Ranking ranges, performance maverick and diversity for decision-making units with interval cross-efficiency matrix

References

• Adler, N., Friedman, L., & Sinuany-Stern, Z. (2002). Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context. European Journal of Operational Research, 140(2), 249–265. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, T., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1988). Some statistical and DEA evaluations of relative efficiencies of public and private institutions of higher learning. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 22(6), 259–269. doi: 10.1016/0038-0121(88)90008-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcaraz, J., Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2013). Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research, 226(3), 516–521. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.11.034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ang, S., Yang, C., Zhao, F., & Yang, F. (2016). Ranking of DMUs with interval cross-efficiencies based on absolute dominance. International Journal of Information and Decision Sciences, 8(4), 325. doi: 10.1504/IJIDS.2016.080455
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, C., Barros, C. P., & Wanke, P. (2014). Efficiency determinants and capacity issues in Brazilian for-profit hospitals. Health Care Management Science, 17(2), 126–138. doi: 10.1007/s10729-013-9249-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi, H. (2014). DEA efficiency analysis: A DEA approach with double frontiers. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(11), 2289–2300. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2013.768715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30(9), 1078–1092. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros, C. A. P., & Santos, C. A. (2006). The measurement of efficiency in Portuguese hotels using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 30(3), 378–400. doi: 10.1177/1096348006286798
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1962). Programming with linear fractional functionals. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 9(3–4), 181–186. doi: 10.1002/nav.3800090303
   Google Scholar
• Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. doi: 10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2014). DEA Cobb–Douglas frontier and cross-efficiency. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(2), 265–268. doi: 10.1057/jors.2013.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, W. W., Li, S., Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2004). Sensitivity analysis in DEA. In W. W. Cooper, L. M. Seiford, & J. Zhu (Eds.), Handbook on data envelopment analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science (Vol. 71, pp. 75–97). Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. R., & Green, R. H. (1994). Efficiency and cross efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(5), 567–578. doi: 10.1057/jors.1994.84
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsu, C. M. (2014). An integrated portfolio optimisation procedure based on data envelopment analysis, artificial bee colony algorithm and genetic programming. International Journal of Systems Science, 45(12), 2645–2664. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2013.775388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, M., Ang, S., Yang, F., & Bi, G. (2016). An improved cross-ranking method in data envelopment analysis. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research, 54(1), 19–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaffash, S., & Marra, M. (2017). Data envelopment analysis in financial services: A citations network analysis of banks, insurance companies and money market funds. Annals of Operations Research, 253(1), 307–344. doi: 10.1007/s10479-016-2294-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008a). The DEA game cross-efficiency model and its nash equilibrium. Operations Research, 56(5), 1278–1288. doi: 10.1287/opre.1070.0487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang, L., Wu, J., Cook, W. D., & Zhu, J. (2008b). Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 113(2), 1025–1030. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., Oh, K. W., & Zhu, J. (2014). Use of DEA cross-efficiency evaluation in portfolio selection: An application to Korean stock market. European Journal of Operational Research, 236(1), 361–368. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2013.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, S., & Zhu, J. (2015). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation under variable returns to scale. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 66(3), 476–487. doi: 10.1057/jors.2014.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, S. T. (2018). A DEA ranking method based on cross-efficiency intervals and signal-to-noise ratio. Annals of Operations Research, 261(1–2), 207–232. doi: 10.1007/s10479-017-2562-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X., Chu, J., Yin, P., & Sun, J. (2017). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation considering undesirable output and ranking priority: A case study of eco-efficiency analysis of coal-fired power plants. Journal of Cleaner Production, 142, 877–885. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovell, C. K., & Pastor, J. T. (1995). Units invariant and translation invariant DEA models. Operations Research Letters, 18(3), 147–151. doi: 10.1016/0167-6377(95)00044-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, W. M., & Lo, S. F. (2007). A closer look at the economic-environmental disparities for regional development in China. European Journal of Operational Research, 183(2), 882–894. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2006.10.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardani, A., Zavadskas, E. K., Streimikiene, D., Jusoh, A., & Khoshnoudi, M. (2017). A comprehensive review of data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach in energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 70, 1298–1322. doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Narasimhan, R., Talluri, S., & Mendez, D. (2001). Supplier evaluation and rationalization via data envelopment analysis: An empirical examination. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 37(2), 28–37. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-493X.2001.tb00103.x
   Google Scholar
• Noorizadeh, A., Mahdiloo, M., & Farzipoor Saen, R. (2013). Using DEA cross-efficiency evaluation for suppliers ranking in the presence of non-discretionary inputs. International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 5(1), 95–111. doi: 10.1504/IJSTL.2013.050595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2010). On the choice of weights profiles in cross-efficiency evaluations. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(3), 1564–1572. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2010.07.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2011). Reducing differences between profiles of weights: A “peer-restricted” cross-efficiency evaluation. Omega, 39(6), 634–641. doi: 10.1016/j.omega.2011.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramón, N., Ruiz, J. L., & Sirvent, I. (2014). Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 65(9), 1336–1343. doi: 10.1057/jors.2013.90
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Razavi, S. H., Amoozad, H., Zavadskas, E. K., & Hashemi, S. S. (2013). A fuzzy data envelopment analysis approach based on parametric programming. International Journal of Computers Communications & Control, 8(4), 594–607. doi: 10.15837/ijccc.2013.4.580
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salo, A., & Punkka, A. (2011). Ranking intervals and dominance relations for ratio-based efficiency analysis. Management Science, 57(1), 200–214. doi: 10.1287/mnsc.1100.1265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sexton, T. R., Silkman, R. H., & Hogan, A. J. (1986). Data envelopment analysis: Critique and extensions. In R. H. Silkman (ed.), Measuring efficiency: An assessment of data envelopment analysis (Vol. 32, pp. 73–105). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Song, L., & Liu, F. (2018). An improvement in DEA cross-efficiency aggregation based on the shannon entropy. International Transactions in Operational Research, 25(2), 705–714. doi: 10.1111/itor.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., DeCampos, H. A., & Hult, G. T. M. (2013). Supplier rationalization: A sourcing decision model. Decision Sciences, 44(1), 57–86. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5915.2012.00390.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2004). A methodology for strategic sourcing. European Journal of Operational Research, 154(1), 236–250. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00649-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010a). A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(5), 3666–3675. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., & Chin, K. S. (2010b). Some alternative models for DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. International Journal of Production Economics, 128(1), 332–338. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.07.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y. M., Chin, K. S., & Wang, S. (2012). DEA models for minimizing weight disparity in cross-efficiency evaluation. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(8), 1079–1088. doi: 10.1057/jors.2011.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Chu, J., Sun, J., & Zhu, Q. (2016). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on pareto improvement. European Journal of Operational Research, 248(2), 571–579. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2015.07.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Chu, J., Zhu, Q., Yin, P., & Liang, L. (2016). DEA cross-efficiency evaluation based on satisfaction degree: An application to technology selection. International Journal of Production Research, 54(20), 1–18. doi: 10.1080/00207543.2016.1148278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, J., Liang, L., & Yang, F. (2009). Achievement and benchmarking of countries at the Summer Olympics using cross efficiency evaluation method. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2), 722–730. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.06.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, F., Ang, S., Xia, Q., & Yang, C. C. (2012). Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 223(2), 483–488. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2012.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, M. M., Ting, S. C., & Chen, M. C. (2010). Evaluating the cross-efficiency of information sharing in supply chains. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(4), 2891–2897. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2009.09.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2008). A survey of data envelopment analysis in energy and environmental studies. European Journal of Operational Research, 189(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2007.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, J. (1998). Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. European Journal of Operational Research, 111(1), 50–61. doi: 10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00321-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar