General hypergame analysis within the graph model for conflict resolution

References

• Aljefri, Y. (2017). Incorporating misperception into the graph model for conflict resolution (PhD thesis). University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y. M., Bashar, M. A., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (2017). First-level hypergame for investigating misperception in conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 1–18. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2017.2690619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y.  M., Bashar, M. A., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (2015, June 22–26). Generating hypergame states within the paradigm of the graph model for conflict resolution. Presented at GDN (Group Decision and Negotiation) 2015, Warsaw, Poland. Refereed extended abstract published in the Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Group Decision and Negotiation (pp. 249–252).
   Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y. M., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (2014b, October 5–8). Modeling misperception of options and preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, San Diego, CA (pp. 1592–1597).
   Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y.  M., Fang, L., & Hipel, K. W. (2014a, June 10–13). Misperception of preferences in the graph model for conflict resolution. Presented at GDN (Group Decision and Negotiation) 2014, Toulouse, France, 2014 (pp. 200–207).
   Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y. M., Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., & Abul Bashar, M. (2016, October 9–12). Misperception in nationalization of the Suez Canal. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 355–360).
   Google Scholar
• Aljefri, Y. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (2017). Second-level hypergame within the graph model framework. Department of Systems Design Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. G. (1977). Toward a theory of hypergames. Omega, 5(6), 749–751. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(77)90056-1
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. G. (1980). Hypergames: Developing a model of conflict. Futures, 12(6), 489–507. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(80)90005-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. G., & Dando, M. R. (1979). Complex strategic analysis: A hypergame study of the fall of France. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 30(1), 23–32. doi: 10.1057/jors.1979.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, P. G., Huxham, C. S., & Dando, M. R. (1981). Shipping in crisis: A trial run for ‘live’ application of the hypergame approach. Omega, 9(6), 579–594. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(81)90046-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., & Kilgour, D. M. (1993). Interactive decision making: The graph model for conflict resolution. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003a). A decision support system for interactive decision making-Part I: Model formulation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 33(1), 42–55. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2003.809361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, L., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Peng, X. (2003b). A decision support system for interactive decision making-Part II: Analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews), 33(1), 56–66. doi: 10.1109/TSMCC.2003.809360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1979). Solving complex conflicts. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 9(12), 805–816. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.1979.4310131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). Conflict analysis: Models and resolutions. New York, NY: North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Ge, B., Hipel, K. W., Fang, L., Yang, K., & Chen, Y. (2014). An interactive portfolio decision analysis approach for system-of-systems architecting using the graph model for conflict resolution. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 44(10), 1328–1346. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2014.2309321
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giesen, M. O., & Bennett, P. G. (1979). Aristotle's fallacy: A hypergame in the oil shipping business. Omega, 7(4), 309–320. doi: 10.1016/0305-0483(79)90036-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hipel, K. W. (Ed.). (2009a). Conflict resolution, encyclopedia of life support systems (Vol. 1Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hipel, K. W. (Ed.). (2009b). Conflict resolution, encyclopedia of life support systems (Vol. 2Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hipel, K. W., Wang, M., & Fraser, N. M. (1988). Hypergame analysis of the Falkland/Malvinas conflict. International Studies Quarterly, 32(3), 335–358. doi: 10.2307/2600446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, N. (1971). Paradoxes of rationality: Theory of metagames and political behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgour, D. M., & Eden, C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of group decision and negotiation. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kilgour, D. M., & Hipel, K. W. (2005). The graph model for conflict resolution: Past, present, and future. Group Decision and Negotiation, 14(6), 441–460. doi: 10.1007/s10726-005-9002-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour, D. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fang, L. (1987). The graph model for conflicts. Automatica, 23(1), 41–55. doi: 10.1016/0005-1098(87)90117-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. F. (1950). Equilibrium points in n-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 36, 48–49. doi: 10.1073/pnas.36.1.48
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nash, J. F. (1951). Non-cooperative Games. Annals of Mathematics, 54, 286–295. doi: 10.2307/1969529
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shupe, M. C., Wright, W. M., Hipel, K. W., & Fraser, N. M. (1980). Nationalization of the Suez Canal: A hypergame analysis. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 24(3), 477–493. doi: 10.1177/002200278002400305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takahashi, M. A., Fraser, N. M., & Hipel, K. W. (1984). A procedure for analyzing hypergames. European Journal of Operational Research, 18(1), 111–122. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(84)90268-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Hipel, K. W., & Fraser, N. M. (1988). Modeling misperceptions in games. Behavioral Science, 33(3), 207–223. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830330305
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M., Hipel, K. W., & Fraser, N. M. (1989). Solution concepts in hypergames. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 34(3), 147–171. doi: 10.1016/0096-3003(89)90102-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, C. (1999). Rational behaviour and cooperation degree in competitive situations. International Journal of Systems Science, 30(4), 369–377. doi: 10.1080/002077299292326
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, H., Hipel, K. W., Kilgour, D. M., & Fang, L. (2018). Conflict resolution using the graph model: Strategic interactions in competition and cooperation. Cham: Springer. doi:doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-77670-5
   Google Scholar