The new spirit of technoscience: recalibrating symmetrical STS critique

References

• Barben, Daniel, E. Fisher, Cynthia Selin, and David H. Guston. 2007. “Anticipatory Governance of Nanotechnology: Foresight, Engagement and Integration.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wacjman, 979. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthe, Yannick, Damien de Blic, Jean-Philippe Heurtin, Éric Lagneau, Cyril Lemieux, Dominique Linhardt, Cédric Moreau de Bellaing, Catherine Rémy, Danny Trom, and Nathalie Miriam Plouchard. 2013. “Pragmatic Sociology: A User’s Guide.” Politix 103 (3): 175–204. https://doi.org/10.3917/pox.103.0173.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Kean. 2013. “The Political Economy of Technoscience: An Emerging Research Agenda.” Spontaneous Generations: A Journal for the History and Philosophy of Science 7 (1): 49–61. https://doi.org/10.4245/sponge.v7i1.19556.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Kean. 2018. Neoliberal Bio-Economies? 1st ed. New York, NY: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, Kean, and Fabian Muniesa. 2020. Assetization: Turning Things into Assets in Technoscientific Capitalism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Birkbak, Andreas, and Irina Papazu, eds. 2022. Democratic Situations. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bloor, David. (1976) 1991. Knowledge and Social Imagery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bogner, Alexander. 2012. “The Paradox of Participation Experiments.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 37 (5): 506–527. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243911430398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, Luc, and Ève Chiapello. (1999) 2018. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London/New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, Teunis, and Vincent Blok. 2019. “Responsible Innovation in Business: A Critical Reflection on Deliberative Engagement as a Central Governance Mechanism.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (1): 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1575681.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2009. Science in Democracy: Expertise, Institutions, and Representation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. 2015. “Politicizing Science: Conceptions of Politics in Science and Technology Studies.” Social Studies of Science 45 (1): 3–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312714556694.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, Vannevar. 1945. Science - the Endless Frontier: A Report to the President on a Program for Postwar Scientific Research. Washington, D.C.: National Science Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32 (1_suppl): 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callon, Michel, Pierre Lascoumes, and Yannick Barthe. 2009. Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy. Inside Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chilvers, Jason, and Matthew Kearnes. 2016. Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M. 1981. “Introduction: Stages in the Empirical Programme of Relativism.” Social Studies of Science 11 (1): 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631278101100101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and Robert Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312702032002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delvenne, Pierre, and Hadrien Macq. 2020. “Breaking Bad with the Participatory Turn? Accelerating Time and Intensifying Value in Participatory Experiments.” Science as Culture 29 (2): 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1668369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, Tess. 2023. “The Promise of ELSI: Coproducing the Future of Life on Earth.” Science as Culture 32 (4): 461–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doezema, Tess, David Ludwig, Phil Macnaghten, Clare Shelley-Egan, and Ellen-Marie Forsberg. 2019. “Translation, Transduction, and Transformation: Expanding Practices of Responsibility Across Borders.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 6 (3): 323–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1653155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durant, Darrin. 2011. “Models of Democracy in Social Studies of Science.” Social Studies of Science 41 (5): 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312711414759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrahi, Yaron. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, and Maximilian Fochler. 2010. “Machineries for Making Publics: Inscribing and De-Scribing Publics in Public Engagement.” Minerva 48 (3): 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-010-9155-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felt, Ulrike, Brian Wynne, Michel Callon, Maria Eduarda Gonçalves, Sheila Jasanoff, et al. 2007. Taking European Knowledge Society Seriously. Luxembourg: DG for Research. EUR 22: 700.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik. 2021. “RRI Futures: Ends and Beginnings.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 8 (2): 135–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1996771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, Erik, Roop L. Mahajan, and Carl Mitcham. 2006. “Midstream Modulation of Technology: Governance from Within.” Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society 26 (6): 485–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0270467606295402.
   Google Scholar
• Frahm, Nina, Tess Doezema, and Sebastian Pfotenhauer. 2022. “Fixing Technology with Society: The Coproduction of Democratic Deficits and Responsible Innovation at the OECD and the European Commission.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 47: 174–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243921999100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frahm, Nina, and Kasper Schiølin. 2023. “Toward an ‘Ever Closer Union’: The Making of AI-Ethics in the EU.” STS Encounters 15 (2), https://doi.org/10.7146/stse.v15i2.139808.
   Google Scholar
• Groves, Christopher. 2017. “Remaking Participation: Science, Environment and Emergent Publics.” Science as Culture 26 (3): 408–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2017.1297784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guggenheim, Michael, and Jörg Potthast. 2012. “Symmetrical Twins: On the Relationship Between Actor-Network Theory and the Sociology of Critical Capacities.” European Journal of Social Theory 15 (2): 157–178. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431011423601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, David H. 2015. “Responsible Innovation: Who Could Be Against That ?” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (1): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1017982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, Donna. 1988. “Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspectives.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. https://doi.org/10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen, Clark A. Miller, and Rob Hagendijk, eds. 2015. Science and Democracy: Making Knowledge and Making Power in the Biosciences and Beyond. New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Hilgartner, Stephen, Barbara Prainsack, and Benjamin Hurlbut. 2017. “Ethics as Governance in Genomics and Beyond.” In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Ulrike Felt, Rayvon Fouché, Clark A. Miller, and Laurel Smith-Doerr, 4th ed., 823–851. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• “Horizon Europe.” 2023. European Commission. September 7, 2023. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-europe_en.
   Google Scholar
• Hurlbut, J. Benjamin. 2017. Experiments in Democracy: Human Embryo Research and the Politics of Bioethics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, Alan. 2006. “The Politics of Talk: Coming to Terms with the ‘New’Scientific Governance.” Social Studies of Science 36 (2): 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312706053350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Italian Presidency of the Council of the European Union. 2014. “Rome Declaration on Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe.” https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/rome-declaration-responsible-research-and-innovation-europe.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 1995. Science at the Bar: Law, Science, and Technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 1996. “Beyond Epistemology: Relativism and Engagement in the Politics of Science.” Social Studies of Science 26 (2): 393–418. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631296026002008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 1999. “STS and Public Policy: Getting Beyond Deconstruction.” Science, Technology and Society 4 (1): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/097172189900400104.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2003. “In a Constitutional Moment: Science and Social Order at the Millennium.” In Social Studies of Science and Technology: Looking Back, Ahead, edited by Bernward Joerges and Helga Nowotny, 155–180. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0185-4.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. International Library of Sociology. London/New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila. 2007. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. 5th ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, Sheila, ed. 2011. Reframing Rights: Bioconstitutionalism in the Genetic Age. Basic Bioethics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaye, Jane, Eric M. Meslin, Bartha M. Knoppers, Eric T. Juengst, Mylène Deschênes, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Donald Chalmers, et al. 2012. “ELSI 2.0 for Genomics and Society.” Science 336 (6082): 673–674. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1218015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knopf, Sophia, Nina Frahm, and Sebastian M. Pfotenhauer. 2023. “How Neurotech Start-Ups Envision Ethical Futures: Demarcation, Deferral, Delegation.” Science and Engineering Ethics 29 (1): 4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00421-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1988. “The Politics of Explanation: An Alternative.” In Knowledge and Reflexivity, New Frontiers in the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Steve Woolgar, 155–177. London: Sage. http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/32-EXPLANATION-WOOLGAR-GB.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2004. “Why Has Critique Run out of Steam? from Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern.” Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248. https://doi.org/10.1086/421123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Clarendon Lectures in Management Studies. Oxford /New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno. 2009. “Dialogue sur deux systèmes de sociologie.” In Compétences critiques et sens de la justice: colloque de Cerisy, edited by Marc Breviglieri, Claudette Lafaye, and Danny Trom, 359–390. Paris: Economica.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, Bruno, and Steve Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laurent, Brice. 2022. European Objects: The Troubled Dreams of Harmonization. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, Rebecca, Philip Mirowski, and Samuel Randalls. 2010. “Introduction: Sts and Neoliberal Science.” Social Studies of Science 40 (5): 659–675. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710378549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, John. 1990. “Introduction: Monsters, Machines and Sociotechnical Relations.” The Sociological Review 38 (1_suppl): 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1990.tb03346.x.
   Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Donald. 2009. “Making Things the Same: Gases, Emission Rights and the Politics of Carbon Markets.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 34 (3-4): 440–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2008.02.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, Phil, Matthew B. Kearnes, and Brian Wynne. 2005. “Nanotechnology, Governance, and Public Deliberation: What Role for the Social Sciences?” Science Communication 27 (2): 268–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547005281531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macq, Hadrien, Céline Parotte, and Pierre Delvenne. 2021. “Exploring Frictions of Participatory Innovation Between Sites and Scales.” Science as Culture 30 (2): 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2021.1910230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamidipudi, Annapurna, and Nina Frahm. 2020. “Turning Straw to Gold: Mobilising Symmetry in Responsible Research and Innovation.” Science, Technology and Society 25 (2): 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0971721820902964.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Clark A. 2004. “Interrogating the Civic Epistemology of American Democracy: Stability and Instability in the 2000 US Presidential Election.” Social Studies of Science 34 (4): 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312704045661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagel, Thomas. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga, Peter Scott, and Michael Gibbons. 2003. “‘Mode 2’ Revisited: The New Production of Knowledge.” Minerva 41 (3): 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025505528250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottinger, Gwen. 2013. Refining Expertise: How Responsible Engineers Subvert Environmental Justice Challenges. New York: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, Richard, René von Schomberg, and Phil Macnaghten. 2021. “An Unfinished Journey? Reflections on a Decade of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation July: 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2021.1948789.
   Google Scholar
• Pallett, Helen, and Jason Chilvers. 2022. “STS and Democracy Corpoduced? The Making of Public Dialog as a Technology of Participation.” In Democratic Situations, edited by Andreas Birkbak, and Irina Papazu, 305–368. Manchester: Mattering Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pansera, Mario, Richard Owen, Darian Meacham, and Vivienne Kuh. 2020. “Embedding Responsible Innovation Within Synthetic Biology Research and Innovation: Insights from a UK Multi-Disciplinary Research Centre.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 384–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1785678.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parthasarathy, Shobita. 2017. Patent Politics: Life Forms, Markets, and the Public Interest in the United States and Europe. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/9780226437996.
   Google Scholar
• Pestre, Dominique. 2008. “Challenges for the Democratic Management of Technoscience: Governance, Participation and the Political Today.” Science as Culture 17 (2): 101–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430802062869.
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, Trevor J., and Wiebe E. Bijker. 1984. “The Social Construction of Facts and Artefacts: Or How the Sociology of Science and the Sociology of Technology Might Benefit Each Other.” Social Studies of Science 14 (3): 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radder, Hans. 1998. “The Politics of STS.” Social Studies of Science 28 (2): 325–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631298028002005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randles, Sally, Elise Tancoigne, and Pierre-Benoît Joly. 2022. “Two Tribes or More? The Historical Emergence of Discourse Coalitions of Responsible Research and Innovation (Rri) and Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI).” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 248–274. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2061306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, Jenny. 2017. The Postgenomic Condition: Ethics, Justice, and Knowledge After the Genome. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reber, Bernard. 2018. “RRI as the Inheritor of Deliberative Democracy and the Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (1): 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1331097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds, Jesse L., Eric B. Kennedy, and Jonathan Symons. 2023. “If Deliberation Is the Answer, What Is the Question? Objectives and Evaluation of Public Participation and Engagement in Science and Technology.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 10 (1): 2129543. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2129543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruess, Anja K, Ruth Müller, and Sebastian M Pfotenhauer. 2023. “Opportunity or Responsibility? Tracing Co-Creation in the European Policy Discourse.” Science and Public Policy 50 (3): 433–444. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, Jathan. 2020. “Rediscovering a Risky Ideology: Technocracy and Its Effects on Technology Governance.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 112–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1816345.
   Google Scholar
• Shapin, Steven, and Simon Schaffer. 1985. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle, and the Experimental Life : Including a Translation of Thomas Hobbes, Dialogus Physicus de Natura Aeris by Simon Schaffer. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, Jack, Richard Owen, and Phil Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, Andy. 2008. “‘Opening Up’ and ‘Closing Down’: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 33 (2): 262–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907311265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabarés, Raúl, Anne Loeber, Mika Nieminen, Michael J. Bernstein, Erich Griessler, Vincent Blok, Joshua Cohen, Helmut Hönigmayer, Ulrike Wunderle, and Elisabeth Frankus. 2022. “Challenges in the Implementation of Responsible Research and Innovation Across Horizon 2020.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (3): 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2101211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, Charles. 2008. “Political Theory in Science and Technology Studies.” In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, edited by Edward J. Hackett, 63–82. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, Charles. 2020. “Science, Technology, and Life Politics Beyond the Market.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (sup1): 53–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1816363.
   Google Scholar
• Tyfield, David. 2012. “A Cultural Political Economy of Research and Innovation in an Age of Crisis.” Minerva 50 (2): 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-012-9201-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyfield, David, Rebecca Lave, Samuel Randalls, and Charles Thorpe. 2017. The Routledge Handbook of the Political Economy of Science. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Von Schomberg, René. 2011. “Prospects for Technology Assessment in a Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Technikfolgen abschätzen lehren, edited by Marc Dusseldorp and Richard Beecroft, 39–61. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-93468-6.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. (1864) 2002. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Andrew. 2007. “Crossing Boundaries Social Science in the Policy Room.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 32 (4): 458–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907301004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winner, Langdon. 1993. “Upon Opening the Black Box and Finding It Empty: Social Constructivism and the Philosophy of Technology.” Science, Technology, & Human Values 18 (3): 362–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224399301800306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar