A goal-oriented approach based on fuzzy axiomatic design for sustainable mobility project selection

References

• Achillas, C. , Vlachokostas, C. , Moussiopoulos, N. , & Banias, G. (2011). Prioritize strategies to confront environmental deterioration in urban areas: Multicriteria assessment of public opinion and experts’ views. Cities , 28 (5), 414–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Annema, J.A. , Mouter, N. , & Razaei, J. (2015). Cost-benefit analysis (CBA), or multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) or both: Politicians' perspective in transport policy appraisal. Transportation Research Procedia , 10 , 788–797.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , & Chauhan, S.S. (2011). Using AHP and Dempster–Shafer theory for evaluating sustainable transport solutions. Environmental Modelling & Software , 26 (6), 787–796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , & Chauhan, S.S. (2012). A hybrid approach integrating affinity diagram, AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable city logistics planning. Applied Mathematical Modelling , 36 (2), 573–584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , & Omrani, H. (2009). A hybrid approach based on AHP and belief theory for evaluating sustainable transportation solutions. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues , 9 (3), 212–226
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , Breuil, D. , Chauhan, S.S. , Parent, M. , & Reveillere, T. (2007). A multicriteria decision making approach for carsharing stations selection. Journal of Decision Systems , 16 (1), 57–78
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , Chauhan, S.S. , & Breuil, D. (2009). Sustainable mobility solutions: A pre-implementation questionnaire study for carsharing. International Journal of Services Sciences , 2 (3-4), 242–264.
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , Chauhan, S.S. , & Omrani, H. (2011). Application of fuzzy TOPSIS in evaluating sustainable transportation systems. Expert Systems with Applications , 38 (10), 12270–12280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , Chauhan, S.S. , Hurteau, X. , & Breuil, D. (2008). An analytical hierarchical process-based decision-making approach for selecting car-sharing stations in medium size agglomerations. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences , 1 (1), 66–97
   Google Scholar
• Awasthi, A. , Omrani, H. , & Gerber, P. (2013). Multicriteria decision making for sustainability evaluation of urban mobility projects (CEPS/INSTEAD Working Paper no:2013-01). Luxembourg: CEPS/INSTEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Bai, C. , Fahimnia, B. , & Sarkis, J. (2017). Sustainable transport fleet appraisal using a hybrid multi-objective decision making approach. Annals of Operations Research , 250(2), 309–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beinat, E. (2001). Multi-criteria analysis for environmental management. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis , 10(2), 10–51.
   Google Scholar
• Black, J.A. , Paez, A. , & Suthanaya, P.A. (2002). Sustainable urban transportation: Performance indicators and some analytical approaches. Journal of Urban Planning and Development , 128 , 184–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brey, J.J. , Contreras, I. , Carazo, A.F. , Brey, R. , Hernández-Díaz, A.G. , & Castro, A. (2007). Evaluation of automobiles with alternative fuels utilizing multicriteria techniques. Journal of Power Sources , 169 (1), 213–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, P.C. , Vassallo, J.M. , & Cheung, K. (2015). Sustainability assessment of transport infrastructure projects: A review of existing tools and methods. Transport Reviews , 35 (5), 622–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bueno, S. , & Salmeron, J.L. (2008). Fuzzy modeling enterprise resource planning tool selection. Computer Standards and Interfaces , 30 (3), 137–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campos, G.V.B. , Rodrigues Ramos, R.A. , de Miranda, D. , & Correia, S. (2009). Multi-criteria analysis procedure for sustainable mobility evaluation in urban areas. Journal of Advanced Transportation , 43 (4), 371–390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celik, M. , Kahraman, C. , Cebi, S. , & Er, I.D. (2009). Fuzzy axiomatic design-based performance evaluation model for docking facilities in shipbuilding industry: The case of Turkish shipyards. Expert Systems with Applications , 36 (1), 599–615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chakraborty, K. , Mondal, S. , & Mukherjee, K. (2017). Analysis of product design characteristics for remanufacturing using fuzzy AHP and axiomatic design. Journal of Engineering Design , 28 (5), 338–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curiel-Esparza, J. , Mazario-Diez, J.L. , Canto-Perello, J. , & Martin-Utrillas, M. (2016). Prioritization by consensus of enhancements for sustainable mobility in urban areas. Environmental Science & Policy , 55 (1), 248–257.
   Google Scholar
• Dalkey, N.C. , & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application method to the use of experts. Management Science , 9 (3), 458–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Brucker, K. , Macharis, C. , & Verbeke, A. (2011). Multi-criteria analysis in transport project evaluation: An institutional approach. European Transport , 47 , 3–24. Retrieved from http://ucalgary.ca/verbeke/files/verbeke/multicriteriaanalysis-mca-institutions-europe.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deng, J. (1982). Control problems of grey systems. Systems and Control Letters , 5 , 288–294.
   Google Scholar
• Foith-Förster, P. , Wiedenmann, M. , Seichter, D. , & Bauernhansl, T. (2016). Axiomatic approach to flexible and changeable production system design. Procedia CIRP , 53 , 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S.T. (2010). Managing quality: Integrating the supply chain (5th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Goswami, M. , & Tiwari, M.K. (2014). A predictive risk evaluation framework for modular product concept selection in new product design environment. Journal of Engineering Design , 25 (1–3), 150–171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, P. , Rao, H.A. , & Tseng, M.M. (2001). Systematic design of manufacturing systems based on axiomatic design approach. CIRP Annals-Manufacturing Technology , 50 (1), 299–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iniestra, J.G. , & Gutiérrez, J.G. (2009). Multicriteria decisions on interdependent infra-structure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing , 9 (2), 512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ison, S. , & Rye, T. (2005). Implementing road user charging: The lessons learnt from Hong Kong, Cambridge and Central London. Transport Reviews , 25 (4), 451–465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanović, I. , Grujičić, D. , Macura, D. , Jović, J. , & Bojović, N. (2013). One approach for road transport project selection. Transport Policy , 25 , 22–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeon, C.M. , & Amekudzi, A. (2005). Addressing sustainability in transportation systems: Definitions, indicators, and metrics. Journal of Infrastructure Systems , 11 , 31–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, S. , Tefe, M. , & Appiah-Opoku, S. (2013). Proposed framework for sustainability screening of urban transport projects in developing countries: A case study of Accra, Ghana. Transportation Research A , 49 , 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahraman, C. , Onar, S.C. , & Oztaysi, B. (2015). Fuzzy multicriteria decision-making: A literature review. International Journal of Computational Intelligence Systems , 8 (4), 637–666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klir, G. , & Yuan, B. (1995). Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic. 4, New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kulak, O. , & Kahraman, C. (2005). Multi-attribute comparison of advanced manufacturing systems using fuzzy vs. crisp axiomatic design approach. International Journal of Production Economics , 95 (3), 415–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulak, O. , Cebi, S. , & Kahraman, C. (2010). Applications of axiomatic design principles: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications , 37 (9), 6705–6717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, Y.F. , & Chen, P.C. (2008). Constructing performance appraisal indicators for mobility of the service industries using fuzzy Delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications , 35 , 1930–1939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pira, M. , Inturri, G. , Ignaccolo, M. , & Pluchino, A. (2015). Analysis of AHP Methods and the Pairwise Majority Rule (PMR) for collective preference rankings of sustainable mobility solutions. Transportation Research Procedia , 10 , 777–787.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, L.W. , & Chen, S.M. (2015). Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators. Information Sciences , 294 , 513–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H.Y. , Hsu, P.Y. , & Sheen, G.J. (2007). A fuzzy based decision making procedure for data warehouse system selection. Expert Systems with Applications , 32 , 939–953.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, Z. , Shao, C. , Ma, S. , & Ye, Z. (2011). Constructing road safety performance indicators using fuzzy Delphi method and grey Delphi method. Expert Systems with Applications , 38 , 1509–1514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Macías, A. , Alvarado, A. , García, J.L. , & Balderrama, C.O. (2014). Intuitionistic fuzzy TOPSIS for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 70 (9–12), 2283–2292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Macías, A. , García, J.L. , Alvarado, A. , & Balderrama, C.O. (2013). A hierarchical fuzzy axiomatic design methodology for ergonomic compatibility evaluation of advanced manufacturing technology. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology , 66 (1–4), 171–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maldonado-Macías, A. , García-Alcaraz, J.L. , Esparza, F.J.M. , & Zezzatti, C.A.O.O. (2012). Decision making approaches for advanced manufacturing technology evaluation and selection. In Logistics management and optimization through hybrid artificial intelligence systems (pp. 403–438).
   Google Scholar
• Maoh, H. , & Kanaroglou, P. (2009). A tool for evaluating urban sustainability via integrated transportation and land use simulation models. Urban Environment , 3 , 28–46. Retrieved from http://www.vrm.ca/wp-content/uploads/EUE3_maoh.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mardani, A. , Jusoh, A. , & Zavadskas, E.K. (2015). Fuzzy multiple criteria decision-making techniques and applications – Two decades review from 1994 to 2014. Expert Systems with Applications , 42 (8), 4126–4148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omrani, H. , Awasthi, A. , Ion, L. , & Trigano, P. (2009). A hybrid approach for evaluating environmental impacts for urban transportation mode sharing. Journal of Decision Systems , 18 (2), 185–201
   Google Scholar
• Pai, J. (2007). A fuzzy MCDM evaluation framework based on humanity oriented transport for transforming scheme of major arterial space in Taipei metropolitan. Journal of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies , 7 , 1731–1744.
   Google Scholar
• Paz, A. , Maheshwari, P. , & Kachroo, P. (2013). Estimation of performance indices for the planning of sustainable transportation systems. Advances in Fuzzy Systems , Article ID 601468, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• Pedrycz, W. (1994). Why triangular membership functions? Fuzzy Sets and Systems , 64 , 21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez, J.C. , Carrillo, M.H. , & Montoya-Torres, J.R. (2014). Multi-criteria approaches for urban passenger transport systems: A literature review. Annals of Operations Re-search , 226 (1), 69–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, R. , Gastaldi, M. , & Gecchele, G. (2013). Comparison of fuzzy-based and AHP methods in sustainability evaluation: A case of traffic pollution-reducing policies. Eu-ropean Transport Research Review , 5 (1), 11–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, G. , & Awasthi, A. (2011). AHP-based approach for location planning of pedestrian zones: Application in Montréal, Canada. Journal of Transportation Engineering , 139 (2), 239–246
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, R. , & Awasthi, A. (2016). A simulation-based optimisation approach for identifying key determinants for sustainable transportation planning. International Journal of Systems Science: Operations & Logistics , 1–14 .
   Google Scholar
• Sayyadi, R. , & Awasthi, A. (2017). A system dynamics based simulation model to evaluate regulatory policies for sustainable transportation planning. International Journal of Modelling and Simulation , 37 (1), 25–35
   Google Scholar
• Shang, J.S. , Youxu, T. , & Yizhong, D. (2004). A unified framework for multicriteria evaluation of transportation projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management , 51 (3), 300–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suh, N.P. (2001). Axiomatic design: Advance and applications . New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Suh, N.P. , & Sekimoto, S. (1990). Design of thinking design machine. Annals of the CIRP , 39 (1), 145–148.
   Google Scholar
• Taha, Z. , Hartomo, S. , & Dawal, S.Z., Md. (2014). Axiomatic design principles in analysing the ergonomics design parameter of a virtual environment. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics , 44 (3), 368–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao, C.C. , & Hung, C.C. (2003). A comparative approach of the quantitative models for sustainable transportation. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies , 5 , 3329–3344.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai, H. , Chang, C. , & Lin, H. (2010). Fuzzy hierarchy sensitive with Delphi method to evaluate hospital organization performance. Expert Systems with Applications , 37 (8), 5533–5541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turcksin, L. , Macharis, C. , Lebeau, K. , Boureima, F. , Van Mierlo, J. , & Bram, S. (2011). A multi-actor multi-criteria framework to assess the stakeholder support for different biofuel options: The case of Belgium. Energy Policy , 39 (1), 200–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermote, L. , Macharis, C. , Hollevoet, J. , & Putman, K. (2014). Participatory evaluation of regional light rail scenarios: A Flemish case on sustainable mobility and land-use. Environmental Science & Policy , 37 , 101–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yedla, S. , & Shrestha, R. (2003). Multi-criteria approach for the selection of alternative options for environmentally sustainable transport system in Delhi. Transportation Re-search Part A: Policy and Practice , 37 (8), 717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zak, J. (2011). The methodology of multiple criteria decision making/aiding in public transportation. Journal of Advanced Transportation , 45 , 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar