The uses of grand challenges in research policy and university management: something for everyone

References

• Åm, Heidrun. 2019. “Limits of Decentered Governance in Science-Society Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (2): 163–178. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1605483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, Geoffrey C., and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting Things Out. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://mitpress.mit.edu/books/sorting-things-out.
   Google Scholar
• Breznik, Kristijan, and Kris M.Y. Law. 2019. “What Do Mission Statements Reveal About the Values of Top Universities in the World?” International Journal of Organizational Analysis 27 (5): 1362–1375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOA-08-2018-1522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvert, Jane. 2006. “What’s Special About Basic Research?” Science, Technology, & Human Values 31 (2): 199–220. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243905283642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conceição, Cristina Palma, Patrícia Ávila, Ana Rita Coelho, and António Firmino Costa. 2020. “European Action Plans for Science–Society Relations: Changing Buzzwords, Changing the Agenda.” Minerva 58 (1): 1–24. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09380-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CORDIS. 2009. Swedish Presidency: Research Must Focus on Grand Challenges. 2009. https://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/31013_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Egeland, Cathrine, Ellen-Marie Forsberg, and Tatiana Maximova-Mentzoni. 2019. “RRI: Implementation as Learning.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 375–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2010. Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Brussels: European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2013. EU Research and Innovation: Tackling Societal Challenges. The EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2016. FAQ: How Should Interdisciplinarity and Stakeholder Knowledge Be Addressed and Evaluated in Horizon 2020 Proposals? Horizon 2020. 2016. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/desktop/en/support/faqs/faq-935.html.
   Google Scholar
• European Research Council. 2021. Horizon Europe: European Research Council Frontier Research Grants. EU Grants: ERC-STG & ERC-COG— Information for Applicants to the Starting and Consolidator Grant Calls. Brussels: European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/funding-tenders/opportunities/docs/2021-2027/horizon/guidance/information-for-applicants_he-erc-stg-cog_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. 2019. Horizon Europe Factsheet. Research and Innovation. Brussels: European Union. https://ec.europa.eu/info/sites/info/files/research_and_innovation/knowledge_publications_tools_and_data/documents/ec_rtd_factsheet-horizon-europe_2019.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Judith Igelsböck, Andrea Schikowitz, and Thomas Völker. 2016. “Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research in Practice: Between Imaginaries of Collective Experimentation and Entrenched Academic Value Orders.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 41 (4): 732–761. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915626989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flink, Tim, and David Kaldewey. 2018. “The New Production of Legitimacy: STI Policy Discourses Beyond the Contract Metaphor.” Research Policy 47 (1): 14–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2017.09.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, Rider W., Michael J. Bernstein, and Arnim Wiek. 2016. “Towards an Alignment of Activities, Aspirations and Stakeholders for Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (3): 209–232. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1257380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foray, Dominique, David C. Mowery, and Richard R. Nelson. 2012. “Public R&D and Social Challenges: What Lessons from Mission R&D Programs?” Research Policy 41 (10): 1697–1702. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, Joan H. 1987. “Constructing ‘Do-Able’ Problems in Cancer Research: Articulating Alignment.” Social Studies of Science 17 (2): 257–293. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631287017002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, Joan H. 1992. “Crafting Science: Standardized Packages, Boundary Objects, and “Translation.”.” In Science as Practice and Culture, edited by Andrew Pickering, 168–211. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, Albert. 1991. High-Performance Computing Act of 1991. S.Rept 102-57. https://www.congress.gov/bill/102nd-congress/senate-bill/272/text.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, Greg, Kathleen MacQueen, and Emily Namey. 2012. Applied Thematic Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483384436.
   Google Scholar
• Hicks, Diana. 2016. “Grand Challenges in US Science Policy Attempt Policy Innovation.” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11 (1–3): 22–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078379.
   Google Scholar
• Jalas, Mikko, Mikko Rask, Tatu Marttila, and Tero Ahonen. 2019. “Strategic Research as a Mode of Academic Engagement.” Science & Technology Studies 32 (3): 44–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.65948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jütting, Malte. 2020. “Exploring Mission-Oriented Innovation Ecosystems for Sustainability: Towards a Literature-Based Typology.” Sustainability 12 (16): 6677. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166677.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaldewey, David. 2017. “The Grand Challenges Discourse: Transforming Identity Work in Science and Science Policy”. Minerva, September, 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-017-9332-2.
   Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. 2015. “Infrastructural Inversion as a Generative Resource in Digital Scholarship.” Science as Culture 24 (1): 1–23. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2014.917621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaltenbrunner, Wolfgang. 2020. “Managing Budgetary Uncertainty, Interpreting Policy. How Researchers Integrate “Grand Challenges” Funding Programs into Their Research Agendas.” Journal of Responsible Innovation, 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1744401.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, Stefan, and Arie Rip. 2014. “The Challenge of Addressing Grand Challenges A Think Piece on How Innovation Can Be Driven towards the “Grand Challenges” as Defined under the Prospective European Union Framework Programme Horizon 2020’. ERIAB Reports on Innovation Policy. Wien: European Research and Innovation Area Board (ERIAB). doi:https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.4757.1841.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, Stefan, and Arie Rip. 2019. “Next Generation Science Policy and Grand Challenges.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, and Weert Canzler, 12–25. Handbooks of Research on Public Policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ladikas, Miltos, Julia Hahn, Leonhard Hennen, P. Kulakov, and Constanze Scherz. 2019. “Responsible Research and Innovation in Germany – Between Sustainability and Autonomy.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (April): 1–7. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603536.
   Google Scholar
• Lund declaration. 2009. The Lund Declaration 2009: Europe Must Focus on the Grand Challenges of Our Time. Lund: Swedish presidency of the European Union. https://era.gv.at/object/document/130.
   Google Scholar
• Luukkonen, Terttu, and Duncan A. Thomas. 2016. “‘The “Negotiated Space” of University Researchers’ Pursuit of a Research Agenda’.” Minerva 54 (1): 99–127. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-016-9291-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mate, Domician, Mohammad Fazle Rabbi, Adam Novotny, and Sandor Kovacs. 2020. “Grand Challenges in Central Europe: The Relationship of Food Security, Climate Change, and Energy Use.” Energies 13 (20): 5422. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. “Mission-Oriented Innovation Policies: Challenges and Opportunities.” Industrial and Corporate Change 27 (5): 803–815. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, Jeffrey. 2016. “NSF Director Unveils Big Ideas.” Science 352 (6287): 755–756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.352.6287.755.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, Jonathan. 2013. “Placing the Stakes: The Enactment of Territorial Stakeholders in Planning Processes.” Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space 45 (4): 781–796. doi:https://doi.org/10.1068/a45116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Modic, Dolores, and Maryann P. Feldman. 2017. “Mapping the Human Brain: Comparing the US and EU Grand Challenges.” Science and Public Policy 44 (3): 440–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molen, Franke van der, David Ludwig, Luca Consoli, and Hub Zwart. 2019. “Global Challenges, Dutch Solutions? The Shape of Responsibility in Dutch Science and Technology Policies.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 340–345. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1603569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Möllers, Norma. 2016. “Shifting in and out of Context: Technoscientific Drama as Technology of the Self.” Social Studies of Science 46 (3): 351–373. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312716638951.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Ruth, and Wolfgang Kaltenbrunner. 2019. “Re-Disciplining Academic Careers? Interdisciplinary Practice and Career Development in a Swedish Environmental Sciences Research Center.” Minerva 57 (April): 479–499. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-019-09373-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Economic Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2009. A Strategy for American Innovation: Driving Towards Sustainable Growth and Quality Jobs. Washington, D.C: White House. https://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/innovation-whitepaper.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Economic Council and Office of Science and Technology Policy. 2015. A Strategy for American Innovation. Washington, D.C: White House. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/strategy_for_american_innovation_october_2015.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, and Mario Pansera. 2019. “Responsible Innovation and Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Handbook on Science and Public Policy, edited by Dagmar Simon, Stefan Kuhlmann, Julia Stamm, and Weert Canzler, 26–48. Handbooks of Research on Public Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, Mario Pansera, Phil Macnaghten, and Sally Randles. 2021. “Organisational Institutionalisation of Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 50 (1): 104132. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, John, and Beatrice Crona. 2012. “On Being All Things to All People: Boundary Organizations and the Contemporary Research University.” Social Studies of Science 42 (2): 262–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piso, Zachary, Michael O’Rourke, and Kathleen C. Weathers. 2016. “Out of the Fog: Catalyzing Integrative Capacity in Interdisciplinary Research.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 56 (April): 84–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2016.01.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, Hannot, Erik Fisher, and Daan Schuurbiers. 2013. “Integrating Science and Society in European Framework Programmes: Trends in Project-Level Solicitations.” Research Policy 42 (5): 1126–1137. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, Johnny. 2015. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. 3rd ed. London: Sage. https://www.amazon.com/Coding-Manual-Qualitative-Researchers-Third/dp/1473902495.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela, Mikko, Miles MacLeod, and Johan Munck af Rosenschöld. 2021. “Internally Incentivized Interdisciplinarity: Organizational Restructuring of Research and Emerging Tensions.” Minerva 59: 355–377. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-020-09431-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sataoen, Hogne Leroy. 2018. “Transforming the “Third Mission” in Norwegian Higher Education Institutions: A Boundary Object Theory Approach.” Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62 (1): 52–67. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2016.1212253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schikowitz, Andrea. 2020. “Creating Relevant Knowledge in Transdisciplinary Research Projects - Coping with Inherent Tensions.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (2): 217–237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schreier, Margrit. 2012. Qualitative Content Analysis in Practice. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Shackley, Simon, and Brian Wynne. 1996. “Representing Uncertainty in Global Climate Change Science and Policy: Boundary-Ordering Devices and Authority.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 21 (3): 275–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh. 2010. “This Is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 35 (5): 601–617. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, Susan Leigh, and J. R. Griesemer. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, Translations and Boundary Objects - Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39.” Social Studies of Science 19 (3): 387–420. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundberg, Mikaela. 2007. “Parameterizations as Boundary Objects on the Climate Arena.” Social Studies of Science 37 (3): 473–488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706075330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, Esther. 2009. “The Effectiveness of Boundary Objects: The Case of Ecological Indicators.” Science and Public Policy 36 (5): 403–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.3152/030234209X442007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulnicane, Inga. 2016. ““Grand Challenges” Concept: A Return of the “Big Ideas” in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy?” International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy 11 (1–3): 5–21. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2016.078378.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Susan, and Brian Butler. 2011. “Creating Bigger Problems: Grand Challenges as Boundary Objects and the Legitimacy of the Information Systems Field.” Journal of Information Technology 26 (2): 99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2011.6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar