Place in the World. https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefing-room/speeches-remarks/2021/02/04/remarks-by-president-biden-on-americas-place-in-the-world/.
   Google Scholar
• Wittrock, C., E.-M. Forsberg, A. Pols, P. Macnaghten, and D. Ludwig. 2021. Implementing Responsible Research and Innovation: Organisational and National Conditions. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• WUR [Wageningen University and Research]. 2008-2018. Annual Reports 2007-2017 https://www.wur.nl/en/About-Wageningen/Annual-report-Wageningen-University-Research.htm.
   Google Scholar
• WUR [Wageningen University and Research]. 2011. Strategic Plan 2011-2014 https://www.wur.nl/en/About-Wageningen/Strategic-Plan.htm.
   Google Scholar
• WUR [Wageningen University and Research]. 2018. Dutch Solutions for Global Challenges’ in het agro-domein https://www.wur.nl/en/Publication-details.htm?publicationId=publication-way-353335343937.
   Google Scholar
• WUR [Wageningen University and Research]. 2019. Strategic Plan 2019—2022 https://www.wur.nl/en/About-Wageningen/Strategic-Plan.htm.
   Google Scholar
• WUR [Wageningen University and Research]. 2021. Wageningen Dialogues. https://www.wur.nl/en/Value-Creation-Cooperation/Collaborating-with-WUR-1/Wageningen-Dialogues.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Zwart, H., L. Landeweerd, and A. van Rooij. 2014. “Adapt or Perish? Assessing the Recent Shift in the European Research Funding Arena from ‘ELSA’ to ‘RRI’.” Life Sciences, Society and Policy 10 (1): 1–19.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar