Voice from the Beehive: structuring and recording responsible innovation for novel technologies

References

• Aguilar, F. 1967. Scanning the Business Environment. New York, NY: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews, D., E. J. Newton, N. Adibi, J. Chenadec, and K. Bienge. 2021. “A Circular Economy for the Data Centre Industry: Using Design Methods to Address the Challenge of Whole System Sustainability in a Unique Industrial Sector.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 13 (11): 6319–6340. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ball, J. 2019. “The Double Diamond: A Universally Accepted Depiction of the Design Process.” Design Council. https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/our-work/news-opinion/double-diamond-universally-accepted-depiction-design-process.
   Google Scholar
• Banbury, A., S. Pedell, L. Parkinson, and L. Byrne. 2021. “Using the Double Diamond Model to co-Design a Dementia Caregivers Telehealth Peer Support Program.” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 27 (10): 667–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357633X211048980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, C. 2016. “Focusing Upstream: Supporting Scholarly Communication by Academics.” Insights 29 (1): 37–44. https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.292.
   Google Scholar
• Bjorklund, G. 1988. “Planning for Uncertainty: A Case Study.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 33 (2): 119–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(88)90077-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blue, G., and J. Dale. 2016. “Framing and Power in Public Deliberation with Climate Change: Critical Reflections on the Role of Deliberative Practitioners.” Journal of Public Deliberation 12 (1): 2. https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.242.
   Google Scholar
• Boenink, M., and O. Kudina. 2020. “Values in Responsible Research and Innovation: From Entities to Practices.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 450–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1806451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, D. 2004. “GM Food and Crops: What Went Wrong in the UK?” EMBO Reports 5 (5): 432–436. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.embor.7400160
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2014. Constructing Grounded Theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K., and K. Henwood. 2017. “Grounded Theory Methods for Qualitative Psychology.” In The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology, 238–257. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. New York, NY: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Conley, S. N., R. W. Foley, M. E. Gorman, J. Denham, and K. Coleman. 2017. “Acquisition of T-Shaped Expertise: An Exploratory Study.” Social Epistemology 31 (2): 165–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2016.1249435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Silva, L. M., C. C. Bitencourt, K. Faccin, and T. Iakovleva. 2019. “The Role of Stakeholders in the Context of Responsible Innovation: A Meta-Synthesis.” Sustainability (Switzerland) 11 (6): 828–835. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, S. R., and C. Selin. 2012. “Energy Futures: Five Dilemmas of the Practice of Anticipatory Governance.” Environmental Communication 6 (1): 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2011.644632.
   Google Scholar
• Day, G. S. 1990. Market Driven Strategy. Free Press. https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Market_Driven_Strategy.html?id=z4goAQAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y.
   Google Scholar
• de Hoop, E., A. Pols, and H. Romijn. 2016. “Limits to Responsible Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (2): 110–134. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1231396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Saille, S. 2015. “Innovating Innovation Policy: The Emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation.’.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 2 (2): 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delgado, A., and H. Åm. 2018. “Experiments in Interdisciplinarity: Responsible Research and Innovation and the Public Good.” https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003921.
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., and L. Leydesdorff. 1998. “Triple Helix of Innovation: Introduction.” Science and Public Policy 25 (6): 358–364.
   Google Scholar
• Feynman, R. 1988. “Mr Feynman Goes To Washington: Investigating the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster.” In What do you Care What Other People Think? edited by Ralph Leighton, 113–220. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Forrester, J. W. 1971. “Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems.” Theory and Decision 2 (2): 109–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00148991.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsberg, E. M., G. L. Quaglio, H. O’Kane, T. Karapiperis, L. Van Woensel, and S. Arnaldi. 2015. “Assessment of Science and Technologies: Advising for and with Responsibility.” Technology in Society 42: 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2014.12.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garvie, C. 2019. Statement of Clare Garvie Senior Associate, Center on Privacy & Technology at Georgetown Law Before the U.S. House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Reform Hearing on Facial Recognition Technology (Part 1): Its Impact on Our Civil Rights. https://docs.house.gov/meetings/GO/GO00/20190522/109521/HHRG-116-GO00-Wstate-GarvieC-20190522.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gerber, A. 2018. “RRI: How to ‘Mainstream’ the ‘Upstream’ Engagement.” Journal of Science Communication 17 (3): C06. https://jcom.sissa.it/article/pubid/JCOM_1703_2018_C06/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, A. V., M. Ramic, R. Rohrbeck, and M. J. Spaniol. 2020. “50 Years of Corporate and Organizational Foresight: Looking Back and Going Forward.” Technological Forecasting & Social Change 154: 119966. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119966.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimpe, B., M. Hartswood, and M. Jirotka. 2014. “Towards a Closer Dialogue Between Policy and Practice: Responsible Design in HCI.” Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 2965–2974. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557364.
   Google Scholar
• Guest, D. 1991. “The Hunt is on for the Renaissance Man of Computing.” The Independent, Accessed https://wow.agiledata.io/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/David-Guest-1991-The-hunt-is-on-for-the-Renaissance-Man-of-computing.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hekler, A., J. S. Utikal, A. H. Enk, A. Hauschild, M. Weichenthal, R. C. Maron, C. Berking, S. Haferkamp, J. Klode, D. Schadendorf, B. Schilling, T. Holland-Letz, B. Izar, C. von Kalle, S. Fröhling, T. J. Brinker, L. Schmitt, W. K. Peitsch, F. Hoffmann, … A. Thiem. 2019. “Superior Skin Cancer Classification by the Combination of Human and Artificial Intelligence.” European Journal of Cancer 120: 114–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2019.07.019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jirotka, M., B. Grimpe, B. Stahl, G. Eden, and M. Hartswood. 2017. “Responsible Research and Innovation in the Digital age.” Communications of the ACM 60 (5): 62–68. https://doi.org/10.1145/3064940.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krabbenborg, L., and H. A. J. Mulder. 2015. “Upstream Public Engagement in Nanotechnology: Constraints and Opportunities.” In Science Communication 37 (4): 452–484.
   Google Scholar
• Lehoux, P., F. A. Miller, and B. Williams-Jones. 2020. “Anticipatory Governance and Moral Imagination: Methodological Insights from a Scenario-Based Public Deliberation Study.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 151: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, J. 2014. Process Modeling Style. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
   Google Scholar
• Macnaghten, P. 2020. “Towards an Anticipatory Public Engagement Methodology: Deliberative Experiments in the Assembly of Possible Worlds Using Focus Groups.” Qualitative Research 21 (1): 3–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120919096.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittelstadt, B. D., B. C. Stahl, and N. Ben Fairweather. 2015. “How to Shape a Better Future? Epistemic Difficulties for Ethical Assessment and Anticipatory Governance of Emerging Technologies.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 18 (5): 1027–1047. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-015-9582-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molendowski, E., and M. Żmuda. 2013. “Changes In Competitiveness among The Visegrad Countries After Accession To The European Union: A Comparative Analysis Based On A Generalized Double Diamond Model.” Comparative Economic Research 16 (4): 121–153. https://doi.org/10.2478/cer-2013-0031.
   Google Scholar
• Nandonde, F. A. 2019. “A PESTLE Analysis of International Retailing in the East African Community.” Global Business and Organizational Excellence 38 (4): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21935.
   Google Scholar
• Nordmann, A. 2014. “Responsible Innovation, the art and Craft of Anticipation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.882064.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2003. “Democratising Expertise and Socially Robust Knowledge.” Science and Public Policy 30 (3): 151–156. https://doi.org/10.3152/147154303781780461.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, R., P. Macnaghten, and J. Stilgoe. 2012. “Responsible Research and Innovation: From Science in Society to Science for Society, with Society.” Science and Public Policy 39 (6): 751–760. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs093.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen, R., J. Stilgoe, P. Macnaghten, M. Gorman, E. Fisher, and D. Guston. 2013. “A Framework for Responsible Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz, 27–50. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Pandza, K., and P. Ellwood. 2013. “Strategic and Ethical Foundations for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (5): 1112–1125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pansera, M., and R. Owen. 2018. “Report from National Case Study: United Kingdom.” www.rri-practice.eu.
   Google Scholar
• Pavie, X., and D. Carthy. 2015. “Leveraging Uncertainty: A Practical Approach to the Integration of Responsible Innovation Through Design Thinking.” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 1040–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.523.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, ÂG, and A. Saltelli. 2017. “Post-normal Institutional Identities: Quality Assurance, Reflexivity and Ethos of Care.” Futures 91: 53–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2016.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilemalm, S. 2018. “Participatory Design in Emerging Civic Engagement Initiatives in the new Public Sector: Applying PD Concepts in Resource-Scarce Organizations.” ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction 25 (1): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, M. J. 1979. “How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy.” Harvard Business Review, March. https://hbr.org/1979/03/how-competitive-forces-shape-strategy.
   Google Scholar
• Portillo, V., C. Greenhalgh, P. J. Craigon, and C. Ten Holter. 2023. “Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Prompts and Practice Cards: A Tool to Support Responsible Practice.” Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Trustworthy Autonomous Systems, 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, A., S. Shennan, and M. G. Thomas. 2009. “Late Pleistocene Demography and the Appearance of Modern Human Behavior.” Science 324 (5932): 1298–1301. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1170165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, B. 2018. “RRI as the Inheritor of Deliberative Democracy and the Precautionary Principle.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 5 (1): 38–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2017.1331097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reeves, S. 2012. “Envisioning Ubiquitous Computing.” Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, 1573–1582.
   Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B., and P. Shapira. 2019. “Anticipating Governance Challenges in Synthetic Biology: Insights from Biosynthetic Menthol.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 139: 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.11.020.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, B. E., R. D. J. Smith, and K. Millar. 2017. “A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation.” Science and Engineering Ethics 23 (1): 81–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohrbeck, R., and J. O. Schwarz. 2013. “The Value Contribution of Strategic Foresight: Insights from an Empirical Study of Large European Companies.” Technological Forecasting and Social Change 80 (8): 1593–1606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.01.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sargeant, Richard, Coffey Hatcher, B. Trigunarsyah, and J. Kraatz. 2010. “Creating Value in Project Management Using PRINCE2.” www.prince-officialsite.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. Boston, MA: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schubotz, D. 2019. Participatory Research: Why and how to Involve People in Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Schwarz-Plaschg, C. 2018. “The Power of Analogies for Imagining and Governing Emerging Technologies.” NanoEthics 12 (2): 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11569-018-0315-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallman, M. 2018. “Science to the Rescue or Contingent Progress? Comparing 10 Years of Public, Expert and Policy Discourses on New and Emerging Science and Technology in the United Kingdom.” Public Understanding of Science 27 (6): 655–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517706452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smallman, M. 2020. “Nothing to do with the Science’: How an Elite Sociotechnical Imaginary Cements Policy Resistance to Public Perspectives on Science and Technology Through the Machinery of Government.” Social Studies of Science 50 (4): 589–608. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312719879768.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smuha, N. A. 2021. “From a ‘Race to AI’ to a ‘Race to AI Regulation’: Regulatory Competition for Artificial Intelligence.” Law, Innovation and Technology 13 (1): 57–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/17579961.2021.1898300.
   Google Scholar
• Špundak, M. (2014). Mixed Agile/Traditional Project Management Methodology – Reality or Illusion? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 119, 939–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2014.03.105
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, B., M. Obach, E. Yaghmaei, V. Ikonen, K. Chatfield, and A. Brem. 2017. “The Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Maturity Model: Linking Theory and Practice.” Sustainability 9 (6): 1036–1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. “Developing a Framework for Responsible Innovation.” Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–1580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strand, R., J. Spaapen, M. Bauer, E. Hogan, G. Revuelta, and S. Stagl. 2015. “Indicators for Promoting and Monitoring Responsible Research and Innovation.” https://doi.org/10.2777/9742.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Holter, C., L. Kunze, J.-A. Pattinson, P. Salvini, and M. Jirotka. 2022. “Responsible Innovation; Responsible Data. A Case Study in Autonomous Driving.” Journal of Responsible Technology 11 (July): 100038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrt.2022.100038.
   Google Scholar
• Ten Holter, C. 2022. “Participatory Design: Lessons and Directions for Responsible Research and Innovation.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 9 (2): 275–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2041801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ten Holter, C., B. Stahl, and M. Jirotka. 2022. “Built in, not Bolted on: Responsible Innovation in UK Centres for Doctoral Training – The New Normal?” The Learning Organization 30 (6): 669–686. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLO-09-2021-0117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tinoco, R. A., C. E. Y. Sato, and R. Hasan. 2016. “Responsible Project Management: Beyond the Triple Constraints.” Journal of Modern Project Management 4 (1): 81–93. http://sro.sussex.ac.uk.
   Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., L. Asveld, S. Flipse, P. Klaassen, Z. Kwee, M. Maia, E. Mantovani, C. Nathan, A. Porcari, and E. Yaghmaei. 2020. “Learning to do Responsible Innovation in Industry: Six Lessons.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 7 (3): 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1791506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Poel, I., and M. Sand. 2018. “Varieties of Responsibility: Two Problems of Responsible Innovation.” Synthese 198: 4769–4787. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-01951-7.
   Google Scholar
• van Oost, E., S. Kuhlmann, G. Ordóñez-Matamoros, and P. Stegmaier. 2016. “Futures of Science with and for Society: Towards Transformative Policy Orientations.” Foresight (los Angeles, Calif 18 (3): 276–296. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-10-2014-0063.
   Google Scholar
• van Oudheusden, M. 2011. “Questioning ‘Participation’: A Critical Appraisal of its Conceptualization in a Flemish Participatory Technology Assessment.” Science and Engineering Ethics 17 (4): 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9313-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Schomberg, R. 2013. “A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation.” In Responsible Innovation, edited by R. Owen, J. Bessant, and M. Heintz. 1st ed., 51–74. Hoboken NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A., and R. Hoppe. 2011. “If Post-Normal Science is the Solution, What is the Problem?: The Politics of Activist Environmental Science.” Science Technology and Human Values 36 (3): 389–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910385786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickson, F., and A. L. Carew. 2014. “Quality Criteria and Indicators for Responsible Research and Innovation: Learning from Transdisciplinarity.” Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (3): 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.963004.
   Google Scholar
• Wiens, J., and E. S. Shenoy. 2018. “Machine Learning for Healthcare: On the Verge of a Major Shift in Healthcare Epidemiology.” Clinical Infectious Diseases 66 (1): 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar